Welcome to Sott.net
Fri, 15 Oct 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Dollar

NY Governor Cuomo set to get $25k pay rise despite massive budget deficit

andrew cuomo
© REUTERS/Andrew Kelly
New York may be facing a budget crisis, but Andrew Cuomo is set to receive a pay rise in January that will bring his salary to $250,000, the highest for any governor in the US.

Approved by the Senate and Assembly last year, Cuomo's raise will come into effect on January 1 and increase his $225,000 annual salary by $25,000.

Other public officials receiving raises are Lieutenant Governor Kathy Hochul, Attorney General Letitia James, and Comptroller Tom DiNapoli.

Comment: See also:


Eye 2

'Love and unity'? Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar compares pro-Trump events to Ku Klux Klan rallies in WaPo interview

Ilhan Omar
© REUTERS/Jim Bourg
Ilhan Omar
Congresswoman says she has to explain to her kids why the president has been targeting her for criticism

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) compared rallies of President Donald Trump to rallies of the racist Ku Klux Klan organization during an interview on Monday.

Omar made the comments in an online YouTube interview with Jonathan Capehart of the Washington Post.

Capehart asked for Omar's reaction to the results of the election when she pivoted the conversation toward comments by Trump that she characterized as an "attack" on Somali immigrants and Somali refugees.

Comment: Omar is the last one to be preaching 'respectability of the office'.


Bizarro Earth

Denmark's order to cull 17 million mink was ILLEGAL, agriculture minister resigns, new law rushed through

mink
© Ritzau Scanpix/Mads Claus Rasmussen via REUTERS.
Culled mink are seen at the farm of Henrik Nordgaard Hansen and Ann-Mona Kulsoe Larsen near Naestved, Denmark, (FILE PHOTO)
Denmark's minister for agriculture has resigned, having lost the trust of his colleagues in government after an illegal order to cull the country's farmed mink. The animals are known to be the source of a mutant Covid strain.

"Since I have the clear assessment that I no longer have the sufficient support among a majority of the parliamentary parties, I have today informed the Prime Minister that I am resigning from the government," Mogens Jensen announced on Facebook on Wednesday.

The politician added that he accepts that mistakes have been made by his ministry and he would personally take responsibility, adding "especially I regret this to the many mink farmers who have been in a very unhappy situation."

Comment: So it was illegal, and to get around that hurdle they rushed through a law that means, now, they can do what they wanted. We're seeing this throughout Europe during this manufactured crisis, governments are forcing through shocking new legislation that inevitably confers ever more totalitarian powers to the government and, more often than not, this is achieved by bypassing normal democratic processes.

See also:


X

'Highly inaccurate': Trump fires cybersecurity chief whose agency called the 2020 election 'most secure in history'

TrumpKrebs
© AP/Tom Williams/Getty Images/KJN
President Donald Trump • Former Cybersecurity/ Infrastructure Agency head Chris Krebs
President Donald Trump has fired the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency head Chris Krebs over a "highly inaccurate" elections' statement. The agency stated that the 2020 election was the most secure in US history.

"The recent statement by Chris Krebs on the security of the 2020 Election was highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud - including dead people voting, Poll Watchers not allowed into polling locations, 'glitches' in the voting machines which changed votes from Trump to Biden, late voting, and many more," Trump tweeted on Tuesday evening, adding that Krebs has been terminated "effective immediately."

Comment: Krebs: Out? In? He can't be both. Confusing? Here's a few bits from media-left news-shaper Politico:
KREBS WATCH — After frenzied speculation last week that he would be the next Trump administration official unceremoniously shown the door, CISA Director Chris Krebs remains on the job. In fact, on Saturday Krebs — who's been telling associates he expects to be fired — shot down another baseless claim about the 2020 election, tweeting:
"Quick Election Security Disinfo Debunker: election-related servers WERE NOT recently seized in Europe by the US Army contrary to #disinfo rapidly spreading across social media. Don't buy it & think 2x before you share."
That's not to say the weekend wasn't without drama for Krebs or the agency he helms. The New York Post sparked debate online after it reported that Acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf had refused to fire Krebs. The article, citing unnamed sources, says that Krebs earned President Donald Trump's ire not only for debunking false claims, but for keeping Matt Masterson, who served as U.S. Election Assistance Commission chair during the Obama administration, on as a senior adviser on election security; holding what's been dubbed a "watch party" at the agency's headquarters on election night; and being close with former DHS chief of staff Miles Taylor, who recently outed himself as "Anonymous."

But many, including a former top DHS lawyer, pointed out that only the president has the power to fire Krebs, suggesting the Post's story was planted by allies of Wolf, who has pushed to have the full Senate approve his nomination to be DHS chief.
When President Trump fires someone, he or she remains so. And so it was with Mr. Krebs, according to Business Insider's peanut gallery:
Sen. Elizabeth Warren said Krebs "got fired because he did his job to protect our elections and stood up to Trump's conspiracy theories."

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, the ranking member on the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, which also oversees federal elections, called Krebs' firing "a gut punch to our democracy."

Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Trump was "retaliating against Director Krebs and other officials who did their duty. It's pathetic, but sadly predictable that upholding and protecting our democratic processes would be cause for firing,"

Sen. Angus King, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, "By firing him for doing his job, President Trump is harming all Americans — who rely on CISA's defenses, even if they don't know it."

Ciaran Martin, the founder and former head of the UK's National Cyber Security Centre, chimed in with international support: "He's been the best partner an ally could hope for."
President Trump followed up with a third tweet addressing the 2020 election, while the CISA persisted with its guarantees:

CISA stated:

"While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections."
See also:





Snakes in Suits

Hawley and Cruz take it to Zuckerberg and Dorsey

HawleyCruzDorseyZuckerberg
© Unknown/cspan/AP/Andrew Harnik/KJN
Missouri Senator Josh Hawley • Texas Senator Ted Cruz
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey • Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
RUSH: I tell you, our new senator from Missouri, Josh Hawley? This guy is the real deal. I remember Josh Hawley. I introduced President Trump at the last rally of the 2018 midterms. It was in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, my hometown. Josh Hawley was there since it was in Missouri, and he got some speaking time at it. He's got hell of a voice. Those of us in the voice business, we say, "He's got a really, really great set of pipes."

But Josh Hawley, he is all over these tech guys. And there is testimony going on today, Zuckerberg and what's his name, the Rasputin-looking guy, Jack Dorsey from Twitter. And they're all up there testifying. And it's all such a joke. Kathryn and I were watching some congressional testimony, Senate testimony yesterday, or maybe we were watching some senators who were getting ready for this today.

They were talking about how, "We're not gonna let these guys get away with this! We're not gonna (grumbling)." And I said, "You know, they say this before the hearing, and at the hearing, nothing happens. And they tell us that they're gonna get to the bottom what happened to Russia probe, and they never get to the bottom of it." They just pontificate. They just throw us a bunch of crumbs.

But when it comes down to time for the pedal to hit the metal, the rubber to hit the road, nothing ever happens, nothing ever changes. But it might be different with Josh Hawley someday because he really had Zuckerberg kind of sputtering and fuming in there today. Under oath, under questioning by Josh Hawley of Missouri. Zuckerberg admits that Facebook does have "tools" to track its users across the internet, across platforms, across accounts without user knowledge.

Comment: In the interviews with Dorsey and Zuckerberg, we gain admonitions of an overarching construct and widening mechanisms of coordinated control. Censoring tweets are merely activity on the surface - an interface and information collection vehicle to tame and lame the public. It is what lies hidden and unregulated that is truly alarming. Limbaugh assists this reveal.


Briefcase

Why Trump will likely win a second term

gavel
© Getty Images
I want to stress in advance, that I DO NOT want to be political in this briefing. I am not saying I LIKE any of the recent developments. And I'm certainly NOT saying I want a particular candidate to win. All I am saying is that the election is a mess and from what I can tell, no one in the media is actually outlining what's to come based on the law. Instead I'm seeing a lot of political opinion, being presented as fact, when it isn't.

The media wants you to believe the election is over. By law, it isn't. Unless a candidate concedes, the election remains in play until December 14th when states cast their electoral college votes.

So, unless President Trump concedes between now and then, Joe Biden hasn't won anything, no matter what the media tells you. Indeed, the media has no say in this, anymore than they can decide what color the sky is; they're simply trying to get you angry so you'll continue to watch their awful shows so they can sell your eyeballs to advertisers.

With that in mind, we need to take a step back and assess how this election is likely to play out based on the LAW, not public opinion or media propaganda. Based on the law, it is highly possible and in fact probable that Donald Trump will end up winning the 2020 Presidential election.

Why? Because the election is now in the courts. And the courts have a clear precedent for how contested elections play out.

X

After 3 failures, Pentagon now says it won't be able to produce a 'clean audit until 2027

Pentagon Money
© Frontpage/Shutterstock/KJN
The Pentagon Money Audit
For the third year in a row, the Defense Department failed to come up with a "clean" audit of its agencies and $2.9 trillion in assets. And it probably won't be able to produce one until 2027, Pentagon officials said Monday.

A clean report is issued when an auditor finds no misrepresentation in financial records and that those records have been maintained according to established standards.

The COVID-19 pandemic limited auditors' ability to check the fiscal 2020 books, but the effort still managed to identify about $700 million in savings, the officials added.

This year's effort by outside public accounting firms hired to audit the DoD cost $203 million, said Thomas Harker, who is performing the duties of under secretary of defense (comptroller).

He called for patience, saying the task is just too difficult in size and scope to expect success before 2027. In addition, the auditors could visit only 100 locations to do their work because of the pandemic, compared to 600 last year.

Comment: Why should we be surprised. The Pentagon has never explained the long-standing mystery of the missing trillions or why it can manage multiple wars but not its finances. Is it hiding its real expenditures or massive incompetent accounting...take your pick (probably both). The military audit has been kicked down the road once again and that's apparently the real bottom line.


Arrow Up

Jack Dorsey says Twitter censored more than 300K election-related tweets as 'misleading' over two weeks

Jack Dorsey on screen
© Reuters/Greg Nash
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey says his platform has slapped warning labels on 300,000 election-related tweets, including over 50 from US President Donald Trump, in the course of two weeks.

Dorsey, along with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai, returned to Congress on Tuesday to face questions about social media's role in influencing politics, specifically the 2020 presidential election. Twitter has arguably faced the most criticism, as the platform continues to label tweets from the president alleging voter fraud as "misleading."

Dorsey revealed some 300,000 election-related tweets were given the "misleading" label between October 27 through November 11, which amounts to approximately 0.2 percent of election-related tweets. More than 50 of those have been from Trump himself.
"In the lead-up to the 2020 elections, we made significant enhancements to our policies to protect the integrity of the election. Most notably, this year, we updated our civic integrity policy to more comprehensively enforce labeling or removing of false and misleading information."
Republican lawmakers specifically targeted Twitter over its October decision to suppress a New York Post story about a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden, son of Joe Biden, which contained illicit images, as well as emails that insinuated the former vice president was involved in his son's foreign business deals - something he has long denied. Dorsey admitted the suppression was "wrong."

Comment: The public utilizes a service. It did not give permission for that service to be its interface and conscience. Dorsey and cohorts will mea culpa to any criticism to protect and deflect the real extent of their united control.

See also:


Alarm Clock

Fake democracy: 28 million mail-in ballots went missing in last four elections

mail in ballots
© Kareem Elgazzar/The Cincinnati Enquirer via AP
Between 2012 and 2018, 28.3 million mail-in ballots remain unaccounted for, according to data from the federal Election Assistance Commission. The missing ballots amount to nearly one in five of all absentee ballots and ballots mailed to voters residing in states that do elections exclusively by mail.

States and local authorities simply have no idea what happened to these ballots since they were mailed - and the figure of 28 million missing ballots is likely even higher because some areas in the country, notably Chicago, did not respond to the federal agency's survey questions. This figure does not include ballots that were spoiled, undeliverable, or came back for any reason.

Although there is no evidence that the millions of missing ballots were used fraudulently, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, which compiled the public data provided from the Election Assistance Commission, says that the sheer volume of them raises serious doubts about election security.

These questions are particularly relevant as the COVID-19 pandemic is forcing states across the country to rapidly expand vote-by-mail operations in an election year. Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Ron Wyden have proposed the Natural Disaster and Emergency Ballot Act of 2020, a bill that would allow every eligible voter the opportunity to vote by mail, regardless of state laws governing mail-in ballots.

Comment: See also: 10 cases prove voter fraud isn't a myth


Green Light

Macron says English-language media legitimizing violence in France amid Muslim protests

Macron
© Getty Images
In a recent interview with The New York Times, French President Emmanuel Macron accused English-language media of being biased against France, saying the press characterizes his country as racist and legitimizes the extremist violence it is facing.

"When France was attacked five years ago, every nation in the world supported us," Macron said to New York Times reporter Ben Smith during a phone call this month, adding that the English-language press imposes its own values on a society with different ones.

Macron is referring to the 2015 shooting at the headquarters of satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo after it published a satirical depiction of the Prophet Muhammad, which goes against Islamic beliefs. The attack brought up ongoing debates over free speech and religious sensitivity.

Comment: You'd think that the French gov would have anticipated some of what we're now seeing when they allowed so many Muslims into their country with so little thought as to how well these new populations would assimilate themselves.

See also: