Society's Child
Priebus, the first chief of staff to former President Donald Trump, made the comments Tuesday on former Trump adviser Steve Bannon's podcast. He described the plans three days after Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos of Rochester met with Trump about his plans to review the election.
Vos has faced pressure from both the left and right as he seeks to examine an election that courts have determined was conducted properly. Joe Biden narrowly won the state and gained a handful of votes in recounts requested by Trump in Dane and Milwaukee counties.
The letter, sent Aug. 20, read, "We decided to close your credit cards on September 18, 2021 because continuing the relationship creates possible reputational risk to our company."
Flynn, who was pardoned by former President Donald Trump after he pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and has cast doubt on the integrity of the 2020 election, posted the letter on Telegram and criticized the company.
Comment: This isn't the first time Chase has 'debanked' an individual based on their political views or general deplorableness. Who needs a social credit system when you've got banks acting as moral arbiters and enforcers of right-think?
See also:
- Chase closes Gen. Mike Flynn's bank accounts, cancels credit cards; claims association "creates reputational risk"
- Michael Flynn's relatives sue CNN for $75 million over report alleging QAnon affiliation
- DEBANKING: Chase Bank says 'moral character' a reason why they don't do business with 'those types of people'
- Chase bank de-platforms conservative performance artist and Rebel Media host Martina Markota
- Chase Bank suspends conservative Jewish activist Loomer from online banking account - already banned by Paypal

In this Aug. 9, 2021, file photo, fake pill bottles with messages about OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma are displayed during a protest outside the courthouse where the bankruptcy of the company is taking place in White Plains, N.Y. A federal bankruptcy judge on Wednesday, Sept. 1, gave conditional approval to a sweeping, potentially $10 billion plan submitted by OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma to settle a mountain of lawsuits over its role in the opioid crisis that has killed a half-million Americans over the past two decades.
If it withstands appeals, the deal will resolve a mountain of 3,000 lawsuits from state and local governments, Native American tribes, unions and others that accuse the company of helping to spark the overdose epidemic by aggressively marketing the prescription painkiller.
Under the settlement, the Sacklers will have to get out of the opioid business altogether and contribute $4.5 billion. But they will be shielded from any future lawsuits over opioids.
Comment:
See also:
- NY Times: Consulting firm advised Purdue Pharma to just pay pharmacies when their customers overdosed on OxyContin
- OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma files for bankruptcy
- Pittance: Purdue Pharma offers $10-12 billion to settle opioid lawsuits
- After helping OxyContin maker 'turbocharge' sales, McKinsey cuts ties with Purdue Pharma
- Former Purdue Pharma CEO called opioid addicts 'victimizers' while company counted on addiction for profits
- New book 'Dopesick' documents how doctors and Purdue Pharma are responsible for getting millions of Americans addicted to drugs
- Oregon sues Purdue Pharma, claims it misrepresented OxyContin risks
While 43% of U.S. likely voters say they would now vote for Trump, only 37% say they would vote for Biden and 14% would opt for some other candidate.
Voter regret regarding the choice made in the 2020 election is a major reason Trump would come out on top today, as six times as many Biden voters (12%) as Trump voters (2%) say they are sorry they voted for the candidate they did in the last election, Rasmussen reports:
If a rematch of the 2020 election were held now, Trump would win, because only 79% of Biden voters say they would vote for him again and seven percent (7%) would switch their vote to Trump. By comparison, 81% of Trump's 2020 voters would vote for him again and just two percent (2%) would switch to Biden.

Young, delicate-looking men have amassed large fan bases in China.
The Chinese government has ordered a boycott of "sissy pants" celebrities as it escalates a fight against what it sees as a cultural import that threatens China's national strength.
In a directive issued on Thursday, China's TV watchdog said entertainment programs should firmly reject the "deformed aesthetics" of niangpao, a derogatory term that refers to effeminate men.
Comment: One has to wonder if this impetus by the Chinese government is necessarily a bad thing. Being masculine does not necessarily have to be about militarism and "aggressive diplomatic rhetoric". It may simply be that the Chinese authorities recognize the inherent problems in their men being more feminine and being less able to adhere to traditional male roles and fulfilling those roles in society at large. Masculinity is not inherently 'toxic' and, outside of the encroaching Western ideology, is recognized as necessary.
See also:
- CIA turned our celebrities into 'sissy pants', says Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
- China bans celebrity rankings in bid to 'rectify chaos in the fan community'
If Lisa Shaw hadn't taken a Covid vaccine then she would, in all probability, still be alive today. The mother of one, a popular presenter at BBC Radio Newcastle, was only 44 years old and fit and healthy, with no known underlying conditions.
Yet take the Covid vaccine she did on April 29, despite being in a very low risk category - and complications from it killed her. That's not a 'conspiracy theory' - or the view of an 'anti-vaxxer' - it's the official coroner's report. All our thoughts go out to Lisa's devastated family and friends.
Vaccines generally have been a great boon for humanity, but no vaccines are totally safe. Some, though, are safer than others for different age groups. It is worth noting that at the time poor Lisa had her first AstraZeneca dose in late April, the vaccine had already been suspended or temporarily banned in a number of Western countries over concerns it could cause dangerous blood clots in some recipients.
Comment: See also:
- As drug makers set sights on vaccinating 5-year-olds, latest VAERS data show number of injuries, deaths continues to climb
- 'Urgent' British report calls for complete cessation of COVID vaccines in humans
- CDC panel shows support for regular COVID booster shots, despite vaccine injury & deaths close to 500 THOUSAND
Is it legally and morally acceptable to constrict the rights and economic access of people in order to force them to submit to an experimental "vaccine", or any other medical procedure for that matter?
Furthermore, who gets to decide what medical procedures are acceptable to enforce? Who gets to be the all powerful and benevolent overseer of every human being's health path. I ask this because I don't think many people realize the future repercussions of allowing governments or corporations (the same thing these days) to dictate covid vaccinations. It doesn't stop there; in fact, we have no idea where this stops once the Pandora's box is opened.
Comment: Please catch the many episodes of Objective:Health that look more deeply into mainstream covid narrative headlines and their peddled science.
Here is the latest: Objective:Health - 'Leaky' Vaccines, Immune Escape and Mutating Variants
Acclaimed Broadway composer Stephen Schwartz says that the mob's takeover of arts and culture feels like something straight out of a Maoist "totalitarian state."
In an interview with the Telegraph, Schwartz highlights the insanity of the left's new "cultural appropriation" purity test, where if artists want to avoid retribution from the woke brigade, they are only allowed to write about "someone who is exactly like you."
"Everyone in the arts in America is talking about the tyranny of cancel culture and cultural appropriation," said Schwartz. "The funny thing is, no one dares to say it aloud. It's like living in a totalitarian state."
The composer of 2017's Prince of Egypt slammed the new Maoist ideological militancy which employs censorship and intimidation tactics to suffocate independent creativity.
"We've lost the ability to have our world view challenged by another point of view. It's as though we've become terrified of ideas. But ideas are how society progresses," said Schwartz.
"The world is full of radical chic environmentalists and it is full of extremist and ideological environmentalists," Minister Roberto Cingolani said at a political training school in Rome on Wednesday.
"They are worse than the climate catastrophe towards which we are hurtling, unless we do something that makes sense. They are part of the problem," he said, urging listeners to stay open to "non-ideological discussion."
Cingolani, a physics professor, argued that it is wrong "to ideologize any kind of technology," and options like nuclear power should not be taboo in environmentalist policymaking. "Let's stick to the numbers, when they're available, and make decisions based on them."













Comment: There was likely so much funny business in the 2020 election that it would be hard not to turn up some of it in an official investigation. But trying to do all this work retroactively is probably an exercise in futility - it's like closing the stable door after the horse has already bolted. But even though it seems highly unlikely anything substantial will come of it (other than recognition that Trump was right), it may be worthwhile for Americans to know just how corrupt their system truly is.
See also: