Puppet Masters
Prime Minister Viktor Orban signed a Hungarian government decree on Saturday, his press chief told state news agency MTI, welcoming the ruling by Poland's Constitutional Court which has plunged the EU into an existential crisis.
Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, said she was "deeply concerned" by the ruling and that the Commission would do all in its power to ensure the primacy of EU law.
Right-wing populist governments in Poland and Hungary have been at odds with the Commission over issues ranging from media freedoms, migration, LGBT rights to judicial independence. The two former communist states, which joined the EU in 2004, have been allies within the bloc, often voting in tandem, and supporting each other's case.
- There are many hard lessons to be learned from the current energy crisis in Europe, including the importance of both flexibility and backup options for an energy grid
- While the concept of an energy transition has been fully embraced by governments and institutions around the world, it seems the logistics of such a transition has been ignored
- In order to take back control of an energy transition that has evidently spun out of control, policymakers must manage the decline of the current system as well as the creation of a new one
The current crisis in the UK is a cautionary tale about how not to rush to green energy, Rochelle Toplensky of The Wall Street Journal notes.
Officials from both sides have said issues to be tackled include reining in extremist groups and the evacuation of foreign citizens and Afghans from the country. The Taliban have signaled their flexibility on evacuations.
Taliban political spokesman Suhail Shaheen told The Associated Press there would be no cooperation with Washington on going after the increasingly active Islamic State (IS) group affiliate in Afghanistan.

Jan. 6, 2021, protesters confront U.S. Capitol Police officers outside the Capitol in Washington.
The whistleblower, who requested anonymity for privacy reasons and left the force months after the attack, sent the 16-page letter late last month to the top members of both parties in the House and Senate. His missive makes scorching allegations against Sean Gallagher, the Capitol Police's acting chief of uniformed operations, and Yogananda Pittman, its assistant chief of police for protective and intelligence operations — who also served as its former acting chief.
The whistleblower accuses Gallagher and Pittman of deliberately choosing not to help officers under attack on Jan. 6 and alleges that Pittman lied to Congress about an intelligence report Capitol Police received before that day's riot. After a lengthy career in the department, the whistleblower was a senior official on duty on Jan. 6.
Comment: "Stop the Steal" began as a grass-roots movement of Trump supporters who could see that was something very wrong about the 2020 election. It was ripe for social media suppression and FBI infiltration
- 'Stop the steal!' Trump supporters gather at state buildings, calling Biden victory a fraud
- The Purge: Facebook bans #StopTheSteal as 350,000 Trump voters join group
- Facebook bans phrase "Stop the Steal", Amazon suspends donations to pro-Trump lawmakers, GoFundMe removes pro-Trump fundraisers, and more totalitarian nonsense
- Thousands march in Washington DC to protest Deep State theft of election - Antifa terrorists later attack pro-Trump supporters
- Giuliani Presents Evidence - From Their Own Words - That Antifa & BLM Rioters Were at 'Insurrection' on Capitol Hill
- Media hushes up US court report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on US people
- An FBI informant was marching into the Capitol on Jan. 6 'riot' - testimony contradicts media spin
- Man charged in US Capitol riot worked for FBI, has held top-secret security clearance since 1979: lawyer
- An FBI informant was marching into the Capitol on Jan. 6 'riot' - testimony contradicts media spin
- FBI monitoring of social media posts pre-Jan 6 raises even more questions of what it REALLY knew prior to Capitol Hill riot
This newspaper used Freedom of Information rules to obtain a cache of 32 emails about a secretive teleconference between British and American health officials held early in the pandemic.
But officials blacked out almost every word before releasing the crucial documents.
Comment: See also:
- Did COVID-19 escape Fort Detrick vaccine trial? Evidence that virus originated in US bioweapons lab
- Team of top scientists researching Covid origins disbanded amid controversy and conflicts of interest
- China, Fauci and the Origins of Covid
- Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance Has Hidden Almost $40 Million In Pentagon Funding And Militarized Pandemic Science
- Who Controls The British Government Response to COVID-19?
- COVID-19: The Big Pharma Players Behind UK Government Lockdown

Former National Security Council Fiona Hill said Russia likely didn't have blackmail info on former President Donald Trump.
"What Putin had on Trump is what everybody else had — recognition of his extreme vulnerability to manipulation," Fiona Hill told The Daily Beast in an interview published Monday.
The idea that Trump was uniquely vulnerable to blackmail by Moscow took root even before his inauguration, when BuzzFeed News published the now-infamous dossier compiled by ex-MI6 spook Christopher Steele. Among the dossier's many salacious claims: that Russian intelligence had a video of Trump paying prostitutes to urinate on the bed in the presidential suite at the Ritz-Carlton in Moscow.
Comment: More on Ms. Hill, and none of it pretty. She did her bit though, in obstructing Trump's policies and was rewarded with a book deal, as is custom.
- Fiona Hill (and Dems) ignored compelling evidence of Ukrainian 2016 election meddling
- Optics, or sabotage? Trump aides want anti-Russian hawk in Trump-Putin meeting
- The Pitfalls of a Pit Bull Russophobe, Fiona Hill
- Fiona Hill: Schiff's top witness, connected to Soros and the Deep State
Google is waging a war against skeptics because skeptics have the truth on their side and they win debates too easily. How do we know? There are plenty of wrong people on the internet, and acres of misinformation, but Google is happy to feed those creators. The Flat Earthers are not spreading fast on Youtube, they're not attracting millions of views. But no one needs to cut off their money supply because their arguments aren't persuasive. To stop those ideas from running amok, the world only needs free speech.
Google announces: ...a new monetization policy for Google advertisers, publishers and YouTube creators that will prohibit ads for, and monetization of, content that contradicts well-established scientific consensus around the existence and causes of climate change. This includes content referring to climate change as a hoax or a scam, claims denying that long-term trends show the global climate is warming, and claims denying that greenhouse gas emissions or human activity contribute to climate change.Arrogance knows no bounds:
Google demonetizes content creators who deny climate change
by Ian Miles Cheong, Rebel News
The tech giant claims it will be able to differentiate between content "that states a false claim as fact, versus content that reports on or discusses that claim."Who needs scientists anyhow - just Google the truth instead of doing all those experiments?
It's time for skeptics to hone their skills in satire and parody. Let's screw those algorithms!
For content creators who were relying on Youtube adverts, losing the monetization could kill the business, it's a cruel blow. Google's behaviour is grossly unfair and deceptive. It sold itself as a "platform" deceived people into watching and sharing their creative talents, and on November 1 could wipe them out. But good talent can still find a way — not only are there other, better video homes, but it's so much better to get a business model that doesn't feed or rely on Google. My advice would be to connect with your audience, set up a blog or a website, and ask for help and donations. Use Youtube while you still can, to set up a list.
Describing the death penalty as an "abomination", the French president said he would convene a summit next year to press for capital punishment to be abolished worldwide.
"As part of the French presidency of the European Union (in the first half of 2022), we will organise, with the NGO Ensemble contre la peine de mort (Together against the death penalty), a meeting in Paris at the highest level, bringing together civil societies from countries that still apply the death penalty [...], in order to convince their leaders of the importance and urgency of abolishing it," he said.
Comment: The irony of Macron lecturing the rest of the world about human rights is astounding given his blatant disregard for them when he OK'd vaccine mandates for healthcare workers. Not to mention the bill introduced by the French Senate to mandate Covid vaccines for EVERYONE beginning January 1, 2022.

Translated document. Original can be found on: https://www.senat.fr/amendements/commissions/2020-2021/811/Amdt_COM-1.html
The proposed vaccine mandate was introduced by Senator Bernard Jomier on October 4th. Jomier, the Senator of Paris who introduced the law proposition, sits as the Vice-Chairman of the Social Affairs Committee. He is also a member of the Parliamentary Office for the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Choices, Social Security Assessment and Control Mission, and Socialist, Ecologist and Republican Group within the French government. Jomier, a member of the Socialist Party, continues to work as a physician as he had preceding his initial term as a Senator which began in 2017. He and his fellow senators Marie-Pierre La Gontrie, Monique Lubin -- among others -- had initially introduced the premise of a nation-wide vaccine mandate to the French Senate on August 31st but have since crafted the premise of the bill in a much more actionable manner at its first reading before the Social Affairs Committee.
Comment: Meanwhile Sweden, Denmark and Finland have moved to ban the Moderna mRNA injection for the under 30's considering the threat to health too great; how long before the truth about the harms posed by the other injections are admitted by governments? And how much harm will France's mandate have caused by that point? Moderna vaccine suspended by Sweden, Denmark for under 30's amidst surge in reports of serious side effects - UPDATE: Finland follows suit
We have seen a lot of fear and dependence in this pandemic. Fear has been the message that has propelled types of repressive policies that were not possible before. Had anyone suggested only over a year ago that whole countries, democratic European countries, would close down and quarantine people in their homes most of us would have thought him crazy. But it happened. Because fear was drummed up, many populations went along with it. Even though they later protested and resisted, it was too late. Much of the damage was already done. And of course, many feared not only the virus but also the police, which sometimes with enormous brutality cracked down on those seeking a breath of fresh air after weeks stuck in their homes.
It is possible to roll back these policies. However, many of them will need to be rolled back for society to function again. To be clear, it is not possible for the state to keep everybody locked in their homes for long. This is an overreach and points to the limit of the state's power. When the people rise in opposition, as we've seen in this pandemic, the state has no power.












Comment: It is not only a disorderly mess, it is a train wreck without recourse once all traditional sources lay fallow and the demand for any available energy remains off the chart and unfulfilled. Given the effects of solar minimum cycle and foreseeable earth changes, purposing a diminished, unaffordable energy supply is just insane.
See also:
Energy crisis may unleash winter blackouts across US, insider warns