Puppet Masters
"We do think that's essential, especially as we open up international travel," Cebu Pacific President and CEO Lance Gokongwei said in a briefing in Malacañang on Monday.
"I think we have to work on a global COVID passport, so that each country respects the passport and recognizes that if you do have this COVID passport, that you have already been vaccinated by a credible vaccination source," he added. "If the tourism and travel industries recover, this is an absolute necessity."
U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan granted the Department of Justice's (DOJ) motion to dismiss the case as moot following the pardon in a 43-page decision that took issue with Flynn's conduct in the case as well as prosecutors' sudden to decision in May to drop charges against one of the president's allies.
"The history of the Constitution, its structure, and the Supreme Court's interpretation of the pardon power make clear that President Trump's decision to pardon Mr. Flynn is a political decision, not a legal one," Sullivan, who was appointed by former President Clinton, wrote. "Because the law recognizes the President's political power to pardon, the appropriate course is to dismiss this case as moot. However, the pardon 'does not, standing alone, render [Mr. Flynn] innocent of the alleged violation.'"
Comment: See also:
- Judge Emmet Sullivan is still refusing to dismiss Michael Flynn case
- 'In Defense of Our Vote': General Flynn calls for suspension of the Constitution to prevent Civil War
- Trump pardons General Flynn - let's hope he's just getting warmed up
- Justice: Trump pardons former NatSec Adviser Michael Flynn
- Trump tells allies he plans to pardon Michael Flynn
- Flynn attorney Sydney Powell vows to expose Dem collusion behind prominent voting machine firm: 'I'm going to RELEASE THE KRAKEN'
- Obama official Ben Rhodes admits Biden camp is already working with foreign leaders... which is exactly what they persecuted General Flynn for

Ilhan Omar's husband received $635,000 in Covid-19 bailout money for his consulting firm, despite the congresswoman paying his company nearly $2.25 million this year, according to a new report
Tim Mynett's E Street Group was given $134,800 in Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans and an additional $500,000 in Economic Injury Disaster loans (EIDL) in April, records show.
Mynett co-owns the Washington D.C. firm, which has also been paid $2,256,700 since the start of 2020 from Omar's campaign for services that include digital advertising, fundraising consulting and website production, campaign records show.
DailyMail.com revealed that Omar married the political consultant back in March, which sparked scrutiny and a complaint to the Federal Election Commission by a conservative group that alleged campaign funds paid for Mynett's personal travel.
The FEC has taken no public action on that complaint, and Omar, 38, has said payments to Mynett's firm were legitimate.
Still, Omar announced in mid-November that her campaign was terminating its contract to 'make sure that anybody who is supporting our campaign with their time or financial support feels there is no perceived issue with that support'.
Comment: See also:
- 'O'Keefed': Ilhan Omar connected cash-for-ballots voter fraud scheme exposed by Project Veritas - UPDATE: Trump calls for investigation
- Filings show Ilhan Omar paid third husband's consulting firm nearly $900,000 since 2018
- Rep. Ilhan Omar's husband files for divorce after affair bombshell
- Ilhan Omar plays to her radical base: 'Time to disband Minneapolis Police Department'
- Ilhan Omar's lawyer is finding two marriages hard to explain
- More trouble in Omar-land: DC mom says husband dumped her for congressman Omar - files for divorce
- FBI finally reviewing claims Ilhan Omar married her brother in immigration fraud scheme
- 'Squad' member Ilhan Omar pays husband's firm another $600,000, bringing total to more than $1.6 Million
- Divorce filing: Wife says Democrat consultant had affair with Ilhan Omar
- Complaint alleges Ilhan Omar violated campaign finance law to pursue affair with married Democratic consultant
On Friday, Palestinian teenager Ali Abu Alia was killed by Israeli occupation soldiers, shot in the abdomen. It was during a demonstration at his home town of Al Mughayyir, against a nearby Jewish Israeli settlement expansion. According to Defense for Children International Palestine he was on the sideline, merely "observing clashes" .
Now if you read the Israeli military statement on this, as featured in the Haaretz report, it seems to get really complex, as it were:
The Israeli military said that there were riots in the area, but denied using live fire. Rioters used burned tires and tried to block the road, an IDF spokesperson said, and Israeli forces responded with rubber bullets and "Ruger" guns, which have a low muzzle speed.So the logic, as formulated here, is that the "Ruger" gun is not "live fire", since it has "low muzzle speed".
Comment: Israel's atrocities against Palestinians are happening on a daily basis, and still nobody is holding Israel responsible.
- Shot in the head by Israel
- Israel calls in Air Force to kill single Palestinian man at Gaza security fence
- Israeli troops kill Palestinian near Gaza border, medical officials say
- Israeli strikes kill 10 in Gaza, rockets hit Israel
- Israel accused of illegally spraying toxic herbicides on Palestinian farmlands, destroying crops and contaminating water supply
- IDF denies involvement as two Palestinians have been killed in drone strike
- Israel DEMOLISHES 51 Palestinian structures in East Jerusalem as destruction continues in 'unprecedented manner'
- Psychopathic Israel troops 'kill Palestinian teen' in West Bank
- Horror: One Palestinian child has been killed by Israel every 3 days for the past 13 years
- Israeli soldiers kill unarmed Palestinian in West Bank for 'rapidly approaching' a guard post
The Federal Reserve's actions artificially lower interest rates, thus distorting the signals sent by the rates, which are the price of money. Artificially low interest rates cause investments to be made in projects that are not supported by the real underlying market conditions. This results in a boom, inevitably followed by a crash, then by a new round of money creation and government bailouts restarting the cycle.
Comment: See also:
- The US dollar is being systematically destroyed, and we are on a path that inevitably leads to hyperinflation
- Federal Reserve is creating hyperinflation like in Zimbabwe, Germany's Weimar Republic
- Living Under the Spectre of Hyperinflation: 1923 Weimar and Today
- Macroeconomic analyst: Global gold supplies tighten but the money for hyperinflation has been printed
- Economist: Fed triggered the big stock sell-off - and the almighty dollar's next, 'this kind of thing eventually gives you hyperinflation'
The mass media are reporting that the Biden camp has selected former general Lloyd J. Austin III to be the next secretary of defense, assuaging fears among antiwar activists that the position would go to bloodthirsty psychopath Michele Flournoy as commonly predicted.
As has become the standard ritual for Biden's cabinet picks, the mass media are holding a parade to celebrate the fact that Austin would be the first black chief of the US war machine, while virtually ignoring the murderous agendas he has facilitated throughout his career. As head of Central Command, Austin actively campaigned to resurrect the Pentagon's spectacularly failed program of trying to arm "rebels" in Syria to fight ISIS, and in 2014 he backed immunity for US troops from war crimes prosecutions by the government of Afghanistan. He helped spearhead the Iraq invasion, and he is a member of the same private equity fund which invests in defense contractors as Flournoy and Biden's warmongering pick for secretary of state, Tony Blinken.
Why it matters: The alleged operation offers a rare window into how Beijing has tried to gain access to and influence U.S. political circles.
- While this suspected operative's activities appear to have ended during the Obama administration, concerns about Beijing's influence operations have spanned President Trump's time in office and will continue to be a core focus for U.S. counterintelligence during the Biden administration.

Clockwise from top left: Fang with then-Dublin City Councilmember Eric Swalwell at an October 2012 student event; undated photo of Fang, now former Fremont Mayor Bill Harrison and Rep. Judy Chu; Fang with then-Rep. Mike Honda and then-San Jose city Councilmember Ash Kalra at a March 2014 event at the Chinese Embassy in D.C.
The British Health Secretary Matt Hancock teared up live on air talking about the UK starting to administer the Covid-19 vaccine, with the first male candidate to receive a jab sharing a name with world-famous English playwright.
Hancock appeared emotional on the Good Morning Britain program this Tuesday. "It's been such a tough year for so many people," the MP said, after host Piers Morgan noticed him wiping away a tear.
"There's William Shakespeare putting it so simply for everybody, that we can get on with our lives, though there are still a few months to go," Hancock uttered, referring to the 81-year-old Shakespeare saying that the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine could "make the difference to our lives."
Comment: Hope the doctors are watching carefully. Things can rapidly go pear-shaped.
Public needs to prep for vaccine side effects
This summer, computational biologist Luke Hutchison volunteered for a trial of Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine. But after the second injection, his arm swelled up to the size of a "goose egg," Hutchison says. He can't be sure he got the vaccine and not a placebo, but within a few hours, Hutchison, who was healthy and 43, was beset by bone and muscle aches and a 38.9°C fever. "I started shaking. I had cold and hot rushes," he says. "I was sitting by the phone all night long thinking: 'Should I call 911?'"
Hutchison's symptoms resolved after 12 hours. But, he says, "Nobody prepared me for the severity of this."
He says the public should be better prepared than he was, because a subset of people may face intense, if transient, side effects, called reactogenicity, from Moderna's vaccine. Some health experts agree.
- Ben Swann: Vaccine study halted over "serious adverse side effects" - UPDATE: AstraZeneca jab showing adverse effectsAstraZeneca suspends US COVID-19 vaccine trial amid serious concerns, trials continue in South Africa
- Johnson & Johnson pauses COVID-19 vaccine trials over participant's 'unexplained illness'
- Google & Oracle to monitor Americans who get Warp Speed's Covid-19 vaccine for up to TWO years
"When the federal statutes speak of 'the election'... they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder... By establishing a particular day as 'the day' on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say." Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 (1997)We will take a closer at this binding precedent below, but in preview, please understand that it emanates from a 9-0 decision of the United States Supreme Court, wherein the entire Court joined, not just the outcome, but also the opinion on this very point.
The voters vote. The officials count. These combined actions form "the election," and the election must be decided on the day. States that failed to make a final selection of officeholder by midnight after Election Day have violated the statute, subjecting the nation at large to the very evils Congressionally mandated deadlines were drafted to prevent.
Federal Election Day statutes were designed to curtail fraud, and to infuse a prima facie sense of integrity in our electoral process. But these States - in failing to obey Congressional deadlines - have flagrantly attempted to preempt federal law. This is certainly prohibited, and this is why the late election results are void.
Citizens may file actions in the Federal District Courts and appeal all the way to the Supreme Court. Get this information to your State Representatives and Senators. Forward it to the White House if you know anyone with connections. Blog it. Video it. Podcast it. Share it in comments, please. The President's team has not made this argument yet. They have not plead it. And they must get up to speed.
Your pursuit of happiness is directly infected. You have a cause of action.
This is the peaceful, legal battle plan of the Republic. Let's roll.
Comment: Officials are still counting ballots, in fact, recounting ballots. This action was not completed on Election Day as stipulated by law. Thus, according to the legalities outlined above, it seems the 2020 election is void. We shall see if and how this plays out in the Supreme Court, the states and political parties.

Mark Zuckerberg and State of Georgia precincts
Then imagine this nonprofit group re-granted the millions of dollars to local election officials to "help" them carry out the 2020 election — buying drop boxes for ballots, hiring temporary staff, conducting "voter education," and the like.
Finally, imagine that in 2020, a state that usually voted for the other party in presidential elections narrowly flipped to the donor's preferred party, and counties receiving "help" were disproportionately ones that helped the Republican win the state, with many counties shifting dramatically from their historical patterns in a red-ward direction.
Even supposing there were perfectly ethical and legal reasons for all this, because of the appearance of election influence from private parties with deep pockets, it would be front-page news. The New York Times would be outraged a nonprofit gave the appearance of acting in a partisan basis in an electoral process. Elected officials in the disfavored party would be loudly objecting, threatening lawsuits, demanding investigations of the election officials who accepted the funds, and insisting election laws be changed to prevent any such effort in the future.
As head of Capital Research Center, a watchdog on the use and abuse of nonprofits, I would sympathize with the angry politicians and happily critique the scheme publicly. But I know of no such effort by right-leaning donors or nonprofits.
Comment: Did Mark Zuckerberg help to buy the election for Biden? Did he confine his calculated 'philanthropy' to Georgia's precincts or were other states willing recipients in this pay-to-influence scheme?













Comment: See also: