Welcome to Sott.net
Sat, 02 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Putin

Putin: Mandatory vaccination shouldn't be forced on anyone, people should just be encouraged to get jab instead

Putin
© Sputnik / Mikhail Voskresenskiy
Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with members of the United Russia party to discuss its election platform in the upcoming parliamentary elections scheduled for September 17-19, in Moscow, Russia.
Those who are reluctant or anxious about signing up for a Covid-19 vaccine should be encouraged and incentivized to roll up their sleeves, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said, while railing against coercion and intimidation.

Speaking on Sunday as part of a meeting with members of the governing United Russia party, ahead of parliamentary elections next month, Putin paid tribute to those behind the immunization drive. "We need to do everything we can to overcome this pandemic," he said, "and the best tool we have in this fight is vaccination."

However, at the same time, the president insisted that there must be "no imposition" of jabs on the public, and that the rationale for signing up for doses to protect against Covid-19 "needs to be explained." According to Putin, "it is possible, and necessary, to create different kinds of incentives" in order to increase the number of people eager to be immunized, and these are preferable to tough rules and undue pressure.

Comment: As with the majority of leaders on the planet, it's difficult to know Putin's real thoughts on the manufactured Covid hysteria, because they're all clearly being leaned on by some incredible (if fallible) force, but, as of now, it would appear that he's at least taking the least draconian stance he can possibly take, particularly when compared with his Western counterparts:


Bullseye

'Situation in Kabul calm for eight days, no alternative to the Taliban' - Russian ambassador

Afghanistan kabul airport
© Shekib Rahmani/AP Photo
Hundreds of people gather near a US Air Force C-17 transport plane at a perimeter at the international airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, August 16, 2021
Russia's Ambassador to Afghanistan Dmitry Zhirnov has said that he does not believe in the expansion of the radical Taliban movement (outlawed in Russia) to other countries.

"I do not believe in it (the expansion - TASS). I do not believe that they will go [to other countries]. They have too much to do at home. The country is destroyed," he said on the YouTube channel Solovyev Live on Saturday when asked if expansion was part of the Taliban's plans.

The situation has been calm in Kabul for eight days, Russia's Ambassador to Afghanistan Dmitry Zhirnov said on the YouTube channel Solovyev Live on Saturday.

Comment: Al Jazeera provides more commentary from Ambassador Zhirnov:
Ambassador Dmitry Zhirnov says the Taliban has made encouraging pledges and dismisses resistance efforts as doomed.

Russia's ambassador to Afghanistan has praised the conduct of the Taliban in the days since its takeover, saying there was no alternative to the hardline group and resistance to it would fail.

The comments on Friday by Ambassador Dmitry Zhirnov reflect efforts by Russia to deepen already well-established ties with the Taliban while stopping short, for now, of recognising them as the legitimate rulers of a country Moscow tried and failed to control before the Soviet Union withdrew its last forces in 1989.

Russia wants to ensure that the instability in Afghanistan does not spill over into Central Asia, part of the former Soviet Union it regards as its own back yard, and that the region does not become a launchpad for other armed groups.

Speaking to Reuters news agency from Kabul by Zoom, Zhirnov said the security situation in the capital was much better than it was before the Taliban took control of it and spoke optimistically about the future.

"The mood in Kabul can be described as one of cautious hope," said Zhirnov.

"There was a bad regime which disappeared and people are hopeful. They say it can't be worse so it should be better. But this is another test for the Taliban to pass. After they restore order, they should start improving the socioeconomic situation," he said.

Zhirnov's comments contrast sharply with those of some Western politicians and rights activists who are deeply sceptical that the Taliban has moderated its violence towards those they see as incompatible with their nascent emirate governed by strict Islamic law.


Western politicians may be sceptical but they also had 18 months to prepare for their withdrawal knowing that the Kabul administration would fall and yet the only real chaos we see in Afghanistan is that caused by, and surrounding areas held by, the West: UK's Afghanistan evacuation plane empty amidst Kabul airport chaos, despite having '18 months to prepare'


Zhirnov said the facts on the ground had changed and the Taliban had made a set of encouraging pledges.


"We can't wave reality aside. They [the Taliban] are the de facto authorities. There is no alternative to the Taliban in Afghanistan," said Zhirnov.

The son of Ahmad Shah Massoud, one of the main leaders of Afghanistan's anti-Soviet resistance in the 1980s, has pledged to hold out against the Taliban from his stronghold in the Panjshir Valley north of Kabul.

Afghan First Vice President Amrullah Saleh has also said he is in Afghanistan and the "legitimate caretaker president" after President Ashraf Ghani fled.


Ousted president Ghani did a runner with 1 helicopter and 4 cars stuffed with cash.


Zhirnov said Saleh's declaration violated the constitution and that Panjshir-based attempts to resist the Taliban were doomed.

"They have no military prospects. There are not many people there. As far as we know they have 7,000 armed people. And they already have problems with fuel. They tried to fly a helicopter but they have no petrol and no supplies," he said.

Zhirnov also questioned the idea that all of the Afghans trying to flee the country were doing so because of the Taliban.

"Many people now see this situation ... as a possible ticket to a new life [in the West] and this may not be related to the Taliban," he said of the chaotic exodus.
For more on the situation in Afghanistan, check out SOTT radio's:



Footprints

Tony Blair calls US Afghanistan withdrawal 'imbecilic' - What, then, was the Bush-Blair invasion of 2001?

BushBlair
© Reuters/Win McNamee
Bush and Blair met in Washington to discuss the ongoing operations in Afghanistan, November 7, 2001.
Serial warmonger Tony Blair has blasted the US decision to pull out from Afghanistan, but history tells us the real madness was invading the unconquerable country in the first place.

Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair -aka 'The Blair Creature'- is not a happy bunny this Sunday, folks. He has said that the decision to withdraw western forces from Afghanistan was made "in obedience to an imbecilic slogan about ending the 'forever wars'." What he calls the US' 'abandonment' of Afghanistan was "tragic, dangerous and unnecessary."

In fact we could say the same about Tony Blair himself - and certainly the wars of choice he promoted.

Imbecilic? That's the perfect word to describe what happened in October 2001 when Afghanistan was invaded in response, we were told, to the terrorist attacks of 9/11, even though none of the terrorists were Afghan nationals.

Had Blair read just a little bit of history, he would have pursued an exclusively diplomatic path to try and get Osama Bin Laden handed over and not have been so keen to send in the troops.

Comment: History repeats. Afghanistan is the current lesson.


Briefcase

Soldiers fight back against military's upcoming vaccine mandate by filing lawsuit against the Pentagon

Dose prepping
© Kenny Holston/NYTimes
Dose prepping at Fort Bragg, as less than 50% offered the vaccine have accepted it.
The Department of Defense will require all U.S. military troops to take the COVID-19 vaccine by September 15th. The Associated Press earlier reported on Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's memo. The AP reported that
"the deadline could be pushed up if the vaccine receives final FDA approval or infection rates continue to rise. I will not hesitate to act sooner or recommend a different course to the President if l feel the need to do so. To defend this Nation, we need a healthy and ready force."
An Armed Forces member refusing to take the vaccine is subject to punishment under the U.C.M.J., the AP's report noted. The punishment for refusal to obey an order may escalate up to court martial.
"Some unvaccinated service members have suggested they'd get the shot once it's required, but others are flatly opposed."
Now, some of those 'flatly opposed' soldiers are filing a lawsuit in court against the coming military vaccination mandate. Those listed on the lawsuit as defendants are Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Health & Human Services Xavier Becerra, and Janet Woodock, Acting Commissioner of the Food & Drug Administration.

Comment: See also:




No Entry

Don't want Afghan militants in Russia, says Putin

Putin
© AFP
Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday said the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan would directly impact the security situation in Russia, while adding that he does not want Afghanistan militants arriving under the guise of refugees, local Russian media reported.

TASS news agency quoted Putin as saying:
"Does that mean that they can be sent without visas to those countries, to our neighbours, while they themselves (the West) don't want to take them without visas? Why is there such a humiliating approach to solving the problem?"
His remarks came days after Putin demanded the countries to stop interfering in Afghanistan, saying the west "must stop the irresponsible policy of imposing foreign values from abroad". The Russian president said he hoped the Taliban would "guarantee the security of locals and foreign diplomats" and that the country would not break apart after the withdrawal of US-led forces.

Arrow Up

Leaks suggest Durham probe is making progress

Durham
© US Department of Justice/AP
Federal prosecutor John Durham
Recent media reports point obliquely to significant developments in John Durham's special counsel investigation. He's using a grand jury to subpoena documents and witness testimony regarding the FBI's illegal spying operation against Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. And now stories in the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post say Durham may be looking to make criminal charges against "lower-level FBI agents" as well as outside sources who passed false information to federal law enforcement.

If that's accurate, the latter category could include political operatives, foreign spies, big-name Beltway lawyers, journalists, and computer experts. But current and former government officials say the reports seem intended to shape the narrative on behalf of those Durham may really have in his crosshairs — senior FBI officials, including former Acting Director Andrew McCabe.

Since the November election, I've expressed skepticism regarding Durham's investigation. Without Durham's former boss Attorney General William Barr holding anyone accountable before the 2020 vote, there was nothing stopping the FBI and other federal agencies from continuing to interfere in elections on behalf of their preferred candidates. There was also nothing ensuring that Durham would be allowed to continue his probe with a Trump loss.

Briefcase

FTC files another antitrust lawsuit against Facebook

Facebook/Apps
© Android Police/KJN
Splitting up?
The Federal Trade Commission voted 3-2 on Wednesday to file a new antitrust complaint against Facebook, after a federal judge dismissed its previous complaint in June. FTC Chair Lina Khan, along with her two fellow Democratic colleagues, voted in favor of filing the complaint, while the two Republicans opposed it, Politico reported.

The goal of the lawsuit is to make Facebook sell off Instagram and WhatsApp, which would be the first court-ordered, antitrust breakup of a company since the 1980s with AT&T.

Facebook attempted to get Khan recused from the case, as she had previously worked on a 2020 House Judiciary Committee antitrust probe regarding online market competition. But the FTC's Office of General Counsel denied Facebook's petition, saying, "As the case will be prosecuted before a federal judge, the appropriate constitutional due process protections will be provided to the company."

The social media company criticized the FTC's lawsuit. Facebook spokesperson Christopher Sgro said in a statement:
"There was no valid claim that Facebook was a monopolist — and that has not changed. Our acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp were reviewed and cleared many years ago, and our platform policies were lawful. The FTC's claims are an effort to rewrite antitrust laws and upend settled expectations of merger review, declaring to the business community that no sale is ever final."
The FTC's initial complaint was filed in December, claiming that Facebook either buys or buries its competitors, meaning if it is unable to buy them, then it would effectively make them noncompetitive.

Comment: When influence outweighs commerce, it is beyond time to change the system. It is no longer a commodity nor service; it is leverage.

See also:


SOTT Logo Radio

NewsReal: Kabul Chaos Biden's Bay of Pigs?

biden bay pigs newsreal
© Sott.net
The 'sudden collapse' of the US-installed regime in Kabul, sweeping the Taliban back into power in Afghanistan, brought the war in Afghanistan to a stunning end last week. The chaos at Kabul Airport as tens of thousands of Americans, other Western citizens, and Afghan allies attempt to flee the new regime is mirrored by chaos in the halls of power as the White House, US National Security State, and even the media struggle to explain what the heck just happened.

In this NewsReal, Joe and Niall recall the infamous 'Bay of Pigs' operation in Cuba during the JFK administration and explain that what really caught the Establishment by surprise was the sheer number of Afghans rushing to the gates with the departing forces of occupation.

** Podcast begins at 03:15 **


Running Time: 01:48:48

Download: MP3 74.8 MB


Comment: If YouTube bans this podcast, watch it on the NewsReal Rumble or Odysee channel:




Bizarro Earth

UK's Afghanistan evacuation plane empty amidst Kabul airport chaos, despite having '18 months to prepare'

afghanistan empty flight
© Twitter/@PenFarthing
Paul 'Pen' Farthing posted this picture on Twitter of his wife's empty evacuation flight from Kabul to Norway.
Paul 'Pen' Farthing tells Sky News how aircraft are taking off from Kabul airport every hour "regardless of whether they're full or not", adding: "People can't get in, they cannot get into the airport."

A former Royal Marine commando attempting to help people flee Afghanistan's capital Kabul has warned: "We are going to leave so many people behind."

Paul "Pen" Farthing, who has been running an animal shelter in the city, described to Sky News his pre-dawn journey to Kabul airport on Thursday so his wife Kaisa could be evacuated.

Comment: RT reports that Afghans who worked for the Brits have, unsurprisingly, been left to fend for themselves:
UK embassy guards help diplomats board Kabul evac flight... then told they're ineligible for rescue & sent home - reports

Around 125 Afghans hired to guard the British Embassy in Kabul have been informed they will receive no protection from the UK government, the Guardian reported, noting they were rejected as they didn't work "directly" for London.

The 125 local guards, as well as around a dozen other Afghan embassy staffers, were turned away after applying for the UK's "Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy" (ARAP), designed to help Afghans resettle after working under British agencies, according to the Guardian.
Kabul airport
© LPhot Ben Shread / UK MOD / Handout via Reuters
British citizens and dual nationals residing in Afghanistan board a military plane for evacuation from Kabul airport, Afghanistan, August 16, 2021
The guards were told that their jobs were terminated through an informal notice only - leaving them confused about their employment status immediately after helping British diplomats flee the country last Saturday. They were also reportedly asked to return company computers, radios and body armor.

"We risked our lives for them, and now we find ourselves in this bad situation - not just us, but our families are at risk," said one ex-guard who declined to be named.

"We worked in frontline positions, doing the most dangerous work to keep British officials safe."

The employees were told that they were not eligible for assistance or protection because they "were not directly employed by her majesty's government," having only worked as private contractors under GardaWorld, a Canada-based security firm.

Of around 160 foreign GardaWorld staffers that applied for help, only 21 translators were accepted for assistance and relocation. But the former guards insist that their work deserves recognition from UK authorities. Some of the rebuffed workers have written to the government to request they be added to the list, arguing that "contractors are human too."


The Western establishment will throw people and even entire countries under the bus once they're done using them. This is standard operating procedure and should perhaps be a lesson to anyone thinking of making a similar pact.


The embassy employees - including some who worked at the facility for more than a decade - initially applied for the ARAP program last month, prior to an all-out Taliban takeover of Afghanistan over the last two weeks. They now say they fear reprisals from the Islamist group as their jobs were "in the public eye," voicing skepticism in Taliban vows to give amnesty to those who worked under the Western-backed Afghan government.

"We have been doing a very dangerous job for the British embassy, and we are in a terrible condition," another former employee told the Guardian.

"We are known as British embassy staff; our lives are now at risk"


The Taliban have declared an amnesty on all workers and they have a lot to lose if they do not keep these promises, in particular with regards to the international community. But that's not to say that those guards working for foreign governments, that may have betrayed their community, won't have to fear reprisals from locals.


"No one asked whether we are safe or not. No one asked whether our lives are in danger or not," another guard said.

The president of GardaWorld's Middle East division, Oliver Westmacott, noted that formal termination letters had not been sent out yet, but added "The reality is on Saturday when the contract was demobilised, we sent people home."

"We are going to honour people's salaries, certainly up until the date that they stopped working, and we have every intention of giving people a final gratuity payment or severance."

However, Westmacott warned that his company still needed to secure agreement from the Foreign Office as to how much of the workers' salaries it would reimburse, saying "otherwise we are materially out of pocket."

The UK Foreign Office, meanwhile, told Sky News that it was "monitoring the situation with GardaWorld closely" and is "in contact with them to provide any required assistance," though did not specify any plans to actually help the former workers.

In addition to the UK's ARAP program, the government also rolled out a separate "Afghan Citizens' Resettlement Scheme" earlier this week, vowing to take in 20,000 Afghans over the next 5 years, and 5,000 by the end of 2021. Though the figure mirrors similar relocation plans unveiled by the US and Canada, the British scheme was slammed as too little, too late by critics, some noting that around 550,000 Afghans have already been displaced this year alone.
RT reports that the the Brits have rejected a request by the US to stop embarrassing them following an operation where the Brits had to rescue via airlift Americans who were stuck in a hotel in Kabul, just 200m from the airport, to enable their eventual evacuation:
Commander of the 82nd Airborne Division has told his British colleague to stop "embarrassing" the US troops guarding the Kabul airport by venturing into the city to rescue people, at least according to one Washington columnist.

Major General Christopher Donahue has asked the commander of the 22nd Special Air Service (SAS) Regiment of the British Army to stop their operations beyond the perimeter of the Hamid Karzai International Airport (HKIA), because they were "embarrassing the United States military in the absence of similar US military operations," Washington Examiner columnist Tom Rogan claimed on Friday.

"I understand that the British officer firmly rejected the request," Rogan added.


Elements of the 82nd Airborne are part of the 6,000-strong US force deployed at HKIA, which also includes parts of the 10th Mountain Division and the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit. They were sent in to secure the airport after the surprise Taliban takeover and chaotic scenes of desperate Afghans clinging onto US troop transports last Sunday.

Only a "small number" of US troops went outside the HKIA perimeter for a "short amount of time" on Friday, in order to bring in 169 people that were unable to get in through the gates, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said on Friday, referring to a group President Joe Biden described at an earlier press conference as American citizens.

Around the same time Rogan posted his claim, AP had reported that several CH-47 Chinook helicopters operated by the 82nd "flew into Taliban-held Kabul" to "scoop up would-be evacuees," whom the agency described as "Afghans, mostly women and children." AP attributed this to US officials who requested anonymity.

Kirby initially said he could not confirm this. Later in the day, however, he said that the three Chinooks actually took part in the evacuation of the 169 Americans - not Afghans - stuck at a hotel about 200 meters away from the airport and unable to get in using the roads.

AP also claimed that CIA and DIA officers and special operations forces on the ground in Afghanistan were gathering US citizens and Afghans who worked for the US military at predetermined pick-up sites outside Kabul, to fly them into the airport. That claim was impossible to verify.
Kabul
© USMC/Lance Cpl. Nicholas Guevara/handout
US Marines at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, August 20, 2021.
According to media reports, both British and French commandos have ventured into Kabul to ferry groups of their nationals from the city to the airport, while no such effort has been undertaken by the US troops.

Rogan blamed the situation on a "bureaucratic tug of war between the State Department, Pentagon, and White House," and said that relations with the British, French and other allied governments in Kabul were made worse by US failure "to communicate adequately, or in some cases, to communicate at all, on their intentions and actions." However, they all admit that only the US military could provide the airfield defense and air traffic control currently at HKIA.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley have repeatedly said the US military does not have the capability to extend the security perimeter into Kabul. Biden argued that it wasn't necessary, since the Taliban are letting Americans with the proper papers through their checkpoints anyway. However, Austin and Milley told members of Congress later in the day that some Americans were physically abused by the Taliban at a checkpoint.


We shouldn't rely on any comments from Biden : Something is wrong with the President



"I hope this isn't true," Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume tweeted in response to Rogan's claim. "One part of it is true, though. What the British are doing to get their people out certainly is making the US look bad."

Rogan gained notoriety in May 2018, when he urged Kiev to bomb the newly opened bridge connecting mainland Russia with the Crimean peninsula, describing it as an "outrageous affront to Ukraine's very credibility as a nation." He later claimed to have received support from Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin, who promised to protect him from ending up in a Russian maximum-security prison. Klimkin said he never spoke to the man, however, and the call turned out to be the work of the notorious Russian pranksters Vovan and Lexus.
If this is how the evacuation plan went, when they had 18 months to prepare and weren't even under attack by a military force, one can only imagine the West's behaviour in the country over the past two decades: Also check out SOTT radio's: NewsReal: The Great (End)Game - Closing the Afghan War, Opening the 'Covid War'?





Pistol

He who must not be named: Cop who shot US Capitol rioter Ashli Babbitt cleared after internal probe

ashli babbitt
© Twitter
The unidentified officer who shot and killed Ashli Babbitt during the Capitol riot will not be charged for her death.
The cop who fatally shot US Capitol rioter Ashli Babbitt as she stormed the building was exonerated after an internal police investigation, according to a report Friday.

"No further action will be taken" in the use-of-force probe of the United States Capitol Police officer, whose name has not been released, NBC reported, citing an internal memo from the department.

The Capitol Police's report clearing him concludes the last remaining law enforcement investigation into the shooting, according to the outlet.

Comment: