To admirers he is a Thatcherite reformer set to jolt India from the economic doldrums, while his opponents liken him to Putin or even Hitler. Indian election frontrunner Narendra Modi divides opinion like few other politicians.Leave it to the Wall Street Journal to come up with a grossly over-simplified and skewed news-bite.
For starters, the conventional portrayal of Thatcher is as 'the Iron Lady who reformed the UK with an iron fist' - a mask for the fact that she was a brutal and callous psychopath that eviscerated the social welfare state and trade unions in the UK to facilitate the corporate takeover of British society.
As to whether Mr.Modi will turn out to be 'a Putin or Hitler', Western media scurrilously portrays Putin as a ruthless dictator, when in fact he has proven to be knowledgeable, shrewd and incorruptible. The actions match the words: Putin's government has already delivered half of its 2012 election promises. Putin's only 'crime' was to say 'no' to the US Empire builders and their NATO enforcers, and psychopaths really don't like to be told 'no'.
Nevertheless, the 'Hitler' comparison suggests that alarm bells are ringing in Washington and Brussels over fears that Modi will deepen India's commitments to establishing that 'multipolar world' conceived by the Russians. Sites like Eurasia Review and others are producing interesting analysis of the potential tectonic shifts in geopolitics that Modi's landslide election victory portends, but what I want to do here is introduce a Western audience to some general facts about Indian national politics and Modi's rise to power.
















Comment: Insightful Interview.