Puppet MastersS


Attention

The truth about what happened in Odessa, Ukraine: How Bandera psychopaths murdered, raped and burned people alive with the blessing of the Western powers

ersieesist
Live Journal
Mon, 05 May 2014 12:09 UTC
Warning! Disturbing images!

Great tragedy happened in the port city of Odessa on Friday, May 2nd, 2014. Supporters of federalism were led into the Trade Unions House by Right Sector mob. The building caught fire soon afterwards, which resulted (by official reports) in 42 deaths.

At this point it's clear that the number of casualties in the Trade Unions House is far greater. Provocateurs lured people into the building where it was possible to kill them with impunity, with great relish, and without witnesses. Fire inside the building was directed in order to hide mass murdering of Ukrainian citizens.

Image
Firstly, the tents on the square were set on fire which resulted in appearance of large open fire areas close to the building. People were lured to hide behind massive doors of the Trade Unions House. Federalism supporters had no Molotov's cocktails prepared in advance.

Comment: Translation of the above video:
A man is telling:
- The guys who were dragging the bodies... we were walking over dead bodies.
- [Question]: How many people died there?
- At that moment, approximately 116 people. They just finished them all off.
- [Question]: Using gas?
- Not only gas, but also sound grenades, traumatic, pump shotguns, combat weapons... they were finishing them off inside the building. Two people were beaten by the sticks. Is this [censored] normal?! Is this the united nation [censored]?! The woman with two kids were burned alive on the second floor.
116 people! Your media [censored] called us terrorists. The Right Sector [censored] pushed us to the roof, throwing things at us and yelling "Death to the enemies!" [in Ukrainian], and the media is talking about the "united Ukraine"???! F**k you with such "united Ukraine"!!
- [Many synchronous questions]: Tell us the chronology.
- Children died there! Old people and women. The radicals came and finished them off shooting in their faces, they were jumping on their bodies, jumping on the dead bodies! The police could not do anything, they {the radicals} were wearing shields.
- [Question]: Where are the rest of the bodies?
- Near the 6th kilometer [they were delivered there in the same night], guys, we must go there and take the bodies away.
- [Question]: What is your name?
- Vanya (Ivan).
- [from the croud]: Vanya, be brave!
- I am...
- [old lady wearing a bright hood to the press]: Guys, I'm begging you on my knees tell the TRUTH please! The media is telling that we... [end of the video, the woman meant that the junta is terribly falsifying the information].


Read More...
Bulb

New York Times finally admits that Russia is NOT sending pro-Russian fighters into Ukraine


WashingtonsBlog
Mon, 05 May 2014 12:32 UTC
Image
Mainstream media is being forced to retract its propaganda more and more quickly

The New York Times pushed fabricated evidence in the run up to the Iraq war. A year later, the newspaper apologized for its inaccurate, one-sided coverage.

The U.S. and the New York Times pretended that Syria's government was responsible for the chemical weapons attack ... but that claim was debunked, and even the New York Times was forced to retract it several months later. (The alternative media, including Pulitzer prize winning reporter Seymour Hersh, has also pointed out that it was the Syrians rebels - with the help of the Turkish government - who did it).

Then the U.S. and the New York Times pretended that they had proof that Russian soldiers were the mysterious "masked men" seizing government buildings in Ukraine. But a couple of days later, they were forced reporting from the alternative media - especially Robert Parry, winner of the George Polk Award for National Reporting - into retracting that claim, and admitting that their "proof" was almost as flimsy as proof of Saddam's "weapons of mass destruction".
Read More...
Handcuffs

Questions about global warming: Why is the IPPC blocking access to data?

Dr. Tim Ball
Watts Up With That
Sun, 04 May 2014 07:08 UTC
Image

Attempts to get critical information from agents of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) meet with little success. Why? They claim immediate response to their work is mandatory for planetary survival and time is running out. Here is what Slate reported on March 30 2014.
In a new U.N. report released on Monday morning (Japan time) scientists come to a stark conclusion: Unless the world changes course immediately and dramatically, the fundamental systems that support human civilization are at risk.
If true, surely the world has the right to know every bit of information used for this conclusion, but that hasn't happened. There's a contradiction between orchestrated publicity raising the threat, but silence, obfuscation, and outright denial regarding questions about important data, process, and methodology. Suspicions are driven by natural curiosity and desire for complete openness in science, but also by their behavior to date.
Read More...
USA

Washington responsible for fascist massacre in Odessa

Mike Head
Global Research
Sun, 04 May 2014 00:00 UTC
Image
In what can only be described as a massacre, 38 anti-government activists were killed Friday after fascist-led forces set fire to Odessa's Trade Unions House, which had been sheltering opponents of the US- and European-backed regime in Ukraine.

According to eye-witnesses, those who jumped from the burning building and survived were surrounded and beaten by thugs from the neo-Nazi Right Sector. Video footage shows bloodied and wounded survivors being attacked.

The atrocity underscores both the brutal character of the right-wing government installed in Kiev by the Western powers and the encouragement by the US and its allies of a bloody crackdown by the regime to suppress popular opposition, centered in the mainly Russian-speaking south and east of Ukraine.

As the Odessa outrage occurred, US President Barack Obama, at a joint White House press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, explicitly endorsed the military offensive being carried out by the unelected Kiev government against protesters occupying official buildings in eastern Ukraine.
Read More...
Bad Guys

How did the gates of hell open in Vietnam?

Jonathan Schell
Tom Dispatch
Sun, 04 May 2014 00:00 UTC
Image
For half a century we have been arguing about "the Vietnam War." Is it possible that we didn't know what we were talking about? After all that has been written (some 30,000 books and counting), it scarcely seems possible, but such, it turns out, has literally been the case.

Now, in Kill Anything that Moves, Nick Turse has for the first time put together a comprehensive picture, written with mastery and dignity, of what American forces actually were doing in Vietnam. The findings disclose an almost unspeakable truth. Meticulously piecing together newly released classified information, court-martial records, Pentagon reports, and firsthand interviews in Vietnam and the United States, as well as contemporaneous press accounts and secondary literature, Turse discovers that episodes of devastation, murder, massacre, rape, and torture once considered isolated atrocities were in fact the norm, adding up to a continuous stream of atrocity, unfolding, year after year, throughout that country.

It has been Turse's great achievement to see that, thanks to the special character of the war, its prime reality -- an accurate overall picture of what physically was occurring on the ground -- had never been assembled; that with imagination and years of dogged work this could be done; and that even a half-century after the beginning of the war it still should be done. Turse acknowledges that, even now, not enough is known to present this picture in statistical terms. To be sure, he offers plenty of numbers -- for instance the mind-boggling estimates that during the war there were some two million civilians killed and some five million wounded, that the United States flew 3.4 million aircraft sorties, and that it expended 30 billion pounds of munitions, releasing the equivalent in explosive force of 640 Hiroshima bombs.

Comment: An important piece of the puzzle lies also with the financial motivations such as with those whose interests are employed in and by the Military-industrial complex, supporting and making profit from both sides of the wars. Professor Antony Sutton, who taught economics at California State University discusses here how a close-knit group of Western financiers and industrialists (centered around Morgan and Rockefeller in the US, and around Milner and the City financiers, in the UK) created and sustained Soviet Russia throughout, which also goes for the Vietnam war.



Read More...
Arrow Down

Michigan takes away the "Right to Farm" from folks in the suburbs

Daisy Luther
Nutritional Anarchy
Sun, 04 May 2014 00:00 UTC
Image
The War on Self-Sufficiency continues, and this week's victims are small backyard farmers in Michigan.

The "right to farm" in that state no longer exists for those who live on any property where there are 13 homes within one eighth mile or a residence within 250 feet of the property. This means that the folks who have a couple of goats, chickens, beehives, or rabbits living harmoniously in their suburban backyards are at the mercy of their local governments and their neighbors. The "right to farm" laws that are on the books originally came about when city dwellers moved to the country and complained about their rural surroundings - things like smells and animal noises. However, the law has protected many people since then who just want some freedom from the system, whether they have a couple of acres or a suburban backyard.

The issue here is that those of us who supply as much of our own food as possible are a threat to Big Agri.
Read More...
Propaganda

How Western media protects the right-wing supporters of the new puppet regime in Kiev by covering their murders!


Youtube/RT
Sun, 04 May 2014 04:36 UTC
odessa inferno
Flowers, candles and photos of the dead pile up outside a charred building in the scenic Ukrainian port city of Odessa, where 42 people lost their lives
See no evil? Media mum on inferno details and radical responsibility

Despite clear evidence that the pro-Kiev radicals set Odessa's House of Trade Unions ablaze on Friday killing dozens, the mainstream media is being ambiguous about the causes of the tragedy.

Comment: Would those responsible for the burning alive and killing 42 people be brought to justice?

From the video:
There won't be a fair process any more than there was, for example, over the sniper incidence on Maidan square itself. [Speaking about the American-backed puppet regime in Kiev] On balance, they support the people who've done that terrible thing in Odessa because they want to suppress the protests against themselves. [...] the army seems to be doing some of the fighting. When civilians come along and the soldiers are not prepared to shoot on civilians, right sector are brought in to do that.


Read More...
Stormtrooper

Democrazi: Brussels meeting of dissidents including French comic Dieudonné banned by Belgian Supreme Court under all-purpose pretext of 'anti-Semitism', riot police violently disperse attendees


France 24
Mon, 05 May 2014 04:38 UTC
Image
Citing security risks, a Brussels mayor banned a gathering of far-right figures - including controversial French comic Dieudonné - planned for Sunday after some Jewish groups called the meeting an "anti-Semitic hatefest".

The mayor of the Brussels district of Anderlecht banned both the meeting and any street protests planned in connection with it, the Belga news agency reported.

Organisers of the so-called "European Dissidents' Congress" had kept its venue secret until the last moment to try to avoid a ban. The meeting aimed to bring together a string of controversial far-right figures that included comedian Dieudonné M'bala M'bala, who has faced repeated convictions for anti-Semitism, Holocaust denial and incitement to racial hatred in France.

The Belgian League against anti-Semitism, LBCA, on Friday filed a complaint before the Brussels prosecutor against what it warned would be "a day of hate, that would serve as a platform for the worst gathering of anti-Semite authors, theorists and propagandists that our country has seen since the end of World War II".

The Simon Wiesenthal Centre for Holocaust studies and human rights rallied behind the calls for a ban.

"The fact that this hatefest is to be held in Brussels, the capital of Europe, the seat of its Parliament ... is a threat to democracy reminiscent of the 1920s Weimar Republic, which brought Europe to the Nazi abyss," the centre's director for international relations, Shimon Samuels, said in a statement.

Comment: Strange that Jewish groups should lead the efforts to block this public meeting. Don't they like democracy?

Read More...
Chess

Meanwhile in the Pacific Theater of World War III: US-Philippines to launch war games aimed at China after Obama pledge


Agence France Presse
Sun, 04 May 2014 22:24 UTC
Image
© Noel Celis/AFPPresident Barack Obama delivers remarks to US and Philippine troops at Fort Bonifacio in Manila on April 29, 2014
Manila (AFP) - Longtime allies the Philippines and the United States start annual, large-scale military exercises on Monday after President Barack Obama vowed "ironclad" backing for Manila as a territorial dispute with China simmers.

The two-week Balikatan or "shoulder-to-shoulder" drills involving 5,500 American and Filipino soldiers begin just days after Obama assured Manila his government was committed to a 1951 mutual defence treaty.

The allies last week bolstered their ties with a new defence agreement signed ahead of a visit by Obama giving American forces greater access to Philippine bases -- part of a US rebalancing of military power towards rising Asia.

"What President Obama said was a reaffirmation of our treaty," Philippine military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Ramon Zagala said.
Read More...
Star of David

In historic interviews, US officials blame end of talks on Israeli land theft, illegal settlements

Matthew Taylor
Mondoweis
Sat, 03 May 2014 22:15 UTC
Kerry Netanyahu
© Brendan Smialowski/Agence France-Presse/Getty ImagesIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu listens as US Secretary of State John Kerry makes a statement to the press before a meeting at the Prime Minister’s Office on January 2, 2014 in Jerusalem.
U.S. officials blamed Israel's "expropriating land on a large scale" to build colonies "on the territory meant for that [Palestinian] state" as the "primary" reason for the recent negotiations' failure, in a must-read Ynet interview with historic implications. This rare moment of honesty from anonymous officials of the dishonest broker stands in sharp contrast to the collapse of the Barak/Arafat Camp David talks, following which Israel's apologists seized on the Clinton administration's blaming of Arafat to disseminate the Myth of the Generous Offer.

Finally, for the first time in the history of the U.S. being Israel's lawyer, the superpower has copped to one of the fundamental flaws of the peace process: one cannot negotiate over a pizza with a bully while the bully devours the pizza! "What they told me is the closest thing to an official American version of what happened," writes Nahum Barnea. Put more plainly, indigenous people who are being oppressed by a colonial power cannot negotiate with the colonial power while the colonial power continues to steal, ethnically cleanse, and colonize their land.
"Only now, after talks blew up, did we learn that this is also about expropriating land on a large scale,"
A credulous U.S. official complained, going much farther than any comment Sec. Kerry has made either on or off the record. Apparently the unnamed officials haven't been reading Electronic Intifada, Haaretz, +972mag, our site, or any of the other publications that might have informed them of this reality long ago.
"I guess we need another Intifada to create the circumstances that would allow progress,"
One anonymous official asserted, clarifying that while they don't want that to happen, the lack of a 'sense of urgency' necessitates one. Perhaps a way to interpret this comment is the recognition that the current balance of power so drastically favors Israel, that only if the state came under extreme pressure - for example, through a massive popular uprising (let's think Intifada I, which was largely nonviolent) and a huge increase in international support for the BDS Movement - would Israel make the concessions necessary for negotiations to lead anywhere meaningful.

Of course, never did the unnamed U.S. officials speculate that cutting U.S. military aid to Israel might help create a 'sense of urgency,' nor did the U.S. officials acknowledge their own role as a dishonest broker being one of the main causes of the talks' failure.
Read More...