Puppet Masters
It's the extreme progressive, neo-liberal, uber-socialist Kingdom of Sweden.
George Soros' Open Society Foundation hired a consulting firm to evaluate members of the European Parliament, in an effort to gauge support for the foundation's core "values" until the end of their tenure in 2019.
Here are the "mapping" results of The Open Society Foundation's study, into how much influence it wields in the European Parliament.
The mapping results of the study entitled "Reliable Allies in the European Parliament (2014-2019)", reveal that Sweden tops all lists, as the country most loyal to the core values of billionaire George Soros.
How loyal are Swedish MEPs to the policies of Soros, which to name a few are open borders, regime change wars, and banker profiteering? 13 of 20 Swedish MEPs (equivalent to 65 percent) were classified as "loyal allies."
The list of Swedish Soros cronies includes representatives of both left and right parties, further confirming what we all knew...globalist corruption knows no political spectrum.
Standing on a podium over a crowd of Ohioans, Obama delivered his speech, detailing why one should not vote for The Donald. For example, because of his alleged support of Russia's leadership.
"You're the party that is tough on foreign policy and opposes Russia, and then you nominate this guy, whose role model is [Russian President] Vladimir Putin, the former head of the KGB? I'm sorry, what happened?" Obama said.
Comment: So what's the point? He must have forgotten about Bush senior who was director of Central Intelligence before becoming president.
Comment: Trump is stating a fact here: Poll finds Americans hold more favorable views of Putin than either presidential candidate

Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu looking particularly self-satisfied at UN speech.
A new video published by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has prompted ridicule and accusations of distorted history and racism. The clip, presented by officials as a short history of the Jewish people, was made by an Israeli production company on behalf of the Israeli government, as part of the latter's PR efforts.
The concept is straightforward enough: a Jewish couple - Rachel and Jacob - live in a comfortable modern home that represents the "Land of Israel". The pair then experience a series of "invasions" by the likes of the Assyrians, Babylonians, Romans, Crusaders and Ottoman Empire. Finally, the British Empire arrives, to announce that their home is finally theirs - before, right at the end, two Palestinians appear at the door.
The video has been rightly criticized for its historical inaccuracies and racist caricatures: the Jewish couple remain in suburban jeans-ware throughout while, as critics have pointed out, "portraying non-Jews over 3,000 years of history as primitive barbarians" in stereotypical dress. Nor does it do any favors to Jewish history, depicting Jews as entirely passive, and entirely ignoring the existence of Jewish communities around the world.
Comment: For the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians to be successful, Israel must continue to revise history - even contemporary history - so that their policies will be readily accepted, justified and seem logical among those who might otherwise question their acts of barbarism. But then again, there is a whole percentage of Israelis (and non-Israelis) who, of course, do not require slick commercials for Zionism coming out of Israel's Ministry of Propaganda to convince them that Zionism can do no wrong, and the Jews of Israel "the chosen people".
See also:
- Ethnic cleansing before your eyes: Israel's 'incremental genocide'
- Ilan Pappe on western 'awakening' and what it means for Palestine and Israel
- 1948 "The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine" - Zionism's Jewish enemy
- Ilan Pappe demolishes Israel-Palestine peace process: 'We wasted 40 years talking about nothing, doing nothing'
How powerful is Hilary Clinton? How much in the tank is the entire establishment, from the current White House Administration to the main stream media, in order to get Hillary elected?
The United States of America is readying options to engage in cyber warfare with Russia, over Hillary Clinton's ridiculous, almost comical, narrative that Russian hackers are trying to rig the US election in order to get Trump into the White House.
Only the dumbest of dumb people actually believe the "Russian hacker" Clinton campaign story. This is Hillary's way of distracting the public from Wikileaks Podesta emails, that expose the breathtaking corruption in and around the Clinton machine.
Comment: It's stunning how far these criminals will go to cover for one another. Here are a few revelations they would rather you not know about:
- Russia Checkmates US in Syria: Expect More Terrorism, Not Nuclear War
- Podesta email leaks reveal Citigroup's role in choosing Obama Administration cabinet
- 'Killary hates everyday Americans' and 9 other revelations from leaked Podesta e-mails

Andre Antoine, president of the Walloon regional parliament chairs a debate on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a planned EU-Canada free trade agreement, Belgium, October 14, 2016.
Wallonia's leader Paul Magnette said he would not allow the government to sign the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).
"I will not give powers to the federal government, and Belgium will not sign CETA on October 18," Magnette told an emergency session of the regional parliament.
Belgium's federal government favors the pact but by law Brussels needs the backing of all seven regional, linguistic and federal entities.
Comment: More on the "free trade' agreements:
- Is the EU being set up? Canada-EU Trade Agreement (CETA) is a TTIP clone - provides corporatocracy with "back door" into Europe
- People power: Thousands protest in Brussels against TTIP, CETA trade agreements
- People power! Hundreds of thousands of Europeans protest against TTIP and CETA free trade deals
According to The Wall Street Journal, the adoption of a new package of anti-Russian sanctions had been discussed earlier by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her entourage. Madame chancellor also issued public statements in which she called for Russia to be "punished" for its crimes in Syria.
Deputes from Northern Italian regions, who are currently in Crimea, have stated that sanctions policies are a tool from the 18th century. Nevertheless, the US and EU are obviously still making wide use of this tool. The policy of diplomatic restrictions and economic "punishment" is rather primitive and archaic, but is obviously still preferable to a frontal military confrontation with such a nuclear superpower as Russia. The Americans have a wealth of experience in effectively using political and economic tools to punish recalcitrant countries. An example of this is Iran, against whom a sanctions regime was in place for decades until being lifted only recently.
If voters don't know what to make of Clinton or how to read her, the blame may lie directly with the candidate herself. In an April 2013 speech made public by WikiLeaks last week, Clinton confided:
Politics is like sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be. But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position.That last 'public vs. private' comment quickly made the media rounds, and confirmed - for her critics - Clinton's deliberate duplicity on a number of policy positions.
WikiLeaks has provided an opportunity to delve into some of these, so let's take a look at one very prominent feature of Clinton's foreign policy agenda: Syria, a country that stands at the center of a potential global confrontation today.
Not a Syrian uprising; a regime change plan
A 2012 email released by WikiLeaks last year shows that, behind the scenes, Clinton's State Department was calculating its Syria policy using entirely different metrics than its publicly-stated narrative of supporting reforms and rejecting violence:
You might remember them as the guys who believe RT is a massive threat to civilization (read Western control of the airwaves), despite the fact that this network's budget is about a third of their own.
With all the largesse enjoyed by the BBG, it's always been curious as to how RT manages to achieve around 74 times more monthly visits (103 million, according to similarweb) ) than RFE/RL.org can boast (1.4 million, but their Russian language Svoboda.org can claim 8.3 million) However, things became a little clearer this week, when it emerged that Miller, the American network's main man in Kiev, apparently doesn't understand some basic tenets of journalism. Like how to conduct a good old-fashioned scoop, for instance.
Miller was so shocked at RT's ability to produce an exclusive story before mainstream outlets that he seems to believe that only collusion with the source - in this case WikiLeaks - would explain it. Of course, that fits with a long-term angle from western conspiracy theorists which suggests that the whistleblowing agency works hand-in-hand with the Kremlin. This is despite WikiLeaks releasing lots of negative stuff about Russia and its government, such as completely unverified allegations about the President's wealth - something that's essentially ignored by the popular press because it doesn't fit the neat little narrative box.

President Barack Obama meets with members of his Cabinet in the Cabinet Room at the White House
The revelation came from a hack of the email account of John Podesta, a chair of Obama's 2008 Transition Team. They show that Obama gave executives of Citigroup an "outsized role in shaping and staffing his first term."
In an email dated from October 18, 2008, Michael Froman, who is now the US trade representative, used his official Citigroup email address of fromanm@citi.com, to send the following email to Obama advisers:
"Attached is the latest version of the Agency Review teams. It is a closely held document, so please treat it with the same sensitivity as ours. If you all could take a quick look at the lists for the agencies in your area, that would be helpful. I think the hope is that, while there are no guarantees, some of the people on these lists make their way into the agencies ultimately. Our role, therefore, is to check whether there is much overlap between the names here and the names were seeing/generating for sub-cabinet positions in each agency...."In an earlier email, dated October 6, a month before the election, Froman provided Podesta with "Lists" attaching three documents: a list of women for top administration jobs, a list of non-white candidates, and a sample outline of 31 cabinet-level positions and who would fill them.
Comment: There is no evidence provided by the West that Russia is at all involved in the email leaks surrounding the Clinton presidential campaign Despite that, the US government acts as though perception is reality. The reality is that Russia is very unlikely to be behind the Podesta email leaks and also there is unlikely to be anything done to truly embarrass Putin and Russia. The US media is merely being used to spread misinformation in this case. The likely culprit of the hacking scandal is the US government themselves, specifically factions of the CIA.
"Current and former officials," who the report claims have direct knowledge of the situation, say the CIA has been tasked with providing options to the White House.
Sources tell the channel that US intelligence has started preparations for the operation and has even obtained "reams of documents" to target Russian President Vladimir Putin and his "unsavory tactics."
Comment: His "unsavory tactics" include soundly whipping the US Empire's butt in Syria, saving Syrian civilians from mass slaughter at the hands of US proxy terrorists and forcing the US to back down from its psychopathic "full spectrum dominance" behavior around the world.
Earlier this week, the White House said President Barack Obama was weighing a "proportional response" to Moscow. Spokesman John Earnest told reporters that the president was still deciding on "response options" that would probably not be announced in advance and may never be disclosed.
Comment: Kremlin: Russia faces unprecedented cyber-threats from the US
US aggressiveness is growing, and threats to carry out cyberattacks against Russia are unprecedented, presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said, adding that Russia will take "precautionary measures."
"The fact is, US unpredictability and aggression keep growing, and such threats against Moscow and our country's leadership are unprecedented, because the threat is being announced at the level of the US Vice President," Peskov told RIA Novosti. "Of course, given such an aggressive, unpredictable line, we have to take measures to protect our interests, somehow hedge the risks," he said, adding that "such unpredictability is dangerous for the whole world."
The report claimed to have direct knowledge of the situation, saying the CIA had been tasked with providing options to the White House.
WikiLeaks, however, has expressed doubt over the seriousness of the report about the "clandestine" cyberwar on Russia.
"If the US 'clandestine' pending cyberwar on Russia was serious: 1) it would not have been announced 2) it would be the NSA [National Security Agency] and not the CIA," WikiLeaks wrote on Twitter.












Comment: