
The US media has a long and fine tradition of misrepresenting large events in order to justify the government's involvements in war.
The Ukrainian crisis has triggered an extraordinary series of attacks on the English language Russian media by the Western media. Here in Britain, where I write, hardly a day has passed in the past few weeks without the Russian media coming in for some sort of attack.
These attacks vary from the abusive to the merely sarcastic, but what all of them have in common is the attempt to define the English language Russian media as a "propaganda instrument" of the Russian government (always portentously called "the Kremlin").
The primary target is the Russian media's coverage of the Ukrainian crisis. US Secretary of State John Kerry has even called RT a "propaganda bullhorn" because of it.
There are many ways to define "propaganda", but most people would agree that it involves disseminating information in a way that is misleading and biased so as to influence opinion in a particular way. Doing so can involve an element of outright lying, but in my experience the most common and effective way is to omit or minimise important facts so as to make a correct understanding of an issue or situation impossible.














Comment: Turkey has been one of the main facilitators of ISIS, doing the U.S.'s bidding by providing support for the terrorist proxy army.
- German broadcaster: ISIS supply lines originate in NATO's Turkey
- Western intel op? Press TV reporter killed after reporting that ISIS terrorists are entering Syria from Turkey as 'undercover NGO activists'
Will that change with this latest development? Is the U.S. losing the support of its 'allies' (i.e., vassal states), or does Erdogan really think he can play both sides against the other?