Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 15 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Red Flag

Russian Communist leader warns Putin that police 'brutality' & controversial online voting are 'bomb' waiting to 'blow up' society

Zyuganov
© Sputnik / Maxim Blinov
The leader of Russia's Communists has written an open letter to President Vladimir Putin bemoaning the arrests of his comrades and what he sees as the "unjustified brutality" of the police, warning that trouble may lie ahead.

In the missive, published on the party's official website, Gennady Zyuganov complained about the detentions of Communists following protests on September 20 and 25. He described the arrests as "groundless" and "unlawful."

Last month, the party organized two demonstrations against the results of September's parliamentary election, which, for the first time, was held over multiple days. In Moscow, the Communists believe they were robbed of rightfully won seats by rigged online voting and are campaigning to annul the results. Because of the tallied remote votes, the party failed to win a single seat in the capital's single-mandate districts, despite several candidates topping the poll in the regular physical ballot.


Comment: Sounds a bit like American elections! (See John Helmer on the Russian "robot vote".)


Following the protests, many Communist politicians, supporters and members were detained by the authorities. The demonstrations were officially unauthorized by the Moscow government, but the party claims that it was simply a meeting of MPs with their voters, which by law does not require any approval.

"It is obvious that those who ordered and carried out these and other illegal actions are guided not by legal provisions and the interests of public safety, but by a poorly understood political expediency," Zyuganov wrote.

According to the veteran politician, the new three-day electoral format, combined with online voting, is "a nuclear bomb which could sooner or later blow up the stability of society that patriotic forces have been building for years."

Syringe

UK government has a case to answer on children's vaccination, says judge

youth vaccine
On Friday I reported on ONS figures which showed a worrying rise in deaths among 15-19 year-olds in summer 2021 compared to summer 2020, a period which coincided with the roll-out of vaccines to that age group. I asked whether the increase of 57%, amounting to 90 deaths, was a signal of deaths from serious vaccine side-effects such as myocarditis, or whether there was another explanation (such as increased road deaths, for example). There were only nine Covid deaths in the age group during the period, and there was no corresponding increase in deaths in 1-14 year-olds, adding to the concern.

I was not the only person to raise these questions. This data was presented, in fuller form and alongside other evidence, at a court hearing on Friday, where the Covid19 Assembly is seeking a judicial review of the Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)'s decision to approve the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for use in 12-17 year-olds.

Although the Government had asked for the case to be struck out, the judge, Mr. Justice Jay, allowed it to continue, accepting that the claimants had an arguable case. The current position is that the court has adjourned the matter to a further hearing to allow the Government further time to respond to the case. The court has given directions that the Government submit further response and evidence by October 11th, with the claimants having to October 15th to reply. After this the court will reconsider the matter "promptly". I understand that the vaccination status of the teenagers who died during the period of the rollout is part of the evidence that the Government has been asked to provide.

Propaganda

Trump: Russia collusion was a hoax and every Pulitzer for it should be rescinded

Trump and headline
© White House Flickr
Former US President Donald Trump
Former President Donald Trump demanded that the Pulitzer Prizes staff immediately revoke the award granted to The New York Times and The Washington Post in 2018 for their Russia hoax reporting, which he said "was based on false reporting of a non-existent link between the Kremlin and the Trump Campaign."

In the letter, Trump pushed the Pulitzer Prizes' interim administrator Bud Kliment to admit that the corporate media's coverage of Russiagate was
"no more than a politically motivated farce which attempted to spin a false narrative that my campaign supposedly colluded with Russia despite a complete lack of evidence underpinning this allegation."
Trump noted that the Pulitzer board not only overlooked the falsities and deceptions woven into these stories but praised the "sensational headlines" that "leaned heavily on unsubstantiated anonymous sources." Trump wrote:
"As a result, the public was deprived of an independent means of assessing their credibility, their potential for political bias, and the source of their knowledge. For two years, these institutions feverishly pushed one Russia story after another and - despite lacking any credible evidence - attempted to persuade the public that my campaign had colluded with the Russian government."

Syringe

Fact Check: 30,305 people did die within 21 days of having Covid-19 vaccine says ONS; it's simple math

nurse w syringe
© AMERICASBESTPICS.com
On September 15th 2021 we published an article confirming that the Office for National Statistics (ONS) had published figures confirming 30,305 people had died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first six months of 2021.

But fact checkers have since claimed our article was "false", because according to them just 4,570 people died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, and they claim the very same ONS figures show this.

These are the official figures published by the ONS from their 'Deaths involving Covid-19 by Vaccination status' report-
Table 1
As you can see above 14,265 people died within 21 days of having the first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine, and 4,388 people died within 21 days of having the first dose of a Covid-19 vaccine whose death allegedly involved Covid-19.

Another 11,470 people died within 21 days of having their second dose of having a Covid-19 vaccine, and 182 people died within 21 days of having their second dose of a Covid-19 vaccine whose death allegedly involved Covid-19.

Therefore 30,305 people died within 21 days of having the Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.

Comment: In another instance of truth deciphering: Senator Ron Johnson's presentation to the Senate:
During his Thursday floor speech, Senator Johnson pointed out that 63% of all coronavirus Delta deaths in the last 7.5 months were fully vaccinated individuals. Obviously, the recent surge in cases and deaths is NOT a pandemic of the unvaccinated.



Lemon

Hillary Clinton says she's afraid of 'minority rule,' claims Republicans are the threat to US democracy

Hillary
© Reuters/Gonzalo Fuentes
Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
The real problem with the US is the conspiracy-mongering by Republicans, whose hopes of winning elections endanger democracy itself... at least that's according to former first lady and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Clinton has struggled to remain in the political limelight after her 2016 wipeout to Donald Trump in the presidential election the corporate media overwhelmingly favored her to win. Even as a special counsel indicted a partner in the law firm representing her campaign for one of the 'Russiagate' conspiracy theories, she offered her take on the current political situation in the US on the pages of the Atlantic.

Comment: Hillary keeps proving she is far beyond redemption and repair.


NPC

Yawn: Every US state-funded exposé on the lavish lives of elites is about Russia & Putin, even when he's not mentioned

pandora papers putin
© LOIC VENANCE / AFP; Reuters
The Pandora Papers; (inset) Russian President Vladimir Putin
The powerful are wealthy, and the wealthy are powerful. They'll also often go to great lengths to avoid paying taxes. Those are the conclusions from some 12 million financial files leaked to reporters last week and covered widely.

Known as the Pandora Papers, the revelations were handed to the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) and then picked up on Sunday by the BBC and The Guardian newspaper. The secret documents reveal how some 400 former and current world leaders, government officials and billionaires have funnelled their money through offshore accounts to buy property incognito and avoid paying taxes.

Comment: We've seen this before:


Dollars

Move over Panama Papers, there's more off-shore shenanigans: The Pandora Papers

Pandora papers investigative website
© OCCRP
What are the Pandora Papers?

The Pandora Papers are nearly 12 million files — totalling close to 2.94 terabytes — leaked from 14 companies that provide corporate services in offshore jurisdictions. The documents offer the most comprehensive look to date at how such service providers help the rich and famous — including celebrities, the ultra-wealthy, politicians, and criminals — to hide their money in financial secrecy jurisdictions.

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) received the leaked files and coordinated a worldwide investigation into their contents. The project involves more than 600 journalists from 117 countries.

Comment: Naturally, such of trove of information will send true investigators of many countries into overdrive; Some results from different countries:

No surprise that The Ukraine has found itself prominently featured. Excerpts from Donbass Insider's report:
The Pandora papers reveal that Volodymyr Zelensky and his entourage own offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands, Belize, and Cyprus, three flats in London worth $7.4 million, and that the Ukrainian president potentially received dividends from a company he no longer officially owns. The documents also reveal the Ukrainian President's potential involvement in the laundering of $40 million belonging to Igor Kolomoysky, for which the oligarch has been placed under sanctions by the US.

But the offshore scheme does not end there. The Pandora papers reveal that another close associate of Zelensky, SBU chief Ivan Bakanov, used a tax haven for his company Davegra Limited, registered in Belize. This company is the main owner of Maltex Multicapital Corp, and is said to be hiding details of the real owners, namely Zelensky, his wife and friends, says the Pandora papers investigation. In 2019, Bakanov sold the company to Yakovlev.

While this first part of the Pandora papers concerning Zelensky would in itself be enough to trigger impeachment proceedings against him in Ukraine, it is not the most scandalous part.

Indeed, the Pandora papers reveal that Zelensky is allegedly involved in Igor Kolomoysky's financial shenanigans, for which the oligarch has been placed under sanctions by the US.

The documents indicate that in 2012, the Kvartal 95 group of associates registered more than a dozen companies in the British Virgin Islands, Belize and Cyprus, with Maltex Multicapital Corp at the centre of the network.

The Pandora papers reveal that 40 million dollars were transferred via the Cypriot branch of Privatbank (then owned by Igor Kolomoysky) to this network of companies as a "capital contribution" in a totally non-transparent manner. Moreover, one of the companies that headed Kvartal 95 had an account in this bank. The Cypriot branch of Privatbank was used by Igor Kolomoysky to launder millions of dollars.

This information from the Pandora papers would confirm the information published after the Ukrainian presidential election, which indicated that Igor Kolomoysky had withdrawn more than 41 million dollars from offshore accounts at Kvartal 95.

Zelensky, with his law on oligarchs, which is just a pretty facade with nothing behind it, tried to fool Soros and the United States, who were counting on this law to bring down the Ukrainian oligarchs and take back their assets. A monumental mistake that could cost him and his mentor Kolomoysky a lot.
Times of Israel makes its report:
Some 565 Israelis are listed in the Pandora Papers, published by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, according to Shomrim, an Israeli investigative journalism nonprofit organization that took part in the investigation.

Former Labor Party Justice Minister Haim Ramon is among the high-profile Israelis named in the report. Ramon's name comes up in connection to a dubious tourism real estate deal in Montenegro with Austrian casino magnate Martin Schlaff.

Also named in the papers is secretive Israeli diamond magnate Beny Steinmetz, who was convicted this year of bribery in a Geneva court.

Steinmetz was accused of having set up a complex financial web, including a system of front companies, in order to pay bribes — partly through Swiss accounts — so that Beny Steinmetz Group Resources (BSGR) could obtain mining permits in Guinea's southeastern Simandou region.

Another prominent Israeli named is Likud MK Nir Barkat.

According to the report, the eToro company that Barkat has holdings in is registered in the Virgin Islands, despite the majority of its offices being located in Israel. While having a company registered in a tax haven is not always illegal per se, it may violate the Knesset Ethics Committee's guidelines.
Pakistani government officials make an appearance. From The New Arab:
Prime Minister Imran Khan promised Sunday to "investigate" Pakistani citizens connected to a massive probe into the hidden wealth of politicians worldwide, after members of his inner circle were implicated in the report.

One of Khan's predecessors, Nawaz Sharif, was ousted by the country's Supreme Court in 2017 over allegations made in the Panama Papers.

In total, the ICIJ found links between almost 1,000 companies in offshore havens and 336 high-level politicians and public officials, including country leaders, cabinet ministers, ambassadors and others.
But are the Pandora Papers another U.S. intelligence limited hangout? A word of warning from RT:
Though they may be embarrassing to certain individuals and companies, the Pandora Papers' revelations of offshore assets are not a challenge to the US government or the Western system of corporate power, sceptics say.

But despite those and similar examples, sceptics believe that the Pandora Papers won't do much good in tackling the worst kinds of corruption. Unlike what was revealed by the transparency website WikiLeaks or NSA leaker Edwards Snowden, "few - if any - important [players] in the West will be exposed," predicted journalist Alan MacLeod, who writes at the independent outlet Mint Press. Corporate media's hyping of the leak is a good indicator of how unthreatening it is to the Western establishment, he said.

The ICIJ compiled a bunch of graphs detailing the statistics of the new leak. One map, titled 'Where are the 336 politicians in the Pandora Papers from?' shows exactly zero such individuals for the US. The US is a major destination for people interested in offshore arrangements for their riches, the investigators pointed out, thanks to trust-friendly jurisdictions like South Dakota, Florida, and Delaware.

The Grayzone's Ben Norton sarcastically touted the absence of American politicians as evidence that they are "all pure and free from corruption." Journalist Mark Ames joked that "honest incorruptible oligarchs" like George Soros and Pierre Omidyar are likewise nowhere to be seen in the new ICIJ disclosure - just like in the previous ones.

American super-billionaires may have been somehow screened out from the disclosure - or simply don't need to utilize services to optimize their wealth and dodge taxes. Wondering whether the recurring peculiarities of the leaks indicate Washington's hand behind them is hardly conspiracy thinking.

The Trump administration gave the CIA extra powers to engage in disruptive cyberoperations, and the agency "wasted no time in exercising the new freedoms," according to a 2020 Yahoo! News report. The operations included not only cyber sabotage, but "also public dissemination of data: leaking or things that look like leaking," an intelligence source told the outlet.

That angle does not necessarily apply to the ICIJ investigations, and even if it did, it would be irrelevant to facts that the investigators established, as long as the underlying materials are authentic. At least, that was the long-held standard for journalism before Western media decided that some leaks are more equal than others, and if one exposes potential corruption of presidential candidate Joe Biden, it can be ignored and suppressed.

Snowden, one of the biggest leakers of our time, found the story "very serious" - but he also found humor in the fact that, even after two previous leaks, offshore operators "are still compiling vast databases of ruin, and still secure them with a Post-It Note marked 'do not leak.'"
The Pandora Papers: A nothing burger really


Black Magic

Francis Collins, NIH Director, resigns after gain-of-function lie exposed

francis collins NIH covid gain of function lies
© Saul Loeb-Pool/Getty Images
Francis Collins, former director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), announced his resignation on Tuesday, just weeks after documents exposed that he made "untruthful" comments about U.S. federal funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

"It has been an incredible privilege to lead this great agency for more than a decade," Collins said in a statement posted at the NIH website.
I love this agency and its people so deeply that the decision to step down was a difficult one, done in close counsel with my wife, Diane Baker, and my family. I am proud of all we've accomplished. I fundamentally believe, however, that no single person should serve in the position too long, and that it's time to bring in a new scientist to lead the NIH into the future. I'm most grateful and proud of the NIH staff and the scientific community, whose extraordinary commitment to lifesaving research delivers hope to the American people and the world every day.

Comment: The National Pulse provides more on Collins' dodgy history:
Appointed by President Obama in 2009, Collins issued a statement this week saying: "I fundamentally believe ... that no single person should serve in the position too long, and that it's time to bring in a new scientist to lead the NIH into the future."

But it is unlikely Collins's belief in a revolving door at the NIH that has prompted the move. Rather, with pressure mounting on key public figures such as his minion Anthony Fauci and arms-length brother-in-arms Peter Daszak, it is worth looking at what the media won't be saying about Collins this week.

The National Pulse has reported:

1. Francis Collins Advises Chinese Military Proxy-Linked Group Working Alongside COVID-19 Gene Storage Firm.

National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis Collins serves on the advisory board of a conference sponsored by a Chinese military-linked genomics firm. The D.C.-based, health industry big-wig and boss to Anthony Fauci has even referred to the controversial company's founder as a "friend".

BGI Genomics has been flagged by U.S. intelligence officials for its robust efforts to "collect, store and exploit biometric information" on American citizens through COVID-19 test kits. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the firm has deep ties to both the Chinese Communist Party and its military.

2. Collins Admits Funding Wuhan Lab: 'We Had No Control Over What They Were Doing.'

Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institute for Health (NIH), appears to have directly contradicted his underling Dr. Anthony Fauci in a bombshell moment from an interview with Hugh Hewitt.

The revelations further implicate those who approved U.S. grants to the lab, and the EcoHealth Alliance run by the British-born Peter Dazcak - who The National Pulse first reported on back in February.

3. EVIDENCE: Fauci's Bosses Signed Research Deals With Chinese Communist Military Front.

Under the leadership of Dr. Francis Collins - who recently admitted the U.S. had "no control" over the Wuhan lab despite funding it - the U.S. National Institutes of Health signed a memorandum of understanding to boost collaboration with a Chinese Communist Party-run scientific organization funding the People's Liberation Army.

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) has also funded several studies conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, including research focused on bat coronaviruses alongside U.S.-based research groups such as the Anthony Fauci-funded EcoHealth Alliance.

4. INVESTIGATION: U.S. Has Funded Over 250 Studies for Chinese Communist Military Researchers.

Various National Institutes of Health agencies - including Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases - have funded over 250 studies authored by researchers at institutions controlled by China's People's Liberation Army.

Following a unique investigation into the origins of scientific research papers, the whopping level of collaboration with the Chinese military will further concerns in the United States that the political class has surrendered to the Chinese Communist Party. Last week it emerged that the ranking General in the U.S. Armed Forces agreed to tip off China in advance of a U.S.-led attack.

5. America Has Given Millions for 'Research' At Chinese Communist-Run Facilities Since COVID Outbreak.

The U.S. National Institutes of Health has continued to funnel millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund scientific research in conjunction with Communist China since the beginning of the COVID pandemic, including to military-controlled organizations.

Over half of the grants sent since early 2020 came from Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

6. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fires 54 Researchers As Ongoing Investigation Reveals 93% Failed to Disclose Links to Chinese Communist Party

The National Institutes of Health, the foremost research institute under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, has investigated 189 researchers for undisclosed ties to foreign countries, 93 percent of which were linked to China.

The fresh round of terminations resulted from an ongoing investigation at the taxpayer-funded National Institutes of Health (NIH) into the failure of grant recipients to disclose financial ties to foreign governments.

In reality, accountability in a post-COVID era is what likely shuffled Francis Collins off from his otherwise immortal coil at the top of the NIH. Not that the corporate media would ever tell you any of that.



Dollars

The Pandora Papers: A nothing burger really

The MSM is trying to trick people into thinking they're still journalists, by telling us things we already know.

Leaders
© The Daily Sabah
THE "LEAKS"

So let's get right down to it...what do the "leaks" say? Well, according to The Guardian...
The files reveal how wealthy individuals can shield their income and their assets from taxation and scrutiny by hiding them in offshore jurisdictions, more commonly known as "tax havens".
Mind. Blown.

Rich people don't pay tax! WHAT?!

It's groundbreaking stuff. But that's the kind of world-changing expos's you get when you read the work of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ).

Attention

The American police state's reign of terror continues ... With help from the Supreme Court

Rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges. — George Carlin
SWAT Police
© A Government of Wolves.com/
You think you've got rights? Think again.

All of those freedoms we cherish — the ones enshrined in the Constitution, the ones that affirm our right to free speech and assembly, due process, privacy, bodily integrity, the right to not have police seize our property without a warrant, or search and detain us without probable cause — amount to nothing when the government and its agents are allowed to disregard those prohibitions on government overreach at will.

This is the grim reality of life in the American police state.

In fact, in the face of the government's ongoing power grabs, our so-called rights have been reduced to mere technicalities, privileges that can be granted and taken away, all with the general blessing of the courts.

This is what one would call a slow death by a thousand cuts, only it's the Constitution being inexorably bled to death by the very institution (the judicial branch of government) that is supposed to be protecting it (and us) from government abuse.

Court pundits, fixated on a handful of politically charged cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this term dealing with abortion, gun rights and COVID-19 mandates, have failed to recognize that the Supreme Court — and the courts in general — sold us out long ago.

With each passing day, it becomes increasingly clear that Americans can no longer rely on the courts to "take the government off the backs of the people," in the words of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas. When presented with an opportunity to loosen the government's noose that keeps getting cinched tighter and tighter around the necks of the American people, what does our current Supreme Court usually do?

It ducks. Prevaricates. Remains silent. Speaks to the narrowest possible concern.

More often than not, it gives the government and its corporate sponsors the benefit of the doubt, seemingly more concerned with establishing order and protecting government interests than with upholding the rights of the people enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

Rarely do the concerns of the populace prevail.

Every so often, the justices toss a bone to those who fear they have abdicated their allegiance to the Constitution. Too often, however, the Supreme Court tends to march in lockstep with the police state.

As a result, the police and other government agents have been generally empowered to probe, poke, pinch, taser, search, seize, strip and generally manhandle anyone they see fit in almost any circumstance.