On Thursday,
Science, one of the top scientific publications in the world, ran
a letter titled, "Transgender rights rely on inclusive language," suggesting that biological sex is "context-dependent" and not binary.
If you had to go back and re-read that last sentence, let me assure you, you did indeed read it correctly. The letter — authored by two neuroscientists and a graduate student in biology — argues for "inclusive language around sex diversity," and that, in the five years since the National Institutes of Health announced that research proposals should include sex as a biological variable, society has become hostile to transgender people.
The NIH's directive was originally instated to address the fact that biomedical studies including only male participants lacked application to women. Pre-Clown World, this would be uncontroversial. But behold the pathway of thinking social justice ideology has plowed while I mourn my former field of neuroscience.
Comment: Duerte is threatening the unvaccinated with prison time for breaking stay-at-home rules.