Puppet Masters
Last week, Russia and the United States reached an agreement on the ceasefire in Syria. The cessation of hostilities took effect at midnight on Saturday, Damascus time, generally holding across the country despite reported minor violations.
"The Russian Center is receiving reports from the Syrian General Staff and Kurdish armed groups supporting the ceasefire, that complain of continuing artillery shelling from Turkey," Lt. Gen. Sergei Kuralenko said at a news briefing.
But the doubters overdo it, in my view. They judge the agreement as if they were making book on it: No previous attempt to halt the violence has succeeded, so the odds are this one will collapse, too.
Shallow thinking—the kind one gets from the pack animals that staff our newspapers. You have to look carefully at this agreement and the circumstances that led to its conclusion last week. A lot has changed since the previous attempt at a ceasefire, in 2014, failed in less than a day. At close range, I see grounds for optimism—O.K., tempered, attenuated optimism. And I mean this two ways.

President Putin and his military strategize Mark Toner's suggestion of how to "put up."
The heads of the US military and the CIA are clearly furious at the way in which they feel the US has been humiliated, and in a series of angry meetings in the White House they have made their feelings known. Though they rationalise their anger with talk about how Russia cannot be trusted, and how US allies in the regions like the Turks and the Saudis feel betrayed, that is what it amounts to.
These recriminations have slipped into the open, as shown by the recent angry comments of Mark Toner, the US State Department's deputy spokesman, who in exceptionally crude and undiplomatic language called on Russia in Syria "to put up or shut up".
These comments have provoked a stern rebuke from Maria Zakharova, the Russian Foreign Ministry's formidable spokeswoman...
Comment: "So, Mark, until Russia 'does not shut up,' you have a chance to find out what is really going on in Syria," - Maria Zakharova
...whilst Alexey Pushkov, the Chairman of the State Duma's committee for foreign affairs, has twisted the knife by Tweeting that "A deputy spokesman of the U.S. Department of State has broken down - frayed nerves. In the United States lots of people regard the ceasefire in Syria as a defeat: the papers are indignant and the neoconservatives are shocked."
The difficulty the US hardliners face is that for all the brave talk of a Plan B they have no realistic alternative to offer.
Comment: The US infighting is just revving up and it seems there are many positions in the mix. It does not bode well for any administration to be so fragmented and multi-polarized when it may trigger an epic consequence such as WWIII. Will Russia have the restraint and wisdom to handle the US/Western tantrums and shine a light on this dark shadow? Or will the US hardliners/war mongers/Israeli neocons gain traction and push us globally off the edge in revenge. It depends on a well-devised, high-minded and solid strategy to restore global sanity and trust, not the muscle tactics of the radical few.
"We think China is resorting to the old style of might makes right, as opposed to working through international law and international norms to establish claims and to resolve disputes," Obama said in an interview with Channel News Asia.
The US and its Pacific allies have accused China of building artificial islands on top of sensitive marine habitats to establish an air defense zone in the highly contested waterway. China maintains it has every right to build within what it considers to be its own territory, and has stated that the islands will be used primarily for humanitarian purposes. Beijing has accused Washington of stirring unrest in the region, and new information of additional behind-the-scenes machinations have come to light.

US sailors being apprehended by Iran's Revolutionary Guards after investigations showed their patrol boats had entered Iranian waters unintentionally
The 10 US sailors on two small riverine armed craft were detained in mid-January by naval units from Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps off Farsi Island in the Persian Gulf. The humiliating scene with American navy members kneeling in surrender on deck was filmed by the Iranians and quickly made headlines across the world.
Coming just days before a historic nuclear agreement with Iran, the incident could have rapidly escalated into an international crisis - but it also raised questions about the US Navy's capabilities and its readiness to operate in uneasy Gulf waters.
The fiasco can be put down to a number of reasons, according to an ongoing Navy internal investigation. Several people - including from the White House, congressional officials, and others familiar with the details - shared information with Foreign Policy on condition of anonymity.
Comment: It's also possible that this crew was part of a clandestine operation aimed at penetrating Iranian waters and gaining intelligence, and that the story that was fed to Foreign Policy magazine is a lie. It's not often that the US military willingly admits to incompetence as an excuse.
Speaking at the event, Erdogan also stressed that Ankara's position had "absolutely nothing to do with the sovereignty rights of the states that can't control their territorial integrity." He argued that it, on the contrary, showed Turkey's will to protect its sovereignty rights.
Erdogan's latest comments come after the international community slammed Ankara over its shelling of YPG forces in northern Syria. Catherine Shakdam, Director of Programs for the Shafaqna Institute for Middle Eastern Studies spoke to Sputnik in an exclusive interview saying that Turkey's policy in Syria is aimed only at protecting Erdogan's personal interests.
"By interest I mean Daesh radicals and other groups which are creating chaos in Syria. He is not trying to defeat or combat terrorism but actually he is trying to weild terror as a weapon of mass destabilization in Syria because he is trying to recreate the Ottoman Empire, maybe not in the way it used to be but to create colonies of countries that would heed to the will of Ankara and that is the new reality that we are living in today."
The placement of a number of pro-Israeli neoconservatives at the helm of OFAC has also made the office a virtual tool of Israeli foreign policy and intelligence. OFAC has been at the forefront of prosecuting Americans and others for violating sanctions against Iran, Bashar al-Assad's government of Syria, Lebanon's Hezbollah political party, Hamas in Palestine, Muammar Gaddafi's government of Libya, Saddam Hussein's Iraq, the government of Omar al-Bashir of Sudan, and other foes of Israel. However, none of these Israeli targets are necessarily enemies of the United States.
OFAC was born as the Treasury Department's Division of Foreign Assets Control in 1950 during the throes of the early Cold War era when the Harry Truman administration wanted to prosecute companies and individuals conducting business with mainland China and North Korea in violation of American economic sanctions. In 1962, the division became the present Office of Foreign Assets Control.
Continuing as a tool of Cold War economic warfare, OFAC turned its attention on those who violated the economic embargo of Cuba, particularly American tourists who decided to avail themselves of the island nation's plentiful sunshine, clean beaches, and excellent cigars and rum. As late as 2007, OFAC vigorously pursued a Spanish travel company and its website for "helping Americans evade restrictions on travel to Cuba".
Comment: More evidence that the US is actually being run by oligarchs for their own benefit.
If reality-TV supremo Donald Trump ever makes it into the White House, he says that torture of terror suspects and shoot-to-kill of their family members will be turbo-charged under his command. The capricious demagoguery of this guy is truly sinister. And all the other gung-ho contenders are hardly any different.
Trump's brazen disregard for international law and gung-ho militarism has even alarmed former CIA director Michael Hayden. That's saying something when even a shady organization like the CIA is disconcerted by Trump.
But the fact is that Trump is only able to take a run at becoming US president because of his supposed vast individual wealth. His fortune was made from the kind of wheeler-dealer property capitalism that has bankrupted millions of American families and made Wall Street banks and financiers obscenely rich.
Comment: This is what most of all Trump supporters just don't understand since their support of him is more likened to choosing a favorite football team than a leader of millions. But even being the "elected" leader of the United States is a big misnomer. Trump is a brand, a flavor, and a style of bluster that people identify with and can get behind. At the end of the day, whether it is Trump or Clinton (probably Clinton) who wins, it is just as Cunningham says "like all the other politician-puppets, [he or she] will do as he [or she] is told". They probably won't even require being told too much since they are already on board with so much of how the power game is played.
Geeze, why didn't Trump just stick to his highest destiny:
While chancellor Angela Merkel maintains she wants to keep Europe's borders open, plans leaked to the Welt am Sonntag newspaper suggest that her own government is drawing up far more radical measures.
Sources close to Thomas de Maiziere, the Interior Minister in Merkel's government, told Welt am Sonntag that he had ordered his staff to draft plans to seal the country's borders. The alleged plans, according to the newspaper are meant to turn asylum seekers away at Germany's borders.
The measure might be enforced in "next weeks" if the number of refugees crossing EU-Turkish borders does not reduce dramatically."For de Maiziere, the time of waving the refugees through is over,"the sources said.
Such a radical measure is a direct threat to Brussels, the newspaper notes, stressing the decision to draft a roadmap for border closure could not be that of de Maziere's office alone. The order must have come from chancellor's office too.
They virtually vanished as representatives of the capital, not only at the Majlis (Parliament), but also at the slightly Orwellian-denominated 88-member Assembly of Experts, which will choose the next Supreme Leader and currently oversees Ayatollah Khamenei.
There's simply no ultra-conservative/hardliner featured among the 30 elected parliamentarian members in Tehran (their leader, Gholam Ali Adel, clocked at 31st). The winners were provided by the so-called 'List of Hope'; that's how former President Mohammad Khatami defined the pro-reform candidates.
Yes, never underestimate the wisdom of Iranian voters.













Comment: Further reading: Syrian cessation of hostilities: 'Largely successful' so far, but even 'failure' is a success for Russia