Puppet MastersS


Bad Guys

Best of the Web: Bride of Feinstein: The monstrous hypocrisy of the U.S. Congress vs. NSA/CIA

Image
© Wonkette

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's bombshell accusation about the Central Intelligence Agency Tuesday set off a scramble on Capitol Hill - with Democrats and Republicans ignoring the usual party lines in response to her claim that the agency improperly interfered in a congressional investigation.

Feinstein (D-Calif.) won immediate backing from top Democrats like Majority Leader Harry Reid and Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy while some Republicans, including Lindsey Graham and John McCain, began to echo her concerns. Have these same Senators supported the NSA spying on average Americans? The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.

War Whore

Obama: No U.S. military action in Ukraine

Image
© AFP, Saul Loeb
The U.S. will not take military action in the Ukraine crisis, President Barack Obama told NBC 7 San Diego Wednesday.

"We are not going to be getting into a military excursion in Ukraine. What we are going to do is mobilize all of our diplomatic resources to make sure that we've got a strong international correlation that sends a clear message," President Obama said.

The president's statement on the possibility of military intervention was part of an interview Wednesday with NBC 7's Mark Mullen, who traveled to Washington, D.C. to talk with the president about a range of topics, from military cuts to raising the minimum wage.

Take 2

Israeli arms shipments headed to Iran seized by Greek authorities; U.S. Homeland Security investigating

Image
© AFPFeb 18, 2014 Benjamin Netanyahu responds to media reports that Israeli arms shipments headed to Iran in breach of sanctions by making accusations against Iran.
News of Israel's claim to have intercepted an Iranian arms shipment near Sudan allegedly headed to Gaza last Wednesday has been all over the media: mainstream media coverage in the US included the Washington Post, NYT, NPR, CNN, Fox. You name it, they reported it.

Iran flatly denied the charge. Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif immediately countered that Israel was lying.
An Iranian ship carrying arms for Gaza. Captured just in time for annual AIPAC anti Iran campaign. Amazing Coincidence! Or same failed lies.
- Javad Zarif (@JZarif) March 6, 2014
Well.... coincidentally, there was another big arms interception story that broke two weeks before that the U.S. media somehow managed to miss. It involved Israeli arms shipments headed to Iran seized by authorities in Greece and violating the arms embargo and sanctions on Iran. US Homeland Security is reportedly investigating.

Comment:
The Protocols of the Pathocrats
(No. 12 Control of the Press)
Who Owns The Media? The 6 Monolithic Corporations That Control Almost Everything We Watch, Hear And Read


Attention

How Crimea plays in Beijing

Li Baodong
© Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC
"We are paying very close attention to the situation in Ukraine. We hope all parties can calmly maintain restraint to prevent the situation from further escalating and worsening. Political resolution and dialogue is the only way out."

This, via Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Li Baodong, is Beijing's quite measured, official interpretation of what's happening in Ukraine, tailored for global consumption.

But here, in a People's Daily editorial, is what the leadership is really thinking. And the focus is clearly on the dangers of regime change, the "West's inability to understand the lessons of history", and "the final battlefield of the Cold War."

Yet again the West misinterpreted China's abstention from the UN Security Council vote on a US-backed resolution condemning the Crimea referendum.

The spin was that Russia - which vetoed the resolution - was "isolated". It's not. And the way Beijing plays geopolitics shows it's not.

Chess

Two Air Force commanders fired from 422nd Air Base Group in Europe

air force fires commanders
© Brian Stives/U.S. Air ForceLt. Col. Matthew Olson, right, assumes command of the 422nd Communications Squadron from Col. Charles Hamilton, left, 422nd Air Base Group commander at RAF Croughton, England, on July 8, 2013. Olson and Hamilton were relieved of their commands on Thursday after an investigation raised questions about their abilities.
Two U.S. Air Force commanders in the at RAF Croughton have been relieved over a loss of confidence in their abilities.

Col. Charles Hamilton, who commanded the base group since 2011, and Lt. Col. Matthew Olson, who commanded the 422nd Communications Squadron since July, were relieved of command on Thursday by the 501st Combat Support Wing commander after an investigation, officials said.

"It was loss of confidence in the commanders' abilities to lead their units in the best interest of the Air Force," spokesman Capt. Brian Maguire said in an e-mail. "This action was more about leadership style and organizational climate than a specific event."

Maguire said there was no connection between the two sackings and that the two men were not under criminal investigation.

Col. Brian May will command the air group until a scheduled replacement arrives this summer, Maguire said. Maj. John Riester will command the communications squadron, but no permanent replacement has been selected yet.

Col. Angela Cadwell, 501st commander, said in an email that her primary focus was the "health, welfare and organizational climate" in the wing. She did not elaborate.

Croughton provides communication and computer support to military assets throughout Europe. The base came under public scrutiny last year when it was reported that British Telecom would provide a telecommunication link between Croughton and a base in Djibouti connected with unmanned aerial vehicle operations.

Comment: See also:

Why are dozens of high ranking officers being purged from the U.S. military?
Obama purging military commanders
US military sick and tired of war, have no faith in government
Obama fired 197 US senior military commanders in 5 years including 9 generals in 2013


Vader

Flashback Obama fired 197 US senior military commanders in 5 years including 9 generals in 2013

U.S. Generals fired by Obama
© ABC News
What the president calls "my military" is being cleansed of any officer suspected of disloyalty to or disagreement with the administration on matters of policy or force structure, leaving the compliant and fearful.

We recognize President Obama is the commander-in-chief and that throughout history presidents from Lincoln to Truman have seen fit to remove military commanders they view as inadequate or insubordinate. Turnover in the military ranks is normal, and in these times of sequestration and budget cuts the numbers are expected to tick up as force levels shrink and missions change.

Yet what has happened to our officer corps since President Obama took office is viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture. We have commented on some of the higher profile cases, such as Gen. Carter Ham. He was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.

Rear Adm. Chuck Gaouette, commander of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, was relieved in October 2012 for disobeying orders when he sent his group on Sept. 11 to "assist and provide intelligence for" military forces ordered into action by Gen. Ham.

Other removals include the sacking of two nuclear commanders in a single week - Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, head of the 20th Air Force, responsible for the three wings that maintain control of the 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles, and Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, the No. 2 officer at U.S. Strategic Command.

From Breitbart.com's Facebook page comes a list of at least 197 officers that have been relieved of duty by President Obama for a laundry list of reasons and sometimes with no reason given. Stated grounds range from "leaving blast doors on nukes open" to "loss of confidence in command ability" to "mishandling of funds" to "inappropriate relationships" to "gambling with counterfeit chips" to "inappropriate behavior" to "low morale in troops commanded."

Nine senior commanding generals have been fired by the Obama administration this year, leading to speculation by active and retired members of the military that a purge of its commanders is under way.

Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, notes how the White House fails to take action or investigate its own officials but finds it easy to fire military commanders "who have given their lives for their country." Vallely thinks he knows why this purge is happening.

"Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama's ideology," Vallely said. "The White House protects their own. That's why they stalled on the investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi and ObamaCare. He's intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged."

Comment: See also:

Why are dozens of high ranking officers being purged from the U.S. military?
Obama purging military commanders
US military sick and tired of war, have no faith in government


Attention

Chhattisgarh, India: 15 policemen killed by Maoists

Image
© BBCIndia's prime minister has described the Maoists as the country's biggest internal security threat.
Maoist rebels have killed at least 15 policemen in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh, police say.

The patrol was on its way to provide security to workers building a road in Sukma district when rebels fired at them, officials say.

Twenty-five policemen were injured in the attack, senior police officer Mukesh Gupta told BBC Hindi.

Chhattisgarh is a stronghold of the rebels who say they are fighting for the rights of the poor.

The Maoists are active in more than a third of India's 600 districts and control large areas of several states in a "red corridor" stretching from north-east to central India.

Eye 1

U.S. tech giants knew of NSA data collection, agency's top lawyer insists

Image
© KeystoneUSA-Zuma/RexDe said communications content and associated metadata harvested by the NSA occurred with the knowledge of the companies.
The senior lawyer for the National Security Agency stated unequivocally on Wednesday that US technology companies were fully aware of the surveillance agency's widespread collection of data, contradicting months of angry denials from the firms.

Rajesh De, the NSA general counsel, said all communications content and associated metadata harvested by the NSA under a 2008 surveillance law occurred with the knowledge of the companies - both for the internet collection program known as Prism and for the so-called "upstream" collection of communications moving across the internet.

Asked during a Wednesday hearing of the US government's institutional privacy watchdog if collection under the law, known as Section 702 or the Fisa Amendments Act, occurred with the "full knowledge and assistance of any company from which information is obtained," De replied: "Yes."

Comment: So the U.S. tech companies knew all along that the NSA was collecting data on everyone and lied through their teeth about it... surprise surprise.


Quenelle

Michelle Obama afraid of the Big Bad Wolf, i.e. media attention‏

Image
© Jacquelyn Martin/Associated Press

A quick look at how the sausage gets made, or doesn't...

On Tuesday night, The New York Times reported that no reporters would be traveling with First Lady Michelle Obama to China, and that she would be giving no interviews while there. Nicholas Kristof, the Times columnist, called the First Lady's decision "a mistake," and said it "signals weakness or fear of coverage." Several conservative outlets picked up the Times report, including the influential Drudge Report, which linked to a Weekly Standard article about it.

Shortly after noon on Wednesday, I reached out to the First Lady's office to inquire about the decision. A spokesperson for the First Lady responded to my inquiry but declared the response "off the record," meaning I wasn't allowed to use the information therein. When I told the spokesperson that I needed a response I could use, the spokesperson replied with another off-the-record statement regarding the First Lady's trip.

Attention

Libya pleads with UN for help fighting off post-Gaddafi chaos

Image
© AFP Photo / Abdullah Doma
The Libyan government announced on Wednesday that it has asked the international community for help with a 'War on Terror' that threatens to plunge the already-divided nation into a state of full-scale disarray.

Widespread violence is the main concern for Libya after a number of bombings and assassinations have plagued the eastern city of Benghazi. In Sirte - a city that is home to multiple major oil ports in the central region of the North African country - skirmishes between pro-government militias and rebel troops a number of people dead in the past several months. The government wrote on its official website that "terrorist groups" have waged war in the streets of Benghazi, Sirte, and other cities. Libya has failed to contain rebel groups that helped overthrow Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 then refused to lay down their arms, instead using the weapons to acquire wealth and oil.


Comment: These "terrorists" are merely U.S.-funded rebels that are sent in to create exactly the kind of unrest and violence that you are seeing in Libya here. They create the enemy and then send in the Army to "help". The West is quite practiced at playing both sides.


"Libya's interim government asks the international community and especially the United Nations to provide assistance to uproot terrorism," the government wrote, as quoted by Reuters. "The government confirms that it wants this war on terror and its crimes to start as soon as possible."