Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 03 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Георгиевская ленточка

Kremlin condemns 'reckless' moves by US that led to Iran decision on nuclear deal

Putin Rouhani
© Sergei Karpukhin/AP
Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, shakes hands with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani during a joint news conference at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, March 28, 2017.
Tehran's move to scale down implementation of the 2015 multilateral nuclear deal was a direct result of the US' unconsidered political decisions against Iran, according to Russian President Vladimir Putin's spokesman.

"The situation is serious, it was obviously provoked by decisions made in Washington," Dmitry Peskov told journalists, commenting on Tehran's decision to suspend a part of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

"President Putin has repeatedly told that such ill-advised voluntarist steps, which lead to unreasonable pressure on Iran, would cause repercussions, we're facing now."

Comment: Russia is not the only party concerned about Iran's latest moves:
French Defense Minister Florence Parly told BFM TV on Wednesday that nothing would be worse than Iran withdrawing from the deal, adding that France, Britain and Germany were doing all they could to keep the accord alive. However, she warned that if Tehran does not uphold its part of the deal, it could result in sanctions.

Germany said it regrets the statements made by Iran and urged Tehran not to take any aggressive steps. A Foreign Ministry spokesman added that Berlin is keen to keep the nuclear deal and intends to abide by its commitments, as long as Iran does the same.

Speaking on behalf of the British government, UK junior foreign minister Mark Field warned that there would be consequences if Iran stopped meeting its commitments under the nuclear deal.

He added that the UK remains committed to working on sanctions relief, and called on both Russia and China to pursue this goal as "diplomacy continues." Field said the British government believes the deal is broadly working towards keeping Iran's nuclear program peaceful, and that he hopes to visit the country in the near future.

Meanwhile, Theresa May's spokesman said the prime minister is extremely concerned about Iran's decision, and urges Tehran not to take any escalatory steps. While British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt called the announcement an "unwelcome step".

China also responded to the news on Wednesday, with their Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang saying that the agreement should be fully implemented and that all sides have a responsibility to ensure this happens.

Earlier on Wednesday, Iranian President Rouhani announced on national television that a gradual scale-down of the country's commitments under the 2015 nuclear deal would begin in 60 days, starting with a refusal to dispose of excessive heavy water and enriched uranium. Rouhani also said the move was a reciprocal response to the US' withdrawal from the agreement.

The deal with Iran was signed by the EU and other world leaders to offer Tehran relief from sanctions in exchange for voluntary restrictions of its nuclear industry. Last year, the US broke its commitments under the deal, restored and extended sanctions, and attempted to prevent countries around the world from buying Iran's oil.
And Israel must stick its nose in of course, in the mad idea that Iran is gunning specifically for them:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Israel will make every effort to prevent the development of nuclear weapons by Iran amid the news that the latter may pull out of some of its commitments under the nuclear deal.

"This morning, on my way here, I heard that Iran intends to pursue its nuclear programme. We will not allow Iran to achieve nuclear weaponry. We will continue to fight those who would kill us", he said.
Israel vowed to continue harassing Iran at every opportunity, as it sees Iran as the biggest obstacle to its dominance in the region:
Israel has long criticized Iran over its nuclear operations, with Netanyahu openly opposing the international deal and previously accusing Europe of appeasing Iran on the issue - evocative language that harks back to European nations' initial failure to confront Nazi Germany.

During a 2018 speech at the United Nations, Netanyahu presented what he considered proof that Iran still sought to obtain nuclear weapons, despite the 2015 agreement. The presentation consisted of an aerial photograph of the Iranian capital, marked with a red arrow pointing to what the Israeli leader said was once a secret warehouse holding nuclear-related material that had since been moved. Iran responded to the presentation by calling it an "arts and crafts show."
Netanyahu UN Iran nuclear program
© Timothy A. Clary/Agence France-Presse
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the General Assembly at the United Nations in New York September 27, 2018.



Headphones

Byron York: No question the Trump campaign was spied upon, but how much (and by whom)?

The Barr
© Reuters/Erin Scott
US Attorney General William Barr
At a contentious hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney General William Barr dropped a big hint about his investigation into the conduct of the Trump-Russia investigation. Barr said:
"Many people seem to assume that the only intelligence collection that occurred was a single confidential informant and a FISA warrant. I would like to find out whether that is in fact true. It strikes me as a fairly anemic effort if that was the counterintelligence effort designed to stop the threat as it is being represented."
Here is what he meant. There has been a lot of discussion on the Right about the FBI's use of a confidential informant, an England-based college professor named Stefan Halper, to spy on some Trump campaign figures, including the sometime foreign policy volunteer advisers George Papadopoulos and Carter Page. There has also been talk about the FBI's use of a FISA warrant, a court-approved permission to wiretap, against Page.

There was also speculation about other possible FBI surveillance, but the Halper operation and Page FISA case were the only ones definitely known. So Barr was saying: If the FBI really took the Trump-Russia matter seriously, if they thought it was a threat to the republic, would that be all they would do? No other wiretaps or other surveillance? No other confidential informants? Nothing?

Given that Barr was already looking into the question, his phrasing suggested he suspected there was more.

Comment: Gateway Pundit's Jim Hoft adds background and validation to York's premise:
Democrats and Deep State dirty cops have claimed for months that there was no spying on the Trump campaign. Now we know without a doubt that there was not only spying, but the dirty cops in the Deep State attempted to entrap Trump team members through this spying. We also know without a doubt that Obama was in on it. ...

For starters we know that Obama spied on numerous people for years while he was President. Obama took the US Intelligence community and corrupted it. He used the US intelligence apparatus to spy on anyone and everyone and especially his enemies. We put a list of the many individuals and entities Obama spied on that we know of here.

We also know that Hillary's long lost emails were found in the White House. This was reported by Judicial Watch in April 2019 -
Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch announced that Bill Priestap, former Assistant Director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division admitted, in writing and under oath, that the FBI found Hillary Clinton's emails in the Obama White House - specifically the Executive Office of the President! The FBI also admitted that almost 49,000 Hillary Clinton emails were reviewed as a result of a search warrant for emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop.
We know that Susan Rice, Obama's former National Security Advisor, left an email on the last day that she and Obama were in office that confirms Obama was in on it. Senators Grassley and Graham sent a letter to Rice asking about this email -

"Ambassador Rice appears to have used this email to document a January 5, 2017 Oval Office meeting between President Obama, former FBI Director James Comey and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates regarding Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election. In particular, Ambassador Rice wrote:
"President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities 'by the book'. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book."
Rice and Obama must have felt guilty about their crimes because they sent this email in an attempt to cover up their illegal actions. Unfortunately, nobody is buying it. We also know that Obama, in essence, told incoming President-elect Trump in the Oval office that he was involved in the Deep State coup. Obama did this inadvertently by advising Trump not to hire General Michael Flynn. ... Obama had to know about the coup in order to make this recommendation to Trump months earlier but the media only thought about using this to discredit both Trump and Flynn. Now its coming back to haunt Obama.

In March 2019 Deep State coup participant James Clapper said to CNN's Anderson Cooper:
"If it weren't for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably, special counsel Mueller's investigation. President Obama is responsible for that, and it was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place..."

Finally, if Clapper hasn't said enough, former US Attorney Joe DiGenova was on the radio yesterday and he said point blank says that Obama knew about it all - Obama was in on it. It was a sham. The Mueller investigation was a sham. Obama spied on the opposition party.



DiGenova's interview is pertinent, factual and spot on.





No Entry

Trump asserts executive privilege over Mueller's report, preempts contempt vote in the House

DOJTrump
© Gage Skidmore/CC by-SA 2.0/MGN
US President Donald Trump
US President Donald Trump has invoked executive privilege over the unredacted Mueller report and other subpoenaed materials, the Justice Department has said.

The decision was announced by Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd in a letter to the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday morning. The committee was poised to vote on a contempt citation against Attorney General William Barr over failure to present the unredacted Mueller report and other materials, that have been demanded through subpoena. Boyd wrote in the letter:
"We are disappointed that you have rejected the Department of Justice's request to delay the vote of the Committee on the Judiciary on a contempt finding against the Attorney General. Accordingly, this is to advise you that the President has asserted executive privilege over the entirety of the subpoenaed materials."
The White House defended Trump's move, stating that the president had "no other option" besides invoking executive privilege, as he faced "blatant abuse of power" from the committee's chairman Jerrold Nadler.

Comment: More from BPR:
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders: "Faced with Chairman Nadler's blatant abuse of power, and at the attorney general's request, the president has no other option than to make a protective assertion of executive privilege."

The Justice Department warned Nadler on Tuesday that if he moves forward on the vote, a request will be made to President Donald Trump to do just that.

In a letter to Nadler Tuesday evening, Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd said the panel's demand was "unreasonable" and urged a delay in the vote, according to NBC News. "If the committee decides to proceed in spite of this request, however, the Attorney General will advise the President to make a protective assertion of executive privilege," Boyd wrote in the letter.

With the Judiciary Committee voting 22-12 to hold Barr in contempt, it will have to go to a full vote in the Democrat-controlled House.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi was noncommittal on whether she would proceed with a vote to hold Barr in contempt.

"Let's hope that they can make their own accommodations before that," the speaker said Tuesday night while speaking to reporters off the House floor, a reference to the Trump administration.

But Pelosi said at a Washington Post event that she believes Barr should be held in contempt, according to The Hill.

Trump charged in a tweet prior to the vote that Democrats are the ones obstructing justice by targeting Barr, who is now investigating the circumstances that resulted in Mueller's Russian collusion probe.

"'The real "Obstruction of Justice" is what the Democrats are trying to do to this Attorney General,'" Trump tweeted, attributing the quote to Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee - Jordan made the comment during an appearance on Fox Business Network.
See also:


Attention

Comey's in trouble and he knows it

FBIDirAG
© Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg, Reuters/Aaron P. Bernstein
Former FBI Dir. James Comey • US AG William Barr
James Comey's planet is getting noticeably warmer. Attorney General William Barr's emissions are the suspected cause.

Barr has made plain that he intends to examine carefully how and why Comey, as FBI director, decided that the bureau should investigate two presidential campaigns and if, in so doing, any rules or laws were broken.

In light of this, the fired former FBI director apparently has decided that photos of him on Twitter standing amid tall trees and in the middle of empty country roads, acting all metaphysical, is no longer a sufficient strategy.

No, Comey has realized, probably too late, that he has to try to counter, more directly, the narrative being set by the unsparing attorney general whose words in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee last week landed in the Trump-opposition world like holy water on Linda Blair. Shrieking heads haven't stopped spinning since.

Arrow Down

The US-China trade deal fell apart - here's why

TrumpXi
© MarketWatch
US President Trump • China President Xi
Readers who have been paying close attention to every leak related to the ongoing US-China trade talks might remember this FT story from six weeks ago about Beijing's penchant for returning trade-deal draft proposals to Washington riddled with red-line strikeouts.

We only bring it up now because, according to a play-by-play published by Reuters Wednesday morning, it appears President Trump finally lost his patience with Beijing when they returned a draft trade deal with strikeouts eliminating virtually all of the major concessions made during the past few weeks.

Though reports about Beijing's unwillingness to compromise had begun appearing with more regularity during the preceding week, according to Reuters, it appears Beijing was deliberately trying to provoke President Trump. And if this was indeed China's goal, it appears it succeeded.

Comment: See also: US more than doubles tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods


Briefcase

Venezuela Supreme Court: Turncoat lawmakers to be prosecuted following failed coup

VenezSC
© The Rahnuma Daily
Venezuelan Supreme Court
Venezuela will prosecute six lawmakers who backed opposition leader Juan Guaido's failed coup last week, the Supreme Court has ruled, hinting that more prosecutions were in the works for "high treason" and "conspiracy."

The Venezuelan Supreme Court has announced the prosecution of six lawmakers on charges including treason against the fatherland, conspiracy, insurrection, civil rebellion, usurpation of functions, and public instigation, the body said in a statement issued on Tuesday. The document named Henry Ramos Allsup, a former National Assembly speaker, Luis Florida, Marianela Magallanes, Simon Calzadilla, Americo de Grazia, and Richard Blanco.

The Constituent Assembly subsequently stripped all six of their parliamentary immunity, plus Edgar Zambrano, who joined Guaido at the military base where he kicked off the botched uprising with a call for the military to abandon President Nicolas Maduro's government last Tuesday. Assembly speaker Diosdado Cabello added that three more lawmakers complicit in the coup had been identified and would also be prosecuted. The Assembly has promised to suspend the immunity of any other lawmakers found to be involved in the short-lived attempt to overthrow Maduro, which triggered two days of rioting and resulted in five deaths.

Comment: See also:


Arrow Down

Lavrov to CNN: 'You're called fake news', now you ask 'fake question' on Venezuela

Lavrov
© Reuters/Amr Abdallah Dalsh
Russian FM Sergey Lavrov
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov joked that CNN was "fake news" and described the network quizzing him about Moscow's hypothetical response to a possible US intervention in Venezuela as a "fake question."

Lavrov had a brief press conference following his meeting with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on the sidelines of the Arctic Council in Rovaniemi, Finland on Monday. One of the few questions came from CNN, asking what "leverage or opportunities" Russia had to stop a US military intervention in Venezuela.

"Some call your company CNN 'fake news,' and now you are asking a fake question," Lavrov replied.


Joking aside, the Russian top diplomat continued, Russia is categorically against any military intervention anywhere without UN Security Council authorization.

"From my contacts with American, European and Latin American counterparts, I do not see supporters of a reckless military solution. I hope that this understanding, which everyone has, will be turned into a practical policy, that there will be no military solution, because it would be catastrophic," Lavrov said.

Asked if American diplomats shared this understanding, Lavrov replied, "Yes."

Nuke

Due to lack of EU pushback on US, Iran to cut some 'voluntary commitments' made under nuclear deal

Iran Flag nuclear deal
© Reuters/Leonhard Foeger
An Iranian flag flutters in front of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) headquarters in Vienna, Austria, January 15, 2016
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif has said that Iran will continue to abide by the 2015 nuclear deal - but will no longer implement some optional commitments, due to the lack of EU pushback against the US.

Zarif, who arrived in Russia on Tuesday, sought to debunk speculation that Iran is considering abandoning part of its binding commitments under the internationally acclaimed accord, struck back in 2015.

"Iran's future actions will be fully within the [nuclear deal], from which the Islamic Republic will not withdraw," Zarif told reporters in Moscow.

He chastised the US for being hell-bent on tearing up the deal, and the EU for being too weak to resist American pressure and preserve the accord.

Comment: Iran's President Hassan Rouhani further added that the Iranian move was reciprocal action to US complete withdrawal from it under President Donald Trump.
Rouhani announced that Tehran will be gradually suspending its commitments under the deal, giving other parties subsequent periods of 60 days to negotiate a reversal of those actions. He blamed European signatories of failing to compensate to Iran the damage done by US unilateral sanctions after Washington broke its part of the bargain.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif earlier told reporters Tehran would be backing out of some "voluntary commitments" under the 2015 agreement as a response to the EU's inability to stand up to the pressure of Washington's attempts to isolate Iran.
Iran has decided to resume activities it had ceased under the terms of the JCPOA:
As of now, Tehran will no longer sell off excessive enriched uranium and heavy water, the Iranian president said. Under JCPOA terms, it is required to dispose of those materials if production exceeds certain thresholds.

Other signatories will have 60 days to negotiate with Iran and address its concerns, particularly in oil industry and banking sector, which Washington targets with its sanctions. If an agreement is reached, the suspension will be reversed.

Otherwise Iran will no longer be bound by an obligation not to enrich uranium over a certain level and may restore the shut heavy water nuclear reactor in Arak, which was supposed to be repurposed with the help of other signatories under the nuclear deal.

After those measures are implemented, 60 more days will be given for negotiations, Rouhani warned. And then Iran may take additional unspecified measures, he said.

Rouhani defended the JCPOA as a deal that was beneficial to Iran and detrimental to the enemies of Iran. He said only "radicals in the US," Israel and Saudi-led Arab nations were interested in destroying it.
Yet Iran is still holding the door open for a renewed agreement:
Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has said Tehran's decision to row back on its commitments under the nuclear pact is reversible, and the deal can be saved if European states meet their obligations.

Zarif is currently in Moscow, where he told Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that Iran's move doesn't violate the original terms of the 2015 agreement. He added that there's now a 60-day period for diplomatic activity over its decision.

Iran can guarantee the continued survival of the deal if European nations fulfill their obligations under the agreement, Zarif said.


Iran says the move is a response to the US' withdrawal from the agreement one year ago, and the external pressure that has been placed on Tehran as a result. Zarif said only Russia and China have supported Iran and helped it to keep the nuclear deal going.

Zarif blamed the other signatories - Britain, Germany and France - for failing to shield it from US sanctions. France said that the three European states are doing all they can to keep the accord alive, while China has stated that all sides have a responsibility to ensure the agreement is fully implemented.

"Yes, they made some nice statements," Zarif said of comments from European leaders. "But in practice nothing happened."
But unless there is substantive progress, there are rumors Iran may also withdraw from an even older treaty:
Press TV reported on Wednesday, citing sources close to Iranian president Hassan Rouhani that Tehran might withdraw from the 1970 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons if the UN Security Council puts the issue of the Iranian nuclear deal on the agenda.

Commenting on the partial suspension of Iranian commitments under the JCPOA, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov noted earlier in the day it would be premature to hold a UNSC meeting on the matter.



Attention

DHS Sec McAleenan: Over 1% of Guatemala and Honduras entered the US since September 2018

Acting DHS Sec. McAleenan
© Homeland Security
DHS Sec. Kevin K. McAleenan
In a shocking demonstration of the latest surge of illegal immigrants border officials are struggling with, over 1% of the populations of Guatemala and Honduras have entered the United States since September, according to the Homeland Security Department chief.

Worse, 3% of the population of one Guatemalan county has crossed into the U.S., acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin K. McAleenan told the 49th Washington Conference of the Americas tonight.

"The current migration flows, especially of vulnerable families and children, from Central America through Mexico, to remote areas all along the U.S. border, represent both a security and humanitarian crisis. The situation is not sustainable," said the longtime border and immigration official.

Overall, he predicted the April numbers of illegal immigrants will be even worse than the jaw-dropping March figures which shocked the White House into shaking up its immigration team. "In March, we had over 103,000 irregular arrivals of undocumented migrants - 90% crossing the U.S. border unlawfully and unsafely in the hands of human smugglers. We will see similar numbers in April," said McAleenan.

Russian Flag

Russia expels two Swedish diplomats after Stockholm denies visas for Russian envoys

Sweden Ministry for Foreign Affairs

Sweden's Ministry for Foreign Affairs
Sweden's Foreign Ministry says two of its diplomats have been expelled from Russia following a move by Stockholm to deny visas to two of Moscow's envoys.

The expulsion, announced on May 8, was another blow to relations following an earlier diplomatic dispute over alleged Russian spying in the Nordic nation.

"Two Swedish diplomats have been asked to leave Russia," Swedish Foreign Ministry spokesman Rasmus Eljanskog said. "We regret the Russian Foreign Ministry's decision."