
© Kade McBroom via EcoWatch
An aerial photo showing drift damage on a non-dicamba resistant soybean field next to a dicamba resistant soybean field.
So far, this year has not been very kind to Monsanto. First,
collusion between Monsanto and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was revealed, whereby the company worked in tandem with the federal agency to discredit independent research conducted by the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The IARC, in 2015,
found that glyphosate - the key ingredient in Monsanto's best-known product, Roundup -
most likely causes cancer, a reality that Monsanto had secretly known for decades. Furthermore, Monsanto's own head toxicologist, Donna Farmer,
admitted that she "cannot say that Roundup does not cause cancer" as "we [Monsanto] have not done the carcinogenicity studies with Roundup."
With their lobbyists
now banned from the EU parliament amid the body's deliberations over whether to ban glyphosate entirely, Monsanto seems to be betting on the chemical it hopes will solve its glyphosate troubles - a herbicide known as dicamba. While dicamba has existed for decades, Monsanto has been busy retooling the herbicide, hoping to use it to replace glyphosate - not in response to concerns about glyphosate's dangerous effects on human health but
in order to tackle the development of widespread resistance to glyphosate among weeds in the United States and elsewhere.
Comment: Dicamba is not a benign pesticide - in addition to posing posing serious threats to non-target crops, the herbicide can be highly mobile in soil and easily contaminate water. While only tentative links to cancer have so far been found - there are other health risks as well. From a report by the Center for Food Safety: More on Dicamba: