Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Flashlight

No Surrender: The Paranoid English Fantasy Behind Brexit

In the dark imagination of English reactionaries, Britain is always a defeated nation - and the EU is the imaginary invader
bomber dreams
© Francesco Ciccolella / The Guardian
Before the narrative of Len Deighton's bestselling thriller SS-GB begins, there is a "reproduction" of an authentic-looking rubber-stamped document:
"Instrument of Surrender - English Text. Of all British armed forces in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland including all islands."
It is dated 18 February 1941. After ordering the cessation of all hostilities by British forces, it sets down further conditions, including
"the British Command to carry out at once, without argument or comment, all further orders that will be issued by the German Command on any subject. Disobedience of orders, or failure to comply with them, will be regarded as a breach of these surrender terms and will be dealt with by the German Command in accordance with the laws and usages of war."
Written amid the anxieties of Britain's early membership of the European Communities and published in 1978, Deighton's thriller sets up two ideas that will become important in the rhetoric of Brexit. Since there is no sense that Deighton has a conscious anti-EU agenda, the idea seems to arise from a deeper structure of feeling in England. One is the fear of the Englishman turning into the "new European", fitting himself into the structures of German domination. His central character is a harbinger of the "rootless cosmopolitan" who cannot be trusted to uphold English independence and English values, and who therefore functions as the enemy within, the quisling class of pro-Europeans. This is the treason of the elite, the puppet politicians and sleek mandarins who quickly accommodate themselves to the new regime.

Bell

US Senator compares US immigration agency ICE to the KKK

Senator compares ICE to KKK
© Reuters / Joshua Roberts
Activists call for the abolition of ICE.
Progressive Senator Kamala Harris has compared the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement with the Ku-Klux-Klan, at a hearing to fully confirm the controversial agency's acting director, Ronald Vitiello.

Harris is a longtime proponent of slackening border security and"welcoming" immigrant caravans. On Thursday she stuck to her guns, grilling Vitiello on a tweet he made in 2015 calling the Democratic party "neo-Klanist."

The California senator then suggested that Vitiello's agency ICE is the group that should wear the white robes and hood.

"Are you aware of the perception of many about how the power and the discretion at ICE is being used to enforce the laws and do you see any parallels?" she asked.

"I do not see any parallels," Vitiello cut in. "That puts ICE in the same category as the KKK. Is that what you're asking me?"


Handcuffs

Free speech for CNN, but not for Assange?

White House Correspondents
© REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
White House Correspondents' Association dinner attendees raise a glass to the First Amendment.
Two journalists on the bad side of Donald Trump were vindicated this week. One had his White House credentials restored. Another got proof that Uncle Sam wants him behind bars. Guess which one had all the support from the MSM.

CNN's Jim Acosta was kicked out of the White House because the US president didn't like the way the journalist bombarded him with confrontational questions. Less than a week later, a Trump-appointed judge ordered his access restored, at least for the time being. A big win for the freedom of speech in America.

WikiLeaks' Julian Assange is in a self-imposed confinement in Ecuador embassy in London because he believes that if he leaves the British will snatch him and ship to the land of the free to be prosecuted as a spy. His situation did not change much this week, except that his suspicions of a secret indictment were collaborated an Assistant US Attorney, in an apparent slip of the pen.

Comment: See also: US intel would bring Assange to the US in chains


Handcuffs

US intel would bring Assange to the US in chains

Assange
© Getty Images
"I have given up years of my own liberty for the risks we have taken at WikiLeaks to bring truth to the public."
It appears increasingly likely Wikileaks founder and publisher Julian Assange will wind up in the clutches of the U.S. government.

It's hardly surprising, given that in ten years' time, Wikileaks published more classified information than all other media combined. It exposed human rights abuses, government spying, torture, and war crimes on an unprecedented scale.

WikiLeaks put government, corporations and even the Pentagon, the FBI, the CIA and other intel agencies on notice that they could no longer count on operating in secret.

It created a trove of primary source material that serious journalists and researchers will mine for years to come. Its publications are accessible to readers who prefer primary sources to mostly mediated news.

Wikileaks so infuriates the USA's most violent, corrupt, and criminal institutions that Hillary Clinton half-jokingly suggested drone-bombing Assange. Other U.S. politicians called for his execution by other means.

Comment: It will be a sad, sad day for humanity if these self-serving vultures have their way.


Briefcase

Prosecutor accidentally reveals the US has 'secretly charged' Assange

Assange flyers
© Reuters/Daniel Tapia
Julian Assange has been already charged by the US, but the case will remain sealed until the arrest of the whistleblower, WikiLeaks has revealed citing court filings unrelated to its co-founder.

"...no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged," assistant US Attorney Kellen S. Dwyer wrote urging a judge to keep the matter sealed. However, the exact nature of the alleged charges against the whistleblower was not immediately revealed and is not to be disclosed until Assange's arrest, according to the document.

WikiLeaks tweeted the document on Thursday, saying it was an "apparent cut-and-paste error."
SCOOP: US Department of Justice "accidentally" reveals existence of sealed charges (or a draft for them) against WikiLeaks' publisher Julian Assange in apparent cut-and-paste error in an unrelated case also at the Eastern District of Virginia.
- WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 16, 2018
The same court filings were cited in a Washington Post report. The paper said citing its sources that what Dwyer said was true, but the disclosure was unintentional.

Comment: Here's a closer look at the two mentions of 'Assange' in a similar, but actually unrelated, case:

assange charges extradition
assange charges extradition
See also: Julian Assange willing to testify on alleged Russian hacking


Laptop

Federal court: Clinton must answer more questions regarding her emails

Killary
© Patrick Semansky/AP
A federal court is compelling former secretary of state Hillary Clinton to respond to further questions - under oath - about her notorious emails.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued the ruling Wednesday in response to a lawsuit from Judicial Watch, the conservative research and investigative group that has long had its sights on both of the Clintons.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton was jubilant about the decision in a Thursday morning tweet:
"Breaking: Court rules late today Hillary Clinton must answer more email questions - including key [questions] about the setting up of her email system. Court denied our request to unseal vid depositions of Clinton aides. Great work by Michael Bekesha!" - Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) November 15, 2018
The decision is the result of a Freedom of Information lawsuit initiated by Judicial Watch that sought to clarify why Clinton's executive assistant, Huma Abedin, was authorized to be both an employee of the State Department and a "special government employee" for outside jobs, according to news release issued Thursday by Judicial Watch.

The group says the judge gave Clinton 30 days to respond to questions about how she set up her private email server while secretary of state and whether the State Department ever issued any orders or instructions regarding the use of that server.

Comment: Nothing has truly pierced the 'protection cloak' around HRC. Will this time prove to be different?


Question

N. Korea tests mysterious new 'high-tech' tactical weaponry

Kim Jong-un,reporters
© AFP PHOTO/KCNA VIA KNS
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and officials oversee the test of a new "ultramodern" weapon.
The race is on to identify a mysterious weapon developed by North Korea after the country announced the successful test - its first in over a year - of a new "high-tech" weapon providing few additional details.

News of this "newly developed high-tech tactical" weapon was announced by Pyongyang's KCNA news agency on Friday along with a picture of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un talking with officials on a beach test-site. However, the weapon in question cannot be seen and details about its capabilities remain shrouded in secrecy.

Overseeing the test, Kim expressed his "great satisfaction" with the weapon that "builds impregnable defenses of our country and strengthens the fighting power of our people's army," KCNA said.

Sparse additional information provided by KCNA said that the weapon had been commissioned "personally" by Kim's late father and predecessor, Kim Jong-il.

South Korean authorities are working to identify and analyze the weapon in question. However, Seoul's Ministry of Unification believes Kim supervised the test of a traditional weapon rather than a nuclear-capable one, citing that the term "strategic weapon" was not used by the KCNA in their report.


Dominoes

US-funded NGO sinks $4.1M into Nicaraguan protests then says it's 'misleading' to report about it

Nicaraguan Protest
© Reuters/Oswaldo Rivas
Protest against Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega's government in Managua.
Just months after boasting about 'laying the groundwork for insurrection' in Nicaragua, a US government-funded think tank has branded as 'misleading' a Redfish documentary that reports exactly that.

Global Americans, a think tank subsidiary of the US government-funded soft power organization National Endowment for Democracy (NED), has published an article accusing Berlin-based Redfish media (styled 'redfish') of "misleading" the viewer by blaming the ongoing unrest in Nicaragua on American influence.

Branding Redfish a "Kremlin-funded media startup," Global Americans attacks the documentary The New Battle For Nicaragua. The GA article features a big blue stamp with the word 'MISLEADING', and - true to the headline - cuts straight to the root of the problem.

"Why it's misleading: Most importantly, redfish has been identified funded by the Russian government that regularly airs content on Russian television network RT. "

The New Battle For Nicaragua features interviews with both anti-Ortega protesters and supporters of the government. It also explores headlines in the mainstream US media which have mainly focused on the suppression of the protests and portray the 300 fatalities they have caused as victims of the regime. Out of those 300, about 60 died on either side, and the remaining 180 or so could not be directly linked to the protests, Redfish says.


Comment: NED has disrupted societies all over the globe in the 'name of democracy.'


Hiliter

Trump answered Mueller's questions for the Russia probe, has yet to submit them

Trump and pen
© Reuters/Jonathan Ernst
President Donald Trump, November 16, 2018.
President Trump has said that he has answered questions for Special Counsel Robert Mueller's 'Russiagate' investigation, but has not submitted those answers yet.

"I was asked a series of questions. I've answered them very easily," he told reporters on Friday. "You always have to be careful answering questions with people who probably have bad intentions."

Asked about his comments on Twitter the day before, in which he blasted Mueller and his "gang of Democrat thugs," Trump said nothing in particular had brought that on.

"I'm not agitated," he said. "It's a hoax, the whole thing is a hoax." There should have never been an investigation, he argued, because there had been no wrongdoing by him or his campaign during the 2016 election. "The witch hunt should've never taken place. I imagine it's ending now," Trump added.

The president confirmed he wrote the answers himself, rather than have lawyers do it, but has not submitted the documents to the special counsel yet.

Comment: What is Mueller's intention regarding the president's Q&A if his Russiagate probe is 'ending now'? A last gasp?


Arrow Up

Media prediction: Early general election inevitable; Netanyahu opposes it

Bennett/Netanyahu
© Miriam Alster/Flash90
Education Minister Naftali Bennett • Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
The reports about early general elections started to occur days after Avigdor Lieberman left his position as the country's defence minister in the wake of a controversial cease-fire with Gaza militants. His Yisrael Beytenu party then left the country's ruling coalition, thus leaving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with a fragile majority.

The meeting between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Education Minister Naftali Bennett earlier in the day resulted in the decision to hold early general elections in Israel, Haaretz reports, citing sources close to Bennett.

However, shortly after Netanyahu's office issued a statement refuting reports about the election, warning of the repetition 1992, when a right-wing party left the coalition, the Labour party won the subsequent election, and then-prime minister Yitzhak Rabin signed the Oslo Accords.

Comment: Manipulating its own government for a change? See also: