May and Corbyn blame each other as Brexit talks collapse

The government and Labour have sought to blame each other after cross-party talks to find a compromise Brexit plan collapsed, leaving any remaining hopes of an imminent solution to the impasse in tatters.

While both sides insisted the discussions had taken place in good faith, Theresa May said a sticking point had been Labour splits over a second referendum.

Labour in turn said the government had been unwilling to compromise and that May's imminent departure from Downing Street meant there was no guarantee any promises would be kept by a successor such as Boris Johnson.

That's a reasonable assumption in politics.

Nick Boles, the former Conservative MP who helped spearhead efforts to prevent a no-deal Brexit in March, said he now feared such a departure was almost inevitable when the EU27's latest deadline of 31 October is reached.

"It's game over," he said. "We only won by one, and it's very unclear that we would have the same level of Tory support, and for that matter Labour support. We are absolutely convinced that parliament will not find a way to stop no-deal Brexit."

The conclusion to six weeks of intermittent talks, which had angered many Conservative and Labour MPs who feared the nature of the compromise that might result, came with the release of a letter from Jeremy Corbyn to May on Friday.

Despite praising the talks as constructive, the Labour leader wrote: "It has become clear that, while there are some areas where compromise has been possible, we have been unable to bridge important policy gaps between us.

"Even more crucially, the increasing weakness and instability of your government means there cannot be confidence in securing whatever might be agreed between us."

May's spokesman said the view was mutual: "It was clear to the government ... that the talks were not going to reach a successful conclusion."

Corbyn's letter cited examples of what he said was May's inability to carry her government on possible compromises, for example ministerial dissent over a possible customs union and the idea of allowing reduced food standards to secure a US trade deal.

Speaking in Bristol at a campaign event for next week's European elections, the prime minister said the negotiations had "made progress", but blamed Labour for the lack of an outcome.

"In particular, we haven't been able to overcome the fact that there isn't a common position in Labour about whether they want to deliver Brexit or have a second referendum and try to reverse it," she said.

[...]

Labour hit back at this narrative, with Starmer saying May was "trying to blame everyone but herself" for the collapse of the talks. He tweeted: "She knows the reality is she couldn't carry her own side or offer a realistic compromise. Any deal agreed wouldn't last a day under a new Tory leader."

The tortuous process of discussion, which saw occasional meetings between May and Corbyn and many more involving their frontbench teams and officials, had been widely predicted to come to an end, but the news was still enough to see the pound drop to its lowest level against the dollar since February.

Corbyn had come under mounting pressure from within the shadow cabinet to walk away from the talks, including from close allies who feared a stitch-up that would see Labour blamed as the facilitator of a "Tory Brexit".

Both sides stressed that some progress had been made, with the prime minister's chief Brexit negotiator, Ollie Robbins, in Brussels earlier this week to discuss a joint draft of proposed changes to the political declaration about Britain's future relationship with the EU27.

They're hardly going to admit that, together, they're wasting the public's time and money in order to avoid enacting the will of the people.

But while there were signs the two leaders were not miles apart, a number of Conservative MPs were agitated at the idea of a possible customs union, Corbyn's key demand, while many in Labour disliked the prospect of a plan not being endorsed by a second referendum.

The government intends to press ahead with holding a vote on the withdrawal agreement bill in the week beginning 3 June - but sources stressed it would include "new features that reflect some of the discussions", in the hope of winning over Labour MPs.

May also plans to resume talks with the Democratic Unionist party, with which she is in a confidence and supply partnership, about how it could be reassured that accepting the deal would not undermine the integrity of the UK.

Government sources also pointed to progress on considering "alternative arrangements" for the Northern Irish border - one of the central concerns of Brexiters who have held out against the deal.

Corbyn said Labour would "carefully consider" any new proposals, but added: "I should reiterate that, without significant changes, we will continue to oppose the government's deal as we do not believe it safeguards jobs, living standards and manufacturing industry in Britain."

• Still Confused About Brexit? It's Actually Pretty Simple...
• Brexit: A Political Farce Based on a Public Lie

• NewsReal #26: Globalization vs Nationalism - The Hidden Causes of The Yellow Vest Protests in France
• NewsReal: Yellow Vest Protests, Brexit Farce - Revolutionary Climate in Western Europe?

• Iran is high-hanging fruit, which is why US is unlikely to attack
• Iran squeezed between imperial psychos and European cowards
• What's behind the US embassy evacuations in Iraq?
• Iran: In preparation of the 'battle space'
• Pepe Escobar: The Eagle, the Bear and the Dragon
• EU allies balk as US pushes for war with Iran

• Joe Biden's son blames "Russian Agents" for Ashley Madison profile
• Not just Ukraine; Biden may have a serious China problem as Schweizer exposes Hunter's $1bn deal
• Schiff: Biden Ukraine scandal should be off limits
• Joe Biden's cocaine-using, Navy-busted son now working for huge Ukraine company

• 'Prison time for fraudsters': Salvini calls for elimination of Italy's Central Bank
• Friendly relations with Russia and anti-austerity: Why the West is interfering in Italy's democracy
• 'They hate Italians and must resign': Salvini attacks mayors resisting immigration rules

• Israel slashes Gazans offshore fishing zone by 33% in retaliation for weekly protests
• Suspicious incident: Palestinian fisherman killed off Gaza coast by Israeli forces
• Israeli navy kidnaps six Palestinians off Gaza coast
• Cousin of kids murdered on Gaza beach by Israel navy three years ago shot and killed by Israeli navy while fishing off Gaza coast
• Israeli forces open fire on fishermen and raze farmlands in Gaza
• 'No-grow zone': Israeli Army admits to spraying poisons inside Gaza Strip

The Russian Army will likely get brand new 9mm Udav ('Boa') handguns this year, its maker said. The weapon is set to replace the legendary Makarov pistol, extensively used by the armed forces and police.

The final decision is up to the defense minister, but the pistol's manufacturer is confident that the army will receive the new weapon soon.

"I believe an order will be issued this year, and we will send out the pilot batch [of handguns] to the troops," the company's head, Albert Bakov, told Russian media on Friday.

The gun completed trials and was cleared for mass production in April. The weapon is equipped with an 18-round magazine, which is 10 rounds more than the famous but ageing Makarov pistol (PM) that it is set to replace. Although similar in design, Udav is said to be more powerful than the PM, and has less ricochets.

Different variations of the Udav handgun have been developed for use by the military, special ops units, and civilians.