Puppet Masters
The history of impeachment proceedings in the modern era, from Nixon to Clinton to Trump, shows that a successful impeachment needs three things: it must be bipartisan, it must be about something Americans think is important, and Congress must strike while the iron is hot. In Trump's case, Democrats have botched all three.
First, this impeachment inquiry is an entirely partisan affair. The public hearings of recent weeks have made this undeniable, but even before the hearings it was obvious that Democrats alone were going to conduct this impeachment. The House's impeachment inquiry resolution passed last month without a single Republican vote, and in fact two Democrats joined GOP lawmakers in voting against the resolution, making opposition to the impeachment probe bipartisan.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried to avoid this, which is one reason she refused to call for an open House vote on whether to open an impeachment inquiry and instead announced the "inquiry" in a press conference. She knew any House vote would be entirely along partisan lines, undermining the inquiry's credibility from the outset. By the time Democrats brought forward their impeachment rules resolution at the end of October, Pelosi had lost control of the process.
On September 26, Congressman Adam Schiff reviewed the contents of the "whistleblower" complaint that triggered the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. "It reads like a classic organized crime shakedown," Schiff said.
Imitating Trump speaking to Ukrainian President Volodymir Zelensky, Schiff demanded, "I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand. Lots of it."
If the alleged "organized crime shakedown" by Trump was the "good" reason for the impeachment inquiry, the "real" reason has emerged over two weeks of public congressional hearings. The hearings have lifted the lid on a massive US conspiracy to spend billions of dollars to overthrow the democratically elected government of Ukraine in 2014 and foment a civil war that has led to the deaths of thousands of people.
The impeachment drive is itself the product of efforts by sections of the intelligence agencies and elements within the State Department to escalate Washington's conflict with Russia, with potentially world-catastrophic consequences.
Comment: That's right, the choice to declare war on a peaceful country gets decided by a few thousand crazies in Washington, not the democratically elected leader of the US - or the majority of Americans - who, if they were actually given the facts instead of the propaganda - would likely usher out the genocidal beltway crazies in seconds flat.

HRW director Omar Shakir speaks at Ben Gurion International Airport before his deportation from Israel, November 25, 2019.
Shakir, a US citizen, was placed on a flight out of Ben Gurion International Airport on Monday, after the Israeli Supreme Court upheld the government's decision to expel him from Tel Aviv. The government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Shakir has been an outspoken advocate of the BDS movement prior to his work at HRW, and that they have every right to expel him under a 2017 amendment to the rules of entry and residency.
Comment: If you can't make it, fake it!
A candidate being fielded by the Tories for the UK general election has been left red-faced after being filmed setting up a fake 'spontaneous' interview with one of his residents - who is also, crucially, one of his friends.
Lee Anderson, the Conservative candidate for Ashfield, who recently caused a stir online, after suggesting anti-social council tenants should be forced to live in tents in the field and undergo hard labor, has been caught trying to trick a journalist on the campaign trail.
Michael Crick, who is reporting for Mail+ during the election campaign, spent a day with Anderson as he canvassed his constituents - accompanied by his film crew.
Comment: And it's not just the MPs that are up to such trickery, the Conservatives have the UK's tax-payer funded, state broadcaster, the BBC, doing their dirty work, too:
- 'It was a MISTAKE': BBC accused of BoJo bias after editing out audience mocking laughter
- BBC deliberately broadcasts 'coded negative imagery' of Corbyn, top British lawyer claims
- BBC's anti-Corbyn hatchet job fails to land blow - Panorama exposé full of innuendo and ommissions
The great mistake foreign observers make observing the latest farce in Washington is assuming that there must be some order, rationality and linear logic behind it. There is none. It is Politics According to the Marx Brothers
This is a show trial - incompetently planned and directed with hundreds of crazed scriptwriters: The Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee, their staffs and the salivating Mainstream US Media are writing and rewriting the script as they go along.
If one is to believe the Mainstream Media, who avidly take this bizarre cartoon seriously, enough evidence has already been established to clearly convict Trump of seeking to push an inquiry into the prima facie evidence of corruption on the part of the son of a former vice president and the leading Democratic presidential candidate.
Is this supposed to be criminal or shocking? What is Trump even accused of doing? He is accused of cautiously investigating the possibility of corruption in a sensitive and clearly unstable US ally whose government openly tried to influence the 2016 US presidential election (as Russia did NOT!)
Comment: "Strongman"! Ooh, that's gonna wins hearts and minds!

Supporters of ousted President Evo Morales hold a sign that reads "Down with the coup in Bolivia," November 22, 2019
President Evo Morales of Bolivia resigned on November 10, after losing the support of the military, after US-backed opposition violently protested the outcome of the election which showed him winning in the first round with a 10-percent lead over the closest challenger. Three days later, opposition senator Jeanine Añez declared herself "interim president." Washington called it a "significant moment for democracy in the Western Hemisphere."
In the New York Times narrative, however, Morales was a "strongman" - at least in the printed edition headline - and "a leftist who led with a single-minded pursuit of his vision for 14 years."
Tulsi Gabbard may be trailing in the polls, but she certainly set herself apart from the other 2020 hopefuls.
The veteran has been mercilessly attacked by her own party. Hillary Clinton, defying all logic, accused her of being a Russian operative (sound familiar?).
Gabbard is even taking on Google for alleged attempts to censor her.
It seems the liberal establishment is doing everything they can to squash their fellow Democrat. But Tulsi is not backing down.
And she's taking on the entire party.
Comment: See also:
- Tulsi Gabbard: Impeachment proceedings would only tear US apart
- Tulsi Gabbard's tour of Aleppo shames Western media
- Allies of Tulsi Gabbard pushing back after she is unfairly attacked by Establishment for speaking the truth on Syria
- Tulsi Gabbard hits back: 'They will destroy you' if you stand up to Clinton
- Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard smokes CNN shill: 'US is funding terrorists' in Syria
To understand why, you have to know why the US started a trade war with China in the first place. It began with a very specific investigation, one using Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to examine claims of Chinese theft of US intellectual property.
The investigation determined what many in the business community had been talking about for years: that China abused its US partners, stole the IP of American companies, forced those companies to reveal their technology to Chinese counterparts, and muscled US firms out of the Chinese economy in favor of state-owned enterprises.
This, the Trump administration said, was a problem beyond the capacity of the World Trade Organization. It was a problem worth going to economic war over. And so we did.
But so far this trade war has accomplished nothing aside from breaking up US supply chains and souring relations between the US and China. And now instead of discussing meaningful ways the Chinese economy will open to US businesses, trade negotiators are reportedly haggling over how many soybeans China will buy.
Turkey won't be resuming its military offensive in northeastern Syria, Reuters reports citing an unnamed security source.
Ankara's operation against Kurdish forces along the Syrian border, which Turkey designates as terrorists, lasted for nine days in mid-October. On 17 October, Turkey agreed to a US-brokered ceasefire for five days to let Kurdish-led forces withdraw from the area.
In a bid to avoid further expansion of Turkish troops within Syria's territory, the Damascus government reached a deal with the Kurdish-led alliance of militias, the SDF, to deploy the Syrian army to the border areas. Damascus views the Turkish offensive as a violation of Syria's sovereignty.

The Huawei logo in front of the company’s German headquarters in Duesseldorf, Germany
Berlin did not "boycott" US enterprises after the National Security Agency (NSA) was found to be tapping the phones of Chancellor Angela Merkel and her predecessor Gerhard Schröder in 2013, Economic Minister Peter Altmaier told German TV ARD on Sunday.
"The US also demands from its companies that they pass on certain information that is needed to fight terrorism," Altmaier continued, making the point that even if Huawei is eventually found to be passing on data to Beijing, it would not be anything Washington has not already demanded of US companies working in Germany.
Of course, Germany wasn't just throwing caution to the wind: "It must be demonstrably ensured that the Chinese state has no influence, and every single component must be certified to ensure it hasn't been manipulated in any way," Altmaier continued. But "that of course also applies to European and US suppliers."
That said, the minister's comments infuriated US Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell, who has been one of the most strident voices pushing Berlin to exile Huawei from its networks. The diplomatic mission issued a vague but menacing statement on Monday reminding that the thousands of American troops stationed in Germany are liable to take offense at such careless talk.
"The recent claims by senior German officials that the United States is equivalent to the Chinese Communist Party are an insult to the thousands of American troops who help ensure Germany's security," Grenell said in the statement.












Comment: It is also clear that, on the heels of the ridiculous and disastrous "Russiagate" and Mueller investigation - there is already a precedent set in the minds of many Americans for Washington accusing Trump of great malfeasance and, after much hoopla, it coming to absolutely nothing. This impeachment probe is just obviously more of the same. Unless you're a Trump hater that is.