Welcome to Sott.net
Wed, 27 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Bad Guys

FBI director Wray says Jan. 6 Capitol attack was domestic terrorism

Wray
© Alex Brandon/AP
FBI Director Christopher Wray
The FBI views the Jan. 6 Capitol siege as an act of domestic terrorism, director Christopher Wray testified in his opening statement Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Why it matters: The FBI's designation of the attack as domestic terrorism puts the perpetrators "on the same level with ISIS and homegrown violent extremists," Wray said.
  • The attack was led by supporters of former President Trump, as well as members of the Proud Boys and other far-right extremist groups.
  • Wray testified that the FBI has seen no evidence that the attack was organized by "fake Trump supporters" or Antifa, as some allies of the former president have baselessly suggested.
Where it stands: The FBI has arrested more than 270 people as part of a wide-reaching probe that ranges from felony cases "tied to sedition and conspiracy" to assaults on federal and local officers. Over 300 arrests have been made when including agency law enforcement partners.

Comment: Some Republicans pointed out the asymmetry, with little effect:
"We're not serious about attacking extremism if we care about some government buildings being attacked but not others. We're not serious about attacking domestic extremism if we only focus on white supremacy movements, which isn't the only ideology that's responsible for murders and violence," Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said when questioning Wray.

The FBI director claims his agency has no interest in partisan matters and looks at "ideology" only as a "further piece of the case," but he also pointed to "racially motivated violent extremists" as making up "the biggest chunk" of people committing crimes related to domestic terrorism. It is these "racially motivated violent extremists," he said, that were behind the January 6 attack, along with "militia violent extremists."

Sen. Rick Durbin (D-Illinois) directly shot back at claims that left-wing groups are as equal a threat as more conservative-leaning extremists.

"Let's stop pretending that the threat of Antifa is equivalent to the white supremacist threat. Vandalizing a federal courthouse in Portland is a crime. It should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law," he said. "But it is not equivalent to a violent attempt to overthrow the results of elections, nor is it equivalent to mass shootings targeting minority communities."

Not all Republicans were interested in highlighting groups beyond perceived "white supremacists" during their time questioning Wray. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) actually suggested enlarging the FBI to combat the threat of domestic terrorism, asking Wray to submit a list of expansions his agency needs to combat a problem that, according to the director, has "grown dramatically." Graham even suggested "international" terrorists could work to "infiltrate" domestic terrorist groups within the US to commit acts of terror, especially with the 20th anniversary of 9/11 coming this year.

"We need more agents, we need more analysts, we need more data analytics," Wray told Graham, to which the senator told him to "put pen to paper" and officially request additional resources.
It seems repressive tolerance is here to stay for at least the near future...


Propaganda

WaPo using debunked reporting to issue false pro-Pelosi 'fact-check' on Capitol riots actions

Secret Service members walk National Guard
© REUTERS/Erin Scott
Secret Service members walk National Guard troops through the White House grounds in Washington, U.S., January 15, 2021.
The Washington Post's chief fact-checker, Glenn Kessler, on Monday fact-checked a claim by Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan, who said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told the National Guard to stand down ahead of January's Capitol riot.

"Capitol Police requested National Guard help prior to January 6th," Jordan wrote on Twitter in a post dated Feb. 15. "That request was denied by Speaker Pelosi and her Sergeant at Arms. During the attack, Capitol Police made the request again. It took over an hour to get approval from Pelosi's team!"

Comment:


NPC

Ex-CIA head Brennan confesses to MSNBC: 'I'm increasingly embarrassed to be a white male'

John Brennan
© MSNBC video screenshot
Former CIA Director John Brennan says he is "increasingly embarrassed to be a white male," March 1, 2021 during an interview with MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace.
Former CIA Director John Brennan confessed to MSNBC's audience on Monday that these days he's "increasingly embarrassed to be a white male."

The racial self-flogging came during a segment on the Jan. 6 Capital riot and reporting on the death of Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick by The New York Times.

"Deadline White House" host Nicolle Wallace teed up Mr. Brennan by saying reporter Katie Benner's recent work "renders at best, hypocritical, at worst cynical and false, any notion that the Republicans care about the lives and safety of law enforcement."

Pumpkin 2

'Carrie's coup': UK PM's fiancée tried to damage career of two top female civil servants, one refused excessive redecoration bill for No.10

Carrie Symonds

Carrie on plotting: Boris Johnson's fiancée Carrie Symonds tried to damage career of top woman civil servant who refused to sign off No 10 flat refurb and made crude sexual insult about another woman tipped to become his Cabinet Secretary
Boris Johnson's fiancee Carrie Symonds tried to damage the careers of Britain's top two female civil servants by manoeuvring against them and making offensive remarks.

Miss Symonds urged the Prime Minister to sack a female Whitehall official who refused to sign off a large taxpayers' bill for her refurbishment of the Downing Street flat, including expensive wallpaper.

And she made a crude remark about another mandarin tipped to be the first female head of the Civil Service - but who lost out when Mr Johnson picked a less experienced male rival.

Comment: See also: Police called to Boris Johnson's home after neighbours hear partner screaming


USA

Trump declares he won't start a new party at CPAC: 'We have the Republican Party'

trump flag hugging
© AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
President Donald Trump hugs the American flag as he arrives to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference, CPAC 2019, in Oxon Hill, Md., on March 2, 2019. Trump again hugged an American flag as he began his address to CPAC 2021.
Trump had 97% approval rating in CPAC straw poll.

Former President Donald Trump in his Sunday address to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) clearly declared that he would not start a new political party, after some speculation last month that he might.

"We're not starting new parties. You know -- they kept saying, 'He's going to start a brand new party,'" Trump said. "We have the Republican Party. It's going to unite and be stronger than ever before."

Comment: More from RT:
Trump stopped short of declaring he will run for office again, but he set off a huge ovation by hinting at a 2024 run. "Who knows? Who knows? I may even decide to beat them for a third time," Trump said, alluding to his 2016 victory, his disputed loss in 2020, and the next election 2024.

Trump made it clear that he will seek to remain a powerful force in Republican politics. "I stand before you today to declare that the incredible journey we began together... four years ago is far from being over," he said. "This movement is just getting started, and in the end, we will win."

Trump took aim at President Biden, labeling the Democrat's first 30 days in office "the most disastrous first month" of any president in modern history. Continuing his wide-ranging onslaught against the president, he argued that the new administration has quickly taken the country further left than advertised, describing Biden's presidential campaign as "all lies." Trump accused the Democratic Party of being "anti-jobs, anti-family, anti-economy, anti-energy and anti-women and anti-science."

The former president blasted Biden's immigration reforms aimed at dismantling some of his own hard-line policies, calling them "not just illegal," but also "immoral" and "a betrayal of our nation's core values." Among other things, Trump criticized Biden for immediately ending the travel ban that blocked entry for most people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Venezuela and North Korea. The Republican also took a swipe at the Biden administration for rejoining the Paris climate accord, arguing that Biden should have negotiated a better deal if he was hellbent on returning to the agreement.

"In one short month, we've gone from America first to America last," Trump charged.

On the issue of school reopenings, Trump accused Biden of caving to pressure from teacher unions, urging the Democratic administration to immediately get them reopened. Accusing Biden of "killing" over 40,000 jobs with the cancellation of the Keystone pipeline, Trump argued that the the US will lose its energy independence under the new administration. "You're going to see costs go like you've never seen them before," he said.
Trump also spoke at CPAC about Big Tech. Also from RT:
"The time has come to break up Big Tech monopolies and restore fair competition," Trump said on Sunday at the CPAC in Orlando. "Republicans, conservatives must open our platforms and repeal section 230 liability protections," he added.

While in the past the public had a chance to hear both sides of the argument before making an informed decision, Big Tech censorship disproportionately targeted conservatives, depriving them of the right to be heard, Trump argued.

"You would win, you would lose... But now there is no debate, because they refuse allow our side to even speak or to be heard."

If the power of Big Tech cannot be curbed at federal level immediately, Trump urged "every state in the union where we have the votes" to "punish Big Tech with major sanctions whenever they silence conservative voices." He noted that Texas and Florida "are doing this" already.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has been championing a bill seeking to rein in tech companies by allowing users to bring a "cause of action" against platforms violating Florida law. The bill, if it becomes law, would bar platforms from rapidly changing their policy and enforcing it selectively against users. Under the law, consumers would have the right to "opt-out" from algorithms that shadow-ban certain information. "As these companies have grown and their influence expanded, Big Tech has come to look more like Big Brother with each passing day," DeSantis said, as he voiced support for the bill in early February.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott earlier this month announced that his office was working on a bill to "prevent social media providers like Facebook & Twitter from canceling conservative speech." The bill will reportedly give the state more leverage to regulate social media companies, and allow Texans, yanked off social media platforms over political or religious views, the right to take Twitter and Facebook to court.

Trump made his comments on Silicon Valley giants and the censoring of conservative voices - including his own social media accounts - after calling for reforms to ensure "fair, honest and secure elections." For instance, he said, the US must end mass mail-in voting, require voter identification, verify that each voter is a legal citizen and provide chain-of-custody protection for all ballots.

"All the election-integrity measures in the world will mean nothing if we don't have free speech," he stressed.
If only there were a President who would do, while in office, what Trump talks about once he's no longer in office. Too much to ask?

See also:


Vader

Biden White House not releasing virtual visitor logs as watchdogs call for transparency

biden
The Biden administration will not release White House virtual visitor logs, Fox News has confirmed, as watchdog organizations call on President Biden to do so in the name of transparency.

A White House official told Fox News that the administration does not plan to share the names of attendees of virtual White House meetings — which have become the norm amid the coronavirus pandemic.

A White House official also told Politico on Monday it would not release virtual logs.

"Virtual meetings will not be subject to release — in the same way that previous administrations didn't release phone logs — but we're planning on regularly releasing the attendee lists for in-person meetings at the White House," the official told Politico.

Nuke

Holding Humanity Hostage: Dangerous prospects for Biden's nuclear weapons policy

Biden/Nukes
© therealnews.com
US President Joe Biden and the ever-present threat
President Biden will inherit the U.S. government's decades-long nuclear policy of flirting with apocalypse. The 46th president could very well fast-track the global path to doomsday if he chooses not to rejoin nuclear treaties, address international crises, and remove the corporate profit motive from plans to "modernize" our nuclear arsenal.

As the United States accelerates toward Inauguration Day, and as President-elect Biden announces more of his cabinet appointments, we are getting a clearer picture of how the incoming Biden administration plans to manage the "scorched earth foreign policy" he will be inheriting from Donald Trump. This is a foreign policy designed to create "as many fires as possible," even when it comes to managing humanity's most dangerous asset: nuclear weapons.

Trump has always maintained a somewhat strange and concerning fixation with the use of nuclear weapons. That fixation goes all the way back to the 1980s and 1990s, when Trump was best known as a New York City-based real estate developer who, before the dawn of Twitter, would speak his mind to eagerly scribbling tabloid reporters.

From the 2016 campaign trail to now, Trump's more recent, albeit scattered (and, at times, seemingly contradictory), comments about "nuclear" have been difficult to parse. What has been evident, however, is that, as a U.S. President navigating the geopolitical terrain, Trump's nuclear sensibilities have combined a Hollywood-style apocalypticism with his patented reality-show, tough-talking approach to any and all conflicts. Recall Trump's casual hinting (via tweet) of the potential nuclear annihilation of both North Korea and Iran. Trump has even gone so far as to ask, more generally, "'Why can't we use our nuclear weapons?'"

Comment: The overview explores the depth and breadth of the nuclear dilemma, proving why we can never be rid of this threat. The interview offers an airing of various perspectives, little known information and options.


Bad Guys

US intends to use 'humanitarian aid' shipments to Syrian camp to supply militants destabilizing the region - Russia, Syria report

Syria
© Reuters / Marko Djurica
Boys play soccer among destroyed buildings in Al- Khaldieh area in Homs, Syria, September 18, 2018. Picture taken September 18, 2018.
Washington is pressuring the United Nations to deliver international assistance to an overpopulated desert refugee camp but secretly planning to use the cargo to resupply armed militias it supports, Moscow and Damascus claim.

In a joint statement issued on Monday, the coordination headquarters of Russia and Syria insisted that their military coalition is "making significant efforts to restore peaceful life in the country and provide comprehensive assistance to Syrian citizens in voluntary and safe return to their homeland."

However, they add, the US is actively working to fuel fighting in the bloody civil war, which has been raging since 2011. According to the diplomatic partners, Washington has been politicizing the plight of the Rukban refugee camp, which has seen worsening conditions in recent months amid a rise in displaced civilians.

Comment: See also:


Jet3

Russia officially announced its readiness to shoot down Israeli planes in case of new raids on Syria

Lavrentyev
© Alexander Scherbak/TASS
Russian Presidential Envoy for Syria Alexander Lavrentyev
Russia has threatened Israel with readiness to attack IDF fighters.

The special envoy of the President of Russia, Alexander Lavrentyev, made a report in which he emphasized the unwillingness of the Israeli side to fulfill the agreements reached between Israel and Russia to de-escalate the situation in Syria.

Lavrentyev noted that Moscow's patience has completely dried up, and if Israel does not give up aggressive actions against the Arab Republic in the near future, Russia will be ready to attack Israeli aircraft, obviously, not only over Syria, but also in the airspace over neighboring countries, or in international airspace. Lavrentiev warned:
"Sooner or later, the cup of patience, including the Syrian government, may be overflowing, and a retaliatory strike will follow, which will accordingly lead to a new round of tension. These attacks must be stopped, they are counterproductive. We hope that the Israeli side will hear our concerns, including concerns about the possible escalation of violence in Syria. "
Given the fact that we are talking about an official statement, it is obvious that Russia is extremely unhappy with Israel's actions, especially after strikes were struck in areas where Russian military and civilian Syrian citizens were stationed.

According to analysts, as a first step, Russia may begin to raise its combat aircraft into the sky to counter Israel, and if such a measure does not help, the next step will be to use Russian air defense systems to intercept Israeli missiles, and then, a more radical step, opening fire on Israeli aircraft posing a threat to the Russian military on the territory of the Arab republic.

Comment: Russia announces a clear and precise warning with ultimate consequences, should Israel even acknowledge it.


Arrow Down

Oklahoma House passes bill allowing state to reject Biden's executive orders

Mike Hunter/JoeBiden
© Unknown/KJN
Oklahoma AG Mike Hunter • US President Joe Biden
The Oklahoma House of Representatives passed a bill Thursday that would allow the state to put the brakes on the power of President Joe Biden's executive orders.

HB 1236 would allow the Oklahoma state legislature to review each executive order and determine if the order should be forwarded to the Oklahoma attorney general, who would determine if it is permissible under the U.S. Constitution.

If the attorney general deemed one of Biden's edicts to be unconstitutional, the bill appears to direct the Oklahoma attorney general to sue for a court order invalidating the executive order.

On the other hand, if the attorney general decides not to take legal action, the state legislature could conduct a majority vote declaring it unconstitutional.

If the legislature invokes its option to declare an executive order unconstitutional, the statute is unclear whether the Oklahoma government would file suit or the state would simply ignore the order, leaving it to the federal government to enforce or try to take it to court.

HB 1236 states:
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the state, county, political subdivision or any other publicly funded organization shall not implement any action that restricts a person's rights or that the Office of the Attorney General or the Legislature by a majority vote determines to be unconstitutional.
Federal law always trumps state law, but any federal action that is unconstitutional is not a law at all. HB 1236 raises a series of interesting legal questions.