Welcome to Sott.net
Tue, 02 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Megaphone

The madness of the war in Syria explained in two short lines

syria bombings

At least the explosions are nice
Fact number #1: Turkey is sponsoring ISIS up to the point of facilitating ISIS offensives into Syria from Turkish territory

Fact number #2: US has the use of Turkish airbases which it uses to fly air sorties against ISIS in Syria

Ergo:

Theoreticaly US planes could be flying from Turkey into Syria to hit Ankara-backed militants who are also attacking from their Turkish bases into Syria.

Meditate on that.

Rocket

In violation of nuclear treaty, Saudi Arabia admits to arming their bombers with nuclear warheads

missiles
"We have nuclear bombs": this is what was said on February 19 on Russia Today by the Saudi political analyst, Daham al-Anzi, de facto spokesman for Riyadh. He repeated it on another Arab channel. Saudi Arabia had already declared 1 its intention to acquire nuclear weapons from Pakistan (not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty), of whom it finances 60% of the military nuclear program. Now, through al-Anzi, the Saudis have indicated that they started buying them two years ago.

Of course, for Riyadh, this is to confront the "Iranian threat" in Yemen, Iraq and Syria, where "the Russians aid Assad." That is to say, where Russia supports the Syrian government to free the country from Daesh (Islamic state) and other terrorist groups, financed and armed by Saudi Arabia as part of the US / NATO strategy.

Riyadh has over 250 fighter-bombers with dual conventional and nuclear capability, provided by the US and by the European powers. Since 2012, Saudi Arabia is part of the "Nato Eurofighter and Tornado Management Agency," the NATO agency that manages European Eurofighter and Tornado fighters, of which Riyadh bought from Britain twice the number of that of the whole Royal Air Force.


Comment: If this were Iran, the whole Western world would be in hysterics. But since it's a US ally, they are allowed to break an international treaty. They are already committing war crimes in Yemen, what's the difference if these head-choppers start a nuclear world war.


Chess

Turkey's shelling of Syrian territory 'aimed at derailing reconciliation' - Russian MOD

Turkey soldiers
© AFP 2016/ OZAN KOSE
Russia considers continuing artillery shelling of Syrian territory by Turkey to be a provocative act aimed at derailing reconciliation process in the war-torn country, the commander of the Russian center for reconciliation in Syria said Wednesday.

Last week, Russia and the United States reached an agreement on the ceasefire in Syria. The cessation of hostilities took effect at midnight on Saturday, Damascus time, generally holding across the country despite reported minor violations.

"The Russian Center is receiving reports from the Syrian General Staff and Kurdish armed groups supporting the ceasefire, that complain of continuing artillery shelling from Turkey," Lt. Gen. Sergei Kuralenko said at a news briefing.

Comment: Further reading: Syrian cessation of hostilities: 'Largely successful' so far, but even 'failure' is a success for Russia


Chess

When American imperialism reached its limit: US-Russia agreement in context

John Kerry Hillary Clinton
© Reuters/Carlo Allegri/Brian Snyder/Photo montage by Salon
John Kerry, Hillary Clinton
Hardly does the Syria accord announced jointly in Washington and Moscow last week clarify the swamp of complications, divided loyalties and treachery that have defined the crisis for years. It does not. We do not know yet even if the "cessation of hostilities" will hold, to say nothing of whether it will open any door to political negotiation and a settlement. It is fragile; the predictable interests—notably Turkey and Saudi Arabia, Washington's principle allies—are already trying to tip the deal over.

But the doubters overdo it, in my view. They judge the agreement as if they were making book on it: No previous attempt to halt the violence has succeeded, so the odds are this one will collapse, too.

Shallow thinking—the kind one gets from the pack animals that staff our newspapers. You have to look carefully at this agreement and the circumstances that led to its conclusion last week. A lot has changed since the previous attempt at a ceasefire, in 2014, failed in less than a day. At close range, I see grounds for optimism—O.K., tempered, attenuated optimism. And I mean this two ways.

Chess

Syrian peace plan: Russia humiliates, US seethes

putin and military
© www.politico.com
President Putin and his military strategize Mark Toner's suggestion of how to "put up."
Public comments confirm reports of furious rows and recriminations between US officials at the way Russia has outplayed US in Syria. A very well sourced article, which has recently appeared in The Wall Street Journal (attached below), shows the extent of the policy disarray in Washington following the US-Russian "cessation of hostilities" agreement. It seems there has been a massive row.

The heads of the US military and the CIA are clearly furious at the way in which they feel the US has been humiliated, and in a series of angry meetings in the White House they have made their feelings known. Though they rationalise their anger with talk about how Russia cannot be trusted, and how US allies in the regions like the Turks and the Saudis feel betrayed, that is what it amounts to.

These recriminations have slipped into the open, as shown by the recent angry comments of Mark Toner, the US State Department's deputy spokesman, who in exceptionally crude and undiplomatic language called on Russia in Syria "to put up or shut up".

These comments have provoked a stern rebuke from Maria Zakharova, the Russian Foreign Ministry's formidable spokeswoman...


Comment: "So, Mark, until Russia 'does not shut up,' you have a chance to find out what is really going on in Syria," - Maria Zakharova


...whilst Alexey Pushkov, the Chairman of the State Duma's committee for foreign affairs, has twisted the knife by Tweeting that "A deputy spokesman of the U.S. Department of State has broken down - frayed nerves. In the United States lots of people regard the ceasefire in Syria as a defeat: the papers are indignant and the neoconservatives are shocked."

The difficulty the US hardliners face is that for all the brave talk of a Plan B they have no realistic alternative to offer.

Comment: The US infighting is just revving up and it seems there are many positions in the mix. It does not bode well for any administration to be so fragmented and multi-polarized when it may trigger an epic consequence such as WWIII. Will Russia have the restraint and wisdom to handle the US/Western tantrums and shine a light on this dark shadow? Or will the US hardliners/war mongers/Israeli neocons gain traction and push us globally off the edge in revenge. It depends on a well-devised, high-minded and solid strategy to restore global sanity and trust, not the muscle tactics of the radical few.


Bad Guys

The US seeks deployment of land-based artillery near South China Sea

South China Sea
© Sputnik
With tensions escalating in the South China Sea, the US Army is discussing the possibility of sending mobile artillery units to the region. Over the weekend, US President Barack Obama stated that his administration would continue to challenge Beijing's territorial claims in the South China Sea.

"We think China is resorting to the old style of might makes right, as opposed to working through international law and international norms to establish claims and to resolve disputes," Obama said in an interview with Channel News Asia.

The US and its Pacific allies have accused China of building artificial islands on top of sensitive marine habitats to establish an air defense zone in the highly contested waterway. China maintains it has every right to build within what it considers to be its own territory, and has stated that the islands will be used primarily for humanitarian purposes. Beijing has accused Washington of stirring unrest in the region, and new information of additional behind-the-scenes machinations have come to light.

Question

Propaganda? Capture of US sailors by Iran due to crew errors

us sailors iran
© Iran's revolutionary guards website/AFP
US sailors being apprehended by Iran's Revolutionary Guards after investigations showed their patrol boats had entered Iranian waters unintentionally
The incident in January which saw 10 US sailors detained by Iran's naval guards was caused by repeated crew errors, Foreign Policy magazine has revealed. The sailors had never traveled such distances before, got lost with GPS and their engine broke down.

The 10 US sailors on two small riverine armed craft were detained in mid-January by naval units from Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps off Farsi Island in the Persian Gulf. The humiliating scene with American navy members kneeling in surrender on deck was filmed by the Iranians and quickly made headlines across the world.

Coming just days before a historic nuclear agreement with Iran, the incident could have rapidly escalated into an international crisis - but it also raised questions about the US Navy's capabilities and its readiness to operate in uneasy Gulf waters.

The fiasco can be put down to a number of reasons, according to an ongoing Navy internal investigation. Several people - including from the White House, congressional officials, and others familiar with the details - shared information with Foreign Policy on condition of anonymity.

Comment: It's also possible that this crew was part of a clandestine operation aimed at penetrating Iranian waters and gaining intelligence, and that the story that was fed to Foreign Policy magazine is a lie. It's not often that the US military willingly admits to incompetence as an excuse.


Vader

Turkey's imperialistic destabilization in Syria is a violation of international law

Syria
© East News/ AP
Turkey has the right to conduct military operations in Syria and elsewhere to protect itself from the threat of terrorism. That's what Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told a conference on Saturday at an event celebrating the inclusion of Turkey's southeastern province of Gaziantep on the list of UNESCO's Creative Cities Network.

Speaking at the event, Erdogan also stressed that Ankara's position had "absolutely nothing to do with the sovereignty rights of the states that can't control their territorial integrity." He argued that it, on the contrary, showed Turkey's will to protect its sovereignty rights.

Erdogan's latest comments come after the international community slammed Ankara over its shelling of YPG forces in northern Syria. Catherine Shakdam, Director of Programs for the Shafaqna Institute for Middle Eastern Studies spoke to Sputnik in an exclusive interview saying that Turkey's policy in Syria is aimed only at protecting Erdogan's personal interests.

"By interest I mean Daesh radicals and other groups which are creating chaos in Syria. He is not trying to defeat or combat terrorism but actually he is trying to weild terror as a weapon of mass destabilization in Syria because he is trying to recreate the Ottoman Empire, maybe not in the way it used to be but to create colonies of countries that would heed to the will of Ankara and that is the new reality that we are living in today."

Pirates

OFAC: Uncle Sam's global financial shake-down agent

OFAC sanctions

Office of Foreign Assets Control - US financial muscle
Nothing says globalization more than the US Department of Treasury's dubious Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). This international financial collection agency has become a "hard power" arm of America's neoconservative foreign policy, an agency that seeks to shake down money and other assets from foreign officials and businessmen who dare challenge the supremacy of the United States.

The placement of a number of pro-Israeli neoconservatives at the helm of OFAC has also made the office a virtual tool of Israeli foreign policy and intelligence. OFAC has been at the forefront of prosecuting Americans and others for violating sanctions against Iran, Bashar al-Assad's government of Syria, Lebanon's Hezbollah political party, Hamas in Palestine, Muammar Gaddafi's government of Libya, Saddam Hussein's Iraq, the government of Omar al-Bashir of Sudan, and other foes of Israel. However, none of these Israeli targets are necessarily enemies of the United States.

OFAC was born as the Treasury Department's Division of Foreign Assets Control in 1950 during the throes of the early Cold War era when the Harry Truman administration wanted to prosecute companies and individuals conducting business with mainland China and North Korea in violation of American economic sanctions. In 1962, the division became the present Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Continuing as a tool of Cold War economic warfare, OFAC turned its attention on those who violated the economic embargo of Cuba, particularly American tourists who decided to avail themselves of the island nation's plentiful sunshine, clean beaches, and excellent cigars and rum. As late as 2007, OFAC vigorously pursued a Spanish travel company and its website for "helping Americans evade restrictions on travel to Cuba".

Comment: More evidence that the US is actually being run by oligarchs for their own benefit.


Dollar

'Supreme Leader' Trump and the Mullahs of Wall Street

Supreme Leader Trump
Shocking as it may seem, Iran's recent elections compare favorably against the super-rich, warmongering auction that passes for American "democracy".

If reality-TV supremo Donald Trump ever makes it into the White House, he says that torture of terror suspects and shoot-to-kill of their family members will be turbo-charged under his command. The capricious demagoguery of this guy is truly sinister. And all the other gung-ho contenders are hardly any different.

Trump's brazen disregard for international law and gung-ho militarism has even alarmed former CIA director Michael Hayden. That's saying something when even a shady organization like the CIA is disconcerted by Trump.

But the fact is that Trump is only able to take a run at becoming US president because of his supposed vast individual wealth. His fortune was made from the kind of wheeler-dealer property capitalism that has bankrupted millions of American families and made Wall Street banks and financiers obscenely rich.

Comment: This is what most of all Trump supporters just don't understand since their support of him is more likened to choosing a favorite football team than a leader of millions. But even being the "elected" leader of the United States is a big misnomer. Trump is a brand, a flavor, and a style of bluster that people identify with and can get behind. At the end of the day, whether it is Trump or Clinton (probably Clinton) who wins, it is just as Cunningham says "like all the other politician-puppets, [he or she] will do as he [or she] is told". They probably won't even require being told too much since they are already on board with so much of how the power game is played.

Geeze, why didn't Trump just stick to his highest destiny: