The breathtaking and qualified investigative report, recently released by
Jerome Corsi on the Clinton's cash-sucking empire, have unleashed a wide public campaign to seriously audit and eventually
close the controversial Clinton Foundation. Established back in 2001, it was designed to add some charity charm to banal capitalization of the still powerful brand of the former US President.
According to the Daily Wire, only in 2009-2012 the CF officially (!) raised over $500 million while spending only $75 million on "programmatic grants" and over $400 million on employee salaries and "other expenses".
After having forced to disclose its list of contributors, many investigators exposed numerous facts of the conflict of interests during the period when Mrs. Clinton held the position of the US Secretary of State.
The cases of
Marc Rich, the world's most famous tax evader who was granted amnesty by Bill Clinton in the last minutes of his presidency by enabling the "HRC option", the former Lebanese DPM and Hezbollah sympathizer
Issam Fares making seven-figure donations to the CF, the Ukrainian billionaire, ex-president Kuchma's son-in-law and major CF contributor
Viktor Pinchuk who used to breach the US sanctions regime against Iran, are already properly reported worldwide.
While the story of Mrs. Clinton's lobbying affair with the Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg has also had a notable coverage in the US media, the plot was generally focused on a gibberish
2012 Clinton Global Initiative email controversy. The most detailed report "
From Russia With Money" on Clinton's cronyism in Russian favor was done by Peter Schweitzer, president of The Government Accountability Institute, this August. According to the latter, in 2010-2012 Mrs. Clinton advocated multibillion American technology investments into the Vekselberg-run Skolkovo Project (the Russian Silicon Valley), engaged e.g. in developing hypersonic cruise-missile engines, radar surveillance equipment, and vehicles capable of delivering airborne troops.
Comment: The thing is, Bernie is right about Trump. Trump would be horrible for America. He's just wrong about Hillary. She would be just as bad, if not worse. In the "lesser of two evils" debate, how is it that Hillary has managed to con so many people into thinking she is not a power-hungry corporate shill who gets her jollies toppling foreign governments, having their leaders killed, and massacring thousands of innocent people? Trump is a narcissist who can't help but expose himself whenever he opens his mouth. Hillary is a political psychopath who knows how the game is played, and how to wear a mask of sanity.