Puppet Masters
1. The Fed has perfected moral hazard: everyone from the money manager betting billions to the punters gambling their stimmy money is absolutely confident I can't lose because the Fed will always push the market higher.
What happens when participants are confident they can't possibly lose? They make ever-riskier and ever-larger bets. The entire nation is in the grip of a moral hazard mania, all based on the confidence that the Fed will always push every market higher — always, without fail.
2. Organic (i.e. non-manipulated) market forces have been extinguished. There is now only one consequential force, the Fed. All markets are now 100% dependent on the Fed responding to every bleat from every punter who's recklessly risky bet is about to go bad.
The Fed is now the perfect union of quasi-religious savior and Helicopter Parent: oh dear, our little darling got high and crashed the Porsche? Quick, let's save our precious market from any consequences!
Every day, Fed speakers take to the pulpit to spew another sermon about the Fed's god-like power and wisdom. The true believers soak up every word: golly-gee, the Fed is better than any god — it's guaranteeing I can get rich if I just leverage up any bet in any market!

In this handout photo released by the Russian Foreign Ministry, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is pictured during a meeting with his Djiboutian counterpart Mahamoud Ali Youssouf, in Moscow, Russia.
Comment: Wonderful anti-imperial-US zingers abound in this piece. If only there were enough sane individuals in Washington's seats of power with ears capable of actually listening!
While Russia makes no secret of its colossal armed forces and influence across the globe, it is fundamentally uninterested in imposing its way of life on other nations and is keen to end the current stand-off with the West.
That's according to the country's foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, who told an international relations conference on Wednesday that Moscow "has no superpower ambitions, regardless of how much people try to convince themselves and everyone else otherwise."
"We don't have the messianic fervor with which our Western colleagues are trying to spread their 'values-based democratic agenda' throughout the planet," he added. "It has long been clear to us that the imposition of a certain development model from the outside does nothing good."
Russia, Lavrov argued, "does not have an inferiority complex" and is therefore not spoiling for a fight. He claimed Moscow's foreign policy is based around its willingness "to help those who need it," and said the country is interested in developing "pragmatic relations with the West and the US."

Public First is run by husband and wife policy specialists James Frayne and Rachel Wolf, both of whom previously worked with Dominic Cummings and the Cabinet Office minister, Michael Gove.
Michael Gove acted unlawfully when the government awarded a contract without a tender to a polling company owned by long-term associates of his and Dominic Cummings, then Boris Johnson's chief adviser, a judge has ruled.
Campaigners had taken legal action against Gove over the decision to pay more than £500,000 of taxpayers' money to the market research firm Public First, following the start of the coronavirus crisis in March 2020, and questioned the involvement of Cummings.
Mrs Justice O'Farrell, who gave the ruling on the Cabinet Office contract with Public First, said: "The decision of 5 June 2020 to award the contract to Public First gave rise to apparent bias and was unlawful."
She ruled that the Cabinet Office's failure to identify or consider any other research agency to carry out the work gave the appearance of "a real danger" that the contract award was biased.
The ruling is the first in a series of judicial review legal challenges brought by the Good Law Project (GLP) against government Covid-19 contracts awarded with no competitive tenders under emergency regulations.
Comment: And, of course, Cummings tried to spin his decision to hire his friends (and support the revolving door of cronyism in the name of the 'crisis') in the following way:
Responding to the ruling, Cummings, who previously served as Prime Minister Boris Johnson's chief adviser, argued that the court failed to take into account the government's priorities in the early days of the pandemic.
"On this basis the courts [should] rule that many 2020 decisions were similarly 'unlawful' as I & the Cabinet Secretary repeatedly told officials 'focus on imminent threats to lives/destruction, not process/lawyers/Potemkin paper trails,'" he tweeted. He said that Public First had helped to collect urgently-needed data which "helped key decisions and saved lives."
Suggesting that the government had bypassed formalities so that it could focus on responding in a timely manner to the health crisis, Cummings added: "If Covid doesn't justify focus on outcome>process, nothing will."
The former aide, who left his position last year, argued during the court case that ministers had to act quickly following the outbreak of the pandemic, and that the deal with Public First was "entirely justified."
Comment: In an outrageous development that has not produced the appropriate condemnation and questioning, changes to the way UK hospitals collect data will correct the way covid cases and deaths have been reported. Unlike the last 14 months where anyone who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, or died with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2, were deemed to be "positive cases" or have died "from covid", regardless of whether or not that was the actual cause of death, the new method will clinically define covid cases and deaths. This will create the necessary appearance that the vaccines are working and make the impact of the virus on the NHS "look better".

Russian opposition activist Alexei Navalny appears via video link during a court hearing at the Petushki district court, Russia May 26, 2021.
Alongside the Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK), his national network of political offices and his Citizens' Rights Protection Foundation were also branded as extremist.
The decision comes six weeks after the same body approved preliminary restrictions against the activist's organization, pending today's result. These limits included a ban on posting materials online, as well as a prohibition on organizing rallies and participating in elections.
Comment: During the municipal elections in 2020, Navalny and his supporters won 7 council seats in 2 regions, described as a failure by the Russian press, meanwhile the nationalist parties were seen as posing a more significant electoral threat to Russia's main parties; so, for the moment at least, Navalny and his gang were hardly legitimate challengers to the government.
See also:
- Pro-western liberal, anti-migrant nationalist, or political opportunist: Who exactly is Russian opposition figure Alexey Navalny?
- 50% of Ukrainians who oppose NATO are 'smart' knowing they'd be used by US as cannon fodder against Russia - Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin meets with Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation Director Dmitry Shugaev at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia.
"At least 50% of Ukrainians do not want the country to join NATO," Putin said in an interview with the Russia 1 news channel on Wednesday, "and these are smart people."
"I am speaking without irony, and not because the others are stupid," the president added, "but because those people [who support joining the bloc] do not understand that they are better off not being in the line of fire. They don't want to be a bargaining chip or cannon fodder."
Comment: Earlier this week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken suggested that Europe and the US would be encouraged to subsidize Ukraine's military expenditure: Nord Stream 2 sanctions could have 'poisoned' US ties with Germany & failed anyway - US Sec Blinken
See also: Russia tells US to expect 'uncomfortable' signals ahead of Putin-Biden summit, as West increases activity on its border
On Tuesday, ProPublica, citing Internal Revenue Service documents, revealed that several of America's richest people — Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and Soros, among others — paid no federal income tax in certain years, as they claimed to have made net losses that offset gains.
Soros's tax avoidance is among the most striking, since he funds a vast array of left-wing groups, which generally share the belief that the rich should be taxed more to redistribute their wealth to the poor, and to fund government programs.
Comment:
- Donors of anti-Trump "resistance", Center for Community Change, revealed in unredacted tax forms
- Soros pumps nearly $18 billion into Open Society Foundation to further neo-liberal causes and regime change plans
- George Soros has spent hundreds of millions to manipulate U.S. federal election laws, media coverage
- George Soros meddling: Billionaire pumped £400,000 in anti-Brexit campaign
- Big surprise: Media silent regarding George Soros' hidden hand in U.S. internal affairs
- Soros - Quantum of Destruction: Documentary chronicles the financier of chaos
- George Soros 60 Minutes unearthed: "I don't look at the social consequences of what I do"
As previously reported by Human Events News, Manchin said he will vote against the election reform bill pushed by his colleagues.
Manchin said that because the bill, called the "For the People Act," was forced through via the reconciliation process, it will further deepen the existing divides in Congress and the country as a whole.
"I believe that partisan voting legislation will destroy the already weakening binds of our democracy, and for that reason, I will vote against the For the People Act," he wrote.
Manchin also reaffirmed that he won't vote to weaken or eliminate the filibuster.
"There was nothing basically for or against...basically everyone's position was discussed," Manchin said after meeting with NAACP President Derrick Johnson, Al Sharpton, National Urban League president Marc Morial and others, per the Epoch Times.
Comment: Manchin is pretty much the sole sane Democrat in office. Naturally, the Borg isn't pleased with such a blatant expression of principled individualism.
- Progressive dam about to break
- Joe Manchin opposes DC statehood bill in blow to Dem push for more Senate seats
- House votes to make DC a state, Republicans call bill a Democrat 'power grab'
In a report Thursday, privacy commissioner Daniel Therrien said there were serious and systemic failings by the RCMP to ensure compliance with the Privacy Act before it gathered information from U.S. firm Clearview AI.
Clearview AI's technology allows for the collection of huge numbers of images from various sources that can help police forces, financial institutions and other clients identify people.
Comment: It's possible that this data isn't staying within Canada, either: Danish PM insists relations with European allies don't need repairing amid US spying connection allegations
Comment: A similar ruling was made over in Wales, in the UK, yet the judge declared that the uses of the technology were 'potentially great' - despite having an error rate of up to 96% - and in recent years they've also been trialed on London's streets. In a more unsettling move, but as an example of just what these new technologies can do, the UK's traffic cameras were turned onto pedestrians to monitor whether 'social distancing' restrictions were being adhered to.
And that's just in the UK; numerous other countries in the West seem a little too eager to deploy these 'Big Brother' technologies against their citizens. Over the last year the coronavirus has provided cover for the encroaching dystopia, but before that it was sold to people as simply part of the new 'smart cities'.
The establishment and its propaganda media are quick to criticise the use of these technologies by other countries, China in particular, but they're almost silent on their use in their home countries, against their own population.
National security school
Increasingly, it appears, intelligence agencies the world over are beginning to appreciate agents with a strong academic background. A 2009 study published by the CIA described how beneficial it is to "use universities as a means of intelligence training," writing that, "exposure to an academic environment, such as the Department of War Studies at King's College London, can add several elements that may be harder to provide within the government system." The paper, written by two King's College staffers, boasted that the department's faculty has "extensive and well-rounded intelligence experience."
This was no exaggeration. Current Department of War Studies educators include the former Secretary General of NATO, former U.K. Minister of Defense, and military officers from the U.K, U.S. and other NATO countries. "I deeply appreciate the work that you do to train and to educate our future national security leaders, many of whom are in this audience," said then-U.S. Secretary of Defense (and former CIA Director) Leon Panetta in a speech at the department in 2013.
King's College London also admits to having a number of ongoing contracts with the British state, including with the Ministry of Defence (MoD), but refuses to divulge the details of those agreements.











Comment: Being dependent on those direct deposits will very likely also mean having to do exactly what the Federal Gov't wants you to do; so if there is a way to avoid having to rely on the handouts - it may afford us some measure of independence, however small.