Puppet Masters
The Royal Navy's HMS Diamond was sent to tail Russian Northern Fleet research ship Yantar on its way through the English Channel, the British Navy said in a statement on June 1, calling the Russian vessel a "spy ship." It further added that the HMS Diamond, which is a Portsmouth-based Type 45 destroyer, "will continue to monitor the vessel's movements and activities as it continues north."
The Yantar, however, is far from being a warship. While indeed part of the Russian Northern Fleet, the vessel, commissioned in 2015, is designed to conduct deep-sea research. It can carry various manned and unmanned underwater vehicles, but has no armament.
"We say that the US is our strategic partner. As our strategic partner, the US should not say we should knock on another door," Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Friday. Speaking to Turkish Star TV, Erdogan was referring to a bill recently introduced in the US Senate with the aim of halting the shipment of F-35 stealth fighter jets to Ankara. "If we are strategic partners, if we are model partners, the US should not legally wrong us here," he said.
Turkey has ordered 100 American jets, and the first two units are to be deployed by 2019. The military spending bill, which is yet to be put up for a vote, is being pushed by senators from both the Republican and Democratic parties. It says that Ankara will not receive the promised aircraft and their maintenance depot if it "degrades NATO interoperability" and "exposes NATO assets to hostile actors." The senators also do not want Turkey to get the planes if it tries to buy weapons from nations under US sanctions. Lawmakers also cited the detention of US citizens by Ankara and potential threats to Greece, another NATO ally, as reasons to stop selling fighter jets to Turkey.

Lieutenant General Valery Asapov (right, with President Putin) was killed in Deir Ezzor in September 2017, as he assisted Syrian commanders in their recapture of the city
Vladimir Putin will have paid very close attention to the location of the Syrian artillery battery where four Russian soldiers lost their lives at the weekend. The desert around Deir ez-Zour remains a dangerous place - politically as well as physically - in which the Americans and Russians play an extremely risky game of war.
Putin still suspects the Americans helped the artillery guidance of a mortar battery which killed the commander of the Russian Far East 5th Army in Deir ez-Zour, lieutenant general Valery Asapov, less than a year ago. Was the mortar fired by pro-American Kurdish fighters? Or by Isis? The Russians say that Isis mobile attackers stormed the Syrian artillery position this weekend at night - the Islamists' normal routine, streaming out of the desert wadis in suicide trucks and motorcycles - even though the little Syrian forts, hillocks of sand and cement strewn across the vast sand plateaus, are supposed to be invulnerable.
Comment: Mr. Fisk has unfortunately fallen for some of the West's propaganda. The Russians were extremely careful about civilian lives and especially medical facilities, unlike the carnage unleashed by the West in Raqqa.
- Russian FM spokeswoman on RT: 'We did not bomb children's hospital in Syria - This is Western propaganda'
- Anti-Russian propaganda in action: "Last hospital in Aleppo destroyed" for umpteenth time
- US shells another MSF hospital, Turkey blames Russia for it - Syrian ambassador
- Syrians in Golan Heights plan to set up united resistance front against Israel
- Syria: "All options on the table" in order to liberate Golan from Israeli occupation
So much for those who dismissed charges of Obama administration infiltration of Donald Trump's campaign as paranoid fantasy. Defenders of the Obama intelligence and law enforcement apparat have had to fall back on the argument that this infiltration was for Trump's - and the nation's - own good.
It's an argument that evidently didn't occur to Richard Nixon's defenders when it became clear that Nixon operatives had burglarized and wiretapped the Democratic National Committee's headquarters in June 1972.
In doing so, we should keep in mind that Putin is not the Hitler or Stalin of today, but rather a balancer trying to keep the Russian state and his own security intact after he decided to join the dark world of post-communist and Russian politics in December 1999. He is not trying to restore totalitarianism of any kind, nor is he trying to restore the Russian Empire or Soviet Union. He is trying to maximize his own power within a dangerous milieu of Russian politics and Russia's power in a world in which an expanding West, an unstable and often revolutionary Islamic world, and a rising China of unclear intentions surround Russia.
There is nothing to suggest that he will move to change any of these basic parameters, with the exception of relations with the West, where accommodation can occur if NATO expansion ends. Domestically, some modest modernizations in the economy might be expected.
The most iconic irruption into this sombre mood was the statement in the Knesset (parliament) that the population between the Jordan and the sea, was exactly balanced at 6.5 million each, between Israelis and Palestinians. Of course, that demographic equality would occur at some point, everybody knew. It was not as such, then, a surprise; but it constituted a slap of reality, nonetheless. These figures were published by the IDF and are therefore difficult to contest. This moment of reality thus curtails the ability of some Israelis to persist with the wishful thinking that the number of Palestinians is far less. This hugely symbolic tipping point is here - the point has arrived.
Comment: What had been a predictable conquest plan seems to be no longer the case. We see Israel taking military action against bogey Iranian and Palestinian aggression, widening the disconnect between truth and lies, honor and deceit. Global condemnation for its actions is mounting.
Well, well, well. The bipartisan Beltway establishment has apparently had its fill of this "Trump colluded with Russia" narrative - the same narrative the same establishment has lustily peddled for nearly two years. The Obama administration recklessly chose to deploy the government's awesome counterintelligence powers to investigate - and, more to the point, to smear - its political opposition as a Kremlin confederate. Now that this ploy has blown up on the Justice Department and the FBI, these agencies - the ones that went out of their way, and outside their guidelines, to announce to the world that the Trump campaign was under investigation - want you to know the president and his campaign were not investigated at all, no siree.
What could possibly have made you imagine such a thing?
And so, to douse the controversy with cold water, dutifully stepping forward in fine bipartisan fettle are the Obama administration's top intelligence official and two influential Capitol Hill Republicans who evidently pay little attention to major testimony before their own committees.
The Wall Street Journal reported on June 1st, that the White House is making plans for a potential summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Such a meeting would bring one of the world's most enigmatic relationships to front and center.
According to the Journal:
A senior administration official said Friday that Jon Huntsman, the U.S. ambassador to Russia, has been in Washington to help arrange a meeting between Messrs. Trump and Putin.It would seem that the American President has decided that that RussiaGate controversy has become (rightfully) irrelevant enough to move forward with this plan. Still, the news was released late Friday evening, New York time, and will probably not be a huge piece in the American national media for some time.
The planning is still at an early stage, the official said, with the two nations needing to agree on a date and location.
'This has been an ongoing project of Ambassador Huntsman, stretching back months, of getting a formal meeting between Putin and Trump,' the official said.
Comment: Would it be so. The stale and putrid air surrounding Washington DC has not cleared, nor, in attempts to manipulate both US and Russia, will Israel likely give its blessing.
I arrived a few days after the banks had collapsed in a grim neoliberal foreshadowing as to what was going to happen in the States a decade later. Bank accounts were frozen as the government put salvaging the banks above feeding the people. There was anger and rioting, tear gas and rubber bullets, and a brass band. Always, there was a brass band. Sometimes shirtless, often shoeless, with a few dinged-up instruments creating a wild cacophony of joy to riot to. A tiny country with the equator running through three distinct topographies -- the coast, the alps and the jungle -- its claim to being "el mitad del mundo" rings true. It feels like you are living in the heart of the world. It is life, concentrated. And its people seem more real and more alive than any I have encountered in my many travels.
Which is why I was not surprised when this plucky nation knowingly took on the wrath of the western empire in granting Julian Assange political asylum in 2012. While my own sycophantic country Australia pathetically ignored the plight of its own citizen, Ecuador defiantly strode forward, locked eyes with the US-centralized power establishment, and did what no one else was willing to.
Comment: To openly support Assange, or even acknowledge his contribution in a neutral way, opens the door for others to follow in his footsteps. If Western partners were honorable, law-abiding countries with nothing to hide, the Assanges of the world would be considered valuable. In some respects, this is not about what Assange/Wikileaks has revealed so far, it is fear for what might come next.
In a speech to the council, US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley criticized the proposal, describing it as a "grossly one-sided view". Haley accused Hamas of inciting violent acts at the border between Gaza and Israel, purposefully infiltrating the 'Great March of Return' mass protests with its "terrorist fighters" and deliberately using civilians as human shields.
Comment: Even if that were a speck true in, let's say another galaxy, the IDF didn't have to fire.
"The terrorist group Hamas bears primary responsibility for the awful living conditions in Gaza,"she said, before the UNSC vote.
The US was the only council member to vote against the proposal. There were 10 votes in favor and four abstentions (Poland, the UK, Netherlands and Ethiopia). A resolution needs nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the US, Russia, China, France or the UK in order to be adopted.
"The message given by the council today, as it votes against this, is that the occupying power enjoys an exception," the Kuwaiti representative said, after the proposal was vetoed. "Why do Palestinians continue to suffer? Why does the international community fail to act? Why does Israel enjoy impunity? Why are all these lives lost and all this blood is shed?" he asked.
Comment: What is wrong with this woman? UN protection would secure the Palestinians from ALL such violence (including Hamas if they were even involved) precisely because it is 'international protection'. Can't Haley separate 'protection' from 'blame'?
Unequivocally, the IDF murdered 120 innocent people and injured hundreds. Given the standards in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, there are many infringements continually perpetrated by Israel that would come into question. Haley is determined for these to remain off radar in order to keep up the pretenses against Hamas and substantiate Israeli aggression.
See also:
Appendix 4: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights description of 30 human rights guaranteed by the UN
Appendix 5:The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (abbreviated)
- US lone Security Council member to block UN inquiry into Gaza violence
- UN warns Israel against "unjustified and unlawful" murder of Palestinians in military occupied Gaza is breach of Geneva conventions














Comment: See also: