Puppet MastersS


Yoda

Western isolation of Russia has failed, opens new opportunities for Putin


Sputnik
Tue, 19 May 2015 13:46 UTC
Image
© Sputnik/ Vladimir Pesnya
All attempts by Western countries to put political and economic pressure on Russia have failed. If anything, they have helped Vladimir Putin to become an even more popular leader, Boulevard Voltaire said.

Over the last year, Russia has gone through some tough times — the political isolation from the West over the country's alleged intervention in the Ukrainian crisis, the fall of the ruble and economic sanctions.

However, at the end of the day, Russian President Vladimir Putin came out as a victor from all the adversities and should even thank the West for giving him an opportunity to strengthen his country, open up new economic venues and unite his citizens under a new national idea, French magazine Boulevard Voltaire reported.

After the Western-backed illegal coup that ousted officially elected Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 and the start of the Ukrainian civil war, Russia was able to re-unite with Crimea. The people of the Crimean peninsula did not accept the illegal coup in Kiev and voted to get out of Ukraine and join back the Russian Federation. Thus, Russia ended up expanding its territory, Boulevard Voltaire said.

Comment: It's clear by now that the West has initiated its own downfall by overstepping its bounds. Instead of harming Russia, the Western sanctions have created a more united and stronger Russia under Putin's leadership. Worthy leaders know how to utilize adversity and apply the lessons learned to enrich the people and systems they are responsible for. Putin is doing just that.

Read More...
Magnify

SOTT Focus: Problem solved: NATO and EU want to bomb 'refugee terrorists' they created

Ante Sarlija & Niall Bradley
Sott.net
Tue, 19 May 2015 16:25 UTC
Image
2015
The latest chapter in NATO's 'anti-terror' operations seems to be opening up, again in Libya.

In case you didn't know, 'ISIS jihadists' are coming to Europe and the UK! Disguised as Muslim refugees they are "hell-bent on committing atrocities," thus the necessity of 'bombing them over there so we don't have to bomb them here'. The story goes that ISIS is 'blending in' with refugees on their boat crossings to Europe, thus ALL refugees coming to Europe could potentially be 'terrorists'. So, bomb them!

The US (NATO) which is responsible for causing the humanitarian crisis and, as it happens, ISIS itself, is once again offering a 'solution' to a problem it created. If you don't want hordes of refugees, then don't bomb their homes; that's the simple truth that is lost on NATO warmongers. But the price of killing innocent people - as Madeleine Albright would say - is always "worth it". Especially when you can just call the refugees you create "terrorists", and threaten to kill them too.

NATO is not only capitalizing on the ISIS 'threat', it's using the 'concern' about the refugee crisis it created to continue to 'manage' the Middle East in a way that ensures Western control of the oil spigot and keeps Russia and China out of southwest Asia. Another Western intervention will, of course, cause even more displaced persons and spawn more terrorists in a never-ending loop, but don't expect the goons running NATO to care or have the perspicacity to foresee that inevitable consequence. It's a twisted world of psychopaths in power that wouldn't appear in your worst nightmares.
Read More...
Bomb

At least 5 dead, 42 wounded by huge explosion in Afghan capital


Sputnik
Tue, 19 May 2015 13:07 UTC
explosion in Kabul
© Twitter/Masood Alam

A huge explosion has reportedly hit a diplomatic area of the Afghan capital.

A loud explosion, gunshots were heard in the diplomatic area of Kabul on Tuesday. The diplomatic area is located just beside of the presidential palace and the building of the Justice Ministry.

Comment: Is this related to Russia's decision to stop the transit of NATO military cargo to Afghanistan through its territory?

Read More...
Light Saber

Putin dismisses top ranking officials


Tass
Fri, 08 May 2015 12:50 UTC
Image
© Alexei Nikolsky/Russian presidential press service/TASSRussian president Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin has dismissed a number of top-ranking officers of the Russian Interior Ministry, Emergencies Ministry, the Investigations Committee and the Federal Service for Drug Control, according to a decree posted on the official internet portal of legal information on Friday.

Thus, the president dismissed internal services Major General, chief of the directorate for relations with civil society institutions and mass media of the Russian Interior Ministry Andrei Pilipchuk.

Comment: Putin has a long history of cleaning house when needed. Ustinov, linked to the "siloviki" hardliners, had previously been removed from his position as Prosecutor-General in 2006. It appears Putin may again be taking a stand against some of the more hawkish influences of the Russian government.

Read More...
Take 2

Obama might have just given up on Ukraine, and Western media simply ignored it

Eric Zeusse
Washington's Blog
Mon, 18 May 2015 00:00 UTC
Image
© UnknownRussian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry at the meeting in Sochi: "Yes, this would be the way to avert further disaster, John."
On Tuesday, May 12th, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was asked at a press conference in Sochi Russia, to respond to Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko's recent statements promising renewed war against Donbass, which were made first on April 30th, "The war will end when Ukraine regains Donbass and Crimea," and which were repeated on May 11th, by his saying, "I have no doubt, we will free the [Donetsk] Airport, because it is our land." In other words, Poroshenko had repeatedly made clear that he plans a third invasion of Donbass, and, ultimately, also to invade and retake Crimea. (The Western press, however, had not reported any of these threats that were being made by Poroshenko.)

Kerry responded:

" I have not had a chance - I have not read the speech. I haven't seen any context. I have simply heard about it in the course of today [which would be shocking if true]. But if indeed President Poroshenko is advocating an engagement in a forceful effort at this time, we would strongly urge him to think twice not to engage in that kind of activity, that that would put Minsk in serious jeopardy. And we would be very, very concerned about what the consequences of that kind of action at this time may be."

Comment: Unfortunately there is also, probably, a 'Plan C' being played out that the Obama Administration is not even aware of, or privy to, at this time. Plan C, would have been devised by those who truly pull the strings and basically tell the White House what to do. Such a Plan C would mean "playing nice" for now until a new strategy for instilling chaos in Russia and Eurasia could be devised - and may already be in progress but requires more time to develop and implement. Considering, also, how important Ukraine is to an overall strategy of attacking Russia, don't be surprised if the administration does yet another about face towards supporting the Kiev regime's aggression towards its eastern populations. Remember what we're dealing with here.

Read More...
Wolf

How George Soros dodges his $6.7 billion tax bill

James Hall
BATR
Wed, 13 May 2015 10:19 UTC
George soros
Hedge Fund schemers are the modern version of robber barons. At the top of the list of unscrupulous manipulators is the Nazi collaborator, George Soros. With reports like in Forbes that George Soros May Owe Billions In Taxes, an alarm should go off to all investors.

"By the early 2000s, hedge funds were considered de rigeur for sophisticated investors willing to take a risk in exchange for potential wealth. As that potential wealth grew, so did the potential tax bill, and managers began looking at other options. The solution? Investing in offshore hedge funds. Hedge fund managers are generally taxed on income in the country where the fund is located making relocating to the usual offshore suspects such as the Caymans, Bermuda and Ireland attractive. Tax was essentially deferred on fees from these funds until it landed in the hands of those in the U.S."

The 2008 financial meltdown had all the Wall Street elites scrambling to protect their investment, while avoiding the day of reckoning with the tax man. One such effort as Forbes cites allowed for another deferred work around.

The change was inserted into the (Public Law 110-343) - and if that sounds familiar, you're not imagining it. That law was also instrumental in the administration of the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP. The new law essentially banned the deferral of fees and compensation by these offshore hedge funds.

Moving the domicile for the Soros fund to Ireland was an attempt to circumvent the intent of an ill-written law.

Comment: This is one way the 1% rig the game.

Read More...
Nuke

'Nuclear disaster waiting to happen': Royal Navy probes Trident whistleblower's claims


RT
Mon, 18 May 2015 02:24 UTC
HMS Victorious
© Reuters / Danny LawsonHMS Victorious is seen berthed at the Clyde Naval Base in Scotland
The Royal Navy has launched an investigation into whistleblower William McNeilly, who exposed horrid security lapses in UK's trident nuclear program which make it easier for intruders to access some secured areas than enter "most nightclubs."

UK authorities are "concerned for the whereabouts" of the 25-year old whistleblower, who went absent without leave and cooperated with WikiLeaks to post a detailed 18-page report called The Nuclear Secrets.

McNeilly, a weapons engineer, who allegedly served from January to April this year on board the HMS Victorious, claims that a number of security lapses and technical faults with the Trident missiles carrier exposes the UK nuclear deterrent to potential terrorist attacks that "would kill our people and destroy our land."

Possible attackers have "the perfect opportunity to send nuclear warheads crashing down on the UK," he claims.

In his revelations, the whistleblower notes some 30 safety and security flaws on Trident submarines that are based out of Faslane on the Clyde, Scotland. McNeilly took his time outlining the ease at which potential terrorist can infiltrate the secured base.

"At a Base security brief we were told that thousands of Royal Navy IDs go missing every year. A terrorist can use them, or create counterfeits with them and easily gain access down the submarine. Considering most of the guards barely look at them from a few metres (couple of feet if they're the rare ones) away the fakes wouldn't have to be too perfect," the whistleblower explains.

"I've shown a room card or nothing, at least once at every check point," McNeilly wrote.

An intruder could bring inside the secured facility any private electronic device to potentially steal top secret data - or even weapons and explosives, since the whistleblower claims, contractors and their equipment are hardly ever being searched.

"You can carry anything through the security check points without it being checked!" he says in the report. Personnel Electronics should be banned yet the policy isn't enforced. You can bring whatever electronic devices you want onboard... They use their own personal electronics right beside the missiles."

Comment: See also: Welfare not warfare: Protest in London against £100 billion nuke replacement plan

Read More...
Nuke

International community seems fine letting Saudi Arabia acquire nuclear weapons...


RT
Mon, 18 May 2015 00:07 UTC
Image
© Reuters / Mian KhursheedNuclear-capable missile Shaheen II.
At the prospect of the international community's nuclear deal with Iran, Saudi Arabia has reportedly taken a decision to call in an old favor from Pakistan and get some of its nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia is widely believed to have bankrolled the Pakistani nuclear weapons program. In exchange, Riyadh reportedly expects Islamabad to provide missiles in times of trouble to defend the kingdom.

"For the Saudis the moment has come," a former American defense official told The Sunday Times newspaper. "There has been a longstanding agreement in place with the Pakistanis, and the House of Saud has now made the strategic decision to move forward."


Comment: A good question to ask is why now? What's changed on the international chessboard that makes the Saudi elite think they need nuclear weapons.


According to the report, no actual transfer of weapons has taken place yet, but "the Saudis mean what they say and they will do what they say," the source reportedly said.


Comment: Interesting that there's been no major outcry from the west, no threats of war, barely a peep from the US State Dept. Again, we see that the issue is never what the media pundits proclaim, but that acquiring nuclear weapons (like WMD in Iraq) is simply a rallying banner that governments use to drum up support for their latest desire to invade and conquer.

Read More...
Light Sabers

Russia stops transit of NATO military cargo to Afghanistan through its territory


RT
Mon, 18 May 2015 23:22 UTC
Image
© AFP
Russian PM Dmitry Medvedev has revoked a decree that allowed delivery of NATO military equipment to Afghanistan through Russian territory.

According to the official document, signed by Medvedev and published on Monday, all previous decisions on NATO cargo transit to Afghanistan have now been revoked. This includes an act allowing delivery of military hardware and equipment via rail, motor vehicles, or through Russian airspace.

The Russian Foreign Ministry has been ordered to inform all the countries involved.

Comment: It only makes sense. What has NATO ever done for the benefit of Russia?

Read More...
Snakes in Suits

79 members of Congress have been in office for at least 20 years

Michael Snyder
End of the American Dream
Sun, 17 May 2015 22:54 UTC
Image
No wonder Washington never changes - 79 members of Congress have been there since Bill Clinton's first term in the White House. This list includes names such as Reid, Feinstein, McConnell, McCain, Pelosi, Boehner, Rangel and Boxer.

In this article, I am going to share with you a complete list of the members of Congress that have been "serving" us for at least 20 years. They believe that they are "serving" us well, but without a doubt most Americans very much wish that true "change" would come to Washington. In fact, right now Congress has a 15 percent approval rating with the American people, and that approval rating has been consistently below 20 percent since mid-2011. So of course we took advantage of the 2014 mid-term election to dump as many of those Congress critters out of office as we possibly could, right? Wrong. Sadly, incumbents were re-elected at a 95 percent rate in 2014. This just shows how broken and how corrupt our system has become. The American people absolutely hate the job that Congress is doing, and yet the same clowns just keep getting sent back to Washington again and again.

Comment: Yes, there are solutions but Americans need to wake up first and realize there is a problem in order to make the changes that benefit themselves.

Read More...