Puppet Masters
While our government's debt has been a hot topic for many years, it's the money that we owe China that has been frightening financial analysts, especially since the crash of 2008. The fact that we are indebted to one of our biggest competitors on the global stage, does not bode well for our future. The only question is, what happens if China decides to pull the rug out from under us by ditching these debts?
We may be about to find out, since lately, China has been dropping US government bonds like hot potatoes. After the Chinese government devalued the yuan in August, their currency experienced a massive sell-off by investors who feared that more devaluations were ahead. To contain the situation, China's central bank has been buying up their own currency while selling their dollar reserves.
And China isn't alone either. By July, Russia had sold $32.8 billion in US Treasury debt, and Brazil and Taiwan have been dumping the dollar as well. All of these countries used to be our biggest customers. India has actually increased its holdings, but it hasn't been nearly enough to offset what we've lost. Foreign purchases of US treasury notes and bonds have been in the red throughout 2015, and peaked to about $123 billion in loses last summer; the largest decline since we started keeping track in 1978. While the trend is still young, it appears that the global dollar sell-off has begun in earnest.
One of America's top former generals compared the situation in Syria Tuesday to a historic nuclear disaster, implicitly criticizing the U.S. for allowing it to worsen, and accused Russia's President of trying to re-establish an empire.Ironically, the United States maintains over 800 military bases around the world while occupying Afghanistan since 2001 and carrying out armed operations everywhere from Somalia, Yemen, Iraq, and Syria to the borders of Pakistan. Russia's only overseas base is in fact the naval facility mentioned by Petraeus. Petraeus never elaborates on how despite such obvious disparity between Russia and America regarding foreign policy, why Russia is suspected of pursuing "empire" while the US is not then completely guilty of already establishing and fighting desperately to maintain an immense one.
Russian moves in Syria are designed to bolster and hold on to their naval base and airstrip along the Mediterranean coast of Syria, and shore up the al-Assad regime in order to preserve Russian influence in the Middle East, Petraeus said. "I think that what Vladimir Putin would like to do is resurrect the Russian empire," he said.
Comment: A definitive assessment and overview of the differences between the West and Russia becoming more observable and evidenced as time passes.
- US/NATO Goal: Regime changes via terrorist organizations, to eventually include Iran, Russia, China.
- Russia Goal: Stop Western conquest, seek partners, balance of power, respect of sovereignty, multipolar future.
Those growing pains will ultimately see manifest a new order - which one remains to be determined.
If the Middle East has long been a festering ground for political unrest, ethnic friction and sectarian tension, arguably the direct product of failed Western policies, both Russia and Iran's insistence on challenging the powers has set in motion a new dynamic, one which could yet see a rise of a new geo-political order - where American exceptionalism and Saudi hegemony will no longer hold any diktats over world nations.
Comment: The times are certainly changing, and quick too. The US is beginning to be held responsible for its crimes:
Doctor's Without Borders to formally launch investigation over Afghanistan hospital bombing with commission formed by Geneva Conventions
But of course the West has demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's currently run by psychopaths. The world is at a dangerous crossroads because of that, and it can be expected that the West will not change and suddenly choose the 'sane' path:
US Defence Secretary Ashton Carter 'You'll be sorry' : Russia will soon suffer 'casualties' for Syria involvement

Israeli border policemen take position as they fire tear gas canisters during clashes with Palestinians in the West Bank city of Hebron October 8, 2015.
Thursday attack on the IDF soldier took place near Israel's military headquarters in Tel Aviv when a Palestinian approached the woman with a screwdriver and stabbed her in the neck. He then stabbed three others before being chased. He was shot and killed by another soldier while attempting to flee, a police spokeswoman said.
Comment: The increasing violence by "lone wolf" assailants looks like it could be related to Israel not wanting a two-state solution and providing proof that the Palestinians are not "civilized" enough. The question is who benefits -- certainly not the Palestinians.
On Monday, September 14, Hillary released a campaign video message to show her solidarity with women who have been sexually assaulted and Tweeted some of her quotes from it. She said, "Don't let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed. We're with you."
Hillary certainly is familiar with sexual assault, having spent decades trying to cover it up on behalf of her husband and others, often destroying women's lives in the process. It is Hillary who has demeaned, degraded and in many cases silenced those women unlucky enough to be sexually assaulted by her husband. As I reveal in detail in my upcoming book The Clintons' War on Women, it is Hillary who hired private detectives to track, intimidate, terrorize and silence those women unlucky enough to be sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton.
She has headed the cleanup crew of Bill's sexual assaults on Eileen Wellstone, Juanita Broaddrick, Carolyn Moffet, Liz Ward Gracen, Becky Brown, Helen Dowdy, Paula Jones, Kathy Fergusen, Christy Zercher and Kathleen Willey, among dozens of others.

In Syria, Putin is endearingly nicknamed Abou Ali; a term given to someone who is tough and, the world is learning that when he talks business, he means business.
It may look daunting to ascertain what best represents the major point of view of each stakeholder concerned, let alone to bundle the whole lot together in a manner that makes a comprehensive sense. However, if the main punch lines are considered simultaneously, the picture becomes much clearer.
One can almost conclusively say that the Russian strikes of one single week have been at least much more effective than those of the US-led coalition conducted over the whole last year or so. The actual news of Russian missions are not very detailed. They come in dribs and drabs without the American Hollywood-style razzmatazz that we have got used to ever since the 1991 Operation Desert Storm in Iraq. However, the fact that enemies of the legitimate government of Syria are upset, to say the least, is a clear indication that the Russian strikes are achieving their objectives.
Derivatives are bets. This is not a metaphor, or analogy, or generalization. Derivatives are bets. Period. That's all they ever were. That's all they ever can be. This can be easily illustrated by simply examining and defining some of the more well-known "derivatives", meaning those derivatives with whom everyone is familiar with their labels.
Let's start with the two largest and most-important forms of this gambling (and fraud): "interest rate swaps" and "credit default swaps". What is an interest rate swap? This is a bet between a banker (i.e. the people who control interest rates) and a Chump, on which direction an interest rate will move.
Comment: The derivatives market has been used to bring the world economy to its knees, and it looks like it's about to blow:
Global financial meltdown coming? Clear signs that the great derivatives crisis has now begun

Jason Cone, U.S. executive director of Doctors Without Borders, pauses as he speaks during a press conference Wednesday, Oct. 7, 2015, in New York calling for an independent, international investigation into the U.S. air strike on a hospital in Afghanistan that killed at least 22 people.
The International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission, which was established by the Additional Protocols of the Geneva Conventions, is the only permanent body set up specifically to investigate violations of international humanitarian law. Though it was established in 1991, this investigation marks the first time the Commission has been requested.
"This was not just an attack on our hospital—it was an attack on the Geneva Conventions. This cannot be tolerated," Liu stated. "These Conventions govern the rules of war and were established to protect civilians in conflicts - including patients, medical workers and facilities. They bring some humanity into what is otherwise an inhumane situation."
MSF has asserted that Saturday's airstrike amounts to nothing less than a war crime. Twenty-two people died in the attack, including 12 MSF staff members and 10 patients, and an additional 37 were wounded.
Comment: The United States has literally been getting away with murder for far too long. Let's see if Doctors Without Borders can finally hold them accountable.

US defense minister Ashton Carter speaks at NATO Headquarters in Brussels on October 8, 2015
"This will have consequences for Russia itself which is rightly fearful of attacks ... in coming days, the Russians will begin to suffer from casualties," Carter said at a NATO defence ministers meeting in Brussels dominated by the Syrian crisis.
Comment: A veiled threat? Is the US going to trot out a newer bigger bunch of baddies now? Its certainly not out of concern for Russia or its military incurring casualties that Carter is saying this, so why say it? To sound like he has a better grasp of the situation than the Russians do? And it's not like Russia hasn't had experience fighting terrorists before -- just see what it did to liberate Chechnya from its scourge of Western supported terrorists in the early 2000's.
Media reports soon surfaced claiming the hospital had been targeted because Taliban fighters had been treated there.
"A hospital is a protected facility, we would not target a hospital," Campbell said when asked whether there was ever a scenario in which the United States would justify targeting a medical facility.
On Saturday, a US airstrike on a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, killed more than 20 people, including 12 Doctors Without Borders staff, and wounded more than 37 people.
Campbell argued even if members of the Taliban had been treated at the hospital in Kunduz, US officials would have had no justification to authorize an attack.











Comment: Washington's financial/currency war on China and the Yuan's eclipse of the US dollar