Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 15 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Society's Child
Map

Corona

'Drinktator' Andrew Cuomo extends no-alcohol-without-food rule

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo
© Brendan McDermid/Pool Photo via AP
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is extending his no-alcohol-without-food rule through May 6.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo isn't letting a nursing-home scandal and multiple allegations of sexual misconduct stop him from showing New Yorkers what arbitrary, power-hungry "leadership" looks like: He's extending his no-alcohol-without-food rule through May 6.

His aides suggest it's a bone to the restaurant industry that his lockdown orders have devastated. But it looks a lot more like pure puritanical abuse of power.

It's only been a month, for instance, that city restaurants have been allowed indoor dining at 50 percent, even as the rest of the state had that for months. He's also dictated early closings for eateries and bars, clearly for fear people might have too much fun.

Comment: Cuomo seems determined to ensure he is the most hated New York Governor in history. Even though he's got it in the bag, everyday he introduces a mandate (or a scandal is uncovered) to ensure people hate him even more. It's really a sight to behold.

See also:


Syringe

Telling: Half of vaccine rejectors believe it is safe to travel now, compared to 29% of vaccinated adults

masked airport phone waiting
© Getty Images
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now say it is safe for fully vaccinated Americans to travel. But those most willing to travel right now may reject much else that the CDC suggests.

In the latest Economist/YouGov poll, three in 10 Americans who have received at least one vaccinate shot (29%) believe it is safe for them to travel within the United States today. By contrast, half of the one in four Americans who reject the vaccine believe it is safe for them to venture out now.

vaccine rejectors safe travel
© The Economist / YouGov | April 3 - 6, 2021

Comment: While there is little doubt the intention of publishing this poll is to show how many bad citizens there are out there disobeying the rules, it's actually a pretty good measure of how many people in the US are still able to think. When looked at this way, it's actually surprising the results are so high.

See also:


Fire

Far left Antifa extremists set fire to Portland ICE building

portland protest ICE building fire
In Portland, Oregon, rioters set fire to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement building late Saturday night.

"The Portland ICE facility is currently on fire," journalist Grace Morgan tweeted, accompanied by a video showing the front entrance of the building in flames.


Comment: See also:


Shopping Bag

Pints, shopping and haircuts: English shops and pub gardens reopen as lockdown eases

Primark in Birmingham
© REUTERS/Carl Recine
Customers queue to enter as retail store Primark in Birmingham, Britain reopens its doors after a third lockdown imposed in early January due to the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, April 12, 2021.
People queued up outside retailers across England on Monday to release their pent-up shopping fever and some grabbed a midnight pint or even an early haircut as England's shops, pubs, gyms and hairdressers reopened after three months of lockdown.

After imposing the most onerous restrictions in Britain's peacetime history, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the reopening was a "major step" towards freedom but urged people to behave responsibly as the coronavirus was still a threat.

As the sun rose, people queued up outside Primark in Birmingham, England's second city, and outside JD Sports on Oxford Street in London.

Comment: One has to wonder if this lifting of the lockdown has anything to do with the fact that up to 35% of Brits will go abroad even if it breaches lockdown & despite threats of £5,000 fines. We can't have one third of the populace flagrantly disobeying the rules if we want to continue to be taken seriously, now can we?

See also:


Bandaid

Due process, adult sexual morality and the case of Rep. Matt Gaetz

Rep. Matt Gaetz
© Joe Raedle/Getty Images
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl) speaks during the "Save America Summit" at the Trump National Doral golf resort on April 09, 2021 in Doral, Florida.
The Florida Congressman has not been charged with any crimes. But the reaction to this case raises important questions of political, legal and cultural judgments.

That Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) is a pedophile, a sex trafficker, and an abuser of women who forces them to prostitute themselves and use drugs with him is a widespread assumption in many media and political circles. That is true despite the rather significant fact that not only has he never been charged with (let alone convicted of) such crimes, but also no evidence has been publicly presented that any of it is true. He has also vehemently denied all of it. All or some of these accusations very well may be true and, one day — perhaps imminently — there will be ample publicly available evidence demonstrating this.

But that day has not yet arrived. As of now, we know very little beyond what The New York Times initially reported about all of this on March 30: that "people close to the investigation" told the paper that "a Justice Department investigation into Representative Matt Gaetz and an indicted Florida politician is focusing on their involvement with multiple women who were recruited online for sex and received cash payments." The article also said the DOJ "inquiry is also examining whether Mr. Gaetz had sex with a 17-year-old girl and whether she received anything of material value." Both the NYT and, later, The Daily Beast, indicated the existence of financial transactions involving payments by Gaetz to his associate Joel Greenberg, currently charged with multiple felonies. The New York Times article made clear: "No charges have been brought against Mr. Gaetz, and the extent of his criminal exposure is unclear." That is still true.

Comment: While it's yet to be determined what's actually going on with Gaetz, it has all the hallmarks of a fabricated smear campaign. Wonder why they'd target Gaetz?

See also:


NPC

Thinking of 'Bridgerton' cast or the Kardashians as hot reinforces 'racial hierarchy' in the UK, Guardian column argues

Adjoa Andoh Regé-Jean Page Kim Kardashian
© IMDB; Getty Images / Emma McIntyre
(L) Adjoa Andoh and Regé-Jean Page in Bridgerton, Chris Van Dusen, ShondaLand (2020) ; (R) Kim Kardashian
Considering stars of TV show Bridgerton or the Kardashians to be attractive and wanting mixed-race people to be sterilized are two sides of the same coin of white supremacy, a mixed-race author is arguing in a column.

The fact that African features are not only accepted but sought-after in modern British society is apparently problematic and laced with racism. At least according to Natalie Morris, a lifestyle reporter and book author, who shared her view on race issues in a current piece in The Guardian.

Called "Why celebrating 'mixed-race beauty' has its problematic side," the column scrutinizes the current situation in which mixed-race appearance "personified by the Kardashians" is en vogue. When she was growing up, Morris explained, she wanted to look more like a white person. But now that her natural looks are "trendy" she wonders if she should be pleased about this, because she believes it only works for appearances "with proximity to whiteness."

Comment: You literally cannot win in an argument with a wokey. No matter what the race of the star they're complaining about, it's a symptom of White Supremacy™. Even fictional races don't get a pass.

See also:


Syringe

Brooklyn woman gets COVID 3 weeks after Johnson & Johnson vaccine

Ashley Allen

Ashley Allen, 31, spoke to The Post while quarantined in her Williamsburg apartment and in between calls from city contact tracers.
She's shot out of luck.

A Brooklyn woman who managed to avoid catching COVID-19 throughout 2020 went down with the bug this month — three weeks after being vaccinated.

Ashley Allen, 31, spoke to The Post by phone while quarantined in her Williamsburg apartment and in between calls from city contact tracers.

The contact tracers "started asking me questions about what I was doing three weeks ago," Allen said. "And I said I was getting vaccinated."

Allen was thrilled when she was able to book an appointment for the one-dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine at the Javits Center on March 10.

The sprawling convention space had just received new shipments of vaccine and was jabbing New Yorkers around the clock — Allen's appointment was at 2 a.m. As a wine and spirits distributor, she was able to get a coveted early spot even while vaccines remained unavailable to most New Yorkers. Though she experienced a brief fever the next day, her side effects from the jab quickly resolved.

Comment: See also:


Attention

Professor: White supremacy is to blame for ALL racial violence in the US

white supremacy
© Feng Yu / Shutterstock.com
An ethnic studies professor from the University of Colorado Boulder claims that all race-based violence in the United States has its roots in white supremacy.

Writing in The Conversation, Jennifer Ho, the president of the Association for Asian American Studies whose research interests include "critical mixed race studies," "anti-racist theory and praxis" and "intersectionality," says that even when Asians are victimized by blacks, Hispanics or other non-Caucasians, white supremacy is still the culprit.

"[W]hen a Black person attacks an Asian person, the encounter is fueled perhaps by racism, but very specifically by white supremacy," Ho says. "White supremacy does not require a white person to perpetuate it."

How can this be, exactly? Well, Ho says white supremacy is an "ideology" where "to be white is to be human," but non-whites are "less than human." Or, as Ho puts it, "disposable object for others to abuse and misuse."

Comment: See also:


Briefcase

Nike files trademark lawsuit against MSCHF over Lil Nas X 'Satan' shoes - UDPATE: MSCHF line withdrawn in settlement

satan shoe lil nas x nike
© MSCHF
Nike filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against MSCHF, the shoe designer behind Lil Nas X's now-infamous "Satan" sneakers Monday, alleging that the shoe design and marketing implied Nike is involved with the shoe.

The shoe maker cited a need to "set the record straight," according to NBC News, after the shoes went viral on social media and some outraged individuals accused Nike of supporting the "Old Town Road" rapper's embrace of the occult.

Lil Nas X, whose real name is Montero Lamont Hill, is not named in the lawsuit, only MSCHF, which collaborated with Hill on the Satan shoe design, technically a follow-up to the shoe designer's previously released "Jesus" shoe.

Comment:

UPDATE 09/04/2021: Breitbart reports MSCHF and Nike have settled their lawsuit:
Nike announced on Thursday that it has settled its lawsuit against MSCHF, a company that made the "Satan Shoes" in collaboration with rapper Lil Nas X. The satanic sneakers are now being recalled. The settlement with MSCHF Product Studio Inc. resolves a trademark infringement lawsuit that Nike filed over the "Satan Shoes," which involved modified Nike Air Max 97 sneakers, according to a Reuters report.

As part of the legal settlement with Nike, MSCHF has reportedly agreed to buy back the sneakers that have already been sold in order to remove them from circulation.

The satanic sneakers reportedly contained a drop of human blood and were limited to 666 pairs. The shoes also had "Luke 10:18" printed on them, in reference to a Biblical verse, which reads, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven," and were priced at $1,018. The shoes quickly sold out, with the last of the 666 pairs being held back so that Lil Nas X could choose the recipient, reports Reuters.

Nike reacted by filing a lawsuit against the maker of Lil Nas X's limited edition sneaker line, alleging that MSCHF violated copyright laws by customizing Nike Air Max 97 shoes without the company's permission.

"Nike has not and does not approve or authorize MSCHF's customized Satan Shoes," Nike said at the time. "In fact, there is already evidence of significant confusion and dilution occurring in the marketplace, including calls to boycott Nike in response to the launch of MSCHF's Satan Shoes based on the mistaken belief that Nike has authorized or approved this product."



Stormtrooper

Podcaster receives police visit over alleged AOC threat — but there's more to the story

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
© Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
A podcaster said he was "harassed" by two police officers at his home in California and accused of threatening Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., on Twitter -- a claim he calls outrageous and provably false.

The Twitter user, who goes by @queeralamode, is demanding answers from police and the congresswoman on why he was tracked down at home on Thursday. He said the experience left him "shaken up" and "feel[ing] very unsafe in my home right now."

A spokeswoman for Ocasio-Cortez said the congresswoman did not request the investigation.

"No, we did not report him," spokeswoman Lauren Hitt told Fox News on Friday. "We asked Capitol Police last night to look into what happened here and are awaiting additional information."

Comment: Tara Reade, no stranger to harassment, weighs in:
[...]

Welcome to the American Police State.

Ryan is a cohost of Left Bitches, a podcast that examines the American political experience from a progressive point of view. He is also a social media content provider for Soapbox (which Twitter and Facebook have tagged as Russian state-controlled media for its affiliations with RT). I have a theory that there is a concentrated effort to stop international and alternative media outlets from being active in the US. This erasing of other outlets will be done under the guise that all other views are spreading "misinformation" that is a clear and present danger to the interest of the United States.

If Ryan Wentz is in trouble for his tame critique of AOC then it explains why some journalists refer to me as if I am public enemy number one. My revelations regarding Joe Biden's sexual misconduct were promptly swept under the corporate media rug but not without some character attacks on me for good measure. The result of the attacks on my credibility had a powerful negative domino effect.

Last summer, I was threatened with prison. After coming forward about Joe Biden, it was said I lied about my education. I did not. This led to a criminal investigation with sealed search warrants by the Monterey DA.

Later that month, a separate piece of information came my way. An attorney from Twitter contacted me.

He said that he had to file motions in court to even be allowed to tell me that my Twitter account was being subpoenaed by the Department of Justice on behalf of the FBI. I asked if my other social media and email accounts were subpoenaed, I received no answer about this except some companies do not need to notify the subscriber if the search warrants are sealed.

I called the FBI and asked about it. I was told I could not be given any further information as the case was sealed even if it involved me. My attorney called the DOJ and the Twitter attorney but no further information was given. There was a grand jury impaneled.

Was I the subject of this investigation or was I not? This remains a mystery, all cloaks and daggers.

When I read Ryan's tweet about being intimidated by law enforcement, I felt great empathy. In the course of his activism and work he is being sent a message to be silent.

In the course of my coming forward about my experiences working in the Senate for Joe Biden, I have also been sent a clear message to be silent. It never occurred to me that simply telling the truth would become a political act.

All this, as we criticize other nations about their human rights records. Meanwhile, those of us that speak out with any critique of the Democrats in power will have to wonder whether that next knock at our doors is the police state coming for us.
Journalist Glenn Greenwald comments:


Other had things to say regarding AOC: