Puppet Masters
Cuba's Ministry of Public Health announced Wednesday it is withdrawing from the Mais Medicos (More Doctors) cooperation program with Brazil, which functioned since August 2013 and ensured health coverage for over a hundred million Brazilians who had no prior access to healthcare.
Cuban health authorities also announced they had notified the Pan-American Health Organization and its Brazilian counterparts of the decision to end its participation in the program.

After returning from Armistice Day commemorations in Paris over the weekend, Trump took to Twitter on Monday to savage the US' European allies for failing to meet their defense spending targets and leaving America to foot much of NATO's bill. On Tuesday, the president vented his frustrations again.
"Emmanuel Macron suggests building its own army to protect Europe against the U.S., China and Russia," Trump tweeted.
But it was Germany in World Wars One & Two - How did that work out for France? They were starting to learn German in Paris before the U.S. came along. Pay for NATO or not!In a radio interview a week before the commemorations in Paris, Macron called for the establishment of an EU army that can defend the continent "without relying only on the United States."
While Macron once enjoyed a close bond with president Trump, the leaders' relationship has soured as of late. In a speech on Sunday, Macron emphatically denounced Trump's brand of nationalism, comparing it to the forces that plunged Europe into conflict in the 20th Century.
Early Wednesday, Czech Republic voted to not to sign the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration accord, according to Reuters.
"The Czech Republic has long favored the principle of separating legal and illegal migration," Deputy Prime Minister Richard Brabec stated in a news conference. "That is what the Czech Republic's and other European countries' suggestions aimed for. The final text does not reflect those proposals."

Liam Fox, the trade secretary; the chancellor, Philip Hammond; Matt Hancock, the health secretary; and Andrea Leadsom, leader of the House of Commons, pictured in Downing Street
The critical meeting is the culmination of months of negotiations and will see May's senior ministers consider whether they can personally endorse the agreement that the prime minister has been able to reach.
Ministers were summoned to No 10 in the early evening and some met individually with May or her chief of staff, Gavin Barwell. They were given the chance to read the key documents, although they were not trusted to take any papers home. Further one-on-one meetings were expected to take place on Wednesday.
Comment: Theresa doing some pretty fancy footwork trying to give the appearance of listening to the will of the people while de facto maintaining the status quo with Europe.
- SOTT Exclusive: Brexit's main goals: Oust Jeremy Corbyn and expand predatory capitalism in Europe
- 'Soft Brexit': Free movement of EU citizens to Britain will continue years after Brexit
- The UK can't leave the EU and keep Northern Ireland, so it appears to have chosen to ditch Brexit
- Corbyn slams ex-Labour PM Blair for suggesting voters back Tories to get a soft Brexit
- Brexit: The 'hard' option or 'soft' option, does it truly matter?

Frontier soldiers practice sabreplay in Heihe, Heilongjiang province of China.
The confrontational stance of the Trump administration was described by journalist Josh Rogin in a Washington Post opinion piece. He said Pence outlined it to him during a flight aboard Air Force Two on the VP's Asian trip.
The US wants China to offer concessions on a wide range of grievances, from intellectual property protection to territorial claims in the South China Sea.
Comment: In decades past, the US has been more or less successful in maintaining influence over many Asian countries, but the benefits of such 'relationships' were based in power rather than productivity. China is changing the dynamics in Asia by bringing actual value with the vast projects included under their One Belt One Road initiative. China will not concede to US demands because the US has not and cannot provide any similar value to the East. Beijing understands how the US will respond, and it has created a strong safety net to maintain their course. The US, however, has nothing to fall on for when their influence fails.
The US midterms - and you'd have to have been locked in a wardrobe all week to have avoided hearing about them - reminded me of a great song by the 1980s indie-rock band The Smiths. No, not 'This Charming Man', in reference to Donald Trump, but 'What Difference Does it Make?' Remember that one? It should be played on a loop every time America goes to vote.
Because every couple of years, whenever 'big' elections come along in the US of A, we are treated to the same spectacle. Ordinarily intelligent people making fools of themselves in the belief that the elections are 'tremendously important'. When will they ever learn that the best thing to do on a US election night is to go to bed early with a nice hot water bottle and a good book.
Let's take presidential contests first.
The coalition offensive on Hodeida - a key port and a lifeline for Houthis and civilians alike - is codenamed 'Operation Golden Victory'. Rather telling, considering the vast amounts of money Saudi Arabia bundles into its military. Ironic, too: it would seem that with such massively superior military resources, the coalition should have stamped the Houthi rebels down within days.
Instead, the operation has been dragging on for months. It started in mid-June, then was paused until September for peace talks. Those eventually collapsed, and the fighting resumed. Now, coalition-backed ground forces are moving inside the city after a tense 11-day battle at the approaches. There are running battles in the streets and local hospitals are overflowing with civilians and militants alike; just one day of fighting claimed some 150 lives.
We asked several Middle East experts how, despite the enormous differences in military resources, the battle for Hodeida has become such a mess.
Drone Wars UK claims that the Defence and Security Accelerator (DASA) is funding research for weapons systems which could make life-or-death decisions without any human input.
In an unsettling new report, the group highlighted the Taranis drone, developed over a decade by BAE Systems and the UK Ministry of Defence. The Taranis can fly, plot its own routes and locate targets autonomously - and has cost a cool £200 million so far.
The year-long study by Drone Wars UK also uncovered multiple similar research and development programs that they say are being funded by the British MoD, despite public denials of any plans to develop the deadly machines.
So, in a way, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was refreshingly honest last week when, speaking about newly-imposed US sanctions, he told the BBC that the Iranian leadership "has to make a decision that they want their people to eat." It was an honest admission that new US sanctions are designed to starve Iranians unless the Iranian leadership accepts US demands.
His statement also reveals the lengths to which the neocons are willing to go to get their "regime change" in Iran. Just like then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said it was "worth it" that half a million Iraqi children died because of our sanctions on that country, Pompeo is letting us know that a few million dead Iranians is also "worth it" if the government in Tehran can be overthrown.
The US Secretary of State has demanded that Iran "act like a normal country" or the US would continue its pressure until Iran's economy crumbles. How twisted is US foreign policy that Washington considers it "normal" to impose sanctions specifically designed to make life miserable - or worse - for civilians!
Comment: Ron Paul's last statement is true on many levels - Pompeo and his ilk aren't normal, they are psychopaths. Only those lacking a conscience and any shred of empathy glibly rationalize the brutal and totally unnecessary murder of thousands to achieve their goals.
War crimes: Economic sanctions are essentially medieval sieges designed to starve target populations
The new political maps of Europe, western Eurasia and the Arab that were carelessly drawn during and after the First World War were not only the proximate cause of the Second World War but remain the underlying cause of multiple contemporary conflicts including those in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, the Israel-Palestine conflict and even the war in Yemen. As the root causes of all of these conflicts were the artificial divides of the Arab world among the imperialists of Britain and France, the victory of the Anglo-French Entente is hardly a cause for celebration - certainly no more than the rise of Hitler or the present bloodbaths on Russia's historic western frontier which equally were and remain a direct result of how the First World War was ended.
And yet speaking personally, when First World War veterans from any side of the War were still alive, the end of the First World War was a cause for reflection and an incredibly sombre and important occasion. The 11th of November was once a day to pay tribute to those who made the ultimate sacrifice in the name of futility, having done so without being offered a say in the matter. The fault of the First World War lies not among the soldiers but among poor leadership on all sides that sent a generation to an early grave while haunting those who survived.












Comment: Trump is on a roll, now attacking Macron's approval ratings, disdain for nationalism and wine policy:
Trump then attacked Macron's plummeting approval ratings - likely a result of France's lagging economic performance, ten percent unemployment rate and a series of scandals that have plagued the Élysée Palace. Trump however, decided to get in some jibes by blaming Macrons' distaste for nationalism:
Macron's office has refused to make any comment in response to Trump's tweet salvo...