The races differ also in constitution, in acclimatisation, and in liability to certain diseases. Their mental characteristics are likewise very distinct...
~Charles Darwin, 1871, The Descent of Man
Angela Saini's new book, Superior, is a cautionary tale about the historical legacy, and putative return, of what she calls "race science." As far as we can determine, there are four main theses running through the book:
- 'Race' is not a meaningful biological category
- Genes can only contribute to population differences on certain "superficial" traits
- Studying whether genes might contribute to population differences on non-superficial traits is tantamount to "scientific racism"
- Almost everyone interested in whether genes might contribute to population differences on these other traits is a "scientific racist"















Comment: Here we have yet another example of how the sciences are under attack from Social Justice academics. Whenever an area of study is deemed to be out-of-bounds, one's red flags should be raised. Political correctness is a scourge on any area of society, but within the sciences, it is truly eggregious.
See also: