Puppet Masters
Admiral Ami Ayalon, who also served as the head of Israel's Shin Bet security service, explained to Shevardnadze why he fears that Israel is heading towards another war.
"It seems the Israeli government doesn't have any interest in creating any kind of peace process or any kind of negotiations that will lead to a better future for the Israelis and the Palestinians,"he told the SophieCo host.
He expressed disappointment in how the Trump administration has handled the Israel-Palestine issue and mused that Washington has a poor grasp of the decades-long conflict.
"When I listen, especially to American voices during the last 20 years, they do not understand the Middle East, they do not understand Palestinians, and, if you ask me, they do not understand Israel the way I believe Israel should be," Ayalon stated. He predicted that unfortunately, upcoming elections in Israel are unlikely to "change our political direction" for the better.
The state's Department of Financial Services on Wednesday sent a series of letters seeking information and documents from Facebook and the developers behind the 11 apps mentioned in the Journal's reporting, according to a person familiar with the investigation.
One letter, addressed to Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg, requests information about all companies that have sent Facebook data about mobile application users via software provided by the social-media giant in the last three years, the person said. It also asked the company to provide the categories of data that were shared and a list of all New Yorkers whose data was included, the person added.
The Vermont senator found himself bogged down in complicated policy issues - and apologies - after fielding questions from audience members whose political loyalties and possible ulterior motives were obscured by CNN. The eyebrow-raising oversight was first spotted by Paste Magazine, which accused CNN, in concert with the Democratic Party, of "stacking" the audience against Sanders by not being upfront about who was tasked with asking the senator questions.
For example, a young woman identified by CNN as a student at American University suggested that Sanders had turned a blind eye to his campaign's alleged sexist behavior during the 2016 primaries, and asked what the democratic socialist would do to make women feel more included in his 2020 presidential bid. Curiously, the network failed to disclose that the student also happens to be an intern at a major DC lobbying firm - an odd coincidence considering her question was adapted from a Sanders-bashing talking point popular among corporate-friendly Democrats.
Trudeau is facing explosive allegations that he pressured Canada's ex-attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould to drop a bribery probe into Quebec-based firm SNC Lavalin (details here). Wilson-Raybould testified that officials, including Trudeau himself, "barraged" her with demands and "veiled threats" to drop criminal charges and said she believes her refusal to comply explains her abrupt demotion. If the allegations are true, this is bare-faced corruption. But Canada's swoon-worthy (apparently) prime minister is dismissing calls for his resignation.
Trudeau's refusal to back down reminds me of someone. Oh, who could it be? Ah yes, that other faux-progressive who is likewise accustomed to getting a free pass from the media because he makes all the right sounds with his mouth: It's France's Emmanuel Macron, of course. Macron's approval rating dipped to a mortifying low of 18 percent last year, but he is somehow still around to tell the tale - even after four months of non-stop street protests against his failing neoliberal government.

India's Border Security Force (BSF) soldiers patrol along the fenced border with Pakistan
There's something about the human mind, or at least mine, which causes it to immediately jump to the worst case scenario, especially when it's fuelled by ignorance.
So, this is what my brain does when it hears that India and Pakistan have been firing missiles at each other and shooting each other's planes out of the sky.
First it accesses everything it knows about the situation in Kashmir, which can be summed up as "India and Pakistan don't like each other very much, and they both have nuclear missiles."
The standoff between Venezuela and the AngloZionist Empire last week-end has clearly ended in what can only be called a total defeat for Elliott Abrams. While we will never know what was initially planned by the demented minds of the Neocons, what we do know is that nothing critical happened: no invasion, not even any major false flag operation. The most remarkable facet of the standoff is how little effect all the AngloZionist propaganda has had inside Venezuela. There were clashes, including some rather violent ones, across the border, but nothing much happened in the rest of the country. Furthermore, while a few senior officers and a few soldiers did commit treason and join forces with the enemy, the overwhelming majority of the Venezuelan military remained faithful to the Constitution. Finally, it appears that Maduro and his ministers were successful in devising a strategy combining roadblocks, a concert on the Venezuelan side, and the minimal but effective use of riot police to keep the border closed. Most remarkably, "unidentified snipers" did not appear to shoot at both sides (a favorite tactic of the Empire to justify its interventions). I give the credit for this to whatever Venezuelan (or allied) units were in charge of counter-sniper operations along the border.
Outside Venezuela this first confrontation has also been a defeat for the Empire. Not only did most countries worldwide not recognize the AngloZionist puppet, but the level of protest and opposition to what appeared to be the preparations for a possible invasion (or, at least, a military operation of some kind) was remarkably high. While the legacy corporate Ziomedia did what it always does (that is whatever the Empire wants it to do), the Internet and the blogosphere were overwhelmingly opposed to a direct US intervention. This situation also created a great deal of internal political tensions in various Latin American countries whose public opinion remains strongly opposed to any form of US imperial control over Latin America.
The group of 12 have addressed the United States Holocaust Memorial Council and the Committee on Conscience in a letter in which they identify themselves as "survivors, witnesses and family members lost to genocide, mass murder and other extreme violence perpetrated by the governments of Nazi Germany and the Central American military dictatorships backed by the United States in the 1980s and 90s. Like you, we have come together in the name of advancing values like those contained in the Council's core mission of preventing genocide."
The committee of 45 members under chair Lee Feinstein has as its stated mandate to "alert the national conscience, influence policy makers and stimulate worldwide action to confront and work to halt acts of genocide or related crimes against humanity."
The group writes that in that spirit, "[w]e cannot fathom how Abrams - a proven supporter of the some of the world's most nefarious perpetrators of genocide and mass murderers for nearly 40 years - could be a member of your committee."
Abrams' reemergence on the US policy scene has sparked outrage among those who remember - and abhor - his history as a defender and supporter of violent regimes.
The South Carolina Republican said he is "encouraged there are plans to continue talking" with North Korea after Trump failed to secure a formal pledge of any kind during the summit with Kim in Hanoi, Vietnam, but Graham but also warned that the clock is ticking for negotiators to convince Pyongyang to peacefully surrender its entire nuclear arsenal.
Comment: Talk about arrogance. Graham expects complete surrender, not an actual negotiated deal. He either doesn't seem to realize that "any means necessary" could lead to the destruction of South Korea in the process, or he just doesn't care. Probably the latter.
"There is only one good deal: the complete denuclearization of North Korea in return for security guarantees and economic assistance," Graham tweeted. "We must not go back to the status quo," he added. "If negotiations fail, it would be time to end the nuclear threat from North Korea -- one way or the other."
Later Thursday, Graham referred to Kim as "Rocket Man," a nickname given to the North Korean leader by Trump in 2017, while speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Maryland.
"Speaking of Rocket Man, he couldn't be here and if he doesn't get a deal with Trump he won't be anywhere much longer. The President is on the way back. Here's a question, why is Rocket Man talking to Trump when he's never talked to anybody else? Because he knows Trump means business," he told the audience.
Comment: Yep, and it's people like you who are creating unreasonable demands.
Comment: See also:
- Here's why US-North Korea talks will continue to fail
- Analysts weigh in on Trump-Kim Hanoi summit: 'Huge letdown' due to lack of knowledge
- US-North Korea summit flop details: Kim offered to shut facilities for Trump's partial removal of sanctions
- The art of ... no deal? Why Washington struggles to reach agreements
The so-called summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in Hanoi this week was a predictable flop. According to the US President himself, he ended up walking away from the summit because "it was all about sanctions."
"Basically they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn't do that," US President Donald Trump stated.
As Trump also eloquently noted, "sometimes you have to walk, and this was just one of those times." Though, that being said, he did explain that it "was a friendly walk." Apparently, the two leaders exited the venue of their talks without even attending a planned lunch together. I'm not sure how friendly the walk can be if you walk in the opposite direction from each other, but if there's one thing I know about Trump it's that he is a friendly guy.
Comment: According to reports, North Korea was willing to begin the process of denuclearization on the immediate partial removal of sanctions, and yet the US wasn't even willing to concede that. If this is true, and we have no reason to believe it is not, is it any wonder Kim walked away?
- US-North Korea summit flop details: Kim offered to shut facilities for Trump's partial removal of sanctions
- Pakistan-India showdown: What you're not being told
- India-Pakistan crisis rundown: 'Neither can afford a miscalculation' - PM Khan
"The whole world was holding its breath for the expected news coming out of the summit... and, eventually, there's a huge letdown," Victor Gao, director of the China National Association of International Studies, said on the meeting between the American and North Korean leaders in the Vietnamese capital.
"The disappointment is a real one" after the much-hyped talks ended not only without a signed deal, but even without any hint on the date of the future meeting between Trump and Kim, he added.
Washington and Pyongyang "need to reconsider the situation and come up with more realism and pragmatism to resume the discussions" if they want to achieve any progress at all, he pointed out.The sides aren't on the same page as to what exactly is denuclearization and how to proceed to the final result.














Comment: Some victims are more important than other victims, at least according to emotionally retarded individuals like Abrams and, presumably, other members of the Holocaust Museum's leadership.