Puppet Masters
Assad stressed that Turkey had been involved in events of Syria from the very beginning and sent terrorists to the country.
Last week, media reported that Saudi Arabia could send thousands of ground forces to Syria, most likely in coordination with Turkey, to take part in the fight against the Daesh jihadist group. Shortly after that, Turkey reportedly sent troops to its border, and also intensified the shelling of Kurdish-held areas in northern border regions of Syria.
On Monday, a spokesman for Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), Omer Celik, said Turkey had no plans to conduct a ground operation in Syria.
So one has to commend the Boston Globe for publishing this piece by Stephen Kinzer, a former foreign correspondent, warning that the media is not telling us the truth about what is going on in Syria.
But those constraints are also why Kinzer glosses over deeper problems with the coverage of Syria.
Comment: Cook nails it here. Read additional coverage of Stephen Kinzer's Boston Globe article here:
Storytelling in Washington: How the gov't manages American perception of its part in world affairs
Backed by the Syrian Air Force, the country's army and National Defense Forces (NDF) have clamped down on the terrorists' positions throughout Syria over the past 24 hours, according to the Iranian news agency FARS.
The West has been backing Syrian opposition factions since the 2011 beginning of the civil war. By first supplying arms to rebel groups, and then by launching a bombing campaign, the United States and its allies have acted militarily in Syria without permission from the legitimate government of President Bashar al-Assad.
It should come as no surprise, then, that both the US and France would roundly dismiss a recent UN resolution drafted by Russia to respect Syria's sovereignty.
Presented to the UN Security Council on Friday, the draft calls on all nations to avoid "provocative rhetoric and inflammatory statements" that could escalate foreign intervention in Syrian affairs. Russia also stressed that it was open to revising the draft to better accommodate all involved.
Comment: The lunatics in NATO seem determined to continue an armed conflict in Syria despite the fact they know any escalation into a direct confrontation with Russia can only end badly. They couldn't accept that at the end of the Soviet era, NATO was no longer needed.
- RAND wargame simulation sees NATO lose most of Europe to Russia
- West reviving moribund NATO using Russia as bogeyman
- The West continues spreading the myth of the Russian threat
- U.S. stooge NATO leading fascist charge towards attack on Russia
The Syria-based terror group, DWN says, citing a Reuters report, has asked for a "two-three week truce," and demanded that all attacks on the terrorist group be stopped.
The group has tabled the measure in the hopes that the break in hostilities will give them time to regroup, preventing their complete destruction, the paper says.
The American public is being constantly misinformed regarding global affairs, Stephen Kinzer, a senior fellow at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University, writes in his article for The Boston Globe.
News on developments around the world are generated by the Pentagon, the State Department, the White House and by think tank "experts", who deliver the official point of view.
Comment: The ignorance of ordinary Americans is abysmal. But there will be one day soon when the lies and malevolence that the U.S. gov't has been inflicting will sear through the sleep of many, and awaken them to something like the suffering that so many around the world have already been experiencing. And then no amount of U.S. media will be able to contradict it, or tell them any different.
Seasoned geopolitical analyst William Engdahl, in his recent article for New Eastern Outlook, 'Washington's Machiavellian Game in Syria', reckons the 'reality-creators across the pond' have manipulated both Russia and the main players in the Middle East into a fatal trap: regional conflagration in order to 're-shape the Middle East'.
But with contradictory statements being made by US leaders, and apparently contradictory actions being taken by the different players on the 'grand chessboard', couldn't it be said that it's all coming apart at the seams for the Western imperialists? Or is the chaos in the Middle East, and elsewhere, all unfolding according to 'the grand plan'?
Running Time: 02:03:03
Download: OGG, MP3 - 42MB
First of all, for the truce to hold, terror groups must be prevented from "using it to improve their positions," Assad said in an interview with the Spanish EL PAIS Newspaper. Secondly, any ceasefire deal must ensure that "other countries, especially Turkey, are prevented from sending more terrorists and weapons, or any kind of logistical support. More than 80 countries supported those terrorists in different ways, some of them directly with money, with logistical support, with armaments, with recruitments," Assad said. "Some other countries supported them politically, in different international forums."
When the ceasefire takes place, the fight will still continue against Al-Nusra and ISIS, as well as radical Islamist Ahrar al-Sham and Jaysh al-Islam, the Syrian president said, once again stressing that in order for the truce to work the borders must be sealed. That is what the Syrian army and the Kurdish forces have been doing around Aleppo lately, Assad said: "closing the roads between Turkey and between the terrorist groups. That's why Turkey has been shelling the Kurds recently."
Meanwhile the Russian FM, Sergey Lavrov, and his US counterpart, John Kerry, discussed "practical cooperation" on Syria between the US and Russia during a telephone call on Saturday.
Comment: The hope is that a ceasefire will change things. The hope is that a ceasefire will bring countries and factions to their senses and create an opportunity for common understanding and a way forward. Unfortunately, this action is not just between two sides or a couple of headstrong leaders of different ideologies, it is extremely complicated and layered. To have gotten this far is in fact significant, should it come about. What happens tomorrow is still anyone's guess.
You can read the full interview with Assad here.
Because the US has consistently backed Turkey's provocative acts of war in the past, including Turkey's premeditated shoot down last November 24th of the Russian Su-24 jet killing its pilot immediately defended by Obama's bogus contention that Turkey has every right to protect its own airspace despite no evidence the ill-fated warplane had ever entered Turkish airspace, Erdogan miscalculated counting on America's ongoing unconditional support and felt betrayed when the US began backing the Syrian Kurds. The Turkish president assumed that regardless of how severe his violation of international laws or magnitude of violent transgressions become, the US and NATO will always have his back. But if Erdogan was paying attention to history, he would realize the US Empire has a long track record of turning against its onetime allies after using them up for their own self-serving gains (vis-à-vis Saddam, Muamar, Mubarak, Osama and even Putin).
It seems that Erdogan may be a bit over-confident after Obama and his neocons minimally gave the tacit go-ahead recently for an upcoming joint Saudi-Turkish invasion of Syria where US uses its proxy allies to fight the Russian coalition that in recent weeks has been making mincemeat out of their darling terrorists. As of late the Turkish leader's vital supply line to his terrorists has been significantly severed. He and the Saudi monarchy are seething over America-NATO's reluctance to directly commit its ground forces in Syria. This has the arrogant dictator chomping at the bit to save his vested lost ISIS holdings behaving with unpredictable brashness and recklessness reaching unprecedented megalomaniacal heights.
The disclosure reveals a modest breakthrough in military - to-military communication and cooperation between the US and Russia beyond the very basic "memorandum of understanding" (MOU) signed in October last year which focused on safety protocols for both Russian and American air crews operating in Syrian airspace.
"We provided a geographical area that we asked them to stay out of because of the risk to US forces," Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook told reporters Thursday, according to the Los Angeles Times.
The request was an attempt to maintain special forces' safety "in a dangerous situation." It was made outside the scope of the flight safety memorandum, Cook said.
Up to this point, the Russian military "has honored this request," he added.
Comment: Well, isn't that interesting? The CIA is training and supplying terrorists in Syria, while the Pentagon is sharing intel with Russia for fighting the terrorists in Syria. Perhaps it's some evidence of a few sane heads within the US military. Might it also be evidence of factional splits within the US government?
U.S. tells Russia, "stop bombing al-Qaeda", violates own UNSC resolution















Comment: They will. They won't. They are. They aren't... Anybody got a scorecard? At least President Assad is perfectly clear on what Syria will do.