Russian singer Yulia Samoylova said she can't comprehend what scared the Ukrainian authorities so much that they banned her from entering the country for three years. Samoylova said she still hopes to perform at Eurovision in Kiev this May.

"It is very funny to watch [the situation] from the sidelines, because I don't understand what they have seen in me. They have seen some kind of threat in me, in such a little girl. By and large, I'm not feeling down. I keep on practicing, as for some reason I believe that everything can still change," the singer said, as cited by TASS.

[...]

The SBU announcement was met by a wave of indignation from Russian officials, lawmakers and music industry professionals.

Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry, highlighted what she described as the hypocrisy with which Kiev insists that the law should apply to everybody, while at the same time undermining this rule by imposing restrictions on Russian media and allowing vandalism toward Russian banks.

"For some reason, this principle has been invoked on the territory of Ukraine only in respect to the Russian singer. In respect to other people, including Ukrainian citizens, Kiev does not intend to show any adherence to principles," Zakharova said, adding that the way Europe reacts to the ban on Samoylova will show its true face.

"I think that now comes the moment of truth for the European community: whether it is going to do the SBU's bidding and encourage Ukrainian radicals to attempt further "heroic deeds," thus burying all the efforts made within the Minsk process, or prove that Europe, with its fundamental values, for which Ukrainian politicians always stand for in word, is still alive," Zakharova wrote in a Facebook post.

Meanwhile, the Organization for Security and Cooperation and Europe (OSCE) said it did not view the conduct of the Ukrainian authorities as unlawful, with Thomas Rymer, spokesman for the organization's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), telling TASS that "there are no obligations from the side of the OSCE, of which I am aware of, to identify this case as a violation of human rights."

Russia's Channel One TV, which picked Samoylova to represent Russia, has already announced that if she is forced to miss this year's event, she will take part in the contest next year without needing to go through a selection process.

Ukraine rejects compromise for Samoilova to perform by satellite.

That Ukrainian authorities' reason for banning Yulia Samoilova, Russia's entrant in the Eurovision Song Contest due to be held shortly in Kiev, from entering Ukraine is to prevent any Russian participation in the Contest at all, became clearer today when the Ukrainian authorities rejected a proposal from the Contest organisers that Samoilova be allowed to participate in the Contest via satellite.

This proposal already represented a serious concession - some would say an excessive concession - to Ukraine.

Russia is a member of Eurovision and its entrant is entitled to participate in the Contest fully and on equal terms with the other contestants. If the Ukrainians have rules or laws which prohibit Russian performers from performing in the Contest fully and on equal terms with the other contestants, then logically that is a reason why the Contest should not take place in Ukraine at all. However, instead of standing by this principle, the Contest organisers weakly proposed a compromise which would have treated Samoilova differently from the other contestants. Whilst that was intended to satisfy Ukraine, it nonetheless represents a retreat from the principle of equal access for all contestants upon which the Contest is supposed to be based.

In the event even that compromise, weak and unsatisfactory in principle though it was, proved too much for Ukraine, which is quite obviously determined to prevent Samoilova from participating in the Contest at all.

Behind this determination to exclude Samoilova from the Contest is the likely Ukrainian fear that she might win it.