Israeli security forces and Palestinian protesters confront each other in Jerusalem’s Old City on Dec. 15, 2017.
A federal judge on Tuesday ruled that a Kansas law designed to punish people who boycott Israel is an unconstitutional denial of free speech. The ruling is a significant victory for free speech rights because the global campaign to criminalize, or otherwise legally outlaw, the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement has been
spreading rapidly in numerous political and academic centers in the U.S. This
judicial decision definitively declares those efforts - when they manifest in the U.S. - to be a direct infringement of basic First Amendment rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
The enjoined law, enacted last year by the Kansas legislature, requires all state contractors - as a prerequisite to receiving any paid work from the state -
"to certify that they are not engaged in a boycott of Israel." The month before the law was implemented, Esther Koontz, a Mennonite who works as a curriculum teacher for the Kansas public school system, decided that she would boycott goods made in Israel, motivated in part by a film she had seen detailing the abuse of Palestinians by the occupying Israeli government, and in part by
a resolution enacted by the national Mennonite Church.
The resolution acknowledged
"the cry for justice of Palestinians, especially those living under oppressive military occupation for fifty years"; vowed to
"oppose military occupation and seek a just peace in Israel and Palestine"; and urged
"individuals and congregations to avoid the purchase of products associated with acts of violence or policies of military occupation, including items produced in [Israeli] settlements."
Comment: It's pretty easy to spot low-level behavior like this and expose it for what it is. A much more difficult task is exposing how the drivers of the Nazi ideology are emerging in different forms today, particularly when they take a liberal shape.