Welcome to Sott.net
Tue, 26 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Easter Egg 2

Justin Trudeau accused of 'anti-Christian' bias after failing to refer to 'Easter' in holiday message

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
© Reuters / Blair Gable
Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau takes part in a news conference at the Ornamental Gardens in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada November 19, 2020.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has sparked controversy after referring to the Easter holidays as a "long weekend," with online commenters pointing out that the prime minister frequently mentions other religious events.

"It's the start of a long weekend, and I know that means you'd normally be getting together with your entire family for a few days of fun. But with the number of Covid-19 cases rising across the country, we're all going to have to do things differently again this year," Trudeau tweeted, before concluding that "next year's celebrations" would be "brighter."


Comment: See also:


Syringe

BoJo ripped for saying fully vaccinated people still can't meet indoors because jabs don't give '100% protection'

bojo borris johnson
© Twitter / @BorisJohnson
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson was accused of undermining his government's vaccination program after he told Brits that those fully inoculated against Covid-19 could still not meet indoors as they were not completely protected.

In a Q&A video published on Friday, Johnson said vaccinated friends and family members could not meet one another indoors because "we're not yet at that stage".


Comment: This, from RT, is quite telling:
Covid-19 vaccination should be framed as 'racial inequality issue' to convince minorities to take jab, doctor tells Hancock

The government should promote the Covid-19 vaccine to skeptical minorities through the lens of racial 'health inequalities,' a doctor has told UK Health Minister Matt Hancock.

In a video published by the Department of Health and Social Care, Hancock asked Dr Charles Esene, chairman of Afro GP Herts & Beds, what he would say to someone who came to his clinic and said they were "worried" about being vaccinated.

"It depends on the race," replied Esene, explaining that if "the person is an ethnic minority, then of course you have a conversation about the existing health inequalities" and the impact of Covid-19 on the black community.

Esene also said the government should make minorities "understand that this is also trying to move the black community away from being the hard-to-reach, underserved community" and that "this is the beginning of the conversation about addressing the wider health inequalities in society."
When in doubt, play the race card! Keep in mind, if there were a real pandemic that was actually killing inordinate numbers of people, most people would not need to be convinced (or coerced) into taking protective measures.

Meanwhile, a top UK health adviser has admited that lockdowns won't make Covid disappear and society will have to 'manage it like the flu'. From RT:
Chris Whitty, England's chief medical officer, has conceded that Covid-19 lockdowns can't go on forever and won't eliminate the virus anyway - a view that might have helped before Britons endured months of draconian restrictions.

"Covid is not going to go away," Whitty said in a Royal Society of Medicine webinar on Thursday. "This is now a disease that for the rest of our careers is going to be around. So, it is clear that we are going to have to manage it, at some point, rather like we manage the flu."

...

"We need to work out some balance which actually keeps it at a low level, minimises deaths as best we can, but in a way that the population tolerates, through medical countermeasures like vaccines and in due course, drugs, which mean you can minimise mortality while not maximising the economic and social impacts on our fellow citizens," Whitty said.



Bug

You refuse to get vaccinated, but are you ready to be an outcast?

anti vax
"If behavioral psychologists helped to shape the government's strategy on mass vaccination, then in what other policies were they involved? Were these the "professionals" who conjured up the pandemic restrictions? Were the masks, the social distancing and the lockdowns all promoted by "experts" as a way to undermine normal human relations and inflict the maximum psychological pain on the American people? Was the intention to create a weak and submissive population that would willingly accept the dismantling of democratic institutions and the imposition of a new political order? These questions need to be answered." (From the text)

Let's assume for a minute, that the vaccination campaign is led by people who genuinely want to end the current crisis and restore the country to "normal". Let's also assume, that they believe that mass vaccination is the best way to achieve that objective by preventing the spread of the virus and, thus, reducing the death toll. Is that sufficient justification for silencing vaccine critics and conducting a nation-wide brainwashing operation aimed at controlling public opinion?

Comment: See also:


Hammer

LETTER FROM LONDON: A Troubling Decision

Alexander Mercouris says the conviction of former British diplomat Craig Murray undermines the right of the media to report cases, which is vital to protect the right to a fair trial.

Tower Bridge

Tower Bridge in London. (FlyingShrimp, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)
In the last Letter from London, I discussed the background to the contempt of court case against the historian, journalist and former diplomat Craig Murray for his reporting of the criminal and civil proceedings against Scotland's former first minister, Alex Salmond, on allegations of sexual assault, for which he was acquitted on all charges at trial.

I also discussed in that letter the political situation in Scotland: the rise of sentiment favoring independence from Britain, the power struggle within the Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) and the alarm that the growth of pro-independence sentiment in Scotland is causing in London.

The case against Murray has resulted in a judgment convicting him of contempt of court. He is now at serious risk of up to two years in prison with sentencing set for May 7.

Before discussing the judgment itself there is a point to be made about one aspect of the Court's conduct that is seriously worrying.

There was an eight-week gap between Murray's trial and the announcement of his conviction.

The trial lasted only one day, the evidence was limited in its extent and it was largely agreed by the prosecution and defence lawyers. It is not clear why the Court needed two months to deliver its judgment. Normally after such a trial, judgment would be delivered in a few days or a week at most. The delay seemed both cruel and unnecessary to Murray and his family.

It is useless to speculate about the reason why, but Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights requires that determination of a criminal charge should take place at a "fair and public hearing within a reasonable time." For the record, eight weeks in a case like this does not seem like a "reasonable time."

Comment: See also Craig Murray found guilty of contempt of court

In Craig Murray's own words April 2nd, 2012:
I am still frankly stunned that I was found in contempt of court. I maintain that I carefully identified nobody and, as empirically proven, the MSM did far more than I in revealing identities. I also believe that the terms of the Opinion would make it simply impossible to report anything except the prosecution case in any sexual assault trial - and that MSM journalists are entirely sanguine about this because they believe that in practice the ruling would only be used against dissidents, and never against them.

It is very difficult for me to try to explain why, in my own case, what has happened has much wider bad consequences, because it simply looks like special pleading. I am therefore very pleased that legal analyst Alexander Mercouris has written this important piece at Consortium News, and I should be grateful to you for reading it.



Briefcase

Report says DOJ probe into Gaetz involves cash payments to women

matt gaetz CPAC
© Associated Press
Rep. Matt Gaetz speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference
The Department of Justice investigation into Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) reportedly involves cash paid to multiple women who were recruited for sex online, The New York Times reported, citing payment recipients and text messages.

The Times reported Thursday that the Department of Justice (DOJ) probe into Gaetz also involves former Seminole County, Fla., tax collector Joel Greenberg, who allegedly met women online on websites for dates in exchange for gifts and travel. Greenberg allegedly introduced the women to Gaetz, people familiar with the matter told the Times.

Messages and interviews indicate Greenberg and Gaetz directed the women to meet them at specific times and locations and laid out the amount of money for which they would be compensated. People familiar with the matter told the Times that the illegal drug ecstasy would at times be consumed.

Comment: It has been a rollercoaster story. From The NY Post March 31,where Gaetz claimed he was the target of an extortion plot, :
The former Department of Justice official accused of trying to extort $25 million from Rep. Matt Gaetz slammed the allegations as a "blatant attempt to distract" from the federal sex-trafficking probe that's underway.

David McGee, a former federal prosecutor in Florida who is now working at the firm Beggs & Lane, denied blackmailing Gaetz, who is under investigation for his alleged sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl.

"It is completely false," McGee told the Washington Post. "It's a blatant attempt to distract from the fact that he's under investigation for sex trafficking of minors."

McGee added, "I have no connection with that case at all, other than, one of a thousand people who have heard the rumors."

After news of the probe involving Gaetz broke on Tuesday, the Florida congressman accused McGee of trying to shake his family down for $25 million.

The Republican claimed the existence of the DOJ probe was leaked to the media in an effort to thwart the FBI investigation into the alleged extortion plot.

"On March 16, my father got a text message demanding a meeting wherein a person demanded $25 million in exchange for making horrible sex trafficking allegations against me go away," Gaetz said on Fox News, while identifying that person as McGee.

"Our family was so troubled by that, we went to the local FBI. The FBI and the Department of Justice were so concerned about this attempted extortion of a member of Congress that they asked my dad to wear a wire, which he did, with the former Department of Justice official."

Gaetz called on the FBI to release the tapes — and McGee welcomed that idea.

"If there is a tape, play the tape," McGee said. "There is nothing on that tape that is untoward. It is a pleasant conversation of a dad concerned about his son and the trouble his son was in."

McGee told the Washington Post that Gaetz's father had "called me and asked to talk to me" but did not elaborate on the conversation.

Gaetz, 38, a close ally of former President Trump, denied the allegations that he was involved with a minor.

"In the strongest possible terms. I deny that I have ever been with someone underage," he told The Post Tuesday. "That is false."

He said he became aware of the probe after two of his ex-girlfriends were contacted by authorities.

"They were asked why I had given them plane tickets, money, and other interactions. They were in their 20s," he said.
Apparently Gaetz couldn't keep from boasting about his various relationships. However, the question is whether any of them were with underage girls:
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) showed photos of nude women who he claimed he had sex with to other lawmakers, multiple sources told CNN.

Two sources, who claim they were shown the material directly, said that the photos were "a point of pride" for Gaetz.

The sources also told the news outlet that Gaetz, 38, showed them the photos while conducting business on the House floor, adding that the Florida lawmaker displayed the images on his phone and talked about having sex with the women.

One source claimed that they were shown a video of a naked woman with a hula hoop.

The Hill has reached out to Gaetz's office for comment.

The news from CNN comes after The New York Times first reported on Tuesday that he was being investigated by the Department of Justice (DOJ) over an alleged relationship with a 17-year-old girl.

Investigators are probing whether or not the lawmaker has violated federal sex trafficking laws by paying the girl to travel with him. The probe was opened during the last months of the Trump administration, under former Attorney General William Barr.


Notice the assumption that the relationship was real. A varient on the "when did you stop beating your wife" tactic


The DOJ's investigation into Gaetz, a vocal Trump ally, is part of a larger investigation involving former Florida county tax collector Joel Greenberg, who faces charges of sex trafficking a child and providing payment to people, including a female minor in exchange for sex.
Gaetz is not budging, at least for now:
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Florida) has pushed back against calls for him to resign following his communications director stepping down amid an inquiry into allegations of a relationship with a minor and his having paid for sex.

Gaetz told The Hill on Friday that rumors he is leaving office are "false," and it is "very safe" to say he will remain in office amid a Department of Justice (DOJ) inquiry into whether the congressman violated sex trafficking laws.

...

Gaetz, one of former president Donald Trump's most vocal supporters, has denied any wrongdoing and said the inquiry is part of an attempt by a DOJ official to extort money from him, even claiming the FBI is aware of the situation. He has also said the alleged minor "does not exist."

The weight of the accusations, however, has led many critics to call for Gaetz's resignation. Gaetz's communications director, Luke Ball, reportedly stepped down on Friday amid the controversy.

Speaking to the news platform Axios following reports of the DOJ inquiry, Gaetz said he was not the target of any investigation and had a "suspicion that someone is trying to recategorize my generosity to ex-girlfriends as something more untoward."
Notice the media outlets gleefully running with the most sordid version of the story are uniformly Deep State mouthpieces. It is important to wait for all the facts to come out before passing judgement. Gaetz may have fallen prey to the weaknesses men in power are subject to, but that is not the same as committing a felony. Nothing would make Pelosi and the Democrat machine happier than removing Gaetz, who has been a thorn in their side since the beginning of the Trump administration. And the Dems are not above fabricating evidence. The 'Dirty Dossier' proved that.


People

US, Iran head to Vienna for indirect nuclear deal talks

Iran
© REUTERS/Joe Klamar/Pool/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: Iran and six major world powers reached a nuclear deal on Tuesday, capping more than a decade of on-off negotiations with an agreement that could potentially transform the Middle East. U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, German Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and the head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization Ali Akbar Salehi and the Iranian delegation (L-R) meet during a plenary session at the United Nations building in Vienna, Austria July 14, 2015.
Iran and the United States said on Friday they would hold indirect talks in Vienna from Tuesday as part of broader negotiations to revive the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and global powers.

Tehran has ruled out face-to-face bilateral discussions, but the presence of both Iran and the United States in the Austrian capital - welcomed by Washington as a "healthy step forward" - will help to focus efforts to bring all sides back into compliance with the accord.

The aim is to reach an agreement within two months, said a senior official with the European Union, the coordinator of the deal. Iran holds elections in June.

Comment: Sputnik provides more detail on the talks:
Last month, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei announced that Tehran is in "no hurry" to return to its obligations under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, and is prepared to wait until the US lifts its illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi has stated that a possible US decision to rejoin the 2015 nuclear deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), does not require any talks.
Speaking to the deal's remaining signatories during a virtual meeting on Friday, Araqchi added that "Iran will suspend its steps [scaling back compliance with the deal's terms] as soon as [US] sanctions are lifted and this is verified".
The statement comes as Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif announced earlier on Friday that the US would not take part in talks on the JCPOA, scheduled for next week in Vienna.

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, for his part, hailed the upcoming Vienna event, stressing in a statement that the sides "have no time to lose".
"An agreement that is once again fully respected would be a plus for security for the entire region and the best basis for talks on other important issues of regional stability", Maas pointed out.
The statement followed the JCPOA signatories agreeing to sit down for the Vienna nuclear talks in order to "clearly identify sanctions lifting and nuclear implementation measures, including through convening meetings of the relevant expert groups".

In last month's interview with the US news outlet Politico, Zarif reiterated Iran's readiness to adhere to the JCPOA "as soon as the United States comes to compliance".

The Islamic Republic started to scale down its JCPOA obligations, including those pertaining to uranium enrichment, in May 2019, exactly a year after then-US President Donald Trump announced Washington's unilateral withdrawal from the accord, also reinstating harsh economic sanctions against Tehran.
"Now we want to go back to compliance. The party that has started this process has to go back and Iran will immediately go back", Zarif told Politico, in an apparent nod to the US.
When asked why the Islamic Republic has not sat down with the US yet to discuss the matter, he said that "there is nothing to talk about", accusing Washington of seeking "to use pressure and coercion in order to extract new concessions from Iran" when it comes to the JCPOA.

In February, the White House expressed a willingness to revive US participation in the Iran deal, also demanding that Tehran return to its commitments under the 2015 agreement. Tehran, for its part, insists that it is Washington who should take the first step by scrapping all economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic.
See also:


Syringe

China aims to vaccinate entire city in 5 days after outbreak - 300k people

chinese city line vaccine
© AP
A Chinese border city hit by a fresh outbreak of COVID-19 began a five-day drive on Apr 2, 2021 to vaccinate its entire population of 300,000 people.
A Chinese border city hit by a fresh outbreak of COVID-19 began a five-day drive on Friday (Apr 2) to vaccinate its entire population of 300,000 people.

State broadcaster CCTV showed people lining up and getting vaccinated in Ruili, where 16 cases have been confirmed since Tuesday. Twelve of them are Chinese and the other four are nationals of Myanmar, which lies across the border.

A city Communist Party official told CCTV the previous day that 159,000 doses of vaccine had arrived in the city.

Television footage showed vacant streets as officials ordered people to home quarantine and closed non-essential businesses. The city has also said it would tighten controls around the porous border to try to stop anyone crossing illegally from Myanmar.

Heart - Black

Psycho nanny state: New UK govt campaign will urge everyone not to hug

grandma covid cartoon
© Bob Moran
The Government is planning a new social media poster campaign that will urge people - including those who have been vaccinated against Covid - not to hug. A source has said that the messaging will say that if you "hug your grandchildren there is a chance you are going to infect people you love". The Telegraph has the story.
Vaccinated Britons will be urged not to hug in a new Government campaign that comes amid fears people are more likely to ignore social distancing rules once they have been jabbed.

The Cabinet Office is preparing a social media poster campaign that will call on people who have been inoculated against Covid to abide by the rules as they are relaxed in order to allow more social contact.

"The messaging will be aimed at people who have been vaccinated to stop them going off-piste and ignoring the regulations, and particularly with the elderly who have had two jabs," said a senior source.

"It will be along the lines that it is great that you have been vaccinated, but if you are going to visit your family and hug your grandchildren there is a chance you are going to infect people you love."

A similar campaign has been run during lockdown, in which older vaccinated people were urged to stay at home to save lives.

The posters, featuring older Britons, warned that they could still transmit the virus even after having a jab. "There is still a risk you could spread coronavirus, even after you have been vaccinated," they said.
The Government fears that people who have received the vaccine believe they are safe from Covid.

Comment: Covid policy is psychopathic.


War Whore

The war in Syria: Who are the real anti-imperialists?

Army guy/Assad/Biden
© AFP
US troops on patrol in Syria, December 2020
Billboard portrait of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Golan Heights, February 2021
US President Joe Biden White House speech March 2021
In the history of post-World War II US imperialism, there have been various cases of aggression against countries and regimes that many anti-imperialist, socialist leftists around the world have considered reactionary, or at least not worthy of their support.

In some cases, there was a consensus that while the regime in question was not to be defended, the imperialist aggression against it was not intended to save people from its dictatorial predations, but rather to secure imperialist hegemony and economic profits that would continue to oppress people. Even in cases when anti-imperialists thought the targeted regime deserved defence, their efforts mostly focused on opposing intervention.

Yet, opponents of US aggression in Southeast Asia in the 1960s and 1970s were often branded by American "patriots" as Soviet agents, apologists for the Viet Minh, communists, pinkos, traitors, etc.

Perhaps the most notorious recent cases were the US-led invasions of the Arabian Peninsula in 1991 and Iraq in 2003. None of the anti-imperialist leftist, let alone liberal, opponents of the invasions had any love for Saddam Hussein's tyrannical regime, but they all understood that the invasions were concerned with imperial interests and had nothing to do with ending dictatorship - especially as Saddam had been a western ally since he heeded the call to invade revolutionary Iran in 1980.

Comment: Nothing is ever like it seems and rarely do we comprehend the whole picture - a calculated advantage for those who run counter-narratives. They bet on our ignorance and inattention.


Chess

Welcome to shocked and awed 21st century geopolitics

Lavrov/Yi
© AFP/Russian Ministry/Anadolu Agency
Russia's FM Sergey Lavrov • China's FM Wang Yi
Beijing, China • March 23, 2021
It took 18 years after Shock and Awe unleashed on Iraq for the Hegemon to be mercilessly shocked and awed by a virtually simultaneous, diplomatic Russia-China one-two. How this is a real game-changing moment cannot be emphasized enough; 21st century geopolitics will never be the same again.

Yet it was the Hegemon who first crossed the diplomatic Rubicon. The handlers behind hologram Joe "I'll do whatever you want me to do, Nance" Biden had whispered in his earpiece to brand Russian President Vladimir Putin as a soulless "killer" in the middle of a softball interview.

Not even at the height of the Cold War the superpowers resorted to ad hominem attacks. The result of such an astonishing blunder was to regiment virtually the whole Russian population behind Putin - because that was perceived as an attack against the Russian state. Then came Putin's cool, calm, collected - and quite diplomatic - response, which needs to be carefully pondered.

These sharp-as-a-dagger words are arguably the most devastatingly powerful five minutes in the history of post-truth international relations.

Comment: There is no 'saving face' for Biden (nor the West for that matter). That thin cover has been blown far and wide. For America it's 'Game Over'. It just doesn't think so.