Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 05 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Attention

Raytheon Technologies merger, power-hogging industry trends and the racket of war

Cost of war
© iStock
Who Profits?
Last week two giant war corporations, Raytheon and United Technologies, announced they would merge in early 2020. The new behemoth, to be known as Raytheon Technologies, is expected to have a combined value of over $100 billion in capitalist markets. Recent history provides context to understand today's war industry and the nature of this merger.

The nineteen-nineties witnessed a lot of mergers and acquisitions in the U.S. war industry. Some of the bigger moves were Boeing merging with McDonnell Douglas, Lockheed acquiring Martin Marietta, and Raytheon gobbling up Hughes Aircraft. These moves occurred in parallel to another phenomenon: Home and abroad, the Pentagon effectively doubled down on the corporatization of military functions. Jobs that once were carried out by the troops (e.g. mowing the lawn, serving chow, logistics, eavesdropping on governments, transportation, combat) were increasingly in the private domain, up for grabs to the shrewdest corporation.

The Clinton White House, a country club of neoliberal ideology, was fully onboard. It encouraged the corporatization of the War Department. This aligned well with President Clinton's other accomplishments in office: attacking sovereign nations (e.g. expanding sanctions against Iran's oil sector in 1995, and launching industry ordnance at Afghanistan, the Balkans, Iraq, and Sudan); brutalizing the destitute, working poor, and caged (via the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform & Immigrant Responsibility Act, the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act, the 1996 Personal Responsibility & Work Opportunity Act, and the 1994 Violent Crime Control & Law Enforcement Act); and aiding corporate greed (by passing NAFTA and the 1999 Financial Services Modernization Act and boosting spending on war). One of Clinton's most damaging achievements, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, complemented these activities by deregulating the telecoms and allowing cross-ownership in corporate media, clogging the information space with info-tainment and permitting corporate ideology to further dominate our perception of the world around us. Support for neoliberal economic polices, including the corporatization of war, is one of many traits that both parties in the D.C. regime share.

Comment: The MIC is 'a war business' that increasingly has a say in global events. Without wars, bottom lines sink. Who is in the driver seat? Surely not the public, nor the average politician, nor the military. It is this financial arrangement that determines when and where the action escalates. And, so far, the business of war is booming and deal-maker Trump is treading deep water.


Question

Who will survive the Iran counter-offensive?

Trump
© ABC7.com
US President Donald Trump
Iran has had enough. I think it's fair to say that after 60+ years of U.S. aggression towards Iran that the decision to shoot down a U.S. drone represents an inflection point in world politics.

In the first few hours after the incident the fog of war was thick. But a day later much of it has cleared thanks to Iran's purposeful poke at U.S. leadership by coming clean with their intentions.

Iran chose to shoot down this drone versus hitting the manned P-8 aircraft and then chose not to lie about it in public, but rather come forward removing any deniability they could have had.

They did this after President Trump's comments yesterday during a news conference with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau where Trump described the attack as "a big mistake" and "not intentional."

But it was intentional.

Comment:




Arrow Up

Trump wants to create a new bilateral or multilateral nuclear deal with Iran

Trump

US President Donald Trump
The US unilaterally withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, reinstating sanctions against Iran and imposing additional restrictions since then.

Speaking at NBC News on Sunday, US President Donald Trump said that either a bilateral or a multilateral nuclear deal with Iran would do.

"I don't care what kind of a deal. It can be separate or it can be total. Anything that gets to the result - they cannot have a nuclear weapon," he replied to a question whether he wanted to get China or Russia involved in it.

Trump said he wanted to talk with Iran with no preconditions. He claimed that Iran's economy was "shattered" and the inflation was going "through the roof." "I'm not looking for war. And if there is, it will be obliteration like you've never seen before. But I'm not looking to do that. But you can't have a nuclear weapon. You want to talk? Good. No preconditions," he said.

The US president also said that he didn't send a message to Tehran warning the country of a US attack.

Arrow Down

Silicon Valley destroys American democracy by playing political favorites, gatekeeping the message

Silicon Valley
© Noah Berger/Reuters
Silicon Valley Apple Campus 2, Cupertino, California
Perhaps it was expecting too much that the tech giants would check their political allegiances at the door to ensure fairness. Instead, they have let their political affinities disrupt the process every step of the way and this is leading the country down a blind alley.

June 2019 may go down in the history books as the defining moment when the American IT giants - in cahoots with the limping 'legacy' media - removed their masks, as well as their gloves, revealing the real threat they have become to the institution of US democracy, fragile as it already is.

The New York Times got the ball rolling when it ran a front-page story ('The Making of a YouTube Radical') detailing the trials and tribulations of one tortured Caleb Cain, a college dropout who was "looking for direction" in life but instead tumbled headlong into a rabbit hole of "far-right politics on YouTube" where he eventually found himself "brainwashed" and "radicalized."

The article, quoting "critics and independent researchers," which I suppose could mean just about anyone, says the Google-owned platform has created "a dangerous on-ramp to extremism by combining ... a business model that rewards provocative videos with exposure and advertising dollars, and an algorithm that guides users down personalized paths meant to keep them glued to their screens."

Comment: See also:


Brick Wall

Trump delays ICE deportations: Will Congress work out solution to border crisis?

ICE arrests illegal immigrants
© Joshua LottReuters/File
Donald Trump has delayed a planned round-up of illegal immigrants for two weeks so that Democrats and Republicans can work out a solution to the border crisis that has been going on for months.

The US president declared that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would start catching and deporting millions of illegal immigrants earlier this week. On Saturday, he tweeted that Democrats had asked him to put this process on hold, so he gave it two weeks to see if the parties "can get together and work out a solution to the Asylum and Loophole problems at the Southern Border."

Comment: More from the Gateway Pundit:
On Saturday morning former ICE Director Tom Homan went off on the government official who leaked the cities involved in the upcoming ICE raids. Homan outed acting Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan for resisting the upcoming ICE raids and for leaking the timing and location to the press.
Tom Homan: As far as these mayors from sanctuary cities, I just wish they'd just shut their mouths. Because you want to talk about separation of families? Separation of families are the Angel moms and dads who've been separated from their children forever because illegal aliens walked out of your sanctuary jail. Every one of those mayors ought to be ashamed, San Francisco, New York, Chicago, I could go on and on... You've got the acting Secretary of Homeland Security resisting what ICE is trying to do.

In the Washington Post story, and numerous media outlets, he does not support this operation. And I tell you what, if that's his position then he's on the wrong side of this issue. You don't tell the men and women of ICE a day before they go out there to do this operation. When this story was leaked, they gave the location of the cities, the day this was supposed to start, how many targets. This leak, which I know where the leak came from, I think we all know where the leak came from. That story only benefits one person. Put these officers at greater risk of harm. I know the president said we're going to do an operation, one million people in a week. He didn't give the location... He didn't give the number of targets...
Kevin McAleenan served as deputy commissioner of Customs and Border Protection from 2014 to 2017.

Via FOX and Friends Weekend:

Meanwhile, conservative commentator Candice Owens filed this Periscope report in October of 2018, detailing the near opulence of a illegal immigrant detention center in Florida (strong language warning):





Snakes in Suits

Top security official Ali Shamkhani: 'Iran would sign no-war pact with Iraq if not for US' destabilizing role'

Ali Shamkhani
© Azvision.az
Ali Shamkhani, Supreme National Security Council Secretary
Iran considers security in the Gulf as vital and does not intend to attack anybody, Secretary of the country's Supreme National Security Council Ali Shamkhani told RT, accusing the US of sowing discord in the region.

Shamkhani told RT's Salam Musafir on a visit to Moscow that his country aims to ease tensions with all of its neighbors, including Arab and non-Arab countries, since they share a common history and culture. He said that this provides a basis for exploring a comprehensive non-aggression treaty that might also include Iraq.

"There is much evidence of brotherly relations between the regional powers. This might have paved the way for an agreement or a treaty [on non-aggression]," said the top official.

However, full-fledged reconciliation between Tehran and Baghdad is being impeded by the US, which deliberately drives a wedge between regional powers, many of which are US allies hosting its military installations. "Of course, external forces that have military bases in the countries of the region do not allow this. These forces won't allow these countries to act in accordance with their own will," said Shamkhani.

Snakes in Suits

China recalls its Canadian ambassador; Trudeau's technocrat regime is too nuts

FreelandTrudeauLu
© The Canadian Patriot/shanghaiist.com
Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs Chrystia Freeland, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau,
Chinese Ambassador Lu Shaye
As the international financial system is becoming increasingly shaped by the spirit of cooperation and long term development shaped by China's Belt and Road Initiative and the greater Russia-China alliance, Canada's adherence to the "old liberal order" has caused the Asian giant to make a tough decision: Remove its Ambassador Extraordinary Plenipotentiary Lu Shaye from the Northern Monarchy until saner heads become a factor in Canadian politics.

This has left the already beleaguered government of Justin Trudeau (and Chrystia Freeland... let's not kid ourselves here) in an embarrassing situation as Trudeau's requests to meet with Xi Jinping at the upcoming G20 have gone ignored for the past several days. Freeland has announced that her many requests to speak with China's Foreign Minister have similarly gone unheeded.

Since attaining power in 2015, the Liberal Government has demonstrated nothing but constant belligerence to China. Many then watching the Canadian political scene had hoped that Trudeau would continue the pro-China traditions which his father initiated in 1970 and which paved the way to China's opening up under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping a few years later. This did not occur.

Comment: See also:


Arrow Up

Xi and Kim agree on friendly ties 'whatever the international situation'

Kim and Xi
© KCNA/Reuters
Chinese President Xi Jinping • North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday discussed ways to strengthen collaboration between their two countries, North Korean state media KCNA said on Saturday, according to Reuters.

During a luncheon on the second day of Xi's visit to Pyongyang, the leaders spoke of the "major internal and external policies" of their countries and exchanged views on domestic and international issues of mutual concern, Reuters reported, citing KCNA.

Moreover, Kim and Xi reached a consensus on "important issues", and agreed to build on their countries' friendly relations "whatever the international situation", Reuters reported, citing North Korean state media.

Xi's historic visit marks the first time in 14 years that a Chinese party and state leader has come to North Korea. The summit was organized to mark the 70th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the People's Republic of China and North Korea. Xi last traveled to the country as prime minister in 2008. Hu Jintao, the country's previous leader, visited Pyongyang in 2005.

Rocket

US wants low-yield nukes, not to deter Russia, but to blackmail dissident countries

Trident II D5 missile
© Reuters/US Navy
Trident II D5 missile is test-launched from the Ohio-class US Navy ballistic missile submarine USS Nebraska.
US generals are well aware that there's no way of limiting the use of nuclear weapons in a war between superpowers, so the claim that some "low-yield" nukes are needed to match Russia is an outright lie, the Foreign Ministry said.

Moscow's statement comes in response to the vice-chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Paul Selva, who vehemently promoted the modification of the warheads on Trident missiles, which are carried on Ohio-class submarines, in order for them to be able to carry low-yield nuclear weapons.

Selva argued that the US will be put in a difficult situation if Russia decides to hit an American city with a low-yield nuclear weapon. "The US doctrine says it will respond in kind, but without a low-yield nuclear weapon in its inventory, responding in kind means it will have to respond with a high-yield nuclear weapon," supposedly provoking and all-out nuclear war.

But the Russian Foreign Ministry on Saturday blasted the general's claims as "disingenuous" and pointed out that the use of low-yield nuclear weapons wasn't even a part of Russia's military doctrine. "An obvious deception is also the idea that it's possible to 'limit' the use of nuclear weapons in a clash between two nuclear powers."

The yield of an incoming enemy warhead can only be determined after it detonates and the Americans are well aware of that, the ministry said in a statement. "Therefore, any launch of a strategic nuclear carrier aimed at Russian territory... regardless of the capacity of its warhead, will be treated as an aggression with the use of nuclear weapons, and met with an appropriate response."

Comment: See also:


Broom

Trump on Bolton: If it was up to him, we'd be fighting the whole world

bolton trump
© REUTERS/CARLOS BARRIA
John Bolton sits behind Donald Trump during a White House event earlier this year.
Donald Trump has confirmed that his top foreign policy adviser wants to embroil the US in multiple international conflicts. But the US president insists he retains final say on whether American missiles are to fly into Iran.

In a sit-down Meet the Press interview broadcast Sunday, host Chuck Todd asked Trump if he was "being pushed into military action against Iran" by his advisers - presumably pointing to the aggressive pronouncements from National Security Advisor John Bolton.

"I have two groups of people. I have doves and I have hawks," replied Trump. "John Bolton is absolutely a hawk. If it was up to him he'd take on the whole world at one time, okay?"


Trump then brushed away concerns about the influence of Bolton, who also served in the White House during the Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush administrations.


Comment: This is how he said it:
I disagree very much with John Bolton. His attitude in the Middle East and Iraq - going into Iraq, I think that was a big mistake and I've been proven right but I've been against that forever. John Bolton is doing a very good job, but he takes a generally tough posture. I have other people that don't take that posture, but the only one that matters is me.
"These people want to push us into a war, and it's so disgusting. We don't need any more wars", Trump is alleged to have told one confidant about his advisers, per the WSJ.


"That doesn't matter because I want both sides," said Trump.

Comment: Here's what Bolton had to say, while in Israel:
Tehran should not "mistake US prudence and discretion for weakness," Bolton cautioned.

"Our military is rebuilt, new and ready to go," he added, days after Trump called off a planned attack on Iran, a chosen response to Tehran downing a US drone on Thursday.

Citing a planned strike against Iranian targets which US President Donald Trump called off, Bolton emphasized that Trump had only stopped the attack from "going forward at this time" - an indication that the decision may only be temporary.