Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 03 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Sherlock

Former students and colleagues rush to defend Rep. Jim Jordan from accusation of turning a blind eye to sexual abuse (Update)

Jim Jordan
Four former wrestlers accuse Congressman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, of turning a blind eye to the sexual misconduct of a team doctor while working as an assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State University. But just as many former coaches, teammates, and student wrestlers vehemently deny those allegations. In interviews with the Washington Examiner, each said a version of the same thing: If abuse did occur, Jordan couldn't have known about it, because it is against his character to back down from conflict.

This past week, a handful of wrestlers told NBC that the late Dr. Richard Strauss used his position as team physician to prey on students. In his first interview since his name was brought into the story, Jordan told me, he didn't know of any sexual misconduct "plain and simple."

Comment: From these seats, it seems clear that this entire "scandal" is completely fabricated in order to smear Rep. Jim Jordan. Being outspoken, Jordan likely has a lot of enemies who would like to see him silenced, especially considering he's thinking about a bid for House Speaker. The sad thing is that it might work.

15 wrestlers have come forward to defend Jim Jordan. From The Political Insider:
15 Wrestlers Break Silence About Accusations Against Jim Jordan Allegedly Covering Up Sexual Abuse, Defend Him
July 11, 2018 2:23PM

...

Fourteen wrestlers are using their real names, while one has chosen to remain anonymous. Here is a sample of the powerful testimony shared about their former wrestling coach Jim Jordan:
"I was a member of the Ohio State Wrestling team from 1989 to 1994. Russ Hellickson and Jim Jordan recruited me as a heavyweight. I always felt they looked out for best interest of our team and believe they would have reported any sort of misconduct. I suffered an injury to my leg early in my career and had considerable interaction with Doctor Strauss. He always treated me in a professional manner." - Rick Burlenski, Wrestler (1989-1994)
And...
"From the very first day I met Jim, I can say without reservation that Jim's character is beyond reproach. I have ALWAYS known Jim to "do the right thing" and to live his life according to the strong morals upon which he was raised. As a coach and as a friend, Jim has ALWAYS been a man on which I could depend and provide me with wise counsel for any challenges that I may be trying to work through. He has NEVER demonstrated any lapses of judgement with me and is one of the most honest, truthful and forthright men I have ever met,"

"Please consider my most heart-felt and emphatic endorsement of Jim as he finds himself in a position where he is being forced to defend his credibility and character. You may contact me for additional insight into this matter should you feel it would be beneficial." - Stephen Mendicino, Wrestler (1983-1986)
And as many are assuming, this news is likely all about politics and money...
"For Jimmy to know that this was going on and not do anything about it, it wouldn't happen. It's completely out of character. I've had dinner at his house, worked out with him. This didn't happen,"

"After Larry Nassar, everyone is seeing dollar signs" George Pardos, Wrestler quoted in The Hill.
These wrestlers join six former OSU coaches who are coming to Jordan's defense. Former OSU head coach Russ Hellickson said he was "pissed off at what they are doing to Jim Jordan."

Some of the wrestlers defended Jordan but agreed Strauss committed transgressions. Unfortunately, no matter the truth, the damage to Jordan's reputation has been accomplished. The allegations happened so long ago that Jordan's opponents can use them against him for the rest of his time in Congress.

Jordan, a conservative champion, and defender of President Trump, just learned what happens when you try to drain the swamp.
See also:


Russian Flag

Two big Russia hysteria stories meant to shock us right before the Trump-Putin Helsinki Summit

New York Times anti-Russia hysteria Russian cyberattacks
© New York Times
I have said it before, and I will say it again, and I will keep saying it and saying it until it becomes mainstream conventional wisdom: it is the US intelligence community's job to lie to you.

In an article for The Nation dated July 11, the internationally renowned US-Russia relations expert Stephen F. Cohen warned of possible attempts by peace-hating beltway stalwarts to sabotage the Helsinki peace talks between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin that is scheduled for this coming Monday.

"There is a long history of sabotaging or attempting to sabotage summits and other détente-like initiatives," wrote Cohen. "Indeed, a few such attempts have been evident in recent months and more may lie ahead."

And, lo and behold, right before the summit we are seeing two major news stories loudly promoting Russia hysteria blasted onto the front pages on the very same day.

Comment: And don't miss: Hardcore Hitler on Hitler in Helsinki


Book

Special Counsel indicts 12 Russian military officers for hacking state election systems

Putin
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced the indictment of 12-Russian intelligence officers Friday afternoon for a number of crimes, including hacking state election systems and digitally stealing documents. Because of the nature of the attack and the Russian military officers involved, Russian President Vladimir Putin more than likely ordered it and oversaw its execution.


Comment: Baloney! "More than likely" does not evidence make. Let's see some proof.


"The indictment charges twelve Russian military officers for conspiring to interfere with the 2016 presidential election. Eleven of the defendants are charged with conspiring to hack into computers, steal documents, and release documents in an effort to interfere with the election," Rosenstein said. "One of those defendants, and a twelfth Russian officer, are charged with conspiring to infiltrate computers of organizations responsible for administering elections, including state boards of election, secretaries of state, and companies that supply software and other technology used to administer elections."

No votes were changed by Russia infiltrators and although operatives communicated with Americans during the 2016 presidential election, no American is named or suspected in the indictment of collaboration or even knowing they were in contact with agents of the Kremlin.

Comment: The White House responds:
"As Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said today, there is no allegation in this indictment that Americans knew that they were corresponding with Russians.There is no allegation in this indictment that any American citizen committed a crime. There is no allegation that the conspiracy changed the vote count or affected any election result," Deputy Press Secretary Lindsay Walters released in a statement. "Today's charges include no allegations of knowing involvement by anyone on the campaign and no allegations that the alleged hacking affected the election result. This is consistent with what we have been saying all along."
Link to the indictment can be found here


See also: 12 Russians indicted by Mueller for presidential hacking offenses


Info

NATO bends to Trump's will, Secretary General says his message is 'having an impact'

Trump NATO
NATO's secretary general agreed on Wednesday that President Trump's call for other members to boost their defense spending under the military alliance is having an effect, and promised that other NATO members would soon be chipping in more.

Trump was in Belgium Wednesday to keep up his complaint that other NATO members are "not paying what they should," and said it's an "unfair burden" to the U.S.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg agreed.

Comment: See also:


USA

Trump is rattling the West's Cold War mindset

Trump Theresa May  NATO
The "no food on the plates" breakfast talk that President Donald Trump gave is making a lot of news, on The Duran, and everywhere else. His morning smackdown of NATO was unprecedented. The alliance's decades-long delinquency of member nations to meet their financial obligations has never been addressed so directly by any American president.

Fox News' Sean Hannity commented extensively on this, as has The Duran's Alex Christoforou and many others, on the clarity that President Trump is showing by simply telling the NATO member leaders where things stand.

But on Rush Limbaugh's radio program, some very interesting elements were brought up that reveal just how strongly embedded the mentality actually is among the American political machine that the Cold War is still going on - even to the place where Russia is still referred to as "The Soviet Union."

Bullseye

What Trump can realistically ask from Putin at the Helsinki Summit

Trump Putin


This article appeared on
Aspenia Online on July 12, 2018.

The summit meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Helsinki on July 16 offers an important opportunity to repair the badly damaged relationship between Russia and the United States. A successful outcome would be beneficial to European nations as well, since it could substantially reduce overall East-West tensions. Success, however, depends on President Trump having realistic expectations and not making demands that have no chance of being fulfilled.

Unfortunately, sentiment in the United States in the lead up to the summit is not encouraging. Trump's partisan opponents, as well as the usual flock of congenital hawks, are already pressuring him not to show any inclination to compromise with Russia. Indeed, some critics act as though his mere willingness to meet with Putin shows poor judgment and an appeasement mentality. That attitude surfaced as well when President Trump held a face-to-face meeting with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.

It is an unhealthy, unrealistic view of foreign affairs. A willingness to meet and negotiate in good faith with foreign adversaries is a crucial aspect of successful diplomacy, and Washington has achieved important successes by doing so. Without such policy flexibility, the United States would never have concluded important arms control agreements with the Soviet Union or normalized relations with the People's Republic of China - breakthroughs that benefited both U.S. interests and the welfare of humanity.

Comment: This is a much more reasonable approach to the Putin-Trump summit than we normally read on Western media. However, we should factor in that:
  • Ukraine is currently under the grip of a corrupt, neonazi-sympathizing regime. This is another reason for Russia not to give back Crimea, which overwhelmingly voted to go back to Russia. Any support for the regime in Kiev comes directly from the pressure of neocons and warhawks in or around the White House.
  • President Bashar al-Assad has been legitimately chosen by his own people, and in spite of any criticisms against his administration, he has managed to successfully save his country from terrorists (with the help of Russia). The only reason for Trump to seek his departure is that he is trying to please his Zionist sponsors and Israeli 'friends'.
It is interesting that Trump wants to talk to Putin alone. Is it because he realizes that he cannot trust some U.S. officials who would like to see his relation with Russia fail?


Attention

Trump 'breaches' royal protocol twice after meeting Queen

Trump UK
Few people will have expected Donald Trump to conform to all protocols during his first official visit to Britain - but he nevertheless raised eyebrows when he twice broke with etiquette within minutes of meeting the Queen at Windsor Castle.

The US president was condemned on social media for walking in front of the Queen as they inspected a guard of honour of the Coldstream Guards.

She was left having to decide which side of him to go as she caught up to walk alongside him.


Comment: Much ado about nothing. All said, it looks like his meeting with the Queen went a lot better than Obama's


Jet5

China sends strategic bombers to international army games to demonstrate 'their ability to safeguard territory'

Taiwanese jet fighter jet next to Chinese H-6 bomber
© Taiwan Defense Ministry / AFP
Taiwanese jet fighter jet next to Chinese H-6 bomber
The Chinese air force will send its H-6K strategic bombers to participate in the upcoming International Army Games in Russia later this month, which were praised by the PLA as an effective practice under "real combat conditions."

Airborne troops will be using the aircraft of China's vast air fleet -comprised of J-10A fighters, JH-7A fighter-bombers, H-6K bombers, IL-76 and Y-9 transport aircraft- in showcasing their skills at the games, which kick off July 28. China will join the ranks of 32 nations competing in 26 military contests which will take place at various Russian military training facilities. Last year China came in second, behind Russia and ahead of Kazakhstan.

This year's competition will witness H-6K bombers and Y-9 transport aircraft perform outside of China for the first time in military competitions, a spokesperson for the PLA Air Force announced Thursday.

"Participation in the International Army Games is an effective way to improve fighting capabilities under real combat conditions," Xinhua quoted the spokesperson as saying. "The troops will strengthen military training and war-preparedness to improve their ability to safeguard China's sovereignty and territorial integrity."

Comment: It's understandable that China is showing off it's military prowess considering the relentless antagonism of some players within the US, but unlike it is equally effective within the diplomatic and economic sphere, and it hasn't wasted any time : Also check out SOTT radio's: Behind the Headlines: Trump Ditches Europe, Europe Bluffs, Russia and China Carry on With Eurasian Integration


Toys

Brexit hokey cokey: HoC suspended as white paper thrown to MPs mid debate

Brexit car
© Simon Dawson/ Reuters
Farcical scenes caused the House of Commons to be suspended as MPs weren't given copies of the UK government's Brexit white paper before the new Brexit secretary, Dominic Raab, addressed them.

Raab's attempt to explain the government's position on Brexit to the Commons descended into what Shadow Brexit Secretary Keir Starmer described as an "utter shambles" - with MPs hurriedly throwing copies of the white paper at their parliamentary colleagues during the five minutes that the house was suspended.


Comment:



Unsurprisingly, opposition MPs were particularly aghast at the government's manner in delivering their published paper on Brexit - none more so than Labour's Starmer.

Starmer directed the blame at Raab, who took up the role of chief UK Brexit negotiator this week, telling him: "He's not got off to a very good start. The utter shambles of the last twenty minutes that led to the suspension of the house during a statement is clear evidence Mr Speaker of why the government is in such a mess."

Comment: It doesn't seem like there's much change happening to the current agreement at all. Is that why they delayed delivery of the white paper till the last minute, so ministers wouldn't be prepared to voice their concerns?

Brexit probably always was more about an attempt to claw back power from the divorced from reality, centralised bureaucracy in Brussels who UK citizens hold accountable for their increasingly deteriorating quality of life. And that's partly true. But the problem is also very much closer to home: Also check out SOTTs' new show: NewsReal: Novi-shock! Devious Russians Tire of Spectacular World Cup, Poison Innocent Brits For Laughs




Chess

'This is US law and not a UN law': India's defense chief resists pressure over S-400 deal with Russia

Russian S-400 air-defense systems
© Sergei Karpukhin / Reuters
American laws are their own matter locally and have nothing to do with India, the country's defense chief said, refusing to bow to a US sanctions threat over its planned purchase of Russian S-400 air-defense systems.

New Delhi has relayed to Washington that the threat of unilateral US sanctions will not have an impact on its decision on the possible purchase of S-400 Triumf air defense missile systems from Russia.

"We have told the US Congress delegation that this is US law and not a UN law," India's defense minister Nirmala Sitharaman noted, apparently referring to a US federal bill that was implemented in 2017.

Comment: See also: