© Los Angeles Times
Rep. Devin Nunes of California briefed US President Donald Trump at the White House on
surveillance that had been conducted on
some members of Trump's circle, which Nunes said
may have been legal. Nunes was skeptical if the surveillance was morally right.Surveillance reports
included the names of some individuals on Trump's team, Nunes said, which is
"perhaps legal." He quickly followed up by saying, "but I don't know if it's right. I think
the President is concerned and he should be," Nunes added. The committee still needs more time to investigate,
but some of the espionage activity "seems to be inappropriate."The individuals subject to surveillance
"appear" to be under FISA warrants, adding that multiple FISA warrants are "out there." The NSA is cooperating very well with the investigation, Nunes commented. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the committee, was not briefed by Nunes.
The FBI has rejected allegations that surveillance was conducted against Donald Trump prior to November 8.
The data was collected in November, December, and January, Nunes explicated. Trump had taken to Twitter to blast the "bad (or sick)" President Barack Obama for "wiretapping," which Trump maintained could include broad forms of surveillance.
Nunes confirmed that Trump himself was not the subject of an investigation.Nevertheless, Nunes "
confirmed" that not once, not twice, but
"on numerous occasions" US intelligence agencies "incidentally collected information about US citizens involved in the Trump transition." The individuals' names were explicitly stated in intelligence data, potentially constituting a legal violation, he said. "I have seen intelligence reports that clearly show the
president-elect and his team were at least monitored and disseminated in what appears to be intelligence reporting channels," the representative said.
"None of the surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities," he noted.
Comment: See also: