Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Eye 2

Trump has quietly ordered the elimination of Julian Assange

assange
© Inconnu
Julian Assange
The destruction of Assange has clearly been arranged for, at the highest levels of the U.S. Government, just as the destruction of Jamal Khashoggi was by Saudi Arabia's Government.

On June 28th, the Washington Examiner headlined "Pence pressed Ecuadorian president on country's protection of Julian Assange" and reported that
"Vice President Mike Pence discussed the asylum status of Julian Assange during a meeting with Ecuador's leader on Thursday, following pressure from Senate Democrats who have voiced concerns over the country's protection of the WikiLeaks founder."
Pence had been given this assignment by U.S. President Donald Trump. The following day, the Examiner bannered "Mike Pence raises Julian Assange case with Ecuadorean president, White House confirms" and reported that the White House had told the newspaper, "They agreed to remain in close coordination on potential next steps going forward."

Comment: Sputnik interviewed British human rights activist Peter Tatchell on Assange's plight:
Sputnik: How likely is it the Julian Assange will be extradited by the Ecuadorian government?

Peter Tatchell: I'm afraid to say that we simply don't know, all we do know for certain is the Ecuadorian authorities have been turning the screw on Julian Assange with the special protocols that have restricted his freedom of expression and his ability to communicate with the outside world and to receive visitors.

All this looks like a deliberate attempt to make life so inhospitable and so difficult for Julian Assange that he will voluntarily leave the Embassy and of course this latest speculation which is really all it is, but I guess it's got some basis, there is some kind of an agreement being drawn up by Ecuador, UK and the US to get him out of the Embassy and to possibly extradite him to the US.

Now, this would be a very big turn around by the Ecuadorian's because they have granted him not only citizenship but also asylum, and so therefore to hand over someone who has been given asylum to a foreign power that is a very big, extraordinary and I think morally questionable step.

Sputnik: What's your take on his mentality and his particular stance, does he just want to see it through to the death, so to speak, in remaining in the Ecuadorian Embassy?

Peter Tatchell: Certainly we do you know that Julian Assange is very determined to resist extradition to the United States, he doesn't want to leave the Embassy unless he can be given safe passage to Ecuador which is what we would expect given that he has legitimately claimed political asylum.

The conditions being imposed upon him by the British in terms of not recognizing his legitimate asylum status that is pretty extraordinary and we also know that the United States several years ago began convening a secret grand jury with a view of slapping Julian Assange with very, very serious charges which are likely to put him in prison for 30, 40 or 50 years.

These are all related, of course, to WikiLeaks publication of leaks about US government military policy, including war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the US or US agents and forces. If he was forced out of the Embassy and managed to try and seek some kind of compromise or deal, it's very hard to see how he can escape being extradited to the US because senior US officials in the Trump administration have said time and time again that Julian Assange is a target, they want to get him, they're determined to get him, they're going to put him on trial, so in that sort of situation his prospects look pretty bleak.

Sputnik: Have you actually spoken to Julian Assange recently Peter? And if so what is his state of mind?

Peter Tatchell: No I haven't because his visitor regime has been severely restricted, the Ecuadorians are only allowing very, very few visitors and even though his visitors that do go and understand that the Ecuadorians will reserve the right to seize any property they're caring and to hand it over to Britain and the United States.

These conditions are very, very extreme and, as you say, I know others that have been in contact with him recently, that Julian's mental and physical health is very much in jeopardy. Even prisoners in a maximum-security jail have more freedom and freedom of movement than Julian Assange has had in that Embassy. Whatever you think about Julian Assange and things he may have done or said or accusations against him, it take someone of considerable courage to endure all these years of being holed up in the Embassy.

Sputnik: What options does Assange have to avoid extradition to the US? Julian Assange is a citizen of Australia, why hasn't that country taken his case into their hands and done more?

Peter Tatchell: We don't know, we can speculate, Australian government is center-right, it's quite well aligned with the US administration, it has a tradition of following US policy, conceding US requests, so I would be very, very surprised if Australian kicked up a fuss because they haven't in all these years and the British government the same, you would think the British government would recognize its own obligations under the refugee convention to acknowledge that Assange has been granted asylum by Ecuador and therefore grant him safe passage to their country, but I'm afraid the British, for whatever reason, are just ain't doing it.

Sputnik: Just give us some commonsense approach, what would you like to be seen to be done by the British administration, for example?

Peter Tatchell: The British government is totally consumed by Brexit and everything else is just gone to the wall, but even if there wasn't Brexit I think it's pretty clear that the British government has indicated that it's not going to seek a compromise. Now my view is we have to ask ourselves is it in the public interest here in Britain for Assange to be pursued in this way, is it really in the public interest?

And my answer is it's clearly not, even if you accept that Assange is a bad guy and did bad things I don't see how it fits with the public interest here in Britain to treat him in this way.

I would've expected there to be some kind of deal where Assange would face legal action for having skipped bail because when he went to the Embassy he did skip bail, he has a price to pay, but it should be a fine or maybe a very short term of imprisonment that's the maximum but the deal could be agreed and should be agreed, then of course Britain should allow him safe passage to Ecuador, but all our attempts to try to influence the British government to take that line have met with brick walls. The British government is really lining up with the Americans and I fear for Julian's state.



Cow Skull

Fiascos multiply: Avenatti's law practice evicted from LA offices

Michael Avenatti
© Reuters/Lucas Jackson
Michael Avenatti, lawyer for adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, also known as Stormy Daniels, speaks to media outside federal court in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., April 16, 2018.
Stormy Daniels' embattled lawyer Michael Avenatti lost a last-ditch appeal Friday to block the eviction of his law practice from its California offices, according to a new report.

Avenatti - who was busted earlier this week in LA on domestic violence allegations - now needs to move out of his ocean-view suite in a Newport Beach office building after Orange County Superior Court Judge Robert J. Moss affirmed an October order that the attorney and his staff vacate the premises, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Avenatti's longtime firm, Eagan Avenatti, had skipped four months of rent payments - totaling $213,254 - prompting the landlord, Irvine Co., to sue for eviction.

Comment: Yet the delusional Avenatti still considers himself presidential material.


Pirates

Blowback: An Inside Look at How US-Funded Fascists in Ukraine Mentor US White Supremacists

Not only are white supremacists from across the West flocking to Ukraine to learn from the combat experience of their fascist brothers-in-arms, they are doing so openly, under the nose of a shrugging law enforcement - chronicling their experiences on social media before they bring their lessons back home...
azov battalion
© Efrem Lukatsky | AP
Volunteers of the Azov Battalion carry portraits of members killed in the war conflict with separatists in the country’s east, at a rally marking Fatherland Defender Day in Kiev, Ukraine, Oct. 14, 2016.
Last month, an unsealed FBI indictment of four American white supremacists from the Rise Above Movement (RAM) declared that the defendants had trained with Ukraine's Azov Battalion, a neo-Nazi militia officially incorporated into the country's national guard. The training took place after the white supremacist gang participated in violent riots in Huntington Beach and Berkeley, California and Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017.

The indictment stated that the Azov Battalion "is believed to have participated in training and radicalizing United States-based white supremacy organizations."

After a wave of racist violence across America that culminated in the massacre of twelve Jewish worshippers at a Pittsburgh synagogue, the revelation that violent white supremacists have been traveling abroad for training and ideological indoctrination with a well-armed neo-Nazi militia should cause extreme alarm.


Comment: Indeed, though not quite in the way you might imagine. What this dynamic shows is that actual white supremacists should give extreme cause for alarm when they are being protected and funded by Western intelligence agencies for the purpose of making ALL nationalism seem evil...


Bullseye

'Judgement Day' nears: Analyst on why Clinton may finally end up behind bars

clinton
© REUTERS / Jim Bourg
While the rumours about Hillary Clinton's potential third presidential run continue to circulate in the media, the conservative camp is seemingly determined to "lock her up." Speaking to Sputnik, Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel explains why "judgement day" for the Clinton Foundation is near.

It appears that US conservatives are not going to let former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton go. Controversy is still simmering around the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton's email scandal. Charles Ortel, a Wall Street analyst and investigative journalist who has been conducting a private investigation into the Clintons' charity, calls the Clinton Foundation the biggest charity fraud ever.

The analyst emphasizes the importance of November 15 as a date for the Clintons, suggesting that the truth about their charity may soon emerge.

For his part, Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch tweeted November 15 that the Federal Court ruled that Hillary Clinton will have to answer the watchdog's further questions concerning her Clinton.com, non-state.gov email system.
​"The public and the media have a right to a full accounting from top officials of the Clinton State Department," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

Sputnik: Why is November 15, 2018 a crucial date for the Clinton Foundation?

Charles Ortel: Under US federal laws, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation ("BHCCF") must file a complete, truthful report on IRS Form 990 by the close of business on November 15, 2018 concerning its operations and financial results for 2017. This is the final filing deadline and no extensions are possible.

In addition, BHCCF must file reports with numerous states by 15 November 2018. Many of these states impose tough filing requirements - one example is New York State, which, effectively, is the base from which BHCCF's global network of purported charities is run.

Unlike the IRS, New York requires charities to list out all of their subsidiaries, branches and affiliates, to provide details concerning all of the grants given to them by governments (foreign and domestic), and to procure an audit from an independent and certified professional accounting firm that is wholly consistent with US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Since 1998, when these New York laws were applied, BHCCF has never complied and therefore has been in gross, uncured violation of laws which the state has enforced vigorously, including with respect to the Trump Foundation.

Comment:


Star of David

Mounting electoral pressure may push Israel into new Gaza attack say analysts

Netanyahu
© Reuters/Eddie Keogh
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Mr. Netanyahu could opt for an escalation if he feels he is losing electoral ground to the country's far-right...

An already volatile situation on the Israel-Gaza border could become even tenser if Israel moves towards early elections, Palestinian analysts say, warning that a wave of violence could once-again flare-up between the two rival territories.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing pressure to head for early polls, which could come as soon as February, after Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman resigned and pulled his far-right Yisrael Beitenu party out of the prime minister's ruling coalition this week, leaving it with only 61 out of 120 seats in the Knesset.

Another far-right party, Jewish Home, is calling for early elections after its leader, Naftali Bennett, was rebuffed Friday in his demand to become the new defence minister so that he could, in his own words, lead Israel to victory over Hamas.

Mr. Netanyahu's government was thrown into discord when the prime minister agreed to a ceasefire with Palestinian fighters on Tuesday after a new round of violence between Israeli forces and Hamas killed six Gazans and one Israeli.

Both Mr Lieberman and Mr Bennett charge the prime minister with responding weakly by accepting a ceasefire. Mr. Lieberman accused the prime minister of "capitulating to terror."

Comment: See also:


Question

In creating an EU army, could Europe easily get rid of American political diktat?

NATO exercise
© Reuters/Rafael Marchante
NATO soldiers participate in NATO Exercise Trident Juncture in Troia, near Setubal, Portugal November 5, 2015.
The creation of a European army would be a boon for Russia-EU relations, various military experts have told RT. It would mean getting rid of the US political diktat - and that's why Washington will not allow it.

Were the European Union to create an army of its own, as French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel have recently suggested, the friction with NATO would be enormous, several military and political analysts predict. At the same time, an EU army would be a tremendous tool for normalizing relations with Russia.

NATO would be obsolete

For the European Union, having its own army is a sort of "national liberation" idea, says Leonid Ivashov, a retired general of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) and President of the Academy for Geopolitical Problems.

While NATO is there, European security is always governed from Washington, Ivashov says. It's always an American general or admiral in charge of the force in Europe. Washington dictates what the EU should be afraid of - and it says the main threat is Russia. That threat is, in fact, an imagined one.
"Nobody is threatening Europe. Russia doesn't want to conquer Europe in the least. Russia wants to trade, to cooperate, mostly in economy. And Europeans understand that."
The problem with NATO is that Europe has come to trust it too much. After the Soviet Union fell apart, the trans-Atlantic alliance has been looking for a pretext to remain intact. It took it upon itself to protect Europe from terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, illegal drugs and migration.

Comment: The US is an occupational force for most of the world. The EU hasn't, nor will have, anything in comparison. The best it could expect to do is protect its sources - of which the US is one. NATO will likely remain the construct: an adjunct confederation.


Star of David

Bluster: Israel says it's capable of taking out S-300 and S-400, but won't do this

S-300s
© Sputnik / Pavel Lisitsyn
Russian S-300s
The deployment of the Russian-made S-300 in Syria has not brought an end to Israeli military operations in the region, Israeli publicist Avigdor Eskin has told Sputnik.

"Israel is capable of overcoming both S-300 and S-400," Israeli publicist and political commentator Avigdor Eskin told Sputnik. "As a matter of fact, the Israeli Air Force (IAF) did it successfully several times in Syria."

Regardless of this, Israel does not have any intention to spoil its working relations with Moscow, the political commentator underscored.
"The issue is rather political and not military," Eskin explained. "Israel does not want to harm positive and constructive relations with Russia. We do not want to demonstrate our far advanced superiority over Russian air forces. We have no intentions of controlling Syria and therefore we will always look for friendly compromise with the Russians."
In October, Moscow delivered the S-300 system to Syria following the accidental downing of the Russian Il-20 surveillance plane by Syrian forces in September 2018. The incident was blamed on the IAF which was conducting military operations in the Syrian airspace at the time of tragedy. Tel Aviv vehemently denied the accusations.

Eskin's comment comes in response to reports of Israel's alleged training to take out the Russian-made S-300 long range surface-to-air missile systems during its latest drills in Greece.

Comment: See also:


Footprints

It's a 'migrant tsunami': Tijuana mayor threatens deportation of US-bound migrants amid tensions, clashes

Tijuana migrants
© Reuters / Claudia Daut
Migrants heading to the US in Tijuana, Baja, Mexico
The arrival of growing crowds of migrants to Tijuana has led to increased tensions and clashes with locals, with the mayor warning that those who disturb the "tranquility and security" of his city will be deported.

The arrival of the first members of the caravan to Tijuana triggered an anti-migrant backlash in the Mexican border city. Tijuana's mayor, Juan Manuel Gastelum, is leading the charge to have the troublemakers expelled and is asking the federal government for help to deal with the influx.
"No city in the world is prepared to receive this - if I'm allowed - this avalanche," he said during a news conference at City Hall. "It is a tsunami. There is concern among all citizens of Tijuana. There will be zero tolerance to any conduct that violates the law and social order. Protecting the safety of the Tijuanans is the top priority."
Any members of the migrant community that are violent will be handed over to immigration authorities so that they be deported to their country of origin, Gastelum said on Friday. In an earlier interview with local TV, Gastelum called the migrants "bums" (vagos) and "pot smokers"(mariguanos) who do nothing but disturb the "tranquility and security of Tijuana."


Comment: Mexican border towns will bear the brunt of the influx as the US applies its legal recourse, picking and choosing in a timely manner...or not.


Star of David

Israel: PM Netanyahu takes over the defense minister job portfolio

Netanyahu
© Russian Press Office
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will take up the daily responsibilities of the defence minister after Avigdor Lieberman's resignation on Wednesday.

A spokesperson for his Likud party said on Friday that Netanyahu will handle the defence portfolio himself after he and his key coalition partner Naftali Bennett of the Jewish Home Party couldn't reach an agreement, Reuters reported.

Netanyahu also spoke by phone with his coalition partners, urging them to "make every effort not to bring down the right-wing government" and to prevent the left from getting into power, the spokesperson said.

A source close to Bennett told Reuters that failure to reach an agreement could lead to early elections, as "there was a need to go to elections as soon as possible with no possibility of continuing the current government."

Israeli media reported that other coalition partners would oppose Bennett's ambitions of becoming the defence minister.

Comment: The political force behind Netanyahu may be waning, but it doesn't matter because psychopathy runs strong in Israel, no matter who is in charge.


Snakes in Suits

'Spygate' figure Joseph Mifsud - once rumored to be dead - resurfaces, willing to testify before Senate

mueller
© Getty Images
A lawyer for the Maltese professor who told former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos that the Russians had "dirt" on Hillary Clinton says his client will testify in front of the Senate.

BuzzFeed reports that Stephan Roh, attorney for Professor Joseph Mifsud, wrote in an email that Mifsud "is to testify in front of the US Senate - we are working towards his appearance."

Lawyers for the Democratic National Committee wrote in a September court filing for their Russia lawsuit that they believed Mifsud was "missing and may be deceased."