Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 29 Sep 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Bullseye

21 Republicans, led by Boebert, move to censure Biden over 'refusal' to enforce border laws

Biden illegal migrants

Illegal migrants dash across the Mexico border; (R) Joe Biden
Twenty-one Republicans, led by Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., on Wednesday introduced a resolution to censure President Biden for what the lawmakers described as a "failure" to faithfully execute U.S. border and immigration laws - as Republicans continue to hit the administration for its handling of the crisis at the southern border.

"My censure resolution holds President Biden accountable for his actions - or lack thereof - at the border," Boebert said in a statement. "Biden has refused to enforce the laws securing our border, he has refused to visit our border, his border czar Kamala has refused to visit the border, and his Secretary of Homeland Security is lying to the American people by saying that our border is closed."

The resolution expresses "disapproval of the failure to uphold the constitutional duty to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed' and the usurpation of the legislative authority of Congress by the President of the United States."

Comment: Beobert expanded on the purpose of her PR actions in a Newsmax interview:


The Twitterati weighed in:





Eagle

Caitlin Johnstone: So much of what the CIA used to do covertly is now done overtly

CIA seal
Like an abusive partner, the Central Intelligence Agency is now so confident it is immune from criticism and consequences that it feels completely free to do the things it used to do in the shadows in plain sight.

In the later years of an abusive relationship I was in, my abuser had become so confident in how mentally caged he had me that he'd start overtly telling me what he is and what he was doing. He flat-out told me he was a sociopath and a manipulator, trusting that I was so submitted to his will by that point that I'd gaslight myself into reframing those statements in a sympathetic light. Toward the end one time he told me "I am going to rape you," and then he did, and then he talked about it to some friends trusting that I'd run perception management on it for him.

The better he got at psychologically twisting me up in knots and the more submitted I became, the more open he'd be about it. He seemed to enjoy doing this, taking a kind of exhibitionistic delight in showing off his accomplishments at crushing me as a person, both to others and to me. Like it was his art, and he wanted it to have an audience to appreciate it.

I was reminded of this while watching a recent Fox News appearance by Glenn Greenwald where he made an observation we've discussed here previously about the way the CIA used to have to infiltrate the media, but now just openly has US intelligence veterans in mainstream media punditry positions managing public perception.

Vader

US wants Iran stripped of capacity to challenge US hostile propaganda

Press Tv
The United States' "seizure" of domains belonging to some Iranian websites, including Press TV, is because Washington does not want Iran to challenge the US' "hostile propaganda," a political analyst says.
"By shutting down Press TV[.com domain], the US is attempting to deprive Iran of its capacity to challenge hostile propaganda, and put forth its own counter-narrative of controversial events, and more generally of peace, justice, and democratic governance,"
American scholar Richard Falk told the Press TV's website in an interview on Wednesday.
"In effect, being able to exercise monopoly control of media platforms is a crucial representation of power."

Comment: In the meantime, the last two web addresses of the Press TV are also not working anymore
( www.presstv.co.uk and www.presstv.tv ). It looks that it is just a matter of time when all their addresses will be disabled.

Controlling the media is one of the most important things for the PTB. Then they can promote their sick agenda as a "new normal" on all the media they have control. Respectful alternative media are their biggest enemies.

There are a few interviews that Sott editors have for Press TV See also:


Bad Guys

Media claim Syria suffering food shortages due to drought, but the truth is a lot more complicated

syria wheat crop farmer
© Reuters
Farmer Imad al-Sayyed harvests wheat in a field in Deir Khabieh
Syria is back in the news again. This time, it's not about hospitals allegedly being bombed, but a drought devastating Syria's wheat harvest. But there's a lot more to the story than a simple 'Act of God'.

A recent article on Reuters would have readers believe the current Syrian wheat shortage is mainly due to drought. The article makes a passing reference to the crippling Western sanctions choking Syrians, but doesn't emphasize how those sanctions contribute to the wheat shortage, as well as the fuel shortage, massive hyperinflation, and an all-round worsening of Syrian lives.

On June 16, Prensa Latina reported on wheat theft by US occupation forces noting, "a convoy of 32 trucks and containers loaded with looted wheat left for Iraq... The column was guarded by vehicles of the so-called Syrian Democratic Forces (FDS)."

Comment: Whilst it is indeed true that the increasingly erratic climate and soaring inflation are causing problems for farmers and consumers all over the world, the West is making the burgeoning crisis worse in the hopes of reviving its failing campaign to overthrow Assad:


Bad Guys

Indictment of French execs for supporting African dictatorships exposes Paris' hypocrisy & double-dealing

africa police
© Marco Di Lauro/Getty Images
The prosecution of major Parisian company heads for collaborating with 'enemy' governments has captured the media's attention. But the fact this is standard practice for France stubbornly remains the elephant in the room.

On June 22, it was announced that four executives at French companies had been charged with "complicity in acts of torture" over allegations they'd helped North African authorities spy on opposition figures who were subsequently detained and tortured.

Philippe Vannier, former chief of defence firm Amesys, and Olivier Bohbot, current head of homeland security specialist Nexa Technologies, were among those indicted. The former is accused of providing "deep packet inspection"solutions to the government of Libya's Muammar Gaddafi, which allowed authorities to secretly intercept private internet communications. The latter purportedly sold Cerebro software, capable of real-time message and call tracing, to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

Comment: See also:


Black Cat 2

Covering up true origins? Scientist discovers that key early Covid-19 Wuhan samples are MISSING from US government NIH database

Fort Detrick Maryland

Fort Detrick, Maryland, actual source of the 'Wuhan' Flu?
Chinese scientists have deleted crucial data from the earliest confirmed Covid patients, it emerged today amid intense scrutiny about the true origins of the disease.


Comment: As we'll see below in this report, the contention that it was Chinese scientists who did this - working, presumably, at the behest of the Chinese government - is ludicrous.


Dozens of test samples from patients in epicentre Wuhan were found to have been wiped from an international database used to track the virus' evolution.

The files could have provided vital clues about how the virus originated and how long it had been spreading before the seafood market outbreak in December 2019.

The American professor who spotted their deletion and managed to recover some of the data said they suggested Covid was circulating long before China's official timeline.


Comment: Long before THE official timeline. China is not particularly attached to it commencing in December 2019.


Comment: This study further cements the fact the virus was circulating the globe before the Chinese were caught unawares by it in Wuhan in December 2019.


Eagle

Who is a 'Terrorist' in Biden's America?

the capital
Far from being a war against "white supremacy," the Biden administration's new "domestic terror" strategy clearly targets primarily those who oppose US government overreach and those who oppose capitalism and/or globalization.

In the latest sign that the US government's War on Domestic Terror is growing in scope and scale, the White House on Tuesday revealed the nation's first ever government-wide strategy for confronting domestic terrorism. While cloaked in language about stemming racially motivated violence, the strategy places those deemed "anti-government" or "anti-authority" on a par with racist extremists and charts out policies that could easily be abused to silence or even criminalize online criticism of the government.

Even more disturbing is the call to essentially fuse intelligence agencies, law enforcement, Silicon Valley, and "community" and "faith-based" organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League, as well as unspecified foreign governments, as partners in this "war," which the strategy makes clear will rely heavily on a pre-crime orientation focused largely on what is said on social media and encrypted platforms. Though the strategy claims that the government will "shield free speech and civil liberties" in implementing this policy, its contents reveal that it is poised to gut both.

Indeed, while framed publicly as chiefly targeting "right-wing white supremacists," the strategy itself makes it clear that the government does not plan to focus on the Right but instead will pursue "domestic terrorists" in "an ideologically neutral, threat-driven manner," as the law "makes no distinction based on political view — left, right or center." It also states that a key goal of this strategic framework is to ensure "that there is simply no governmental tolerance . . . of violence as an acceptable mode of seeking political or social change," regardless of a perpetrator's political affiliation.

Light Sabers

Black Ops in the Black Sea: British destroyer violates Russia's border, Russian ship & fighter jet respond with warning shots

HMS Defender
© REUTERS / Sergey Smolentsev
British Royal Navy's Type 45 destroyer HMS Defender arrives at the Black Sea port of Odessa, Ukraine
A Russian patrol ship and fighter jet have fired warning shots after the British destroyer HMS Defender violated the country's border in the Black Sea. The UK embassy's defense attaché has been summoned by officials in Moscow.

According to Russia's Ministry of Defense, the British naval ship entered the country's territorial waters at 11:52am local time and traveled 3km inside the frontier, near Cape Fiolent, in Crimea. The peninsula is not recognized by the United Kingdom as Russian land and London believes it to be illegally occupied Ukrainian territory.

"At 12:06 and 12:08, a border patrol ship fired warning shots," the Defense Ministry said. "(And) at 12:19, a Su-24m aircraft performed a warning bombing (4 OFAB-250) ahead of the course of the USS Defender."

Four minutes later, at 12:23, the destroyer left Russian territory.

Comment: The UK MoD claiming that the passage of their vessel was "innocent" is laughably absurd. Even a BBC journalist on the HMS Defender said that the vessel's incursion into Russian waters was "deliberate, to make a point." What the point was is lost on most, since the Brits don't have the military might to stand up against the Russian navy. This isn't 1853 Britain, your boats don't scare.

Craig Murray said it best in his short article on the actions of the British navy:
Sometimes it is worth stating the obvious. The United Kingdom does not have a coast in the Black Sea. British warships are not infesting the Black Sea out of a peaceful intent, and there is no cause for them to be entering disputed waters close to anybody's coast. This is not a question of freedom of navigation under the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea. There is nowhere that a British warship can be heading from the UK under the right of innocent passage that would require it to pass through coastal waters by Crimea. The Black Sea is famously a cul-de-sac.

There is certainly a right to pass to the Ukrainian port of Odessa - but that in now way requires passing close to Crimea. This is therefore not "innocent passage". There is a right of passage through the Kerch strait, which Russia has to date respected. Russia has not just a right but a duty to enforce sea lanes for safe navigation through the strait, exactly as the UK does off Dover.

I expect we will now be in for a mad frenzy of Russophobia, yet again. I shall comment further once I have more details of why and exactly where Russia was firing warning shots. But just remember this, it was not Russian warships near the British coast, it was British warships in an area where they had no business other than ludicrous, British nationalist, sabre-rattling.

The UK needs to lose its imperial delusions. Sending gunboats to the Crimea is as mad as - well, sailing an aircraft carrier expressly to threaten the Chinese. There are those who see this activity as evidence of the UK's continued great power status. I see it as evidence of lunacy.



Chess

Merkel and Macron to propose revival of EU-Russia relations & meeting with Putin

merkel and macron
© REUTERS/Axel Schmidt/Pool
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, backed by French President Emmanuel Macron, reportedly wants the EU to consider "selective engagement" with Russia on issues of common interest and inviting President Vladimir Putin to a summit.

French and German diplomats "wrongfooted" other EU member states at a meeting in Brussels on Wednesday by proposing to invite Putin to a summit with the bloc's leaders, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday, citing "people with knowledge of the discussions."

According to FT, Merkel wants to revive EU relations with Russia along the template provided by last week's Geneva summit between Putin and US President Joe Biden. Though she meets and speaks with Putin on a regular basis herself, the German chancellor reportedly wants a format that allows the EU to address Russia "with one voice."

Stop

Warren Buffett resigns as trustee of Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Buffett
© Johannes Eisele/AFP via Getty Images
Warren Buffet resigns post at Gates Foundation
Warren Buffett announced Wednesday that he's resigning from his position as trustee at the Gates Foundation, as the divorce of its founders, Bill and Melinda, casts uncertainty on the leadership of one of the world's largest charitable organizations.

Buffett, who's the eighth richest person in the world with a net worth of about $105 billion, pledged most of his fortune in 2006 to the Gates Foundation and to four other charitable trusts created by his family.

In a statement, Buffett downplayed the significance of his departure, which represents an about-face for the Gates Foundation. A spokesperson for the foundation told reporters last month after the Gateses announced their divorce that "no changes to their roles or the organization are planned." Buffett said:
"For years I have been a trustee - an inactive trustee at that - of only one recipient of my funds, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMG). I am now resigning from that post, just as I have done at all corporate boards other than Berkshire's."