Welcome to Sott.net
Thu, 04 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Chess

'Special relationship most likely': The CIA got Macron elected - It looks like they wrote his big US speech too

Gilbert Doctorow
Russia Insider
Wed, 02 May 2018 10:01 UTC
Saudi crown prince and French president Macron

He does what he's told
A study in the illegal intervention in US political life by our intelligence services

In this essay, I offer a detailed textual analysis of the speech which French President Emmanuel Macron delivered before the Joint Session of Congress, Washington, D.C. on 25 April 2018, in line with the kind of textual analysis which I performed on major political documents signed by heroic East European freedom fighters in 2007 and 2009, which were in fact authored by US intelligence operatives.

I maintain here that a substantial part of Macron's speech was either written by or coordinated closely with these same intelligence services for the purpose of exerting maximum influence on domestic US politics by reinforcement of centrist American predispositions from respected foreign actors. It is also essential to explain how M. Macron became president of France in 2017 with the connivance of these same intelligence services. I will attempt to do that in the second part of the essay.

I freely admit that my argumentation is circumstantial and relies heavily on hunches that today are sagely phrased as "most likely" scenarios. But whereas the "most likely" reasoning of Theresa May is used to justify unprecedented verbal attacks on Russia and military attacks on the sovereign state of Syria, my reasoning, if unpersuasive, has no other consequence than to lose a reader here or there.

Comment: See also: Behind the Headlines: Western Order Break-Up? New Middle East? New Korea?

      Read More...
Bad Guys

US troops to remain in South Korea despite forming peace treaties - President Moon Jae-in


RT
Wed, 02 May 2018 16:01 UTC
US army South Korea
© Kim Hong-Ji / Reuters
A US army soldier stands guard in front of a F-22 stealth fighter jet at Osan Air Base in Pyeongtaek, South Korea.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in said on Wednesday that US troops will remain on the peninsula even if a peace agreement with the North is reached, saying their presence has "nothing to do with signing peace treaties."

"US troops stationed in South Korea are an issue regarding the alliance between South Korea and the United States. It has nothing to do with signing peace treaties," Moon's spokesperson Kim Eui-kyeom said at a press conference.

The statement came in response to a Foreign Affairs magazine article written by presidential adviser, Moon Cung-in, in which he stated that it would be "difficult to justify [US forces] continuing presence in South Korea," if peace is concluded with the North. The spokesperson warned the adviser "not to cause any more confusion" with such comments.

Comment: Citing 'the Libya model' for the future of North Korea doesn't exactly instill a great sense of hope over the intentions of the US for North Korea.

See: Should North Korea think twice about ditching nukes after what happened to Libya?

      Read More...
Recycle

Xi and Modi meet at SCO Summit: It's the Belt and Road Initiative against Washington's Indo-Pacific strategy all over again

Pepe Escobar
Asia Times
Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:43 UTC
Xi Jinping Narendra Modi China India
© AFP/Fred Dufour
Chinese President Xi Jinping welcomes Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the BRICS Summit in Xiamen on September 4, 2017.


Modi and Xi meeting could have a crucial SCO subplot focusing on security and economic cooperation

All bets are off on the outcome of India Prime Minister Narendra Modi's potentially ground-breaking meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping this Friday and Saturday in Wuhan.

Things have not exactly started in auspicious mode.

After a meeting in Beijing of foreign ministers represented at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), India, once again refused to support the New Silk Roads, known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the final communiqué.

Every other SCO member - represented by the foreign ministers of Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Pakistan - did.

So here we go again - back to the interminable, intractable India-Pakistan soap opera.

Comment: This puts Trump's threats to scrap the JCPOA and Netanyahu's accusations against Iran in a new light.

As for India, money talks, at the end of the day. If it's committed to INSTC, it'll find solutions to Kashmir, sooner or later.

      Read More...
Life Preserver

Should North Korea think twice about ditching nukes after what happened to Libya? (VIDEO)


RT
Wed, 02 May 2018 15:28 UTC
Kim Jong Un North Korea nukes
© Kim Hong-Ji / Reuters
A poster with the image of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during an anti-North Korea rally in central Seoul, South Korea, February 11, 2016.
The US says North Korean denuclearization should proceed along the Libyan scenario. RT's Murad Gazdiev remembers how Muammar Gaddafi was killed by US-backed rebels a few years after ditching nukes, and asks - is that a good idea?

There was a time when tales of Gaddafi's death had Kim Jong-un keeping his both hands on the nuclear button, which, by his own admission, he cautiously kept on his desk.

Now US President Donald Trump, who not long ago had been erratically tweeting away about his own shiny red button, is suddenly an advocate for peace, welcoming Kim's push to ditch nukes. RT's Murad Gazdiev believes this bears the question - is Libya's history about to be repeated?

And when US officials speak about the "Libyan model", they mean the 2003 denuclearization, not the devastating West-assisted civil war of 2011. Don't they?

      Read More...
Black Cat

Did ultra-warhawk Bolton leak intelligence to undercut a Trump-Kim Deal?

Gareth Porter
TruthDig
Wed, 02 May 2018 14:57 UTC
bolton
© Gage Skidmore / CC BY-SA 2.0
War monger John Bolton speaking at the 2015 Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Md.
The still-unscheduled Donald Trump-Kim Jong Un summit offers the opportunity for a denuclearization deal that would avoid a possible nuclear war, but that potential deal remains vulnerable to a hostile corporate media sector and political elites in the United States. At the center of this hostility is national security adviser John Bolton, who's not just uninterested in selling a denuclearization deal to the public. He's working actively to undermine it.

Strong circumstantial evidence indicates that he leaked intelligence to a Washington think tank sympathetic to his views in order to generate media questioning about the president's announced plan to reach an agreement with North Korea's leader.

Bolton made no secret of his visceral opposition to such a deal before Trump announced that Bolton would become national security adviser, arguing that Kim Jong Un would never let go of his nuclear weapons, especially since he is so close to having a real nuclear deterrent capability vis-a-vis the United States.

Comment:

      Read More...
Nuke

Nuclear deal with Iran or JCPOA explained


RT
Tue, 01 May 2018 15:12 UTC
JCPOA negotiations Vienna
© Kevin Lamarque / Reuters
Vienna January 16, 2016.
The Iran nuclear deal hangs by a thread as US President Donald Trump keeps everyone in suspense over whether he will recertify it on May 12, despite the scrambling by other Western signatories to defend it. Here's what's at stake.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), better known as the Iran nuclear deal, is an agreement signed on July 14, 2015, after 20 months and six rounds of rollercoaster negotiations. The signatories are Iran and a group of nations known as the P5+1: Russia, China, the US, UK, France (all permanent UN Security Council members), and Germany. The deal aims to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon by curbing its nuclear program, which dates back to the 1950s and was, ironically, set up with American help before the 1979 revolution ended most of Iran's ties with the West.

Iran's concessions

Under the JCPOA, Tehran gave up 98 percent of the enriched uranium it already had, and only keeps material enriched to the lowest threshold of five percent (weapons-grade uranium starts at 85 percent). Two-thirds of Iran's enrichment centrifuges are halted, leaving only around 6,000 older models operational. Any remaining materials and facilities are to be used strictly for scientific, medical, and agricultural purposes.

Comment: The only reason Trump says it's the "worst deal ever" is that the US cannot profit from as much as its European counterparts. However, his Deep State and Zionist handlers most likely think it should be scrapped because Iran should not be allowed to become a regional power and compete with Israel. Thus, they will try to 'take Iran out', either economically or militarily.

Don't miss:

      Read More...
Document

Leaked Mueller questions prove investigation is a witch-hunt - Mueller wants to take Trump down, but doesn't have the evidence to do so

Alexander Mercouris
The Duran
Wed, 02 May 2018 13:09 UTC
Mueller bites his nails
© Andrew Burton/Getty Images
Ever since Deputy Attorney General Rod Rostenstein appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller Special Counsel to investigate the Russiagate collusion allegations, there has been a huge amount of speculation about what if any information Mueller may have which he has not publicly divulged.

Mueller has however succeeded in running an exceptionally tight ship, with no leaks from his investigation to speak of.

The situation has now changed with the leak - possibly by someone in the Trump administration rather than the Mueller's team - of the questions Mueller apparently wants to ask Donald Trump. These provide a fascinating insight into the state of his inquiry.

Here is my take on these questions:

(1) Robert Mueller is in possession of no facts which have not previously been made public

Every single one of the questions is obviously drawn on information which has already been made public and which has been widely discussed.
      Read More...
Binoculars

The truth about Netanyahu's 'Iran files': Well known, old, purloined from Vienna


Moon of Alabama
Tue, 01 May 2018 12:57 UTC
netanyahu

Netanbullshit
The dog and pony show the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahoo provided yesterday (video, slideshow) was not based on material Israeli secret services acquired in Iran, but most likely from data Iran provided to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) during the implementation period of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA, pdf).

Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the Crisis Group, was the first to propose this thesis:
Ali Vaez @AliVaez - 18:06 UTC - 30 Apr 2018
5/ It appears to me that what Israel has done is that it has probably hacked the @iaeaorg and gathered some new details from what Iran responded to the agency to close the outstanding issues in 2015: IAEA Board Adopts Landmark Resolution on Iran PMD Case
Several nuclear proliferation experts point out that there was nothing new in Netanyahoo's presentation:
Jeffrey Lewis @ArmsControlWonk - 00:14 UTC- 1 May 2018
Let's go through Netanyahu's dog-and-pony show. As you will see, everything he said was already known to the IAEA and published in IAEA GOV/2015/68 (2015). There is literally nothing new here and nothing that changes the wisdom of the JCPOA. 1/10
All the graphics, pictures and technical details Netanyahoo quoted were known to the IAEA and the negotiators of the agreement with Iran.

Comment: See also:

      Read More...
2 + 2 = 4

Bibi's speech was a bust - makes the case for keeping the Iran deal

Fred Kaplan
Slate
Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:45 UTC
netanyahu iran powerpoint
© Jack Guez/AFP/Getty Images
Powerpoint skill level 0.1
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has issued the lamest critique of the Iran nuclear deal that one might imagine. Though his avowed aim was to convince President Trump to back out of the deal, he in fact unwittingly made a strong case to stay in.

In his Monday broadcast, which he recited in English and Hebrew, Netanyahu did publicize a remarkable heist by Israeli intelligence agencies - if his claims are true - of 55,000 pages of "files" and "archives" showing that 15 years ago, Iran did have a plan with an avowed intent to build nuclear weapons.


Comment: Which they're probably not. Netanyahu is a liar.


But did the prime minister think his viewers, at home and abroad, would glide over those key words - files and archive - or that they wouldn't notice that the quotations from some of those files were dated 2003?

He said and showed nothing to suggest that the Iranians ever put their plan into motion or that they are violating the deal's restrictions on nuclear activities now. In fact, at one point in his telecast, he acknowledged that Iran stopped the program - supporting the conclusion of a U.S National Intelligence Estimate, published in 2007, that Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in the fall of 2003.

Comment: The fact is, everyone Netanyahu "revealed" is old news. The IAEA has been aware of all his data for years:

      Read More...
Dollar

The business of America is war - but the world isn't buying

Stephen Lendman
Global Intel Hub
Wed, 02 May 2018 11:35 UTC
US Soldier
Post-WW II, a permanent US war economy was established to pursue unchallenged global dominance, wanting all sovereign independent governments eliminated - replaced by puppet regimes bowing to Washington's will, a prescription for endless wars of aggression, risking eventual catastrophic nuclear war.

Permanent war shapes geopolitical policymaking in Washington - business allied with the warrior state for maximum profit-making.

Enterprise in America is built on a foundation of endless war-making, imperialism on an unprecedented scale - nothing like it before in world history.

Nothing earlier matched the recklessness and ruthlessness of US pursuit of absolute global rule - supported by major media, most people none the wiser or indifferent about what's going on.
      Read More...
Amazon Smile
Revolt! T-shirts