© Michael Dalder / ReutersMigrants are escorted by German police to a registration centre, after crossing the Austrian-German border in Wegscheid near Passau, Germany, November 1, 2015.
A small German village containing just 102 residents and with almost no infrastructure will have to accommodate as many as 750 asylum seekers after a decision by the regional authorities. Villagers fear the area will be unable to cope with the burden.
The first group of refugees amounting to 500 people will arrive in Sumte - a small village in the German state of Lower Saxony - as early as Monday.
The one-street settlement with no shops, no school and even no police station fears that its accommodation capabilities will be pushed to the limit.Initially, the regional authorities wanted the village to house 1,000 refugees, which they informed the settlement mayor of via e-mail in early October. At that time, this news was perceived by the villagers as a hoax.
Christian Fabel, the village's mayor, and his wife thought "
it was a joke," which "
certainly could not be true," as they could not believe that the settlement would be ordered to house a number of asylum seekers that exceeded 10 times the number of its villagers, the
New York Times reported. However, they soon realized that it was not a joke and that it was impossible to block this decision when Alexander Gotz, a spokesman of the Lower Saxony Interior Ministry, responsible for the distribution of refugees, told Fabel that the village had "
two options - yes, or yes."
Later, after the villagers protested this decision at several meetings with regional authorities citing security concerns and a lack of necessary infrastructure, the number of refugees the settlement should house was decreased from 1,000 to a maximum of 750 people.
"The burden of 1,000 refugees for one village with only 102 residents is absolutely disproportionate - it cannot be compared with any other place in Germany," the village's mayor Christian Fabel said at the first meeting with the regional authorities devoted to this issue.
Comment: That's right. We don't condone it, BUT... In other words, they do condone it. In the minds of these moderate lunatics, it makes perfect sense to cage innocent civilians in order to stop fictional 'mutilations' on the part of Syria and Russia. Russia and Syria aren't mutilating people: the FSA, ISIS and Nusra have that covered.