Society's Child
An innocent elderly man's surveillance camera saved him from years in prison after it showed that cops attacked him for no reason and lied about it in their report.
Long Island, NY - An innocent elderly man was yanked from his front porch, thrown down stairs, and then brutally attacked by those who claim to protect and serve. Then, after he was permanently injured, police charged him with a crime.
Robert Besedin, the 72-year-old Air Force veteran has since filed a federal lawsuit against police after he said two officers "pushed him, grab him by his neck, hurled him down four steps and body slammed him to the ground."
The force with which the officers attacked Besedin was so brutal that it knocked his hearing aids from his ears.
After the officers savagely attacked the innocent elderly man, he was arrested, brought to jail, locked in a cage for days-unable to hear anything without his hearing aids-and charged with felony assault against two Nassau police officers. The only thing is, he never touched them.
In short: Increased demand for labour + reduced supply of labour + chaos = collapse of status quo.
What emerged from the chaos was a rudimentary 'free market' in labour and goods. The age of capitalism had begun...the unforeseen consequence of a plague, borne on a creature that looked like this:
Comment: See also:
- World Economic Forum - "The internet is exposing our lies and it needs to stop"
- Russiagate is collapsing under the weight of massive lies, corruption and irrationality
- Soft coup succeeds? Wall Street and military-industrial complex run US Presidency
- The lies we tell ourselves about the US military
- The CIA machine of lies - Ray McGovern on the Agency's history of lying to the public (VIDEO)
- The threatening collapse of the Western monetary system

A Palestinian boy weeps for a relative killed by Israeli soldiers during a “clash.” AP reports minimally on such Palestinian deaths.
Associated Press is one of those news sources we expect to be objective and reliable. But when it comes to the subject of Israel-Palestine, things are not always as they seem.
More than half the world's population reads Associated Press content every day.
But a study of news reports so far in 2018 indicates that this trusted news source has been presenting the deaths of Israelis at the hands of Palestinians, and of Palestinians at the hands of Israelis, in two completely different ways.
This pattern may be a factor in how readers perceive the players in this decades-old issue. It is also, quite likely, a factor in how editors all over the U.S., who read AP stories daily, view the conflict.
So far in 2018, eleven Palestinians have been killed and two Israelis.
(Since December 6th, when President Trump announced that the US would recognize Jerusalem as "the capital of Israel," overturning decades of US policy, 27 Palestinians and 2 Israelis have died.)
In AP's 2018 news reports, Palestinian deaths have been reported in far shorter news articles than Israeli deaths, averaging 181 words in length vs. 551.
Comment: It is bad enough that Israel treats Palestinians as sub-human. We don't need the mainstream media doing the same.
The operation involves 22 states
The US has joined the Channel anti-drug operation conducted by the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the organization's Deputy Secretary General Valery Semerikov said on Thursday.
He pointed out that the CSTO's annual "Channel" operation was aimed at countering drug trafficking.
"It has been generally recognized. The operation involves 22 countries, including the US, the Baltic states, European countries and Iran," Semerikov said.
The CSTO deputy secretary general elaborated that since the start of the operation, more than 360 tonnes of drugs had been seized. In particular, as many as 20.5 tonnes of drugs were seized during the four stages of the operation carried out in 2017.
Comment: 22 countries involved to seize 20.5 tonnes of drugs in one year (2017) doesn't seem that much of a success. For comparison, consider that Iran alone seized over 124 tonnes in the first quarter of 2014.

In this June 22, 2016 file photo, Assemblywoman Cristina Garcia, D- Bell Gardens, speaks at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif. Garcia, the head of California's legislative women's caucus and a leading figure in the anti-sexual harassment movement is herself the subject of a sexual misconduct claim, Politico reported Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018.
Daniel Fierro told The Associated Press on Thursday that Garcia stroked his back, squeezed his buttocks and attempted to touch his crotch in a dugout after a legislative softball game in 2014.
Messick, who worked at Miramax as a production executive from 1997 to 2003, also served as Rose McGowan's manager in January 1997, which is when, McGowan has claimed, she was raped by Harvey Weinstein.
In a statement following her death, her family says Messick was "victimized" after becoming embroiled in the Weinstein-McGowan allegations. Her name made headlines when Weinstein's attorney, Ben Brafman, released an email on Jan. 30 attributed to Messick in defense of his client. Her family says now that Messick "became collateral damage in an already horrific story."
Messick's family's full Feb. 8 statement is below.
The 24-year-old man was arrested by officers from Essex Police's Operation Raptor West, the gangs and street crime unit, in Harlow, Essex on January 17. He is charged with two counts of possessing Class A drugs with intent to supply and is allegedly part of a London gang.
He is believed to have inserted a batch of drugs into his body.
Comment: Many countries see the war on drugs have failed, that resources are being wasted on prohibition that has never and will never work. If we consider the sheer quantity of drugs that enter our society, it is fairly certain that the trade is assisted by people in high places, who are also skimming off a massive profit for their nefarious dealings:
- War On Drugs Is A Hoax - US military Admits to Guarding, Assisting Lucrative Opium Trade in Afghanistan
- The war on drugs is a failure, says prominent medical journal
- Jon Rappoport: CIA MKULTRA - drugs to ruin the nation
- Doctor given 18 years for healing autistic son with cannabis while cop gets no time for raping and urinating on woman
- SWAT Team raid innocent family suspected of growing cannabis only to find hibiscus plants
- Irish govt permits special license for medicinal cannabis oil (CBD) to girl suffering from severe form of epilepsy
- California legalizes Cannabis giving hope to 500,000 convicted during prohibition
- US cops crash birthday party then bust 70 people for a thimble of weed
- Portugal's radical drugs policy is working. Why hasn't the rest of the world copied it?
But a good question to ask Peterson's detractors would be why? Why do they hate him so much? Why are so many liberals so determined to mock and malign him at every turn? Why do they see him as such a dangerous figure, when the impact of his work in the real world is so overwhelmingly positive?
"In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs, it is the rule."
-Friedrich Nietzsche
"I want to understand how a normal brain becomes conservative," my professor said. "That is the thing that most puzzles me." At the time (I was in my early twenties) I completely agreed*. That was the question. Sometimes I would stare at a picture of G. W. Bush like Hamlet staring at a skull, pondering how any sane human could have voted for him. It just didn't make sense. Progressivism was so obviously correct that it baffled me that anyone could deviate from its basic principles. I didn't hate conservatives. I even knew one or two. I was just befuddled by them.
Most social scientists feel today about conservatives as my professor and I did then. Almost all social scientists (especially social psychologists) are socially liberal, and most of them voted for Barack Obama over Mitt Romney. To many of these scientists, conservatives are like eccentric antiquities that belong in a museum, where they can be carefully studied. Consequently, social psychology journals are littered with articles about conservatives. Many paint a Hieronymus Bosch-like picture of them as flawed, fallen creatures: rigid, dogmatic, close-minded, fearful, prejudiced, and inclined to authoritarianism. Scales that describe traits found among conservatives more than progressives have scary names such as Right Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation, and Benevolent Sexism, to name a few.
However, other researchers have expressed concern that this unflattering image of conservatives might be an unfortunate manifestation of bias from within the academy. Because most social psychologists are progressives, they simply take progressivism for granted, assuming that it is the right way to view the world and that, therefore, any divergence from its tenets is wrong and requires explanation. This leads to disparaging depictions of conservatives in the same way that having evangelical Christians study doubters would lead to disparaging depictions of atheists (imagine the scales: Unholy Skepticism Scale, Doubting Thomas Scale, et cetera). Scholars have begun to support this argument with research that suggests that progressives and conservatives are equally biased so long as scholars examine the right topics and targets. In fact, in an upcoming meta-analysis (a study that combines all effects from other studies), Dr. Peter Ditto and his colleagues found no statistically significant difference between progressives and conservatives on measures of bias.
Comment: A very interesting look into some of the biases inherent in what's going on today in politics. Take look at Jonathan Haidt's The Righteous Mind for a deeper examination into the divide between the left and the right. For more on Haidt see: Scientific explanation for 'libtards'? Conservatives have more complex moral compass than liberals

Local residents carry bodies taken from rubble in Old City of Mosul on January 17, 2018.
The situation in Mosul remains tough, with its residents having extremely limited access to health facilities, despite all the efforts of the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) and other humanitarian organizations, Peter Hawkins said. The official has recently paid a personal visit to Mosul to hand over equipment to a public health laboratory and witnessed the situation on the ground.
"What we need to understand is the extent of the problem. This is a massive city. Mosul city probably faced one of the biggest urban warfares since World War II and 2.2 - 2.4 million people affected. It's an enormous challenge to everybody to try and clear everything up and get the people working again," Hawkins told RT.













Comment: Who would have thought that we would ever see the day that criminals would be allowed to wear badges.