Puppet Masters
Approved by the Senate and Assembly last year, Cuomo's raise will come into effect on January 1 and increase his $225,000 annual salary by $25,000.
Other public officials receiving raises are Lieutenant Governor Kathy Hochul, Attorney General Letitia James, and Comptroller Tom DiNapoli.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) compared rallies of President Donald Trump to rallies of the racist Ku Klux Klan organization during an interview on Monday.
Omar made the comments in an online YouTube interview with Jonathan Capehart of the Washington Post.
Capehart asked for Omar's reaction to the results of the election when she pivoted the conversation toward comments by Trump that she characterized as an "attack" on Somali immigrants and Somali refugees.
Comment: Omar is the last one to be preaching 'respectability of the office'.
- 'Squad' member Ilhan Omar pays husband's firm another $600,000, bringing total to more than $1.6 Million
- FBI finally reviewing claims Ilhan Omar married her brother in immigration fraud scheme
- Ilhan Omar's lawyer is finding two marriages hard to explain
- Complaint alleges Ilhan Omar violated campaign finance law to pursue affair with married Democratic consultant
- Ethics complaint filed against Rep. Ilhan Omar - accused of immigration, tax, student loan fraud
- 'O'Keefed': Ilhan Omar connected cash-for-ballots voter fraud scheme exposed by Project Veritas - UPDATE: Trump calls for investigation

Culled mink are seen at the farm of Henrik Nordgaard Hansen and Ann-Mona Kulsoe Larsen near Naestved, Denmark, (FILE PHOTO)
"Since I have the clear assessment that I no longer have the sufficient support among a majority of the parliamentary parties, I have today informed the Prime Minister that I am resigning from the government," Mogens Jensen announced on Facebook on Wednesday.
The politician added that he accepts that mistakes have been made by his ministry and he would personally take responsibility, adding "especially I regret this to the many mink farmers who have been in a very unhappy situation."
Comment: So it was illegal, and to get around that hurdle they rushed through a law that means, now, they can do what they wanted. We're seeing this throughout Europe during this manufactured crisis, governments are forcing through shocking new legislation that inevitably confers ever more totalitarian powers to the government and, more often than not, this is achieved by bypassing normal democratic processes.
See also:
- 'Merkel must go, democracy must stay!' Anti-lockdown protesters blasted with water cannon at central Berlin rally
- Spanish government enforces state of emergency on Madrid after court rejects lockdown

President Donald Trump • Former Cybersecurity/ Infrastructure Agency head Chris Krebs
"The recent statement by Chris Krebs on the security of the 2020 Election was highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud - including dead people voting, Poll Watchers not allowed into polling locations, 'glitches' in the voting machines which changed votes from Trump to Biden, late voting, and many more," Trump tweeted on Tuesday evening, adding that Krebs has been terminated "effective immediately."
Comment: Krebs: Out? In? He can't be both. Confusing? Here's a few bits from media-left news-shaper Politico:
KREBS WATCH — After frenzied speculation last week that he would be the next Trump administration official unceremoniously shown the door, CISA Director Chris Krebs remains on the job. In fact, on Saturday Krebs — who's been telling associates he expects to be fired — shot down another baseless claim about the 2020 election, tweeting:When President Trump fires someone, he or she remains so. And so it was with Mr. Krebs, according to Business Insider's peanut gallery:"Quick Election Security Disinfo Debunker: election-related servers WERE NOT recently seized in Europe by the US Army contrary to #disinfo rapidly spreading across social media. Don't buy it & think 2x before you share."That's not to say the weekend wasn't without drama for Krebs or the agency he helms. The New York Post sparked debate online after it reported that Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf had refused to fire Krebs. The article, citing unnamed sources, says that Krebs earned President Donald Trump's ire not only for debunking false claims, but for keeping Matt Masterson, who served as U.S. Election Assistance Commission chair during the Obama administration, on as a senior adviser on election security; holding what's been dubbed a "watch party" at the agency's headquarters on election night; and being close with former DHS chief of staff Miles Taylor, who recently outed himself as "Anonymous."
But many, including a former top DHS lawyer, pointed out that only the president has the power to fire Krebs, suggesting the Post's story was planted by allies of Wolf, who has pushed to have the full Senate approve his nomination to be DHS chief.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren said Krebs "got fired because he did his job to protect our elections and stood up to Trump's conspiracy theories."President Trump followed up with a third tweet addressing the 2020 election, while the CISA persisted with its guarantees:
Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the ranking member on the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, which also oversees federal elections, called Krebs' firing "a gut punch to our democracy."
Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Trump was "retaliating against Director Krebs and other officials who did their duty. It's pathetic, but sadly predictable that upholding and protecting our democratic processes would be cause for firing,"
Sen. Angus King, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, "By firing him for doing his job, President Trump is harming all Americans — who rely on CISA's defenses, even if they don't know it."
Ciaran Martin, the founder and former head of the UK's National Cyber Security Centre, chimed in with international support: "He's been the best partner an ally could hope for."
See also:
CISA stated:
"While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."

Missouri Senator Josh Hawley • Texas Senator Ted Cruz
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey • Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
But Josh Hawley, he is all over these tech guys. And there is testimony going on today, Zuckerberg and what's his name, the Rasputin-looking guy, Jack Dorsey from Twitter. And they're all up there testifying. And it's all such a joke. Kathryn and I were watching some congressional testimony, Senate testimony yesterday, or maybe we were watching some senators who were getting ready for this today.
They were talking about how, "We're not gonna let these guys get away with this! We're not gonna (grumbling)." And I said, "You know, they say this before the hearing, and at the hearing, nothing happens. And they tell us that they're gonna get to the bottom what happened to Russia probe, and they never get to the bottom of it." They just pontificate. They just throw us a bunch of crumbs.
But when it comes down to time for the pedal to hit the metal, the rubber to hit the road, nothing ever happens, nothing ever changes. But it might be different with Josh Hawley someday because he really had Zuckerberg kind of sputtering and fuming in there today. Under oath, under questioning by Josh Hawley of Missouri. Zuckerberg admits that Facebook does have "tools" to track its users across the internet, across platforms, across accounts without user knowledge.
Comment: In the interviews with Dorsey and Zuckerberg, we gain admonitions of an overarching construct and widening mechanisms of coordinated control. Censoring tweets are merely activity on the surface - an interface and information collection vehicle to tame and lame the public. It is what lies hidden and unregulated that is truly alarming. Limbaugh assists this reveal.
The media wants you to believe the election is over. By law, it isn't. Unless a candidate concedes, the election remains in play until December 14th when states cast their electoral college votes.
So, unless President Trump concedes between now and then, Joe Biden hasn't won anything, no matter what the media tells you. Indeed, the media has no say in this, anymore than they can decide what color the sky is; they're simply trying to get you angry so you'll continue to watch their awful shows so they can sell your eyeballs to advertisers.
With that in mind, we need to take a step back and assess how this election is likely to play out based on the LAW, not public opinion or media propaganda. Based on the law, it is highly possible and in fact probable that Donald Trump will end up winning the 2020 Presidential election.
Why? Because the election is now in the courts. And the courts have a clear precedent for how contested elections play out.
A clean report is issued when an auditor finds no misrepresentation in financial records and that those records have been maintained according to established standards.
The COVID-19 pandemic limited auditors' ability to check the fiscal 2020 books, but the effort still managed to identify about $700 million in savings, the officials added.
This year's effort by outside public accounting firms hired to audit the DoD cost $203 million, said Thomas Harker, who is performing the duties of under secretary of defense (comptroller).
He called for patience, saying the task is just too difficult in size and scope to expect success before 2027. In addition, the auditors could visit only 100 locations to do their work because of the pandemic, compared to 600 last year.
Comment: Why should we be surprised. The Pentagon has never explained the long-standing mystery of the missing trillions or why it can manage multiple wars but not its finances. Is it hiding its real expenditures or massive incompetent accounting...take your pick (probably both). The military audit has been kicked down the road once again and that's apparently the real bottom line.
Dorsey, along with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, returned to Congress on Tuesday to face questions about social media's role in influencing politics, specifically the 2020 presidential election. Twitter has arguably faced the most criticism, as the platform continues to label tweets from the president alleging voter fraud as "misleading."
Dorsey revealed some 300,000 election-related tweets were given the "misleading" label between October 27 through November 11, which amounts to approximately 0.2 percent of election-related tweets. More than 50 of those have been from Trump himself.
"In the lead-up to the 2020 elections, we made significant enhancements to our policies to protect the integrity of the election. Most notably, this year, we updated our civic integrity policy to more comprehensively enforce labeling or removing of false and misleading information."Republican lawmakers specifically targeted Twitter over its October decision to suppress a New York Post story about a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden, son of Joe Biden, which contained illicit images, as well as emails that insinuated the former vice president was involved in his son's foreign business deals - something he has long denied. Dorsey admitted the suppression was "wrong."
Comment: The public utilizes a service. It did not give permission for that service to be its interface and conscience. Dorsey and cohorts will mea culpa to any criticism to protect and deflect the real extent of their united control.
See also:
- CEO Jack Dorsey admits Twitter was 'too aggressive' in targeting conservatives
- Dorsey admits to mob-driven censorship on Twitter during heated section 230 hearing
- Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey will appear before House committee to testify over 'shadow banning' & bias claims
- Former WH strategist Steve Bannon: Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey should be arrested for censoring Trump's tweets
States and local authorities simply have no idea what happened to these ballots since they were mailed - and the figure of 28 million missing ballots is likely even higher because some areas in the country, notably Chicago, did not respond to the federal agency's survey questions. This figure does not include ballots that were spoiled, undeliverable, or came back for any reason.
Although there is no evidence that the millions of missing ballots were used fraudulently, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, which compiled the public data provided from the Election Assistance Commission, says that the sheer volume of them raises serious doubts about election security.
These questions are particularly relevant as the COVID-19 pandemic is forcing states across the country to rapidly expand vote-by-mail operations in an election year. Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Ron Wyden have proposed the Natural Disaster and Emergency Ballot Act of 2020, a bill that would allow every eligible voter the opportunity to vote by mail, regardless of state laws governing mail-in ballots.
"When France was attacked five years ago, every nation in the world supported us," Macron said to New York Times reporter Ben Smith during a phone call this month, adding that the English-language press imposes its own values on a society with different ones.
Macron is referring to the 2015 shooting at the headquarters of satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo after it published a satirical depiction of the Prophet Muhammad, which goes against Islamic beliefs. The attack brought up ongoing debates over free speech and religious sensitivity.
Comment: You'd think that the French gov would have anticipated some of what we're now seeing when they allowed so many Muslims into their country with so little thought as to how well these new populations would assimilate themselves.
See also:
- Poll shows 57% of young Muslims in France believe Sharia law more important than national law
- Pakistani girls' school stages mock BEHEADING as cleric vows vengeance on France for 'insulting the Prophet'
- Muslims are strangely obsessed with cartoons, all the while there are very real crimes over which they should be angry at France
- Tens of thousands stage anti-France rally in Bangladesh capital
- Free speech or deliberate incitement? France's Charlie Hebdo republishes Mohammed cartoons at start of terror trial












Comment: See also: