Comment: Hobsbawm. A lifelong supporter of the Soviet Union. Marxist, leftist intellectual.
In the 1970s and 1980s something new and threatening to human solidarity and well-being was wresting itself free of service to the common good and undermining the "principle of oneness." Its name was Neo-liberalism, the mighty Moloch to whom all must surrender.
Comment: So, the problem wasn't that Communism was alive and well, it was ... neo-liberalism? That's not really even a thing.
It also became undeniable that the "global nature" of the crisis was being uneasily recognized. One part of the world-the USSR and E. Europe-had collapsed entirely. And in Africa, West Asia, Latin America the growth of the GDP ceased as a severe depression settled in the lands like an unwanted damp fog. But from the corporate elite's towering vantage-point, western economies seemed to be thriving even if millions of individuals weren't.
Comment: Ahh, the leftist throw-n-go. Notice the envy generating, injustice tweaking "even if millions of individuals weren't".
















Comment: What else would you expect from a Neo-Marxist. Basically they ignore reality and then create paper tiger bad guys that they can pew-pew in their screeds.