Welcome to Sott.net
Tue, 26 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Pistol

Kamala Harris calls for Congress to act on gun control: 'Slaughter have to stop'

Harris/Guns
© Reuters/Eduardo Munoz/Carlos Barria
US VP Kamala Harris and guns
Decrying two mass shootings in the United States in less than a week, Kamala Harris said on Wednesday that "these slaughters have to stop" but deflected a question about whether Joe Biden was prepared to take executive action to restrict access to guns, calling instead for action by Congress.

The US vice-president said on the CBS This Morning program.
"We should first expect the US Congress to act. I'm not willing to give up on what we must do to appeal to the hearts and minds and the reason of the members of the US Senate."
Two gun safety bills have been passed by the Democratic-controlled House, but under current rules unless Republicans in the Senate budge from their opposition to any such legislation - which they have shown no sign of doing - the bills cannot advance.

Comment: Lining up the horse with the cart? Shooting sprees always seem to predate the push for gun control:
As the Biden administration launches a new push for gun control, Vice President Kamala Harris insists that nobody's "coming after your guns." With Harris on record saying the exact opposite, will anyone believe her?

Speaking to CBS News on Wednesday, Harris urged Congress to pass a pair of bills that would strengthen background checks for weapon purchases. The bills were recently passed by the Democrat-controlled House, but need a 60-vote majority in the Senate. With control of the Senate split 50-50 between Democrats and Republicans, they are unlikely to pass, even after two high-profile mass shootings in the past two weeks.


Harris scolded Republicans who equate gun control with "getting rid of the Second Amendment," telling them to "stop pushing the false choice that this means everybody's trying to come after your guns, that is not what we're talking about."

Harris' appeal echoes President Biden's call for "common sense" gun laws, a call he made on Tuesday, one day after alleged gunman Ahmad Al Aliwi Al-Issa murdered 10 people in a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado.

However, gun owners and Second Amendment advocates are unlikely to be moved by her promise not to "come after" their guns. For one thing, Joe Biden explicitly vowed on the campaign trail to rid America of "assault weapons," a term ascribed by Democrats to hundreds of weapons, from certain shotguns to pistols to the ubiquitous AR-15 rifle. Asked in 2019 by CNN's Anderson Cooper if "a Biden administration... will come for my guns?" Biden answered: "Bingo, you're right if you have an assault weapon... they should be illegal, period."


His plan to "end our gun violence epidemic" includes promises to ban the sale of these weapons by reinstituting a Clinton-era law, to register all existing weapons on a federal database, to implement a mandatory buyback scheme, and to ban all online firearms sales. However, these actions are the purview of Congress, and Biden can push for them as much as he wants, but they ultimately won't pass without Republican votes in the Senate.

Both Biden and Harris are aware of this, hence their pleas to lawmakers. Biden can take executive action, and Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Tuesday that he is "considering a range" of executive orders, but their scope is far more limited and temporary than any laws passed by Congress.

Yet before she was vice president, Harris announced during her own presidential campaign that she wouldn't wait for Congress to act. She asserted in 2019 that she would ban the importation of AR-15 style rifles, mandate "near universal background checks," implement mandatory buybacks, and make gun manufacturers criminally liable for mass shootings, all by executive order if necessary and within her first 100 days in office. When Biden stressed during a debate that she had "no constitutional authority" to do this, Harris responded: "Hey Joe, instead of saying 'No, we can't,' let's say 'Yes, we can.'"


Let's just take law into our own hands and the country will just have to deal with it - seems to be a Democratic thing:


Harris was gung-ho about depriving Americans of their beloved AR-15s, as was fellow candidate Beto O'Rourke, who said taking Americans' rifles is "exactly what we're going to do... Americans who own AR-15s, AK-47s, will have to sell them to the government."

Harris told reporters that compulsory buybacks were "a great idea," and promised to do the same if elected. However, campaign trail rhetoric is just that. Barack Obama tried and failed to reintroduce the Clinton-era assault weapons ban in 2013, but fell foul of Congress [...] and short of curbing the number of so-called 'assault weapons' sold in the US.

As such, Biden and Harris may have every intention of getting these weapons off the streets, but barring a shakeup of Congress in next year's midterm elections, gun owners and enthusiasts are safe, for now.



Doberman

Byte worse than its bark? Armed robot dogs don't belong in the US police; Black Mirror is not an instruction manual for officers

robot dog
© Reuters/Kim Kyung Hoon
"DigiDog"
Unleashing weaponized robotic dogs to supplant the US's metastasizing police forces is not just a bad idea - it's a disastrous move that will vastly compound the levels of human suffering for which cops are responsible.

"DigiDog," the nickname given to Boston Dynamics' robo-canine monster by the New York Police Department, has been tested over the last year by the agency for its ability to see in the dark, assess threats, and otherwise perform policing duties human officers cannot. Hailed for its usefulness by the NYPD's emergency service and bomb squad units, it was singled out last week by New York City Council member Ben Kallos, who called for a unilateral ban on the use of "robots armed with a weapon" in a manner "likely to cause death or serious physical injury."

Kallos unveiled the No Killer Robots Act in an effort to crack down on the use of secretive surveillance and technology tools, with New York one of three American states (along with Massachusetts and Hawai'i) that have made a not-so-subtle show of testing the quadruped attack dogs in public.

Rocket

Western media quick to accuse Syria of 'bombing hospitals' - but when TERRORISTS really destroy Syrian hospitals, they are silent

Aleppo hospital
© Reuters
A general view shows the damage at a Russian military field hospital after it was shelled by Syrian rebels in Aleppo
As legacy media again bleat the unsubstantiated "Syria is bombing hospitals" chorus of its war propaganda songbook, let's pause to review the relatively unknown (but verifiable) reality of terrorists bombing hospitals in Syria.

Following recent allegations of a hospital being targeted Al Atarib, western Aleppo, the US State Department repeated the claim, in spite of any clear evidence to back it up.

Instead, reports rely on highly questionable sources like the White Helmets, the USAID-funded Syrian American Medical Society and the usual unnamed "witnesses" and (clearly impartial!) "rebel sources," as per a Reuters' report on the recent claims.

In fact, Reuters even acknowledges being unable to verify the authenticity of videos purporting to show "a ward damaged and civil defence rescuers carrying bloodstained patients outside."

Let's recall that Idlib is occupied by Al-Qaeda in Syria - a fact emphasized (as I wrote) by the US' own former special envoy, Brett McGurk, who deemed the northwestern Syrian province the "largest Al-Qaeda safe-haven since 9/11."

Comment: See also:


NPC

The Deep State can't meme! Pentagon spent over 20 days creating crappy anti-Russia cartoon

Pentagon Russia meme
© Twitter / CNMF_CyberAlert
An uninspired cartoon commissioned by the Pentagon that attempted to throw shade at Moscow required weeks to complete, documents have revealed, shining a light on how the US military goes about its creative endeavors.

On October 29, 2020, the US Cyber Command's Cyber National Mission Force posted a "meme" to Twitter showing a bear wearing a Russian ushanka. Apparently in a nod to Halloween, the cartoon animal is seen tripping as he drops his trick-or-treat basket, spilling candies labeled with the names of malware programs allegedly used by Russia.

While the image itself is rather prosaic, the process used to create it was nothing short of a bureaucratic masterpiece.

A Freedom of Information Act request filed by Runa Sandvik, a senior adviser for Norway's Armed Force Cyber Defence, unearthed 23 pages of emails and other documents related to the cartoon.

In a heavily redacted message dated October 7, a proposal is put forward to make the public aware of several types of malware.

Eye 2

Bellingcaught: Who is the mysterious author of Bellingcat's attacks on OPCW whistleblower?

Bellingcat OPCW whistleblower
© HuffPost
After publishing fraudulent claims in a bid to smear OPCW whistleblowers, Bellingcat has been caught in another subterfuge that contradicts its stated allegiance to "transparency and accountability": a hidden, external author writing its material.

The website Bellingcat promotes itself as a collective of digital sleuths who "pledge allegiance to truth and evidence and abide by the principles of transparency and accountability." Its self-described "groundbreaking investigations," especially those aimed at Russia and Syria, have led to fawning Western media endorsements of its claim to be an "intelligence agency for the people."

But Bellingcat's carefully crafted public image as an "open source" outlet is belied by its extensive NATO government ties and a conspicuous pattern of conduct in line with its state sponsors' interests. Bellingcat has hauled in grants from the National Endowment for Democracy, a US government-funded CIA cutout. Leaked documents reported by The Grayzone revealed that Bellingcat has collaborated with a UK Foreign Office operation that aims to "weaken Russia."

Comment: Further reading:


Arrow Up

Lula judge was 'biased', Brazil's supreme court rules, paving way to challenge Bolsonaro in 2022

Silva
© Miguel Schincariol/AFP/Getty Images
Lula da Silva could face off against Bolsonaro in 2022 elections in Brazil.
Brazil's supreme court has ruled that the former judge Sergio Moro was biased in the way he oversaw former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's corruption trial, providing vindication for the leftist leader who has long claimed political persecution.

The decision further darkens the shadow over the reputation of Moro and the sweeping "Car Wash" corruption investigation he presided over for years.

He sentenced hundreds of business and political leaders previously believed to enjoy impunity, and transformed himself into one of the Brazil's best-known public figures. Some hailed him a hero while others accused him of being a zealot.

Comment: See also:


Attention

UK faces 'covid decade' due to damage done by pandemic

1 Patrick Vallance
© Tolga Akmen/AFP/Getty
Patrick Vallance set up the British Academy report last year.
Britain faces a "Covid decade" of social and cultural upheaval marked by growing inequality and deepening economic deprivation, a landmark review has concluded.

Major changes to the way society is run in the wake of the pandemic are needed to mitigate the impact of the "long shadow" cast by the virus, including declining public trust and an explosion in mental illness, the British Academy report found.

Published on the anniversary of the UK's first lockdown, the report brings together more than 200 academic social science and humanities experts and hundreds of research projects. It was set up last year at the behest of the government's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance.

The British Academy warned that failure to understand the scale of the challenge ahead and deliver changes would result in a rapid slide towards poorer societal health, more extreme patterns of inequality and fragmenting national unity.

Comment: In other words, the pandemic reset worked just fine with 'changes' unfolding according to plan.


Tornado1

Expectations were created: Mexico's president blames Biden for border crisis

Obrador
© Getty Images
Andrés Manuel López Obrador
On Tuesday, left-wing Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador blamed Joe Biden and his administration for the immigration crisis which continues to unfurl at the border between the United States and Mexico. Obrador said during a press conference:
"Expectations were created that with the Government of President Biden there would be a better treatment of migrants. And this has caused Central American migrants, and also from our country, wanting to cross the border thinking that it is easier to do so."

Arrow Down

Trump: McConnell 'Hanging by a thread' as 'catastrophic' filibuster debate looms

Mitch McConnell
© Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell
Former President Donald Trump excoriated Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., as weak, ineffective, and ultimately reliant on Democrats to prevent the destruction of the filibuster, which would be "catastrophic for the Republican party."

"He's hanging by a thread," Trump said on Monday's iHeartRadio The Truth with Lisa Boothe" podcast.
"... I don't really want to talk to him. He's hanging by a thread right now with respect to the filibuster. He's hanging on [West Virginia Democratic Senator] Joe Manchin, who always goes with the Democrats. Joe talks, but he ends up going with the Democrats ... But he's hanging by a thread and if they get the filibuster, if they knock it out, it will be catastrophic for the Republican party."
Democrat momentum to abolish the Senate filibuster, which requires 60 votes to end debate and move to a final vote for most items, has picked up in recent months, with proponents charging the increasingly gridlocked Senate will be largely useless unless reforms occur. Those who support keeping the filibuster — mainly Republicans, at this point — say it's essential to preserve the voice of the minority.

Trump said Democrats would be free to pursue any radical policy they desire if the filibuster falls.

Star of David

No clear winner in Israeli election, but Netanyahu has upper hand in building a coalition

Netanyahu supporters
© Reuters/Ronen Zvulun
Exit polls show no clear winner in Israel's latest general election. However, incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a clear path to building a coalition, if his potential allies give him that gift.

Israelis went to the polls on Tuesday, to vote in the fourth general election in two years. Rocked by corruption charges in 2018, Netanyahu has managed to hold onto power thus far, winning a narrow victory in spring 2019 but failing to form a government.

After multiple elections, abortive back-and forth attempts between Netanyahiu and rival Benny Gantz to form coalitions, and Netanyahu's shutdown of the country's institutions last year - ostensibly due to the threat of Covid-19 - the Jewish state has finally had another shot at choosing a government.

Channel 13's exit poll showed Netanyahu's Likud party on track to win 33 seats in the 120-seat Knesset. Though far short of the 61 seats necessary for a majority, Netanyahu could cobble together a coalition of other right-wing parties to remain in power, but only if he secures the support of Naftali Bennett of the Yamina party.