Puppet Masters
Katehon, a think-tank dedicated to the protection of nations' sovereignty against invasions and coups from abroad, headlined, on May 15th, "Special Services Agent: Attack on Russia Is Being Prepared", and reported that [with editorial clarifications and links supplied by me in brackets]:
Assange, who is currently incommunicado in the Ecuadorean embassy in London, reportedly offered - through an intermediary - to talk to US investigators about the release of DNC documents by WikiLeaks during the 2016 US election campaign.
US intelligence claims that WikiLeaks acted on behalf of Russia as part of a campaign to prop up the candidacy of Donald Trump and undermine that of Hillary Clinton. The offer was flatly rejected by Representative Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, who said Assange would only be interviewed if he is in US custody.
Comment: Some are predicting Assange will be forced to exit the embassy relatively soon, due to restrictions placed on him and his deteriorating health. Sputnik reports:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange may be getting the boot from the Ecuadorean embassy in London "any day now," it was revealed Friday by sources familiar with the matter.Assange receives this treatment while Hillary Clinton - whose crimes he made public - remains free to roam the country blaming everyone else for her failure.
Assange, who has been residing inside the embassy since 2012, could either be forced out of the embassy or make the decision to willingly leave over restrictions placed on him, the New York Post reported.
A slew of troubling situations would start to trickle in for the 46-year-old if he's forced out, activist and comedian Randy Credico told Radio Sputnik's Loud & Clear.
"The situation is very fluid right now and the word is that Mr. Assange could be expelled from that embassy," Credico told show hosts John Kiriakou and Walter Smolarek, which means "he would immediately be arrested on an old bail jumping charge by the British police."
He'll probably then be extradited to the US, Credico said. [...]
If booted from the Ecuadorean embassy, extradition procedures would likely be started by British officials to ship Assange to the US to answer for a series of leaks, including of US war logs on Afghanistan and Iraq and the Collateral Murder video that was provided to WikiLeaks by Chelsea Manning in 2010.
Further reading:
- John Pilger: Ecuador's talks with UK over Assange 'defame country's good name'
- The Guardian engages in conspiracy to silence Julian Assange and push him into the hands of the US and UK
American warships will continue to be deployed in the region "on an everyday basis," Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Christopher Logan told the Russian media on Sunday. He said that the US Navy operated strictly within the international rules, exercising the freedom of navigation.
The Pentagon statement contradicts strong words coming from Beijing. The Chinese Defense Ministry accused the US of "provocation" and infringing upon China's sovereignty by conducting operations near the disputed Paracel Islands.
Comment: This is actually at least the second time Farrakhan has praised Trump, (although both times it has been a rather left-handed compliment). There seems to be a trend in black Americans waking up to the fact that the Democrats have never really had their backs and they're looking for other options.
See also:
- New paradigm? 'Black People Don't Have to Be Democrats' - Chance the Rapper
- Candace Owens Unlocks New Reality, Makes 'Victor Mentality' the New Black
- Kanye West is a race traitor because he's not leftist enough, declares Atlantic columnist Ta-Nehisi Coates
- The Kanye Effect: Black male support for Trump doubles in week after Kanye tweets
- Kanye-Trump love-fest just demonstrates everything wrong about America?
Lebanese sources released a video showing the Russian Su-34 flying over Tripoli. However, no Israeli F-16 was spotted. This led many observers into doubting that the Su-34 was intercepting an Israeli warplane.

Saudi Arabia ministers enter the Moncloa Palace for a ceremony presided by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Spain’s Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, in Madrid, Spain, April 12, 2018
Exiled Saudi Prince Khalid bin Farhan, in a videotaped appearance with Middle East Eye, called on two of his relatives in particular — Prince Ahmed bin Abdulaziz and Prince Muqrin bin Abdulaziz - to launch a coup against the current ruler King Salman and, the real power behind him, the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, popularly referred to as MBS in Western media. According to Prince Khalid, who was granted political asylum by Germany in 2013, "99 percent of the members of the royal family, the security services and the army would stand behind them," were they to challenge the country's current rulers.
Both of the relatives named by Khalid have been influential in the Saudi government in the past. Ahmed bin Abdulaziz was longtime deputy minister of interior from 1975 to 2012 and briefly served as minister of interior in 2012, while Muqrin bin Abdulaziz was head of Saudi intelligence until 2012 and served briefly as crown prince in 2015 before resigning. He was replaced by Muhammad bin Nayef, who was dramatically ousted in June of last year by MBS — who since then has brought numerous "reforms" to the country, seeking to modernize it, while also cultivating a controversial alliance with his country's long-time enemy, Israel.
Comment: Dissident Saudi prince calls for coup, urges uncles to seize power
As commented in this prior article:
The question is: with corruption so rampant among the Saudi royal family, is there any other approach? Unless the entire system of government is reformed, it's just going to be one crook at the top or another.
At first blush, they show Vladimir Putin in a very negative light that may shock the reader. A more careful scrutiny of Browder's case shows it to be a disingenuous, baseless smear, which further begs the question: if this is the best (worst) Browder can offer as proof against Putin, the ceaseless assertions of his corruption amount to what, exactly?
The following excerpt from my book (currently banned, but available here in electronic format) examines the merits of Bill Browder's assertions.
Shane suggests that the problem with the DNC leak stories was not their content, which "revealed true and important things, including the party leadership's hostility to Bernie Sanders's campaign and the texts of Mrs. Clinton's private speeches, which she had refused to release." The problem, rather, was that "Russian hackers chose not to deliver to American voters the same inside material from the Trump campaign," and thus "the tilt of the coverage was decided in Moscow." By counting on reporters to "follow their usual rules" of reporting truthful information in the public interest, Shane concludes, "the Kremlin hacked American journalism."
Shane's piece doesn't propose any fixes for this problem other than "extreme caution and extra transparency." It is hard to know how much more transparent the Times could have been beyond its practice of disclosing in its stories, when it knew, that WikiLeaks and Russia were the sources for the stolen information it reported and analyzed.
Comment: "the Kremlin hacked American journalism." Seriously? Can you spot the disconnects, the disavows and the persuasive, but unqualified scrub job? MSM at its 'selective' best.
How about this one:
For another case-in-point see references to a NYT article here: Stephen Cohen: 'Suspicious contacts' echo of dark pasts
On May 23, activist and satirist Randy Credico met with the staff of Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and de facto leader of the House's investigation into Russian meddling. Credico described the discussions to me hours after his meeting.
According to Credico, Schiff requested the interview after a brief chat with Schiff at the White House Press and Correspondents Association gala last month. An email from House Intelligence Committee senior counsel Shannon Green to Credico (below) demonstrates Schiff's interest in the encounter.
Schiff was interested exclusively in gathering evidence to bolster the Russiagate narrative of Credico as a secret liaison between Julian Assange, who has been branded without evidence by the CIA as a hostile foreign intelligence asset rather than a journalist, and former Trump campaign aide Roger Stone.
(Credico, an erstwhile associate of Stone and fervent advocate for Assange's freedom, was subpoenaed last November by Schiff. He invoked the Fifth Amendment at the time).
But once Credico arrived in Schiff's office, he sent the congressman's staff in an unexpected - and politically inconvenient - direction.
















Comment: