Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 27 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Eye 1

Justice Department investigating SpaceX after complaint over hiring practices, follows Musk's criticism of US government

SpaceX
© SpaceX
A Falcon 9 rocket launches the Transporter-1 mission in January 2021.
The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating SpaceX over whether the company discriminates against non-U.S. citizens in its hiring practices and said Elon Musk's company is stonewalling a subpoena for information, court documents revealed Thursday.

The DOJ's Immigrant and Employee Rights Section received a complaint of employment discrimination from a non-U.S. citizen claiming that the company discriminated against him based on his citizenship status.

"The charge alleges that on or about March 10, 2020, during the Charging Party's interview for the position of Technology Strategy Associate, SpaceX made inquiries about his citizenship status and ultimately failed to hire him for the position because he is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident," DOJ attorney Lisa Sandoval wrote in a court document filed Thursday. The document was a request for a judge to order SpaceX to comply with an administrative subpoena for documents related to how the company hires.

Comment: Some are speculating that Musk has made a few comments recently that have provoked the establishment:


Here is Musk again, today, weighing in on the market intervention by Wall Street to protect financial speculators:





Briefcase

Lincoln Project threatens to 'sue the s***' out of Rudy Giuliani who claims anti-Trump group had ties to Capitol attack

Giuliani
© The Lincoln Project/Mark Reinstein/Shutterstock
Trump Lawyer Rudi Giuliani
Anti-Trump group The Lincoln Project says it is going to "sue the s***" out of Rudy Giuliani, after the attorney for former President Donald Trump claimed the clan of former Republicans had ties to those who incited violence at the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob of Trump supporters.

What are the details?

Giuliani floated the allegations on the show of former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, who was pardoned by the former president in the 24 hours before he left office.


Arrow Up

"The Red Wave": Former President Trump to make a major political comeback

McCarthyTrump
© Reuters/AP/Kevin Lamarque
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy • Former US President Donald Trump
According to reports, President Trump is working with top GOP officials to make a return to the political arena. In an interview Thursday, long-time Trump adviser Corey Lewandowski said the President is actively recruiting candidates for the 2022 elections with plans to hold Democrats and some Republicans accountable.

Lewandowski went on to confirm President Trump has access to hundreds of millions of dollars raised during his campaign last year and he intends to use that money to pull control of government away from Democrats. Allies of Joe Biden are reportedly concerned considering a number of top Trump officials have held on to their positions and may assist the upcoming red wave.

His comments came as President Trump was meeting with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy in South Florida. According to Save America, the President's leadership PAC, the two discussed the GOP's efforts to retake control of the House in 2022.

"Republicans are always focused on putting the people first before politics and we will continue to do that work," stated McCarthy. "In this next Congress, we might not be able to schedule the floor, but we are going to run the floor."

Comment: See also:

Donald Trump just issued a statement that should give Republicans a lot of hope



No Entry

Capitol police chief calls for permanent fencing, back-up security

Capitol dome and fencing
© Getty Images
Acting U.S. Capitol Police Chief Yogananda Pittman on Thursday called for the Capitol to have permanent fencing and back-up security to prevent another riot.

"In light of recent events, I can unequivocally say that the vast improvements to the physical security infrastructure must be made to include permanent fencing, and the availability of ready, back-up forces in close proximity to the Capitol," Pittman said in a statement.

The Capitol police, along with other officials and organizations, have been reviewing the events of Jan. 6 and assessing the security of the Capitol building.

A seven-foot security fence was erected the day after the Capitol was overrun by hundreds of supporters of former President Trump. Police were severely outnumbered and the riot left five people dead, including a police officer.

While the security fencing has been up around the Capitol since Jan. 7, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) said Thursday that she did not want fencing or extra troops to become a "long-term fixture" in the city.

Comment: Alarms bells everywhere! - according to Pelosi and AOC:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) has demanded additional security for lawmakers, citing threats from "within" the House, while the temporary fence around the Capitol is on the way to becoming permanent.

"We will probably need a supplemental [budget] for more security for members when the enemy is within the House of Representatives, a threat that members are concerned about in addition to what is happening outside. It means we have members of Congress who want to bring guns on the floor and have threatened violence on other members of Congress." she said, not clarifying what those specific threats of violence have been.


Some 5,000 National Guard troops - of the 25,000 initially deployed in Washington, DC to protect Joe Biden's inauguration from threats that never materialized - are staying in the US capital indefinitely as well.



Bad Guys

The downfall of Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte

mark rutte halbe zijlstra netherlands

Mark Rutte (right), former Prime Minister of the Netherlands, defending ex-Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands Halbe Zijlstra (left) who lied about his visit to the dacha of Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The reason Mark Rutte had to step down is the big scandal about the children's allowance affair. The entire team of ministers stepped down after exposing the affair. For years, thousands of parents were incorrectly classified by the Dutch tax authorities as fraudsters. They received child benefits, but according to the department of Social Affairs, they were not entitled to them but actually they were! So, often they had to repay thousands of euros, and some of them lost their houses, their children, and their lives. But this was not the only crime of this government, or therefore the one that Prime Minister Mark Rutte committed. He already had to step down when it was known that he and his government supported terrorists in Syria, or the MH-17 cover-up and the criminal acts done by his party members. These include corruption and fraud, as well as Minister of Foreign of Affairs Halbe Zijlstra lying about his visit to Russian President Vladimir Putin, which never took place.

Comment:


Penis Pump

Pro-western liberal, anti-migrant nationalist, or political opportunist: Who exactly is Russian opposition figure Alexey Navalny?

navalny
© Sputnik / Valeriy Melnikov
FILE PHOTO. Moscow, Russia
After his alleged poisoning, accusations that the Kremlin was responsible, then his immediate arrest on returning home, Russian opposition figure Alexey Navalny is enjoying notoriety like never before. But who is he, exactly?

Media portrayals of the Moscow street-protest leader have ranged from comparing him to a western-style liberal, to a far-right radical racist to a persecuted freedom fighter. While many Russians from all points along the political spectrum support his investigations into corruption at the highest levels of government, there is little agreement on what he actually stands for or how he'd act if he were somehow thrust into a leadership role.

A former student at America's Yale University, Navalny first gained international prominence in 2011, over a decade after he first became active in politics. Since then, he has been arrested on numerous occasions, received two suspended sentences, and participated in a Moscow mayoral election. He is well known for opposing President Vladimir Putin and exposing corruption, but what are his political positions? What does he believe in, other than simply removing Putin?

Comment: See also:


Pirates

Confederacy of crooks: Biden appointee who let Washington state be defrauded of MILLIONS now to manage unemployment grants

biden sue levine unemployment manager

Suzi LeVine, after losing millions to Nigerian fraudsters in her role as head of Washington state’s Employment Security Department has been appointed to administer federal unemployment grants for the Biden administration.
Suzi LeVine, the head of Washington state's Employment Security Department (ESD), will leave her post to serve in the Biden administration as "interim political head" of the Employment and Training Administration (ETA), under the Labor Department according to the Seattle Times.

LeVine who lost hundreds of millions of dollars in Washington State unemployment funds to Nigerian scammers will be starting the position on Monday for the ETA which "administers federal government job training and worker dislocation programs, federal grants to states for public employment service programs, and unemployment insurance benefits," according to their website.

LeVine was a political appointee of Governor Jay Inslee and a donor to his campaign. According to federal filings, LeVine and her husband have donated over $400,000 to the Biden campaign and other Democrat causes from 2019-2020. Bloomberg reported that LeVine served as the Democratic National Committee's deputy national finance chair.

Putin

Another Navalny flop: 'Putin's palace' turns out to be an empty shell - owner comes public: Business man and ex-judo partner of Putin Rotenberg

putin palace
© Mash
With its supposedly lavish furnishings, long swimming pool and digital dance studio, an opulent manor said to belong to Russian President Vladimir Putin shocked viewers of a documentary made by Kremlin critic Alexey Navalny.

Now, however, the very existence of its gilded corridors and plush carpets has been called into question, after a film crew from the Moscow-based Mash news channel paid a visit to the property in Gelendzhik. On Friday, the reporters released their footage on the Telegram messaging service.


Having gained unprecedented access to the site, the journalists weren't greeted by butlers or security guards, but by "an entrance without a gate," they said. Instead of a luxurious coastal home, the channel's editor-in-chief, Maxim Iksanov, described it as "a big pile of concrete."

Surrounded by scaffolding, the building has been only partly completed from the outside, while the interior is effectively a shell, with wires hanging from un-plastered walls. Across 16 identical rooms, bags of concrete are stacked up, with the swimming pool and much of the garden still unfinished.

Comment: Compare that to Navalny's fantasy:

Thierry Meyssan points out the obvious:
The film begins with the biography of the president, drawing on the archives of the East German political police kindly opened by the BKA [Federal Crime Police Office]. The problem is that there is no connection between the documents exhibited and Alexei Navalny's discourse. They only contain illustrations (wish the exception of the KGB card of one of President Putin's companions).

Then the film takes us back to the palace using new images captured by a drone. Here again, these images fall short of illustrating Alexeï Navalny's point. They simply show a palace built by Italian architect Lanfranco Cirillo.

Finally, Alexeï Navalny displays blueprints, cost estimates and invoices for the Palace. The only thing they prove is that this residence is luxurious. But these facts have been known for a long time. The Russian opposition figure then claims that the property deeds are forgeries. After convoluted explanations, he purports that the building does not belong to billionaire Alexander Ponomarenko, but to President Putin, whom he calls "the richest man in the world".

Let us recall that the CIA had already accused Fidel Castro and Yasser Arafat of being secret billionaires. Forbes magazine had even confirmed such accounts which, after their death, turned out to be malevolent fabrications. Thus, the CIA attributed to Yasser Arafat ownership of the PLO funds that he managed in his own name, no bank being willing to receive funds from the Palestinian resistance. Everyone who knew Castro, Arafat and their families have never had any doubts about them.

The slipshod approach of the documentary does not argue in favor of Navalny.
UPDATE: Arkady Rotenberg has come forward publicly as the owner of the property.
Rotenberg, Putin's former judo sparring partner who sold his stake in gas pipeline construction firm Stroygazmontazh in 2019 for a sum which RBC business daily put at some 75 billion roubles ($990 million), said he bought the palace two years ago.

"Now it will no longer be a secret, I am the beneficiary," Rotenberg said in a video published by Mash channel in Telegram. "There was a rather complicated facility, there were a lot of creditors, and I managed to become the beneficiary."

He gave no further financial details of the purchase or how it had been funded.
It won't be a personal palace for Putin, Rotenberg, or anybody else, but a hotel:
He added that he intends to use the location as an apartment hotel, once it is finished.

"I like the hotel business...and have been involved in it for several years now," Rotenberg said, adding that he owns several 'objects' throughout Russia. He explained that the site in question has a troubled financial history, but he nevertheless acquired it a few years ago, putting faith in its "gorgeous" coastal location, near the resort town of Gelendzhik.

"This project is somewhat scandalous and difficult. But mark my words, in 12 or 18 months I'll invite you to witness for yourself what beauty it will be," he told Mash editor-in-chief, Maksim Iksanov, joking that the journalist may get a discount since he already visited the property.
Which should have been an obvious guess given the details of the floor-plan revealed by Navalny. But you've got to give it to Navalny. He's good at propaganda. Even when the hotel is ready for business, many of Navalny's dupes in the West will still believe it is Putin's palace. Because good luck getting Western media to retract their breathless reports once the truth is made clear.


Eye 1

Ice Age Farmer Report: Biden Attacks Farms - Comprehensive War on Global Food Supply - Engineered Famine

food wars
The Biden admin's executive actions in the last 48 hours are attacking farms and implementing the technocratic takeover of food, accelerating a global collapse in food production by paying farmers NOT to grow food, cutting their financial support, tasking Tom Vilsack's USDA with a Net-Zero goal, changing COVID guidance on grocery stores, restaurants, and meatpacking plants.

Meanwhile, the media is finally acknowledging the soybean shortage, and the US is now also experiencing a fertilizer shortage, which will further increase costs and cause yields will collapse. As other countries stop exporting to protect domestic supplies, the US has been wholly sold out.

This confluence of issues and cascading failures merits our attention urgently -- start growing food today.


Sources

(Video also available here.)

Sherlock

Pipe bombs placed at RNC, DNC HQs night before Capitol riot weakens incitement case against Trump

US capitol
© Eduardo Munoz / Reuters
Federal authorities believe that pipe bombs discovered at the headquarters of the Republican and Democratic national committees during the Capitol riots were placed there on the night before the siege.

The FBI, in a new appeal for public assistance Friday, released images of a unidentified suspect — dressed in a gray hoodie, distinctive Nike shoes and carrying a backpack — who is believed to have delivered the live explosives to the locations between 7:30 and 8:30 p.m. Jan. 5.

In an attempt to inject new urgency in the search for the suspect, the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives upped a reward for information in the case from $75,000 to $100,000. Prominently featured in the FBI appeal are images of the suspect's footwear, described as Nike Air Max Speed Turf shoes in yellow, black, and gray.

Comment: Just The New reports on how this demonstrates that some were planning on disorder that evening despite what Trump had to say:
Growing evidence of advance planning and coordination of the Jan. 6 storming of the Capitol undermines claims that the rioters were responding spontaneously to former President Trump's speech to supporters about a mile and a half away, according to legal and intelligence experts.

As Senate Democrats mull their options for convicting or censuring Trump and banning him from future public office for allegedly inciting insurrection, experts said their incitement case against him was dealt a severe blow this week when federal prosecutors charged three men in the Capitol attack, alleging their communication and coordination dated back to November.

For speech to meet the threshold of incitement, a speaker must, first, indicate a desire for violence and, second, demonstrate a capability or reasonable indication of capability to carry out the violence, according to Kevin Brock, former assistant director of intelligence for the FBI.

In Trump's case, Brock said, there were neither.

In an interview Thursday, Brock told Just the News he listened to Trump's entire Jan. 6 speech. "I didn't hear a single word about — or anything that would trigger a reasonable person to believe that he was inciting — violence," he said. "He even used the words 'peaceful' and 'respectful.'"

Brock thinks that Trump "was caught by surprise at what happened" and was probably unaware of the segment of the crowd intent on violence. That was "a failure, frankly, on the intelligence that he should have been provided as president of the United States," Brock said. "We shouldn't be in a position where knuckleheads like Proud Boys and Oath Keepers can plan a disruptive violent event and it catches us by surprise."

Still unanswered are questions about how much House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell knew in advance of the potential for violence and when they knew it. Also unresolved are lingering questions surrounding the Pentagon's pre-attack offer to send National Guard troops to reinforce the Capitol Police.


Brock, former principal deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), noted that Trump did use the word "march" in encouraging his supporters to march to the Capitol and voice their dissent during the floor proceedings to formally certify the 2020 Electoral College vote.

"But 'march' — we've had peaceful marches as part of our history — doesn't necessarily indicate automatic, violent response," Brock said. "So I think they'd be hard-pressed to prove that he was using words that were inciting violence."

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard," Trump said during his speech at the Ellipse, according to a transcript. "Anyone you want, but I think right here, we're going to walk down to the Capitol, and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong. We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated, lawfully slated."

Brock, who is now consulting at a firm he founded called NewStreet Global Solutions, said such use of words urging "strength" to "take back our country" is far from uncommon in political speeches.

"Every other politician in this country uses those kinds of words and that kind of language," Brock said. "So I think to convict him on those words would open up politicians across both parties for future examination as to whether or not their words are inciting violence across the country. Frankly, I think a lot of them are exposed in that regard."

In a Senate floor speech, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) cited other examples that he said further undermine Democrats' claims that Trump incited the Capitol Hill riot.

"No Democrat will honestly ask whether Bernie Sanders incited the [pro-Sanders] shooter that nearly killed Steve Scalise," Paul said. "No Democrat will ask whether Maxine Waters incited violence when she literally told her supporters" to confront Trump officials in public.


Brock said based on his assessment of Trump's claims questioning electoral integrity in key battleground states, Trump's language in the weeks and months leading up to Jan. 6, following the Nov. 3 election, "purely from a predication standpoint, for a federal investigation, those words would not be significant."

A politician expressing frustration, bitterness, or disbelief he or she lost "is not new in the American tradition," Brock said. "So that alone is not enough to have the FBI launch an investigation as to whether or not somebody is inciting an insurrection. If that were the case, we'd have to do it after every election."

Constitutional law scholar Alan Dershowitz told Just the News that a successful case by Democrats would depend on whether Trump knew about the planning of the Capitol Hill assault but that there was no evidence of that.

"If you didn't know about it, they had planned it without him, then you're missing the causal relationship," said the longtime Harvard Law School professor. "It would have happened without his speech as well. So that would be relevant on the issue of causation."

All of Trump's claims in the weeks and months before Jan. 6 about electoral malfeasance are protected by the First Amendment, said Dershowitz, a member of the president's defense team during his January 2020 impeachment trial.

Even while he personally disagreed with Trump's content, he said legally there was "nothing wrong, it's constitutionally protected, clearly" under the Brandenburg test established in Brandenburg v. Ohio, a court ruling used to determine whether inflammatory speech is intended to advocate illegal action. In Trump's case, said Dershowitz, it was "not even a close question" under Brandenburg,

"The Bible has caused violence, the Koran has caused violence. [Karl Marx's] 'Das Kapital' has caused violence," Dershowitz noted. "You can't be held responsible for making constitutionally protected arguments that lead others to engage in violence. Jefferson wrote about that in 1801. It goes way back in our history, we punish the actor, not the speaker."

Senate Democrats say they are considering whether or not they can utilize the 14th Amendment to the Constitution to bar President Trump from ever holding public office again. The 14th Amendment, passed in the wake of the Civil War, in part directs that no individual may hold any public office in the country if he or she "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. after taking an oath of office in support of the Constitution.

"It's an idea that's out there that I think people are contemplating in the accountability space," U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine told the Hill last week.
Also check out SOTT radio's insightful discussion on the matter: