Society's Child
As I was on my way, I started thinking about just how many people I had lost in my life over the last year or two. It's got to be in the hundreds. People who have known me for 20 years or more, who said they loved me, who took care of me and let me take care of them, are all mostly gone now. For many, it's a matter of their own social survival. Guilt by association is a h-ll of a thing.
As I was starting to tally the people I have lost touch with, another thought occurred to me: I probably have more conservative friends than liberal friends now. For a lifelong "bleeding heart" liberal, this is quite the unexpected life development. I decided to tweet something to that effect.
As president-elect and president, respectively, of the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences, we disagree with Eliot's claim that the brain is "no more gendered than the liver or kidneys or heart". We also disagree that sex differences in behaviour are due to cultural effects on newborns, not to biological effects. In our view, these are not mutually exclusive. Sex disparities occur in animal models that are not subject to cultural bias.
The brain, like many organs, shows differences attributable to sex, both during health (see, for example, E. Luders et al. J. Neurosci. 29, 14265-14270; 2009) and during disease. Two-thirds of people with Alzheimer's disease are women; twice as many men as women have Parkinson's disease (see, for example, L. J. Young and D. W. Pfaff Front. Neuroendocrinol. 35, 253-254; 2014). And multiple sclerosis affects three times more women than men, although men with the condition develop neurological disability more quickly (see, for example, R. R. Voskuhl and S. M. Gold Nature Rev. Neurol. 8, 255-263; 2012). Sex is a modifier of disease risk and progression.
Studying the effects of sex differences in health and disease will lead to new treatments that target sex hormone and sex-chromosome effects. These will ultimately help people irrespective of their sex.
Nature 568, 171 (2019)
doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01141-6
Sometimes, someone is.
Amazon.com Inc. employs thousands of people around the world to help improve the Alexa digital assistant powering its line of Echo speakers. The team listens to voice recordings captured in Echo owners' homes and offices. The recordings are transcribed, annotated and then fed back into the software as part of an effort to eliminate gaps in Alexa's understanding of human speech and help it better respond to commands.
The Alexa voice review process, described by seven people who have worked on the program, highlights the often-overlooked human role in training software algorithms. In marketing materials Amazon says Alexa "lives in the cloud and is always getting smarter." But like many software tools built to learn from experience, humans are doing some of the teaching.
The team comprises a mix of contractors and full-time Amazon employees who work in outposts from Boston to Costa Rica, India and Romania, according to the people, who signed nondisclosure agreements barring them from speaking publicly about the program. They work nine hours a day, with each reviewer parsing as many as 1,000 audio clips per shift, according to two workers based at Amazon's Bucharest office, which takes up the top three floors of the Globalworth building in the Romanian capital's up-and-coming Pipera district. The modern facility stands out amid the crumbling infrastructure and bears no exterior sign advertising Amazon's presence.
Comment: See also:
- The walls have Orwellian ears: Warrant granted for Amazon Echo recordings
- Amazon's creepy plan to put a camera and microphone in every room
- Senators press Amazon for answers on improper Echo recording incident
- Dangerous precedent: Arkansas prosecutors want to force Amazon to release Echo device audio data
- Data 'sharing': Amazon's Alexa sends thousands of recordings to the wrong user

Anti-abortion activists protest outside the Supreme Court during the March for Life on Jan. 18.
Rep. Tony Tinderholt, a Republican, introduced the "Abolition of Abortion in Texas Act," or House Bill 896, in January to "protect the rights of an unborn child" but it was granted its first committee hearing on Monday and Tuesday.
Nearly 500 people testified, with 54 people testifying against the bill, according to The Washington Post.
"A living human child, from the moment of fertilization on fusion of a human spermatozoon with a human ovum, is entitled to the same rights, powers, and privileges as are secured or granted by the laws of this state to any other human child," the text of the bill reads.
Republican Rep. Matt Krause, who sits on the Texas House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence, which heard the bill, said in a statement on Facebook before the hearing that it was "the first legislative hearing since 1973 on this topic."

Teacher Justine Nelson’s lawyer Roger Nuttall has said the 13 year-old boy she is accused of sexually abusing is ‘the real predator’.
Justine Nelson's defense attorney Roger Nuttall made the stinging attack on the teen in court Monday after highlighting testimony from a psychologist who claims Nelson is not a sexual predator.
Nuttall said that meant the unidentified boy, who says he was 13 when Nelson began targeting him at Tenaya Middle School in Merced, California, during 2016.
The attorney went on to tell jurors: 'You can't find someone guilty if they're mentally or physically coerced to do something.
'She wasn't the aggressor. He was the aggressor.'
Supporters of Assange gathered near the embassy in London in the days prior to his arrest after WikiLeaks, citing a source in Ecuador's government, said on Twitter that they were expecting Assange to be expelled from the building imminently.
The supporters began to notice some peculiar activity and some of the faces hanging around the area became familiar. So familiar in fact that they were able to recognize them when they popped up in footage of the 47-year-old's arrest on Thursday.
Speaking to RT, journalist Cassandra Fairbanks recounted the peculiar activity she saw while staking out the stakeout.
Comment: Ms. Fairbanks has been a support of Julian Assange from the beginning of his confinement.
- US journalist held in locked embassy room while Ecuadorian ambassador tells Assange to 'shut up' and accept being spied on
- WikiLeaks says Julian Assange has been subject of sophisticated spying operation in Ecuadorean embassy
- Julian Assange's living conditions are akin to a Stasi-era dissident
- US-backed Ecuadorian plans leaked: Court transcripts shed light on Assange expulsion strategy
A statement from the Department of Justice on Wednesday said Assange had been charged for engaging in a conspiracy to crack a password on a Department of Defense computer in order to release classified information. If found guilty, he could face up to five years in prison.
Fellow whistleblower and former CIA employee Edward Snowden said on Twitter that the "weakness of the US charge against Assange is shocking" in that the allegation that Assange and Manning had "tried" to crack the password had been public knowledge for "nearly a decade," and that the Obama administration's DOJ had concluded that prosecuting Assange would pose a threat to press freedom.
Comment: The hope of a fair trial is nil according to CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou. He should know:
Kiriakou was the first person to be sentenced in the US for leaking classified material to a journalist as part of President Barack Obama's crackdown on whistleblowers. His case was heard by the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. He took a plea bargain in October 2012 and was sentenced to 30 months in prison.
The same court is handling the case against Julian Assange, who is alleged to have conspired with WikiLeaks source Chelsea Manning as part of her leaking the damning classified materials. Assange was arrested by the UK authorities on Thursday after Ecuador allowed British police into its embassy in London to drag the whistleblower out.
Kiriakou believes that once in US custody, Assange would face additional charges and may spend the rest of his life in jail.
"I think that there are many more charges to be considered for Julian. I would expect a superseding indictment, possibly to include espionage charges," he told RT.I don't think Julian is looking at five years in prison. He is probably looking at 50 years in prison.
The US court that would try Assange will not give him a fair trial, Kiriakou believes. "They don't call EDVA the 'Espionage Court' for nothing," he tweeted earlier in the day. He told RT he was speaking from his personal experience."Judge Leonie Brinkema is a Reagan appointee to the federal bench and she was promoted to District Court bench by Bill Clinton in the mid-1990s. She reserves all national security cases for herself. She handled my case, the Jeffrey Sterling case [over leaking details of a CIA op to journalist James Risen], she is Julian's judge, she has reserved the [NSA whistleblower] Ed Snowden case for herself."Kiriakou said he hopes that the way Assange is being treated by the US justice will galvanize the US public and result in more documents being leaked to expose the misdeeds of the US government.
"No national security defendant has ever won a case in the EDVA. In my case, I asked Judge Brinkema to declassify 70 documents that I needed to defend myself. She denied all 70 documents. And so I had literally no defense for myself and was forced to take a plea."Critics of the US case against Assange, like Kiriakou, say all he has been doing was publishing material of public interest, which was also embarrassing to the US government. This is exactly what journalists in the US have been doing before him when they reported major scandals in cases like Watergate, Pentagon Papers or Iran-Contra.[The prosecution of Assange] was only theoretical until this morning. Now it is a reality that we have to face. This is an assault on our civil liberties here in the United States. It's an assault on our constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of the press and freedom of speech.
"If Julian Assange as publisher and journalist is prosecuted, then there is literally nothing to stop the government from prosecuting journalists at the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times and anywhere else," he warned.

Michael Avenatti speaks to the media after being arrested for allegedly trying to extort Nike for $15-$25 million on March 25, 2019 in New York City.
The Los Angeles Times reported Thursday morning that charges stem from Avenatti's dealings with multiple clients, including Geoffrey Ernest Johnson, who is mentally ill and a paraplegic. Johnson won a $4 million settlement from Los Angeles County, but Avenatti hid the money from him for years. He allegedly also hid $2.75 million from another client. The day after he received that money, he allegedly purchased a $2.5 million private jet for a company he owned. The jet has since been seized by federal agents
"Avenatti stole millions of dollars from five clients and used a tangled web of shell companies and bank accounts to cover up the theft, the Santa Ana grand jury alleged in an indictment that prosecutors will make public Thursday," the Times reported.
WikiLeaks editor Kristinn Hrafnsson has said that Julian Assange is facing "political persecution" for "doing his job as a journalist," and vowed to fight his extradition to the US.
Speaking to reporters outside Westminster Magistrates Court, Hrafnsson said that Assange's removal from the Ecuadorian embassy - where he had been seeking asylum for almost seven years - "sets a horrible precedent."
"A journalist is facing political persecution for doing journalism," Hrafnsson added. "If this goes forward, no journalist anywhere in the world will be safe from extradition to the United States for doing his job."
Comment: Comment: The mainstream media shows its true allegiance as independent journalists speak out:
The arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, is a severe blow to press freedom, but the mainstream media has no objections, despite never shying away from writing articles based on his publications, analysts told RT.
"What we're seeing right now is criminalization of journalism; the criminalization of publishing," analyst Patrick Henningsen said hours after the UK police forcibly removed Assange out of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.
This "very unfortunate" development affects each and every journalist, but the "supine mainstream media isn't protesting what's going on," he added. The leading Western outlets are "in lockstep with the government of the US, the UK, Spain and others" and just don't see Assange as their colleague.There's "no viable Fourth Estate" anymore, only the "government media complex," Henningsen said.© Reuters / Henry Nicholls
Members of the media are reflected in a window of a police van as WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is seen inside, after he was arrested in London.
That aside, Julian Assange has been "a modern Robin Hood for independent journalists. Everybody used what he revealed on [Hillary] Clinton; on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan," independent journalist Luc Rivet told RT.
And the MSM also heavily relied on the work done by the WikiLeaks, human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell explains. "Assange didn't leak anything," but only made documents, obtained by Chelsea Manning, available to the public. He's "a publisher in the same way that the New York Times and the Guardian that also published the leaks of Chelsea Manning," Tatchell said.
The fact that it's only Assange, who is being persecuted by the US, but not those outlets, "smacks of double standards. It smacks of a vendetta," the activist pointed out.Henningsen stressed that nowadays "things only become protest-worthy if the mainstream media is giving it coverage," so Assange's arrest won't lead to large-scale rallies, adding that only concerned activists will take to the streets.The reason the US authorities are going after him isn't because he caused any damage per say, but because he caused huge embarrassment exposing American wrongdoing around the world.
He expressed the belief that Ecuador, which sheltered Assange for more than six years, withdrew the publisher's asylum claim as a result of "backroom deal that's been done between the Ecuadorian, British and the US governments."
Assange will most likely be extradited to the US where and the "danger is that Julian Assange will not face justice," but only "a facade of due process," he said.
"What's he's going to face is secret grand jury proceedings, most likely in northeastern Virginia, most likely it'll be ruled on by the judge, who has ruled against every single whistleblower under the Obama administration, including Thomas Drake, John Kiriakou and many others."
The Basmanny district court's April 11 decision came a day after Russia's Investigative Committee called for Calvey's release. Calvey left the court shortly after the ruling.
Kristina Panshina, a spokeswoman for the Federal Penitentiary Service, said that Calvey will be wearing an electronic bracelet while under house arrest.
The court later said the Investigative Committee has asked it to keep Calvey under house arrest until July 14.













Comment: See also: