Puppet MastersS


Uzi

Best of the Web: The FBI entraps another fake assassin

trump FBI routh
Two attempts on the life of a former president, less than two months apart, is unprecedented in American history. And yet it's not entirely surprising given that the country's most powerful institutions and industries have spent the last eight years weaponizing the most suggestible and mentally ill of our citizenry to target Donald Trump and his supporters. Now it seems the FBI may be recruiting from abroad as well.

According to the Trump campaign, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence recently briefed the Republican candidate on "real and specific threats from Iran to assassinate him in an effort to destabilize and sow chaos in the United States." The Secret Service was alerted to the threat before the July 13 attempt on Trump's life and reportedly increased his security because of it. But that was not enough to stop Thomas Matthew Crooks from shooting Trump in the face, killing Corey Comperatore, and wounding two other attendees.

There's little doubt the Iranians are targeting Trump, say former intelligence officials with whom I spoke. "The Iranians are promiscuous assassins, and they hate Trump more than anyone else on earth," says Peter Theroux, a retired CIA officer who worked on Iran and related issues during his tenure at Langley. "Trump enforced sanctions against Iran. He moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem. He was the most antithetical to everything Tehran wants, including the triumphal visit to Riyadh he made for his first presidential trip in 2017."

Comment: This time. As if a deep stater like Wray will ever 'come clean'. The more alarming aspect of this fake FBI assassination plot is that the Feds may have intended to link Crooks to this idiot, and thus Iran, thereby channeling American public outrage into support for war against Iran.


Nuke

Liberation of the Kursk Region or nuclear armageddon

Dugan apocalpse
© vgenii Bugubaev/Getty Images/KJNAlexander Dugin • Nuclear Apocalypse
Alexander Dugin argues that the decision has been made.

Yesterday's session of the permanent meeting of the Russian Security Council, during which Vladimir Putin announced amendments to our country's nuclear doctrine ("Fundamentals of State Policy in the Field of Nuclear Deterrence"), is an extremely important event. The most significant aspect here is the following innovation introduced into the nuclear doctrine: participation in aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear state, if supported by a nuclear state, will be considered a joint attack on the Russian Federation.

This is a fundamental point, according to which our President, as Supreme Commander-in-Chief, now not only retains the right to use nuclear weapons. In the event that our country is attacked by a non-nuclear state with the support of a nuclear state, he is not only entitled to respond according to the full logic of nuclear deterrence but is obligated to do so.

Comment: Grasp 'the totality' of what is at stake. That's it. Show's over.

See also: Russia's new nuclear doctrine ready - Kremlin


Stop

True Promise II: Did Iran 'restore deterrence' after its latest strikes against Israel?

rocketsflags
Iran versus Israel
All that can be assessed thus far in the absence of any Israeli retaliation at the time of writing is that both sides are very concerned about their reputations.

Iran launched several hundred ballistic missiles against Israel on the evening of 1 October in retaliation for the self-professed Jewish State's assassination of top Resistance Axis figures and its latest war in Lebanon.

Both sides are spinning this to their advantage: Iran claims that "True Promise II" destroyed several of its enemy's military bases while Israel insists that it was a mostly harmless demonstration. Even so, Israel still promised to retaliate at a time and place of its choosing, keeping the world on edge.
The timing of Iran's retaliation coincides with the start of the latest Israeli-Lebanese War's ground phase and might thus have been partially meant to deter a large-scale operation that could lead to Gaza-like levels of destruction. It also followed some of its supporters angrily speculating that Hezbollah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah's assassination last week might not have happened had Iran decisively responded to the assassination of Hamas' political chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran over the summer.

Comment: The answers? We won't have long to wait. Neither side will pass up an advantage.


Tornado2

Chaos as cover

red fire
© unknown
If you're looking toward this election as anything other than a trigger event, you're missing the point. It doesn't even matter who wins in respect to your preparedness. Contact with the enemy is ensured either way. There is no peaceful path other than total and complete compliance; abandoning any hope for the future of the republic and human rights.

As LTC Steven Murray put it in a recent video, this vote is not like any other, it is the last act of a civilized man participating in a civilized act simply to erase the last vestige of responsibility before becoming absolutely ungovernable. The goal is to make the communists exert every effort to overcome the popularity and vote count to arrive at a Kamala win. The harder they have to work the more careless they become and the more eyes open as to the real status of the coup.

Where Trump would have to be inaugurated before implementing any of his policies, Kamala could start immediately, bypassing the ordinary transition, because all of her secretaries and sychophants would already be in place. They would basically be those of Barack Obama's fourth term, anyway. She will then be able to go to sleep like Joe and let them run it all, but with much strengthened zeal toward the outright denigration of the population.

Comment: It is all downhill from here: How soon, how fast, how deadly.


Red Flag

Harris a threat to US democracy - Vance

TrumpVance
© Win McNamee/Getty ImagesRepublican ticket Donald Trump and J.D. Vance • Republican National Convention • July 15, 2024 • Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Democratic nominee Kamala Harris wants to silence those she accuses of "misinformation," the Republican VP candidate has said.

Limits on free speech have become the biggest threat to US democracy, Republican vice-presidential candidate J.D. Vance claimed during a televised debate on Tuesday.

Donald Trump's running mate for the November election faced off with his Democratic opponent, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, on CBS News.

Vance claimed:
"Rather than debating and persuading fellow Americans, (Democratic nominee) Kamala Harris would like to censor people who engage in misinformation.

"Harris is engaged in censorship on an industrial scale. She has done it over a number of issues. That's a bigger threat to democracy than what Donald Trump said when he said protesters should peacefully protest on January 6."

Comment: Donald Trump has the right to free speech just like every other American.


Vader

White Helmets are back! RT investigates what jihadi-linked Oscar winners are up to

White Helmets

The self-proclaimed NGO is allegedly working on another false-flag chemical attack in Syria.


The White Helmets, a self-proclaimed civil defense group formed a decade ago in Syria at the height of the civil war, is back in the spotlight, after the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service accused it this week of preparing to stage another chemical weapons attack.

RT's Saskia Taylor looks back at the shady origins of the group, which was generously sponsored by Western governments and lionized by Western press. She explores its unsavory coziness with jihadist forces, and extensive evidence that at least some of its media content was fraudulent.

Comment: The link to the video is here Link

See also:


Bad Guys

UN takeover with chaos & crisis

un assembly
Award-winning journalist Alex Newman, author of the popular book "Deep State" and the new best-selling book called "Indoctrinating Our Children to Death," has been warning of plans by the United Nations for total tyrannical control of your life. This past weekend at UN headquarters in New York City, all countries sealed the deal to hand over your freedoms to these demonic monsters. Newman explains,
"This is probably the most important story of the decade. Every world leader was there. Joe Biden was there. Almost every world leader on the planet was there. Every president, king and dictator were all there, and they are all signing what the UN calls the "Pact for the Future." This, in their own words, is going to morph the United Nations into the "UN 2.0." When you read the text of this agreement that was adopted by every government on earth. . . . every government agreed to this, and they said they are going to strengthen the UN.

Attention

Putin just announced Russia's own Monroe Doctrine

Putin
© SputnikRussian President Vladimir Putin • Kremlin • Moscow, Russia
The president has cleared up any ambiguity about how Moscow will respond to any new threats in its backyard.

On September 26, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced updates to the Foundations of State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Area of Nuclear Deterrence. The revised document implies that under certain conditions, Moscow may consider a proxy war against itself as justification for using nuclear weapons.

Salami tactics

Traditional nuclear deterrence doctrines date back to the Cold War and were developed with major world powers and military alliances in mind. The underlying assumption is that large states are unlikely to attack a nuclear power, since they risk facing a massive retaliatory strike.

However, the conflict in Ukraine has created a new and unprecedented reality: The West is waging war against Russia through a proxy state that shows little regard for its own self-preservation. At least under the grip of its current leadership.

Comment: How quickly international relationships devolve. We are not 'one world'; we are many opposing fragments.


Bizarro Earth

The Middle East is on the brink of a full-scale war

tanks
© Baz Ratner/APIsraeli tanks in a staging area in northern Israel, near the border with Lebanon • October 1, 2024
All the major players are poking each other, but there is no desire to cross the Rubicon.

One year after Hamas' infamous attack on Israel, the Middle East seems to have returned to its eternal state: a hotbed of acute conflict, with waves of tension. Outside observers can only look on in horror, while experts shrug their shoulders. That's how it was, that's how it will be. How is the current crisis different from previous ones in the region, you might ask? Well, without pretending to have a deep understanding, let us note what is striking from the outside.

Patron-client relationships are changing, both between regional powers and major external actors. The most obvious is the status of the United States. The current White House administration does not have a clear and consistent line; it's just plugging holes and putting out new fires. The US does not need high-profile events in the Middle East right now, its priorities are different. Contacts with key players are inconsistent, and relations with the Gulf monarchies, and even more so with Iran, are volatile. But Washington's actions are based on a fundamental contradiction that cannot be resolved, and it has to do with Israel.

Comment: No one wants it? The kingpins of war are all balancing on the same trip wire. It only takes one.


No Entry

Russia could ban export of vital resources to West

factory
© Pavel Lviv/SputnikRussian manufacturing
The sanctions could affect the supply of commodities in high demand globally, Aleksandr Novak has said.

Russia could shut off the flow of strategically important resources to countries it deems unfriendly, according to Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandr Novak, as the government contemplates countermeasures to Western sanctions. The ban could include a "large list of products that are in high demand on global markets," Novak told reporters on the sidelines of Russian Energy Week on Thursday.

While the minister did not specify the exact products, it is widely expected that a list would include so-called transition metals, in particular uranium, nickel, and titanium.

According to the deputy PM, the Russian government is analyzing the feasibility of the restrictions to ensure domestic industries would not be hit by limiting the supply and will continue to develop.

"There is a specific analysis of the situation on world markets and Russia's opportunities. Relevant proposals will be prepared in the near future," Novak stated.

The possibility was first voiced by Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier this month.

Comment: Frenemies with benefits need watch their step. The theme of 'war' has many variations.