• China's ninth consecutive day with no locally transmitted COVID-19 cases, life returning to normal
• Officials insist second coronavirus lockdown in Russia 'unlikely', say recent growth in cases was predicted & is 'manageable'
• Lockdown related suicides rise in Japan, women hit hardest

• Threats to freedom: Facebook's Atlantic Council censors are more interested in tanks than thinking
• Inspired by the Atlantic Council and Ben Nimmo, Facebook deletes Craig Murray's posts since July 2017 - apparently cause he's a 'Russian bot'
• Atlantic Council - the four person NATO-funded team who advises Facebook on "propaganda"
• Facebook Announces Partnership With Atlantic Council to 'Protect Democracy'
• Facebook teams up with Atlantic Council to meddle in elections around the world

• Masks are neither effective nor safe: A summary of the science
• Denis Rancourt: 'The Scientific Argument Against Wearing Facemasks'
• The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses
• Exercising with face masks on could be dangerous and here's why
• Corruption of science: Multiple journals reject major mask study amid hints that it shows masks don't stop COVID
• Is evidence masks don't work being purged from the internet?

• The Hunter Biden criminal probe supports a Chinese scholar's claim about Beijing's influence with the Biden administration
• Hunter Biden lists Joe, Chinese business partner as 'office mates' in leaked email
• DOJ confirms FBI criminal investigation into "Hunter Biden and Associates" has money laundering focus - probe ongoing
• Ukrainian MP: $7.4B Obama-linked laundering, Biden group's take tallies at $16.5M
• "Smoking gun" email from laptop shows Burisma's goal was to buy influence via Hunter Biden and Devon Archer
• Hunter Biden laptop labeled 'national security nightmare'
• Facebook and Twitter censor NY Post's new story about Hunter Biden on their platforms
• The truth about Hunter Biden's laptop

As the Biden administration launches a new push for gun control, Vice President Kamala Harris insists that nobody's "coming after your guns." With Harris on record saying the exact opposite, will anyone believe her?

Speaking to CBS News on Wednesday, Harris urged Congress to pass a pair of bills that would strengthen background checks for weapon purchases. The bills were recently passed by the Democrat-controlled House, but need a 60-vote majority in the Senate. With control of the Senate split 50-50 between Democrats and Republicans, they are unlikely to pass, even after two high-profile mass shootings in the past two weeks.

Harris scolded Republicans who equate gun control with "getting rid of the Second Amendment," telling them to "stop pushing the false choice that this means everybody's trying to come after your guns, that is not what we're talking about."

Harris' appeal echoes President Biden's call for "common sense" gun laws, a call he made on Tuesday, one day after alleged gunman Ahmad Al Aliwi Al-Issa murdered 10 people in a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado.

However, gun owners and Second Amendment advocates are unlikely to be moved by her promise not to "come after" their guns. For one thing, Joe Biden explicitly vowed on the campaign trail to rid America of "assault weapons," a term ascribed by Democrats to hundreds of weapons, from certain shotguns to pistols to the ubiquitous AR-15 rifle. Asked in 2019 by CNN's Anderson Cooper if "a Biden administration... will come for my guns?" Biden answered: "Bingo, you're right if you have an assault weapon... they should be illegal, period."

His plan to "end our gun violence epidemic" includes promises to ban the sale of these weapons by reinstituting a Clinton-era law, to register all existing weapons on a federal database, to implement a mandatory buyback scheme, and to ban all online firearms sales. However, these actions are the purview of Congress, and Biden can push for them as much as he wants, but they ultimately won't pass without Republican votes in the Senate.

Both Biden and Harris are aware of this, hence their pleas to lawmakers. Biden can take executive action, and Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Tuesday that he is "considering a range" of executive orders, but their scope is far more limited and temporary than any laws passed by Congress.

Yet before she was vice president, Harris announced during her own presidential campaign that she wouldn't wait for Congress to act. She asserted in 2019 that she would ban the importation of AR-15 style rifles, mandate "near universal background checks," implement mandatory buybacks, and make gun manufacturers criminally liable for mass shootings, all by executive order if necessary and within her first 100 days in office. When Biden stressed during a debate that she had "no constitutional authority" to do this, Harris responded: "Hey Joe, instead of saying 'No, we can't,' let's say 'Yes, we can.'"

Let's just take law into our own hands and the country will just have to deal with it - seems to be a Democratic thing:

Harris was gung-ho about depriving Americans of their beloved AR-15s, as was fellow candidate Beto O'Rourke, who said taking Americans' rifles is "exactly what we're going to do... Americans who own AR-15s, AK-47s, will have to sell them to the government."

Harris told reporters that compulsory buybacks were "a great idea," and promised to do the same if elected. However, campaign trail rhetoric is just that. Barack Obama tried and failed to reintroduce the Clinton-era assault weapons ban in 2013, but fell foul of Congress [...] and short of curbing the number of so-called 'assault weapons' sold in the US.

As such, Biden and Harris may have every intention of getting these weapons off the streets, but barring a shakeup of Congress in next year's midterm elections, gun owners and enthusiasts are safe, for now.