Welcome to Sott.net
Thu, 21 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Light Sabers

Lawfare 101: Trump campaign sues CNN, NYT and WaPo for 'false and defamatory' coverage

trump cnn
© Reuters / Jonathan Ernst; Reuters / Chris Aluka Berry
The Trump 2020 re-election campaign has now sued three major mainstream media outlets for defamation, in a move that seems less about legal redress than about holding self-appointed guardians of democracy actually accountable.

On Friday, the campaign filed a lawsuit against CNN for "100 percent false and defamatory" statements in a report that alleged the US president had decided to leave "on the table" the option of "again seeking Russia's help" in the 2020 election.

Jenna Ellis, the campaign's senior legal adviser, said the lawsuit - along with the complaints against The New York Times and The Washington Post, filed earlier this week - seeks "to hold the publishers accountable for their reckless false reporting and also to establish the truth."

Vader

'White, male & 70+ years old'? DNC scorched for shifting debate rules AGAIN, after Tulsi Gabbard meets previous threshold

biden and bernie
© Reuters / Jonathan Ernst
The DNC has changed the qualifying threshold for the next Democratic primary debate, supposedly targeting no one specifically, but ensuring Tulsi Gabbard - the last remaining woman and person of color in the race - is excluded.

DNC announced the rule change on Friday, requiring candidates for the upcoming debate in Arizona later this month to rack up 20 percent of convention delegates to qualify. While Gabbard had met the previous threshold, having won two delegates in American Samoa on Super Tuesday, the new standard guarantees that she will not make the cut - a move that was blasted far and wide across social media.

Laptop

US & Britain again accuse Russia of cyberattacks in Georgia - provide no proof

hacker
The United States, Britain, and Estonia have accused Russian military intelligence of conducting massive cyberattacks against the Georgian government and media websites in a bid "to sow discord and disrupt the lives of ordinary Georgians."

The three countries told the UN Security Council on March 5 that the cyberattacks "are part of Russia's long-running campaign of hostile and destabilizing activity against Georgia and are part of a wider pattern of malign activity."

The remarks came after Georgia's ambassador wrote to the Security Council in February about the large-scale attack in October.

On February 20, the United States and Britain publicly joined Georgia in blaming Russia for the coordinated cyberattack, which took thousands of Georgian websites offline and even disrupted TV broadcasts.

Comment: Is Georgia so desperate to join the failing EU and the ailing NATO as well as to appease the US that it will go along with baseless accusations against Russia in the hopes that they may get the chance to join their clubs? Attacks on Georgia benefit a number of countries but Russia isn't one of them.


Chalkboard

UK stronger Brexit negotiating stance than EU thanks to its fishing rights - analyst

scenery
© AFP / Pascal Pochard-Casabianca
The British negotiators have returned home from Brussels after the first week of talks with the European Union over UK's exit from the bloc. The two sides have still many disagreements to work out.

Boom Bust is joined by Hilary Fordwich of the British-American Business Association to get a closer look. Fordwich reminds about concessions that have been made in 1973, when the UK was getting into the EU.

In France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Ireland, fishing communities "depend their whole livelihoods on basically what the British consider invading the British coastal waters."

Comment: See also: Still Confused About Brexit? It's Actually Pretty Simple...


Heart - Black

Princely protection: Is Andrew being shielded by the FBI over his paedo affair with Virginia Roberts?

prince andrew
© Reuters / Chris Radburn
Prince Andrew
The royal family in the UK is having its very foundations shaken by both the controversial departure of Prince Harry and Meghan and now startling new revelations which compromise Prince Andrew even further, since his "car crash" interview with BBC, over his alleged relationship with a sex-trafficked child prostitute working for Jeffrey Epstein.

Andrew had always denied any link whatsoever with the then named Virginia Roberts who was in just 17 when the main allegation - that Epstein flew her to London in March 2001 for her to have sex with the British royal - was brought against him. Central to that allegation was a photo taken by Ghislaine Maxwell in her London home on the same night in question which Andrew claims is fake.

Roberts claims that she was forced into the act by Epstein and Maxwell and has gone on the record to talk about the intimate details of the incident, but her case have been light on witnesses or those who can corroborate her allegations. Until now.

Comment:


Putin

Pepe Escobar: Putin just saved the Mad Sultan from himself (again)

Erdogan
© AFP / PhotMurat Kula / Anadolu Agency
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan makes a speech on November 9 last year on the 81st anniversary of the death of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, founder of the Republic of Turkey.
At the start of their discussion marathon in Moscow on Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan with arguably the most extraordinary diplomatic gambit of the young 21st century.

Putin said: "At the beginning of our meeting, I would like to once again express my sincere condolences over the death of your servicemen in Syria. Unfortunately, as I have already told you during our phone call, nobody, including Syrian troops, had known their whereabouts."

This is how a true world leader tells a regional leader, to his face, to please refrain from positioning his forces as jihadi supporters - incognito, in the middle of an explosive theater of war.

Comment:


Dominoes

Idlib: Moscow's difficult decision

PutinErdo
© Russian Government 2014
Russian President Vladimir Putin • Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Turkey's leader, who nurses dreams of some kind of neo-Ottoman restoration across the Middle East, is now on a reckless tear.

As Recip Tayyip Erdogan prosecutes his latest military intrusion southward into Syria, all the old mythologies about the Turkish president and the 9-year-old Syrian conflict are rehearsed once again, hopelessly threadbare as they are. The problem now is not the fog of war. The problem is the war of fog.

Let us be clear from the start, then, as to what has unfolded since last week and what will be the desired outcome. The Syrian Arab Army, a force for good, must not stop short of decisive victory in Idlib, the governorate in northwest Syria sheltering the last jihadist militias operating on Syrian soil. Russia, which is correctly (and legally) supporting the S.A.A.'s campaign, should try to avoid a direct conflict with a NATO member but should engage Turkish forces if there is no alternative.

NATO, breaking its own Article 5 covenant, will not come to the aid of a member nation engaged in so despicable an assault on another sovereign nation. I am not alone in holding this opinion. Don't forget: Most NATO members are squeamish, mealy-mouthed Europeans who have given up the ghost in Syria.

Comment: See also:


Attention

Trump: It's 'possible' Taliban could seize power after US pullout

Trump
© Firenews
US President Donald Trump
U.S. President Donald Trump says the Taliban could "possibly" overrun the Western-backed government in Kabul after the United States withdraws from Afghanistan.

Trump was speaking to journalists at the White House on March 6, days after the United States signed a deal with the Taliban aimed at putting an end to the 18-year war in Afghanistan.

Asked whether an eventual U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan might lead to the Taliban overrunning the sitting government, the president said:
"It's not supposed to happen that way but it possibly will. Eventually, countries have to take care of themselves. We can't be there for another 20 years."

Comment: See also:


Arrow Down

Backed by parliament, Zelensky fires Ukraine cabinet - too many foreigners on state company boards

Zelensky
© Genya Savilov/Getty Images
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday dismissed his entire Cabinet of ministers, citing their decisions to place too many foreigners on the boards of state companies.

"The citizens of our country on governing boards of our companies are feeling like an ethnic minority," Zelensky said in a speech to Parliament, in which he also thanked Western nations that financially aid and support Ukraine.

Zelensky was also critical of poor job performances by his Cabinet members over the last six months, but expressed gratitude that none of them had been involved in a corruption scandal.

Of the Ukraine parliament's 450 members, 335 voted in favor of dismissing the Cabinet.

Arrow Down

US rejects International Criminal Court's 'reckless' decision to back Afghan war crimes probe

Pompeo
© Reuters/Erin Scott
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has denounced as "reckless" a ruling by the International Criminal Court (ICC) that an investigation into alleged war crimes committed in Afghanistan could go ahead.

"This is a truly breathtaking action by an unaccountable political institution, masquerading as a legal body," Pompeo said on March 5 following the ICC judges' decision to overturn on appeal a previous decision to block the probe into crimes allegedly committed by the Taliban, Afghan security forces, and the U.S. military and intelligence agencies.

The ruling by the ICC's Appeals Chamber in The Hague came days after the United States and the Taliban signed a deal aimed at putting an end to the 18-year war in Afghanistan.

"It is all the more reckless for this ruling to come just days after the United States signed a historic peace deal on Afghanistan -- the best chance for peace in a generation," Pompeo said in his statement.


Comment: How's that for a conflated argument!


He said the United States, which is not a party to the ICC, will take "all necessary measures to protect our citizens from this renegade, so-called court."

Comment: The ICC's decision has support:
The court's decision was applauded by many - but some warned that expectations should be tempered.

Mark MacKinnon, a correspondent for Canada's Globe and Mail, said that the ICC had done the "right thing" by pushing forward with the investigation. "Powerful nations can't be above international law, or the whole concept collapses," he wrote.

The Center for Constitutional Rights described the ruling as "the first time senior US officials may face criminal liability for their involvement in the torture program" in Afghanistan.

The ruling marks a "good day" for the ICC, but it's far from certain that the investigation will lead to formal charges, cautioned Kevin Jon Heller, an associate professor of international law at the University of Amsterdam.

Trump has slammed the ICC for its "broad" and "unaccountable" prosecutorial powers, and has repeatedly scoffed at the idea of US soldiers being charged with war crimes.
US and Taliban signed the peace agreement, but it hasn't held.

See also: