OF THE
TIMES
Speaking in Kansas on December 6, [Obama] said, "Too often, we've seen Wall Street firms violating major anti-fraud laws because the penalties are too weak and there's no price for being a repeat offender." Just five days later on 60 Minutes, he said, "Some of the least ethical behavior on Wall Street wasn't illegal." Which is it? Have there been no prosecutions because Wall Street acted legally (albeit unethically)? Or did Wall Street repeatedly violate major anti-fraud laws (and should thus find itself in the dock)?
The President is confusing "legal" with "difficult to prosecute successfully."
"Last year, we called for the formation of a fact-finding commission with regards to this incident, but the US government, rather than welcoming the suggestion, threatened Iran," said President Ahmadinejad.."The references to the 9/11 commission Report are a total farce as the commission met behind closed doors, not under oath and not in a public court room. They've put the spin on this and will likely launch a war based on more false information. They do not even have to use a catalyzing event anymore, simply twist a few old lies into a new war.
Comment: The Pope appears to bring a lot of 'superficial glitter' with him.